iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll

First Posted: 08/10/2009 6:12 am EDT Updated: 02/12/2013 11:43 am EST

A new study by the Pew Research Center finds that the GOP is alienating scientists to a startling degree.

Only six percent of America's scientists identify themselves as Republicans; fifty-five percent call themselves Democrats. By comparison, 23 percent of the overall public considers itself Republican, while 35 percent say they're Democrats.

The ideological discrepancies were similar. Nine percent of scientists said they were "conservative" while 52 percent described themselves as "liberal," and 14 percent "very liberal." The corresponding figures for the general public were 37, 20 and 5 percent.

Among the general public, moderates and independents ranked higher than any party or ideology. But among scientists, there were considerably more Democrats (55%) than independents (32%) and Republicans (6%) put together. There were also more liberals (52%) than moderates (35%) and conservatives (9%) combined.

"These results were not a complete surprise," said Scott Keeter, Director of Survey Research at Pew, in an interview with the Huffington Post. He said they can be mostly attributed to "the difference between Democratic and Republican parties with respect to issues."

The wide ideological and partisan gap among scientists may have been exacerbated by the Bush administration, which often disputed broad scientific consensus on topics such as evolution and climate change.

Keeter acknowledged this factor, but said that "many of these disputes probably predate the Bush administration," noting that scientists have favored liberal views in numerous past studies.

Religion also plays a role. Republicans tend to promote the centrality of religion more often than Democrats, and while 95 percent of the public said they believe in "God" or "a higher power," only 51 percent of scientists claimed either.

"Many Republicans, especially the Evangelical wing of the party, are skeptical of evolution, and have argued for the teaching of creationism and intelligent design in school," said Keeter.

The results could merely be a reflection of how scientists see the world, rather than of partisan loyalties. In a series of questions posed, the study found that the answers of scientists were consistently more in line with liberal viewpoints than those of the general public.

"The Republican Party has a number of leaders within it who have challenged the accuracy of scientific findings on issues such as climate change, evolution and stem cell research," Keeter told the Huffington Post.

"It suggests that scientists who are Republicans might feel some dissonance from the party's position on some things that are important to them. And while there are Republicans in the scientist sample, there are really not that many," he said.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • "I have flown twice over Mount St. Helens out on our West Coast. I'm not a scientist and I don't know the figures, but I have a suspicion that that one little mountain has probably released more sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere of the world than has been released in the last ten years of automobile driving or things of that kind that people are so concerned about." - President Ronald Reagan, 1980 Not quite. Cars emit about 81,000 tons of sulfur dioxide per day, while Mount St. Helens emitted only about 2,000 tons.

  • "The internet is not something you just dump something on. It's not a truck. It's a series of tubes." -Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), 2006 The "series of tubes" phrase subsequently became a pop cultural catchphrase--it even has its own <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes" target="_hplink">Wikipedia page</a> and mentioned in the <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=a series of tubes" target="_hplink">Urban Dictionary</a>.

  • "And sometimes these dollars go to projects that have little or nothing to do with the public good, things like fruit fly research in Paris, France. I kid you not." - former Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska), 2008 The common fruit fly is one of the most commonly used organisms in genetic research. Discoveries such as sex-linked inheritance and techniques such as gene mapping are a result of such research.

  • "Information is moving--you know, nightly news is one way, of course, but it's also moving through the blogosphere and through the Internets." - President George W. Bush, 2007 The former president went on to use the word "Internets" two more times in public.

  • "Is there some thought being given to subsidizing the clearing of rainforests in order for some countries to eliminate that production of greenhouse gases?" -Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-California), when asked whether the U.S. climate policy should focus on reducing carbon emissions. Rainforests actually absorb far more carbon dioxide than they emit.

  • "Scientists all over this world say that the idea of human-induced global climate change is one of the greatest hoaxes perpetrated out of the scientific community. It is a hoax. There is no scientific consensus." - Rep. Paul Broun (R-Georgia), 2009, at a debate over the Clean Energy and Security Act. Many researchers point to a decline in Arctic sea ice, an increase in droughts, and changing rain and snow patterns as signs of climate change.

  • "What the science says is that temperatures peaked out globally in 1998. So we've gone for 10-plus years where the temperatures have gone down." - Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin), 2009 in an interview with conservative radio show host Jay Weber. The mean global temperature has in fact been increasing since 1998.

  • "Mars is essentially in the same orbit [as Earth]....Mars is somewhat the same distance from the sun, which is very important. We have seen pictures where there are canals, we believe, and water. If there is water, that means there is oxygen. If oxygen, that means we can breathe." - Dan Quayle, former vice president, commenting on President George H.W. Bush's Space Exploration Initiative as quoted in <em>This New Ocean</em> by William E. Burrows. Actually, Mars completes an orbital revolution around the sun about every 1.88 Earth years, according to NASA.

  • "If it's legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down." - Rep. Todd Akin (R-Missouri), 2012 In fact, women can become pregnant from rape.

  • "All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and the big bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of Hell." -Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) 2012 Broun, a member of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, is a doctor, and would have been taught many of the generally accepted principles of evolution and embryology in medical school.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 922
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
diahni
04:58 PM on 07/16/2009
Well, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to know why.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
01:37 AM on 07/12/2009
It's disappointing that Pew didn't compare scientists' and non-scientists' views of Bush administration tampering with other professions, especially the CIA. I guess that's still too "controversial" to even ASK about.
[
An overwhelming majority of scientists say they have heard a lot (55%) or a little (30%) about claims that the Bush administration did not allow government scientists to report findings that contradicted administration policy. By contrast, just 10% of the public heard a lot about the claims and 34% heard a little; most say they have heard nothing at all about it.

About three-quarters of scientists (77%) believe the claims about the Bush administration are true, while just 6% say they are false. And virtually all of the scientists who say these claims are true – 71% of scientists overall – believe that these practices occurred more often during the Bush administration than during previous administrations.
]
05:46 PM on 07/11/2009
Surely, that conservative six percent of scientists are hard at work proving ketchup is a vegetable, creationism, Noah's Ark and voodoo economics. And before you laugh, some large portion of them, no doubt, are contributing to arms development as well, genetic research, and other sensitive areas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fedupinfla
In a kennel full of dogs, I bark the loudest
09:10 PM on 07/11/2009
Hmmm...I truly believe the only science they support is "military science". Making "super soldiers" and biological weapons....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bija
03:08 PM on 07/11/2009
During the Bush years, Republicans denied global warming, evolution and most everything scientific. It isn't surprising to me that scientists don't identify themselves as being Republicans.
11:51 AM on 07/11/2009
From the source page: "About three-quarters of scientists (77%) believe the claims [that government scientists could not report findings that conflicted with Bush administration positions] are true, while just 6% say they are false. And virtually all of the scientists who say these claims are true - 71% of scientists overall - believe that these practices occurred more often during the Bush administration than during previous administrations." ... pardon the extended bracket, but needed to insert the originating site's actual claim into the quoted sentence ... that the Bush administration suppressed scientific investigation for political ends is just another scandalous low point in what can easily be claimed as the worst presidency in United States history ...
05:07 AM on 07/11/2009
Creationism is a pseudo-science targeting the gullible and those who take the Bible word for word literally. Noah's Flood debunked in a small paragraph. We all can agree rain comes down as fresh water with the extremely rare exception of natural acid rain. With the amount of rain added into the ocean a massive salinity change would occur killing off majority of species unable to conform to change. Also, considering 2% of 21,000 species are able to willingly switch saline environment without worries of death. If it was the other way around.. Noah's flood might of happened.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
01:17 AM on 07/11/2009
"The results could merely be a reflection of how scientists see the world, rather than of partisan loyalties."

No doubt about it. In the phrase "free scientific inquiry" the first adjective is, indeed, redundant. It's only natural that scientific minds would prefer the party of liberty, the liberal party; and that liberty lovers would be more open to learning facts, whatever they happen to be, meaning to be scientific in our worldview and chosen profession.
12:03 AM on 07/11/2009
Indeed, reality has a liberal bias..
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
01:50 AM on 07/11/2009
I agree. Just four physical forces govern the behavior of the entire known universe. The only political leaning that resembles is liberal.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
EconPadawan
Too short for a stormtrooper. Too tall for a ewok.
11:05 PM on 07/10/2009
Republican science goes like this...

"Global warming isn't happening because I can walk out of my house in the middle of winter in Colorado and watch it snow."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Phreaked
In Brightest Day, In Blackest Night
01:56 AM on 07/11/2009
Lol, how about the "carbon is natural not harmful" line

As soon as this was said I wondered what they would say if we wanted to put them in a room and filled it carbon dioxide or if they had ever heard of Chlorofluorocarbon's
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sepulchre
A neutron walks into a bar...
04:02 PM on 07/12/2009
Let's not forget the brilliant Republican politician that said that cow farts where CO2. Apparently he hadn't even bothered to find out about methane, probably still doesn't know what it is, but he thinks he is an authority on Global Warming.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sepulchre
A neutron walks into a bar...
10:46 PM on 07/10/2009
I am a scientist, and I am not a Republican, acutally I can't think of any colleges I work with on a regular basis that are.
10:07 PM on 07/10/2009
Intesting that most of the scientists, according to the reserach of Pew, believe in God.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sepulchre
A neutron walks into a bar...
10:48 PM on 07/10/2009
Well believing in a higher power is not actually the same as being religious. Most of my colleges are what you would call agnostic. They believe in a higher power, but have distain for organized religion and all the baggage that comes with it.
11:53 PM on 07/10/2009
Not really true-- only 33% of scientists said they believe in "God" (as opposed to 83% of the public). 18% of scientists said the believe in a "higher power." Pretty huge discrepancy there.
12:17 AM on 07/11/2009
"Higher power" and "God" are the same thing. "Higher power" is just more ambiguous and less specific.
Regardless, the majority of scientists believe in some form of power greater than them.

Now - this is only if you buy the results of this Pew poll (which I don't).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Demarcus Jackson
Southern Psychology Professor
10:00 PM on 07/10/2009
I don't believe that ALL Republicans are anti-science, but I do certainly believe that a lot if not most are. This is a party that implicitly (and at time, explicitly) have denied central cornerstones of the three major physical sciences---biology, physics, and chemistry---and have campaigned and promoted anti-intellectualism for over 30 years. I am surprised that they have not alienated more scientists. Republicans---true conservatives---who value secularism, empiricism, and knowledge ought to speak-up and speak loudly and say that they are not apart of the pervasive "cancer of ignorance and blind faith" that runs through much of the party.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
EconPadawan
Too short for a stormtrooper. Too tall for a ewok.
10:35 PM on 07/10/2009
Well said.
11:01 PM on 07/10/2009
Good point. Now will somebody explain this to the state education board in Texas?
11:49 PM on 07/10/2009
Texas has a board of education?
Layman23
Do we want to live in the past?
10:00 PM on 07/10/2009
6% is a large number. God forbid republicans and science in the same sentence.
10:37 PM on 07/10/2009
You are obviously not one of the scientists b/c 6% is not a big number....
10:49 PM on 07/10/2009
I think he probably means that 6% is larger than expected.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sepulchre
A neutron walks into a bar...
10:52 PM on 07/10/2009
You are right it is a very small number. For example if you were testing a hypothesis you came up with and came before your colleges and said proudly that your hypothesis stood up to testing because the results supported your hypothesis 6% of the time, you would be laughed out of room, and likely not be able to get a another credible job in the sciences.
09:36 PM on 07/10/2009
Not surprising. Republicans don't believe in science. They believe in voodoo. Ergo, they would be highlly unlikely to pursue careers in science.

Wilbur
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:44 PM on 07/10/2009
Not necessarily voodoo, but certainly a lack of vigor in their thinking that relies more on anecdotal information and subservience as opposed to a requirement based on empiricism and repeated observations.

When a Jerry Falwell says the god hates this group or that group, all the heads nod in the right direction and the people open up their wallets to thank Falwell for his invaluable translation services.
11:15 PM on 07/10/2009
Do you have any peer-reviewed studies on how many Republicans believe in voodoo?

I don't either, but i suspect I could count them without taking off my shoes.
11:36 PM on 07/10/2009
The Journal of Applied Polemics
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
12:50 AM on 07/11/2009
In other words, you admit to needing fingers and toes to keep count.
09:30 PM on 07/10/2009
Scientists tend to be intelligent, educated, thinking people, any one of which pretty much disqualifies them from being Republicans. All three together? Not a chance. The 6% were the "scientists" the Bush administration relied up for "scientific fact" that had nothing to do with science, fact or anything other than ignorance..