Google Chrome OS: New PC Operating System Introduced

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Google Chrome OS: New PC Operating System Introduced stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL LIEDTKE and BARBARA ORTUTAY | July 8, 2009 06:08 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this April 17, 2007 file photo, exhibitors work on laptop computers in front of an illuminated sign of the Google logo at the industrial fair Hannover Messe in Hanover, Germany. Google Inc. on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 announced it is working on a new operating system for inexpensive computers in a daring attempt to diminish Microsoft Corp.'s longstanding control over people's computer experience. (AP Photo/Jens Meyer, file)

SUN VALLEY, Idaho — Google Inc. is hoping to gain greater control over how personal computers work by developing a free operating system that will attack Microsoft Corp.'s golden goose _ its long-dominant Windows franchise.

The new operating system will be based on Google's 9-month-old Web browser, Chrome. Google intends to rely on help from the community of open-source programmers to develop the Chrome operating system, which is expected to begin running computers in the second half of 2010.

The early versions of the Chrome operating system will be tailored for "netbooks," a breed of low-cost, less powerful laptop computers that are becoming increasingly popular among budget-conscious consumers primarily interested in surfing the Web.

That is a direct challenge to Microsoft, whose next operating system, Windows 7, is being geared for netbooks as well as larger computers.

The vast majority of netbooks already run on Windows, and that is unlikely to change unless Google can demonstrate the Chrome operating system is a significant improvement, said Forrester Research analyst Paul Jackson. He pointed out that many customers had returned the original netbooks that used open-source alternatives to Windows.

"It was not what people expected," he said. "People wanted Windows because they knew how to use it and knew how applications worked."

Google struck a confident tone in a blog posting late Tuesday night announcing its operating system. The Mountain View, Calif.-based company believes it can streamline the operating system to improve speed and reduce security threats.

"We hear a lot from our users and their message is clear _ computers need to get better," wrote Sundar Pichai, Google's vice president of product management, and Linus Upson, Google's engineering director.

Story continues below
advertisement

Microsoft hadn't responded to requests for comment through Wednesday.

Investors seemed to be betting on Google Wednesday as its shares rose $5.86, or 1.5 percent, to close at $402.49. Shares in Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft inched up 3 cents to $22.56.

The success of the Chrome operating system will likely hinge on its acceptance among computer manufacturers that have been loyal Windows customers for years, said Matt Rosoff, an analyst for the research group Directions on Microsoft. "Most people, when they get a new operating system, they get it with their PC," he said. "I don't think most people think much about their operating systems."

If enough computer manufacturers embrace the Chrome operating system, it could weaken Microsoft while opening up new avenues for Google to persuade consumers and businesses to use its suite of online applications and other Internet services, generating more opportunities for Google to sell lucrative Internet ads.

Getting consumers and businesses to switch to computers powered by a new operating system won't be easy, as Google has learned from the introduction of Chrome. Google says about 30 million people are using Chrome, a small fraction of the Web surfers who rely on Microsoft's market-leading Internet Explorer.

Microsoft's Windows operating system has been even more dominant for a longer period time despite challenges from Apple Inc. and various systems based on Linux, the same type of open-source software that Google plans to use.

"It's going to be tough," Standard & Poor's equity analyst Scott Kessler said of Google's foray into PC operating systems. "The reality is that as the importance of a device or task increases, people have a much lower inclination to consider a change."

Businesses will be especially reluctant to abandon Windows because, on average, about 70 percent of their applications are designed to run on that, said Gartner Inc. analyst Michael Silver.

"This is going to generate a lot of hype, but it will probably be three to five years before it has any noticeable impact on the market," Silver said.

Consumers are likely to be more tempted to experiment with the Chrome operating system because it probably will decrease netbook prices even further. Microsoft's operating system typically adds $50 to $100 to a computer's price, Silver said.

Netbooks are winning new fans largely because they are inexpensive. Gartner estimates about 21 million netbooks will be shipped worldwide this year. That's still just relatively small portion of the 149 million laptops and other mobile PCs that Gartner expects to be sold this year.

If the Chrome operating system gains market momentum, it could raise antitrust concerns, depending on how Google ties the software with its other products, including its dominant Internet search engine. Microsoft had faced such complaints in the U.S. and Europe in packaging Windows with its now-dominant Internet Explorer browser.

Chrome will run on the same x86 microprocessors that now power Windows and Apple Inc.'s Mac computers, as well as ARM chips used in smart phones.

Google has already introduced an operating system for smart phones and other mobile devices, called Android, that vies against various other systems, including ones made by Microsoft and Apple.

The Android system worked well enough to entice some computer makers to begin developing netbooks that will run on it. Acer Inc., the world's third-largest PC maker, said last month it would begin offering Android netbooks, saying it would cut costs and likely help computers start up more quickly.

Google, though, apparently believes a Chrome-based system will be better suited for netbooks.

The duel between Google and Microsoft has been steadily escalating in recent years as Google's dominance of the Internet's lucrative search market has given it the means to threaten Microsoft in ways that few other companies can.

Google already has rankled Microsoft by luring some of its top employees and developing an online package of computer programs that provide an alternative to Microsoft's top-selling word processing, spreadsheet and calendar applications.

Meanwhile, Microsoft has been trying to thwart Google by investing billions of dollars to improve its own Internet search and advertising systems _ to little avail so far. In the past month or so, though, Microsoft has been winning positive reviews and picking up more users with its search upgrade, Bing.

Now Google is aiming for Microsoft's financial jugular with the Chrome operating system.

Microsoft has drawn much of its power _ and profits _ from the Windows operating system that has steered most personal computers for the past two decades. The research firm IDC estimates the Windows operating system and software applications designed to run on it accounted for about $29 billion, or 58 percent, of Microsoft's revenue last year.

Google's chief executive, Eric Schmidt, and its co-founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, have not concealed their disdain for Windows.

Schmidt maintains Microsoft sometimes unfairly rigs its operating system to limit consumer choices _ something that Microsoft has consistently denied doing. Google fears Microsoft could limit access to its search engine and other products if Windows is set up to favor Microsoft products.

Schmidt and Brin are expected to discuss Google's new operating system this week when they appear at a media conference hosted by Allen & Co. at the Sun Valley resort in Idaho. They had not arrived at the conference Wednesday afternoon as other participants finished up their lunch and set out for a whitewater rafting trip.

___

Ortutay reported from New York.

SUN VALLEY, Idaho — Google Inc. is hoping to gain greater control over how personal computers work by developing a free operating system that will attack Microsoft Corp.'s golden goose _ its lon...
SUN VALLEY, Idaho — Google Inc. is hoping to gain greater control over how personal computers work by developing a free operating system that will attack Microsoft Corp.'s golden goose _ its lon...
Loading...
 
Filed by Marcus Baram  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
680
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
- Marcus01 I'm a Fan of Marcus01 6 fans permalink

As a computer tech I have a pretty good handle on how much know-how the average computer user has, and it ain't much. Micro$oft owns the franchise because it's so easy to use, at least as far as basic functions like email and word processing are concerned.

How receptive will the open source community be to helping a for-profit company in the personal information gathering business develop an OS? Hopefully not very. And even if they are, the very best and easiest to use open source software around does not meet with a very warm reception from the computer-challenged public. When introduced to a great alternative and free operating system like Ubuntu Linux, your average Windoze user will break out in a cold sweat.

I don't use Chrome because of the privacy issues. Until Google stops mining everyone's personal data I would not use their OS either. That's a matter of principal for me; a lot of Americans are comfortable with corporate and government entities knowing everything about them.

Time, as always, will tell. We'll see if this is a great idea that bears beneficial fruit, or if it's another bad idea destined for the graveyard of bad ideas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 07/09/2009
- MarcusT I'm a Fan of MarcusT 54 fans permalink
photo

I went through several pages of posts and didn't see one on topic. This has nothing to do with technical issues. Good enough is just fine. For the overwhelming majority of 30 and under outside the US, Goggle is a bigger brand name than MS now. The computer manufactures have been slowly marketing around the MS business model for years and the OS is the last wall. It is also MS last strangle hold on the industry and the biggest single cost item in every manufactures BOM. Goggle is simple trying to cut off MS air supply. Now where have we heard that before? Watching MS very successfully stifle innovation, steal code and re-write history over the years has been both enlightening and depressing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 AM on 07/09/2009

Google will have to decide if they want to position their OS to appeal to novice Dummies or the tech-savvy. Unfortunately, as Microsoft has learned, there are far more ignorant users out there than knowledgeable ones.

Once those numbers are crunched, they'll realize that they'll need to create an OS that holds the users hand as they install things, browse the web, do email, do IM, connect to wireless networks, print, etc. Yeah, there's a reason XP and Vista are over a million lines of code -- it's trying to assist the user in doing everything while creating a nice visual experience as well as maintaining backward compatibility.

Google has a great opportunity, but many ways to screw it up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 07/09/2009
photo

If you have tried Google Chrome you will see that there is very little downside to Google doing this!

Nothing but upside for Google and the Users!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 AM on 07/09/2009
- Whitley2009 I'm a Fan of Whitley2009 116 fans permalink
photo

Go Momma Google! There will be glitches and problems, but I will support anyone or anything that takes on MS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 07/09/2009

Some years ago Microsoft was sentenced for embedding their internet navigator in their OS. In the same way isn't Google reprehensible for building an OS around their internet navigator?
We all know where we are going: a transparent experience for the consumer whose machine is just one part of the net. Microsoft was saying: since the web world and that of the personal computer have fusioned, who needs a navigator? Google is saying: since the web world and that of the personal computer have fusioned, who needs an OS? But fundamentally, isn't it the same argument?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 07/08/2009
- MrVee I'm a Fan of MrVee 27 fans permalink
photo

Great point. They will probably attempt to circumvent the rules by claiming "open source."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 07/08/2009

Kind of hard to claim you don't have access when the source code is posted, yeah

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

I don't think google can be accused of stifling competition when the competition has unrestricted access to google's code.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 07/08/2009

Don't blame Google for reporters that don't have a clue. The operating system is Linux, it is not "embedded" in anything. Nor the other way around. The source code is freely available.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

That was not what they were convicted of, and no sentence was ever handed down. They were convicted of many monopolistic practices. Please read the court's finding-of-fact document on the case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 07/08/2009

Sorry for the mistakes (I am not an expert) and thank you for correcting them and clarifying things.
So it comes down to: Microsoft is blinging Google and Google is chroming Microsoft? As the market matures the business models converge. Eventually we will be left with 2 (maybe 3?) big players + niche players at the high end, like Apple.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 07/09/2009
- MrVee I'm a Fan of MrVee 27 fans permalink
photo

Yet another flavor of Linux. The only people that will be hurt by this will be Ubuntu developers and their user base. And even that's a stretch. Yawn. Somebody wake me up when something new and exciting happens. I'm fast becoming a Bing user and I don't really use Gmail as much as I once did.

Google is becoming so much bloat-ware it's code is almost ugly to look at.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 65 fans permalink
photo

You actually prefer "Bing" ?

At least this will help people realize, perhaps, what the OS is and that other ones actually do exist.

For the last 20 years M$ has defined bloatware, I think Peter Norton will back up that point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 07/08/2009
- MrVee I'm a Fan of MrVee 27 fans permalink
photo

Yes! I'm a Bio student and there isn't this wading through lists of articles that happen to contain a word that matches my search box.

Bing seems to return very relevant articles for me. Very relevant.

Full disclosure, if I don't see what I need on Bing, I'll hit the google yard sale. Not that you can't turn up a few "fleas" on google because Bing is still new. Having said that, Bing, as new as it is seems better equipped for my needs. Results are simply better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 07/08/2009

I have to say as someone who runs linux on my box, I tried bing and found it to be quite good, surprisingly. Unlike google they are for the most part keeping out many irrelevant sites in the searches. I could have done without most of the flash, but it still seems to run pretty fast considering. Although I still have google set to my homepage, I am using bing more and more when doing searches.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 AM on 07/09/2009
- MaxPowerXP I'm a Fan of MaxPowerXP 7 fans permalink

Peter Norton has *no room whatsoever* to accuse anyone of bloatware. Anything with his name on it has been unusable garbage for the last 12 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 07/09/2009

Quit yawning and get back to work, bill is logging you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Why do you have to choose your OS and your search engine from the same vendor? I just don't see the point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 07/08/2009

Get a clue people, this is about branding a Linux distribution. It will use X11, not a proprietary GUI as does Apple. Google does not need to make money off of this, it is about weening computer users off of a monopolized application platform and freeing the marketplace. It is not MS vs Google, its MS vs everyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Yes, they must either run X11 or they must write all new drivers for everyone's video card, not a fun task.

I sure hope the netbooks have ATI video so we are not again stuck using nVidia closed-source drivers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 07/08/2009
- HCB7562002 I'm a Fan of HCB7562002 5 fans permalink

Like I said - it worries me. I looked at the Ubuntu site with Wubi and came away impressed. Then I looked at "mint" and Linux and found this in the first paragraph:

"Warnings:

■This upgrade path is for the x64 Edition only, from a Mint 6 Felicia to a Mint 7 Gloria system.
■There is no guarantee that it will work for you. In fact this is quite a risky process. If you’re experienced and if you know how to troubleshoot and solve common Linux problems (in particular X11, kernel modules and APT problems) then you’re probably OK. If you’re a novice user we recommend you perform a fresh installation of Linux Mint 7 x64 instead.
■You should make backups of all your data before upgrading

That was my original point - "if you're experienced and if you know how to troubleshoot and solve common linux problems ...."

The good news in Ubuntu is that it says a user can simply back out at any time and go back to Windows or whatever. If that's true - and I'm a little skeptical - great. But the question remains - why would I change?

It's going to take people like you to get the word out. I'd never heard of Ubuntu or Mint.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 65 fans permalink
photo

Every OS will warn you to do backups and that it is risky to partition a drive, etc. This is correct, even M$. Most people run a 32-bit system, 64-bit systems are not worth dealing with yet for the average user, so that warning should be considered moot for most.

If you want a safe way, try a Live CD version before installing it on your machine. Another idea is putting it on another drive for a test run, you should not endanger your Windows drive at all in that case.

It is simpler than you think it is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

Better than a live cd make a Live USB stick that way if you do need to download some drivers to make something work you can write them on the stick! But let me just say HCB7562002 if your rig is not bleeding edge or using very obscure hardware you don't have to worry much about compatibility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 AM on 07/09/2009
photo

WUBI is a great, safe way to try out Linux. Ubuntu will create a file in your Window file system, then use that as virtual disk to store its files. Then it adds an entry in the Windows boot.ini file to add starting Ubuntu as a menu option. Windows isn't disturbed otherwise.

Why? Well, you might want to see what the efforts of thousands of programmers can do for the benefit of humanity instead of gross profit margins. You might want to see if you really need to pay for the same applications and OS over and over again because of minor changes and bug fixes that are strong arm marketed with a 'New! Improved!" sticker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 07/09/2009
- DRaymond I'm a Fan of DRaymond 64 fans permalink
photo

Welcome to hell, Google.

You aren't going to be able to dance around deficiencies just by keeping a 'beta' label forever. Nobody is going to buy a netbook that is still carrying a 'beta' label. You are going to have to own this product and own it big time. Sure some netbooks run on Ubuntu, but you are slapping your own moniker on this. So when users are having problems don't expect to just be able to pass them off to 'the community'. When they plug in a six year old USB printer that's an obsolete model from an out of business company and it doesn't print they aren't going to blame 'the community'. They aren't going to blame Linux. They are going to blame Google.

And users, meet your new supreme overlords. First of all you better get used to your Netbook with a lot of NET. To put it bluntly if you get separated from your net connetction your Google Crome Computer will be pretty useless.

And with your whole life in gmail and Google Docs, etc. you are only one national security letter away from the government knowing absolutely everything about you.

Not to mention that Google's only business model consists of analyzing your activities to deliver ever-more targeted ads at you. Why do people who are so quick to find sinister motives in the government or Microsoft are willing to give a complete pass on letting Google have full access to their activites.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 07/08/2009
- c1ee I'm a Fan of c1ee 4 fans permalink

If the Chrome OS is anything like the Chrome browser, then it's going to be sleek, fast and and kickass. MS should better shape up soon, because Vista revealed how much performance means to the user experience. I can't wait to try it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 07/08/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 152 fans permalink
photo

If I could go down to the local Wal Mart and buy an Amiga, even an old Amiga 500, and use it, I would. I used one up until mine finally gave up the ghost in 2002. I was able to do anything a PC or Mac could, and then some. Course, since Apple is beholden to MS, they are not an alternative to escape the MS monopoly. Nor is the misguided Linux which doesn't even ship with drivers that will work right out of the box and/or download. That's what you get when you have 100,000 different people trying to make a driver for 1 thing and none of them are knowing what they are doing. Nevermind the fact that none of them can agree on anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 07/08/2009

what drivers? You don't know what you are talking about. Try any up-to-date distro, they leave little to be desired.

By the way, a buddy of mine had a hard drive fail, he has been trying to re-install Win XP. Guess what, no LAN drivers included with XP for his system. Ha Ha, never a problem with Linux. He can't even get on-line to find them. Needs a Linux Live CD for the job.

Seriously, the only real Linux driver issue these days I find is with scanners. Not even WiFi is a problem. Where scanners are concerned, it is easy enough to find models fully supporting Linux. Canon and others have many models. Adding a heavyweight like Google into the mix will only help, as the rest of the Linux world stands to benefit from their effort.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 07/08/2009
- Tazru I'm a Fan of Tazru 65 fans permalink
photo

Have you even tried any Linux distro in the last 5 years?

Driver issues? I have had trouble with one brand of printer that chose to seek their own path and keep the drivers proprietary, they also happened to have lost market share big time over the last 3 years. I did avoid a driver problem with WiFi by choosing not to buy a model that had other serious issues as well, the rest of their product line is fine.

Open Source model is Collaborative, people check eachotherś work, a good thing for quality assurance. "Boss in charge" is the "old school" business model.

I do not want to even get started on Mall-Wart....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 07/08/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 152 fans permalink
photo

To the both of you, why don't they release generic drivers that works no matter which NIC you got? I have half a dozen NIC's laying around that are unusable with linux because nobody cared to make a specific driver for them. ;o)

Yes, it's been a couple years since I last tried that stuff I admit, but then, how long does it take for them to get it right? 2 issues I had with the last attempt was the NIC and cdrom. I bought a copy of redhat on cdrom, it installed fine from cdrom. However, upon rebooting I couldn't access the cdrom drive. My point is this, at least under XP you can use a 10 year old NIC and know it's going to work. Backwards compatible!

And there is a surprising lack of software out there for it. If all I'm gonna do is surf the net, use GIMP, or play Quake 2, then I might consider Linux. However, I like music and playing instruments too, so it's not like I'm going to find something like Deluxe Music Construction Set (Amiga) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deluxe_Music_Construction_Set or Cakewalk SONAR Home Studio (PC/MAC) http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Cakewalk-Sonar-Home-Studio-7?sku=710003#new or something equivalent.

I'd consider a Mac if it wasn't for the fact I already have so much tied up in this PC with music specific soundcards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 07/08/2009

I'm very skeptical. What makes Google think it can come up with an OS thats going to be able to compete with Mac OSX or Linux? Forget about its ability to compete with MS. MS is simply too embedded and ubiquitous on global scale. As another commenter said, the vast majority of people who use computers don't think about an OS - they just want they're computer to work while they do e-mail, web surf or do word processing without having to make a phone call to a tech support center in Zimbabwe.

So, Chromes chief competitors are MAC OSX, which it will never be able to touch in terms of elegance and ease of use. That leaves Linux, which, sadly, still needs as much, if not more tech support as windows just to get a printer to operate.

Conclusion: Chrome = DOA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 07/08/2009
- Maddox01a I'm a Fan of Maddox01a 4 fans permalink

- Yes Windows is entrenched but has become soft. Educate users and they will change as....

- MacOSx has seen record growth. Apple has been very smart but with the Economy hurting many pocketbooks, not as many ppl will part with the 'Apple Tax' for ease of use when....

- Linux/Ubuntu: 9.04 is very well done and I've set it up for my kids and non-techie users. Setup the usuals progs fully and the user's know where to go. Make sure you're availible to answer questions and find ways to assist them.
Linux is free and many free programs do what Windows does and is very easy to learn for non-techies.

Each one...teach one

The point is there's more competition out there. MSFT knows it...thus Win7. You like it...use it. But if you're budget conscious and have good support, Linux is right for you.

So far in my 3 months running Ubuntu, 99% of the questions I had i found an answer for. I like my new home and I intend to stay.
In my view, Windows is a good gaming platform, not much else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 07/08/2009
- Maddox01a I'm a Fan of Maddox01a 4 fans permalink

I'm a big Ubuntu Jaunty fan and I'm happy to see Google lending it's deep pockets to a new OS. I installed th e@in7 RC in a VM homes in my Jaunty setup and funny...it looks like KDE!!!!

MSFT now is felling the heat and it's only getting hotter. Win7 may be a hit but Google and Apple have enough money for a prolonged campaign and the Linux community is inspired by Ubuntu's success.

I predict in 10 years, MSFT market share will be down to 70% with the challengers having equal shares of the 30%.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 07/08/2009

I love competition!

Thank god the politicians stay out of the tech sector! It's the only sector in our economy that is completely unregulated and left alone. When was the last time we heard of a technology company that needed a government bailout?

If the politicians got involved and started regulating, we'd have a lot less choices, much higher prices, and much worse quality. The sector would be ailing just like every other part of our heavily regulated economy.

Freedom creates competition, competition creates better and affordable products, better and affordable products give us a better life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

The politicians have gotten heavily involved in software. Microsoft has been sued over and over again to release technical information about their products. Thanks to the politicians, Microsoft has competition for their server products. Companies like NetApp would not exist if these lawsuits had not opened the doors of opportunity for them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

And we treat the automakers in exactly the same manner. They also get sued over and over again to release their tech specs, so that other companies have the information they need to make replacement parts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 07/08/2009

The politicians sued Microsoft?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 07/08/2009

Are you serious? What do you think the patent laws do if not stifle creativity and regulate the tech sector? If you have an idea you better be rich to back it up in court, and be ready to spend a long time doing it.
The patent laws are tailored to the people who lobby for them, the large companies like Microsoft and Google, not for the small startup. If corporate America had a say they would have squashed the open source movement a long time ago.
Software patents are bad. No matter what idea I have somebody will improve it. There are many who just squat on the patents waiting to sue, and the people in the courts and in the government don't even realize how they are taking away our freedoms by granting patents that don't even make sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Where oh where did I ever say anything about patents?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 07/08/2009

Microsoft and Google were started in home garages... They got big because they invented and sold a great product that millions of people voluntarily bought and use. There's nothing wrong with that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 07/08/2009
- Chip W I'm a Fan of Chip W 18 fans permalink

This is the right-wing mantra that is true in general principal and speaks to the advantage of capitalism.
But it's not absolute, or comprehensive, and Free Market Capitalism wasn't handed down from God as the divine economic system.
There are disadvantages and limitations to Free Market Capitalism (just like anything else), and it sure would be nice if the big bunch on the right would take a look at what it is they're worshiping.
Freedom creates competition. Yes, until there are those with more economic power than others. Then the power players make the rules, and stifle competition and freedom for the other players. Unrestricted freedom benefits the powerful.
Competition creates better products. Generally true, if it's genuine supply/demand competition. But there are the power players. And if the supply side has more clout, the demand side doesn't have much to say in creating competition. Health insurance, eg.
As to giving us a better life: generally true if - and here's maybe my biggest point - "better life" is measured only in monetary terms. The market is about money; the only value at work is money. If values other than money are to be at work in the economic system, the market won't provide it. Moving towards a better energy future won't be provided by the market except where profits are anticipated. The market doesn't move towards societal objectives; it reacts to stimulus and anticipates future revenue sources.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Competition is EVERYWHERE in life. It is the very nature of life on this planet. It is what makes evolution happen. Nothing ever changes unless there is competition for resources.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 07/08/2009
- jalowe1957 I'm a Fan of jalowe1957 35 fans permalink
photo

Has the word "Linux" ever crossed anybody's mind?

In Bill Gates' mind, "Linux" is a four-letter cuss word with an extra one attached for good measure.

But then, Bill Gates is as likely to use Linux as he his to dance the Funky Penguin to a Rufus Thomas dance tune.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 07/08/2009
- Whitley2009 I'm a Fan of Whitley2009 116 fans permalink
photo

Microsoft owes me hundreds of dollars from improper billing from 35 years back. In those days they had an arrogance which was unbelievable. Customer service was a laugh. And, there is no doubt as to their paying out billions in fines because of their tendency to go against anti-trust and unfair competition laws around the world.

I will suffer through Googles's new system, learn to use it, and hope to see it develop into a quality OS program for all the world. I will gladly pay whatever they ask for the OS software.

Go Google!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 07/08/2009
- ssgman I'm a Fan of ssgman 8 fans permalink
photo

35 years? 1974?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 07/08/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Microsoft was founded in 1975.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 07/08/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect