Reuters:
To fairly divide the climate change fight between rich and poor, a new study suggests basing targets for emission cuts on the number of wealthy people, who are also the biggest greenhouse gas emitters, in a country.
Welcome to Climate Strategies - Climate Strategies
Obama Science Chief Holdren Hints at Compromise on Auctions of Cap ...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
The United States never signed the Kyoto Protocol because we are the worst offender.
Wrong answer. Try again.
Let's start with an $100,000 annual tax on every home over 5,000 sq. ft. Break them into apartments or pay. Let's add a $100 tax on every new computer, as they are now one of the largest energy drains in the system. No new servers.
Definition of a Green Job: Vote democrat every two years.
Compensation and Benefits: Welfare, food stamps, rationed and sub-standard healthcare.
You know how you can tell global warming is a hoax....look at how many posts there are in the green category........hardly any at all....if people really thought the world was going to end you think they'd be a little bit more interested in the subject...but the majority knows its a hoax....
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/03/uah-global-temperature-anomaly-for-june-09-zero/
Bwahahahahahahahaahahah
Typical conservative, always on the wrong side of every issue.
Personally, I find it hilarious watching people who think the world is 3000 years old discuss science.
When did i say the world was 3000 years old, its billions of years old, also, go read up on CO2 levels during the past 600m years, it will do ya some good....
A coal tax paid to the states.
15% import tax on autos 25% on autos worth more than $40,000
Luxury tax on yachts15% of their value each year.
Tax private airplanes 100% of their value every year.
The green hoax is the new rallying cry for marxists to execute their agendas.........
Progressives, coming up with hoaxes, destroying freedoms, economies and humanity since 1848.
Doesn't some teabagger need to stuff his sack in your mouth?
less than 2/1,000 of all CO2 is produced by human activity. So even if we wiped out every car,
power plant, jet liner, and human being from the face of the earth, there would be no noticeable effect on global CO2 levels.
At last. Class warfare, in the open. Except, of course, it will exempt member of Congress and Al Gore.
Gore is a member of Congress?
A pure carbon tax would effectively do this....tax energy consumption in whatever form it comes.
Unfortunately the cap and trade scheme is so riddled with give aways and kick backs that it is unlikely to have any effect at all....except on US jobs.
A related issue concerns socioeconomic inequity and the environment, I've posted some background
data for a number of U.S. cities here:
http://www.sciencetime.org/blog/?cat=9
Governments and corporations place environmentally degrading projects away from places wealthy people live, while the wealthy enjoy the benefits from these projects. My posted data shows the results within the United States, and the article discusses this issue across countries. Wealthy countries disproportionately gain the benefits while developing countries suffer the consequences. Let's change that.
Will Wilson
That would be Al Gore...Pelosi...and Obama....
And Hollywierd!
Why is this even being discussed? The truth is out and the debate is now over.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/03/uah-global-temperature-anomaly-for-june-09-zero/
The rich will just leave the country. I wouldn't blame them.
They will anyway. The most used phrase recently is "tax the wealthy..." to raise money for whatever is being discussed, ie healthcare, cap and tax, whatever. The wealthy will actually leave and take their wealth with them, in order to preserve it. This is to be expected.
They keep threatening... and yet they are still here.
Here here!
Funny thing, oil company memos reveal their biggest problem is too much supply. Their answer was not to build a new refinery in decades.
Now this new proposed law would even make us REDUCE the number of refineries.
Somehow the green "agenda" is to do exactly what the oil companies want.
Go to the front of the class
Exactly:Cut supply, less refining, Prices go up for everyone, Oil companies reap Huge Profits!!
Enjoy America!!.
Loading comments…
First Posted: 07- 7-09 01:06 AM | Updated: 07- 7-09 01:12 AM