China Riots Kill More Than 150 (SLIDESHOW, VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - China Riots Kill More Than 150 (SLIDESHOW, VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07- 5-09 11:10 PM   |   Updated: 07- 7-09 01:40 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

BEIJING -- Chinese state media says that 156 people have been killed in violent riots in the country's western Xinjiang region.

The official Xinhua News Agency did not immediately give any other details in its one-sentence report early Tuesday.

It had said earlier that at least 140 people were dead and that the number "was still climbing." Another 828 people have been injured in the deadliest ethnic unrest to hit the region in decades.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

URUMQI, China (AP) _ Riots and street battles killed at least 140 people in China's western Xinjiang province and injured 828 others in the deadliest ethnic unrest to hit the region in decades. Officials said Monday the death toll was expected to rise.

Police sealed off streets in parts of the provincial capital, Urumqi, after discord between ethnic Muslim Uighur people and China's Han majority erupted into violence. Witnesses reported a new, smaller protest Monday in a second city, Kashgar.

The unrest is another troubling sign for Beijing at how rapid economic development has failed to stem _ and even has exacerbated _ resentment among ethnic minorities, who say they are being marginalized in their homelands as Chinese migrants pour in.

Columns of paramilitary police in green camouflage uniforms, helmets and flak vests marched Monday around Urumqi's main bazaar _ a largely Uighur neighborhood _ carrying batons and shields. Mobile phone service and social networking site Twitter were blocked, and Internet links were also cut or slowed down.

Story continues below
advertisement

Rioters on Sunday overturned barricades, attacked vehicles and houses, and clashed violently with police in Urumqi, according to media and witness accounts. State television aired footage showing protesters attacking and kicking people on the ground. Other people, who appeared to be Han Chinese, sat dazed with blood pouring down their faces.

There was little immediate explanation for how so many people died. The government accused a Uighur businesswoman living in the U.S. of inciting the riots through phone calls and "propaganda" spread on Web sites.

Witnesses and state media said the violence started only after police arrived to disperse a peaceful protest demanding justice for two Uighurs killed last month during a fight with Han co-workers at a factory in southern China.

Thousands of people took part in Sunday's disturbance, unlike recent sporadic separatist violence carried out by small groups in Xinjiang. The clashes echoed the violent protest that rocked Tibet last year and left many Tibetan communities living under clamped-down security ever since.

Tensions between Uighurs and the majority Han Chinese are never far from the surface in Xinjiang, a sprawling region rich in minerals and oil that borders eight Central Asian nations. Many Uighurs (pronounced WEE-gers) yearn for independence and some militants have waged a sporadic, violent separatist campaign.

Uighurs make up the largest ethnic group in Xinjiang, but not in the capital of Urumqi, which has attracted large numbers of Han Chinese migrants. The city of 2.3 million is now overwhelmingly Chinese _ a source of frustration for native Uighurs who say they are being squeezed out.

Kakharman Khozamberdi _ leader of a Uighur political movement in Kazakhstan, where the Uighur minority has its largest presence outside China _ said machine gun fire was heard all night long. One witness told Khozamberdi 10 bodies were seen near a bazaar, including those of women and children.

In Geneva, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged China and any country with violent protests to use extreme care. He urged all government to "protect the life and safety of civilians."

About 1,000 to 3,000 Uighur demonstrators had gathered Sunday in the regional capital for a protest that apparently spun out of control. Accounts differed over what happened, but the violence seemed to have started when the crowd of protesters refused to disperse.

The official Xinhua News Agency reported hundreds of people were arrested and checkpoints ringed the city to prevent rioters from escaping. Mobile phone service provided by at least one company was cut Monday to stop people from organizing further action in Xinjiang.

Internet access was blocked or unusually slow in Urumqi on Monday. Videos and text updates about the riots were removed from China-based social networking sites such as Youku, a YouTube-like video service, and Fanfou, a Chinese micro-blogging Web site similar to Twitter.

Major Chinese news portals relied solely on Xinhua for news of the event and turned off the comment function at the bottom of the stories so people could not publicly react.

Witnesses said the protests spread to Kashgar, a second city in Xinjiang, on Monday afternoon. A Uighur man there said he was among more than 300 protesters who demonstrated outside the Id Kah Mosque. He said they were surrounded by police, who asked them to calm down.

"We were yelling at each other but there were no clashes, no physical contact," said the man, who gave his name as Yagupu.

Calls to Kashgar's public security bureau rang, then were disconnected.

Uighur activists and exiles say the millions of Han Chinese who have settled here in recent years are gradually squeezing the Turkic people out of their homeland.

But many Chinese believe the Uighurs are backward and ungrateful for the economic development the Chinese have brought to the poor region.

Wu Nong, director of the news office of the Xinjiang provincial government, said more than 260 vehicles were attacked or set on fire in Sunday's unrest and 203 shops were damaged. She said 140 people were killed and 828 injured in the violence.

She did not say how many of the victims were Han or Uighurs.

Uighur exiles condemned the crackdown.

"We ask the international community to condemn China's killing of innocent Uighurs. This is a very dark day in the history of the Uighur people," said Alim Seytoff, vice president of the Washington, D.C.-based Uyghur American Association.

Chinese officials singled out the leader of the association _ Rebiya Kadeer, a former prominent Xinjiang businesswoman now living in Washington _ for inciting the violence.

"Rebiya had phone conversations with people in China on July 5 in order to incite, and Web sites ... were used to orchestrate the incitement and spread propaganda," Xinjiang Governor Nur Bekri said on television early Monday.

Xinjiang's top Communist Party official, Wang Lequan, called the riots "a profound lesson learned in blood."

"We must tear away Rebiya's mask and let the world see her true nature," Wang said.

The government has accused Kadeer of having a hand in many of Xinjiang's problems since her release from prison into U.S. exile in 2005. The Foreign Ministry has publicly accused the 62-year-old of having links to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement, a group the U.S. put on its terrorist blacklist.

Beijing has not provided evidence to support the allegation, and Kadeer denies the claim. She has repeatedly called for nonviolent protest.

On "Oriental Horizon," a current affairs program aired on China Central Television on Monday night, a scholar from the government's Chinese Academy of Social Science blamed Kadeer for masterminding the riots.

The half-hour program, which was devoted to the Urumqi violence, also showcased footage shown on earlier newscasts.

The clashes in Urumqi echoed last year's unrest in Tibet, when a peaceful demonstration by monks in the capital of Lhasa erupted into riots that spread to surrounding areas, leaving at least 22 dead. The Chinese government accused Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, of orchestrating the violence _ a charge he denied.

Seytoff said he had heard from two sources that at least two dozen people had been killed by gunfire or crushed by armored police vehicles just outside Xinjiang University.

Mamet, a 36-year-old restaurant worker, said he saw People's Armed Police attack students outside Xinjiang University.

"First they fired tear gas at the students. Then they started beating them and shooting them with bullets. Big trucks arrived, and students were rounded up and arrested," Mamet said.

Previous mass protests in Xinjiang that were quelled by armed forces became signal events for the separatist movement. In 1990, about 200 Uighurs shouting for holy war protested through Baren, a town near the Afghan border, resulting in violence that left at least two dozen people dead.

In 1997, amid a wave of bombings and assassinations, a protest by several hundred Uighurs in the city of Yining against religious restrictions turned into an anti-Chinese uprising that left at least 10 dead.

In both cases pro-independence groups said the death tolls were several times higher, and the government never conducted a public investigation into the events.

BEIJING -- Chinese state media says that 156 people have been killed in violent riots in the country's western Xinjiang region. The official Xinhua News Agency did not immediately give any other deta...
BEIJING -- Chinese state media says that 156 people have been killed in violent riots in the country's western Xinjiang region. The official Xinhua News Agency did not immediately give any other deta...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
443
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

Uyghur Turks are in danger of being assimilated in their homeland where they've been turned into second class citizens since 1949.
East Turkistan has very rich underground resources but Uyghurs (along with Kazakhs and Kyrgyz who live there) are probably the poorest people of China.
The population of Han Chinese in the region increased from 5% to 45% (maybe more) since 1949, and they tend to keep best and most of the jobs to themselves.
Chinese Government doesn't let Uyghurs to have education in their mother language and before university subject them to an exam which Han Chinese don't have to take.
According to an Uyghur who lives in Turkey now: In the toy factory where the incidents started 600 Uyghurs works(it is one of China's biggest toy factories thousands of people works there).
All of them are between the ages of 12 - 17, none of them is there voluntarily. Taken from their families, working for the least possible wages.

As it's been said several times previously, this is not a religious conflict, but of course they have very limited religious freedom along with other things.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 07/10/2009

The only relation these events have with Uyghurs being Muslim is Chinese Goverment's attemps of branding these people as terrorists by using it.
And some people buy it so willingly, it's very telling. Be it because of Chinese Govenment's policies or simply people's apathy, very few knew about Uyghurs until these recent events, yet more than a few is ready to stereotype them.
Stereotyping of Muslims not only can't discriminate brainwashed radicals and the religion itself,
but it also fails to understand what come across as religious beliefs in communities and individuals is actually their interpretation of the given religion with their cultural background­.Culture effects religion at least as much as religion effects culture.
Being Muslim is a part of Uyghurs' identity today. But using it as the sole definition of these people and calling them Chinese Muslims outright ridiculous to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 07/10/2009

"calling them Chinese Muslims outright ridiculous to me"

Why so? Aren't they citizens of China? Aren't they not protected by the same laws of China? I never find calling someone Jewish American or African American or Asian American in any way rediculous even though in some point in time in history, some specific group of people were discriminted due to their minority background.

I whoteheartly believe that you have a good points about the discrimination of some minority groups in China. Yet using it as a pretext for country divsion is absolutely false and an end in it self.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 07/14/2009

I don't think you understand my point. There are Muslims in China who are of different ethnicites, some of them are even Han Chinese. So the term "Chinese Muslims" refers to a larger group of people. Even if Uyghurs were the only Muslim minority in China, the aforementioned term wouldn't be sufficient because they are not just citizens of China who are Muslims. Before 10th century when they converted to Islam, they'd believed in Gök Tengri, been Buddhists and Nestorian Christians for certain periods of time, and if I remember correctly they'd also followed some Iranian Gnostic doctrines. They adapted all these religious beliefs to their culture as they later did to Islam. But none of these alone or together wholly define who they are/were, nor is the religion the reason behind this conflict. The conflict is there because Uyghurs are the largest ethnic minority in China. They have completely different roots and culture than Han Chinese does and are struggling not to lose their identitiy under Chinese Government’s thumb. So, I think, when referring to them, at least, the term “Chinese Uyghurs” (or “Chinese Turks” if we’re also talking about the other Turkic groups in the region), could be used for the sake of not forgetting who these people are and why they are suffering.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 AM on 07/23/2009
photo

China's goal is to force out all other cultures within their border through sheer volume. They're basically trying to breed out or outnumber anyone that isn't Han Chinese. The Han Chinese did the same thing to all the other 6 original kingdoms and now they want to do it to the Xinjiang and Tibet. And I truly feel for the people there, because I don't see how they can stop them. They build the railroads and the highways and Han Chinese flood in by the millions, because of the overpopulation in their own native areas. They're doing to them what white people did to the Native North Americans when they moved West.

Long Live Tibet and the Uighur!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 07/07/2009

I would say migration to Xingjiang area for Han Chinese is much easier than to Tibet, as Tibet is in high plateu and not too many people can live there comfortably. Yet Xingjiang through the aggresive settlement operations under General Wang in the 50s and 60s have created many new cities and large plantations where the Han Chinese can comforbly move in and settle down.

From this day and age, most cities in Xingjiang are already dominiated by Han Chinese. And it will continue to expand in the next several decades. I will say within our life time, Xingjiang area is as ubiqutous as any other Chinese province in Asia continent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 07/07/2009

There is one major difference between white people and Han Chinese. The white people practiced genecide and systematically eradicated the Native Americans. The Han Chinese pratice population dillution to overwhelm the region with larger number of Han Chinese.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 07/07/2009

By the way, the rail road to Tibet is one heck of an outrageous engineering achievement, even for Chinese scale. It is as close to rail road to sky as it can physically and imaginably possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 07/07/2009

Please read the page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_people

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 07/07/2009
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 07/07/2009

Things are not looking bright (and the trend will only deteriorate ) for ethnic minorities in China since China is an authoritarian and emerging superpower of which 95 percent of its 1.3 BILLION nationals are Han Chinese. The Tibetans and the Uighurs are fighting for losing causes, no doubt. Just skim through some of its official history records and literary works will have outsiders realize the dominant people (Han) are not known for peaceful relation with other "barbaric" peoples. Such prejudice is sufficiently evident in many Chinese characters that are used to describe those other-than­-Han-peopl­e barbarians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 07/07/2009
- 111 I'm a Fan of 111 34 fans permalink

Uighurs are not Chinese. They are ethnically, linguistically and culturally Turkic and their region at one time was merged with Central Asian and Turkic states. Unfortunately for them China claimed the area in 1949 and now states that the area has always been part of China just as Tibet was always part of China.

Xinjiang is being used to resettle Chinese Han from the east and what has followed are Han focused policies imposed on the Uighurs, including forcing Uighur children to learn and use Mandarin instead of their own language in school.

The Chinese started forcing their population control of one child per couple on Uighurs in the 1990s which resulted in forced abortions and sterilizations of young women against their wishes. The Chinese government has used the American "War on Terror" to label the Uighur protests against their religious and cultural persecution as 'terrorists'.

All communication with the outside world was shutdown so that the only reports of what has happened is coming from the Chinese government. The US will say nothing because China owns us. Obama's strong words are only used about governments that are weaker than us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 AM on 07/07/2009
- Freenation I'm a Fan of Freenation 25 fans permalink

"Chinese state media says that 156 people"

can we assume 1000+ going by Chinese media track record of censorship­....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 AM on 07/07/2009

Most of the killings were done by the rioters on the innocent bystanders. There is no incentive for the Chinese government to hide the real number.

Many accounts were on how effective these ritoters were. They just suddenly came out from the peaceful protest and started stabbing. Chinese government has put the blame on a female separatist leader currently headquartered in US soil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 07/07/2009
- bdaved I'm a Fan of bdaved 30 fans permalink

There is no way for you to know that your assertions are true, even if you were at the site, without a thorough investigation. Rebiya Kadeer was awarded the Rafto Prize for working for human rights, and was nominated for the Nobel Prize, which I know will bring out howls of "Yasser Arafat". She is not Yasser Arafat. She has been praised by President George Bush and members of the U.S. Congress, which passed a resolution calling for the release of her imprisoned children. Why are you reluctant to give her name?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 07/07/2009

There is no way for me to back up my assertion and yet there is no way that it can be proved I am wrong either.

Reading through the events, it is difficult for me not to make my own conclusion that it is most likely Urgur rioters initiated the deadly force as a way to instigate the ethnic tension between local Urgurs and local Han Chinese for political gain. The Chinese government, always trying to placade the Urgurs, does not seem to have any motive to instigate the deadly confrontation. The local Han Chinese who were not invovled, or even knew, about the death of two Urgurs in the southern Chinese city, were highly unlikely prepared for a chance to lash deadly force on the Urgurs.

Therefore, I would say that in the first 24 hours, it is mostly likely Urgur instigators and their followers in the protest who attacked the local Han Chinese completely off guard and dumb-founded. The videos and reports of any sites around the world, albeit many from the Chinese central governement resources, do confirm my such unscientific conclusion.

In no way you should agree with my conclusion, of course. Make your own or better yet, avoid making one at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 AM on 07/08/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 131 fans permalink
photo

yeah, saw on faux news today they were trying to do the same thing, and blame it on Obama for releasing them from Gitmo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

i just read this news you know what i dont understand tyrant,oppressive government like china and iran always blame to US government­.WHY I?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 AM on 07/07/2009

Because US government is always at the center of it, under the romantic names of "color revolutions" and "freedom fighting movements.­"

Duh ~~~

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 AM on 07/07/2009
- LeBelAge I'm a Fan of LeBelAge 8 fans permalink

Both the Iranians and Chinese are scapegoating. You give the US far too much credit to actually motivate people in those nation to riot or protest.

There is a time and place where you can point to potential US involvement like Honduras. But to scapegoat America in both these instances is to ignore the fact that both China and Iran have their own internal problems.

China has had a long history with discriminating and oppressing their own ethnic miniorities. And although Iran has a legitmate beef with the US government because of covert actions installing the Shah, the younger generation of Iranians view Amadinjad as isloating the nation from the outside world. Even some of the Iran clerics, who are the hardliners against the US, recognize the election as fraudility.

Can either you or these government provide ample evidence of the US's involvement? No you can't.

The Chinese in particular censor their internet. Its ironic that they are now blaming a web-site from America. Are we to believe they censored everything else, except that one troublesome website?

Billy Joel the singer stated correctly, "We didn't start the fire, it was always burning, since the world's been turning". Nations as old as the China and Iran have had their share of problems way before the United States as a nation even existed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 AM on 07/07/2009
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

We have more than 8 major ethnic groups..

We came a long way... and has changed for the better...

Please... work things out...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 07/07/2009

Silly han....the­m and their silly dynasty...­.where that liu bei go?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 07/06/2009

Why do people automatically assume that the deaths were caused by the police against the uighur protesters? If you watched the video most of the death were caused by the protesters against Han store owners.

It's cool to bash China but if I would wait for a few days before drawing any conclusions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 07/06/2009

Well people tend to have a softer heart for the weaker party in any conflict. So it is natural that some people will immediately side with the rioters against the Chinese governement. It is reasonble and quite expected human behaviors.

Likewise, many people in China will immediately suspect US government, specifically C1A, has something to do with this incident. It is also quite expected.

Although lots of people got killed (mostly by rioters), this incident does not have any long lasting consequence. It is managed headache from the Chinese government perspective, and it serves as the frustration pressure valve for both the Urgurs and Han Chinese. After the instigators are gone or erdicated, the Urgurs and Han Chinese still need to live next to each other. They still need to pick up the pieces and go out to work for yet another day for a better future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 07/07/2009
- darthmaul I'm a Fan of darthmaul 19 fans permalink

China will deal with this issue as they have dealt with Tibet, with military force. This coupled by a continuing influx of Han Chinese will "dilute" the problem. Forget about your fairy tale scenario of the two groups "working together." This isn't going to happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

"Pakistan has handed over nine Chinese militants arrested from the country's lawless tribal areas to China, bringing to light for the first time presence of Uyghur fighters amongst the ranks of Taliban and al-Qaeda.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/pakistan-hands-over-nine-uyghur-militants-to-china/451721/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 07/06/2009
- bdaved I'm a Fan of bdaved 30 fans permalink

I've read many comments like yours, which refer to Uighurs who are guilty of associations with Taliban or al-Qaeda groups. Some of them (although not any of yours that I've read, for which I congratulate you) refer to violence against Chinese by Muslims who are not Uighurs, and are not located in Xinjiang or China; the purpose of such comments being to portray Uighurs as violent or terrorist and to justify Chinese repression of them. But I ask you how does the guilt of the Uighurs you refer to in your comment translate into guilt for other Uighurs?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 07/07/2009
photo

Beijing's propaganda is not about strategy but tactics. It may work in the short term but will prove disastrous in the medium to long term:
http://e-blogules.blogspot.com/2009/07/dictatorship-of-short-term-beijing-and.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 07/06/2009

Don't you need to worry about China. It is doing fine. If it works in the short term, it most likely will work in the long term. Basics and fundamentals don't change much, if you see through all sorts of hot air ideas and yam yams.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 07/06/2009
photo

Actually no.

There is a lot of civil unrerst in China. China has suffered catastrophic job losses due to the world wide depression. There have been several large riots over the past year. Most were done by Han Chinese.

Virtually every riot that has taken place on this earth since the beginning of time is economic in nature.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 07/07/2009

China is following colonial strategy in territory it has claimed as its own. It transports Han chinese into areas like Mongolia and Tibet where they gradually outnumber the original inhabitants. Some of the original inhabitants are given positions of pseudo power but the real power lies with representatives of the Chinese communist party. The Han get the best jobs and official government positions and gradually the original inhabitants become colonialised.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 07/06/2009

Yes. And so? Isn't that what USA has been doing all along across the whole Northern America continent? Remember the "Go West" slogan? It is all all about settlement and taking control of the territory it owns. What is the big surprise?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 07/06/2009

I think the idea is - that we learn from history not use it as an excuse

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 AM on 07/07/2009
photo

You have explained the situation accurately. Han Chinese now outnumber Tibetans in Tibet. The Uighurs are suffering the same fate. In addition to usurping their lands, the Han look down on the original inhabitants, calling them ignorant and ungrateful. They are a scourge.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/margolis/margolis102.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 AM on 07/07/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect