CIT Explained: What If It Fails?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - CIT Explained: What If It Fails? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CANDICE CHOI | 07/16/09 06:51 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?

NEW YORK — You may not have heard of CIT Group Inc., but there's a good chance you've shopped in stores that it helps keep in business.

The New York-based bank is one of the nation's largest lenders to small and mid-sized businesses. Despite the scope of its customer base, however, CIT emerged from meetings with federal regulators Wednesday failing to secure the cash infusion it needs to avoid bankruptcy.

In turning CIT Group away, the Obama administration is betting that any ripple effect from the company's demise wouldn't pose a critical risk to economic recovery.

CIT Group is now rushing to raise billions of dollars in financing from debt holders, but Wall Street doesn't appear confident that the company will pull through. On Thursday, investors sold off shares and drove down the stock price 75 percent.

As the company fights for survival, here are some questions and answers about how small businesses and the broader economy are affected by CIT Group.

Q: First of all, what is CIT Group?

A: It's a century-old company that primarily provides lending to small and mid-sized businesses. To a much lesser extent, it also provides advisory services and leases out property such as airplanes and rail cars.

The company has been bought and sold a number of times over the years. Most recently, it was acquired in 2001 by Tyco International, which at the time was embroiled in an accounting scandal. To pay down debt, Tyco spun off CIT Group in an initial public offering in July 2002. CIT has been an independent public company since then.

Story continues below
advertisement

Q: Who does CIT serve?

A: CIT says it serves more than 1 million business customers, most of them small or mid-size businesses.

The company's clients run the gamut, but tend to be in industries considered riskier in the small business landscape, such as restaurants and retail. Dunkin' Donuts franchisees and Dillard's Inc. are among the company's clients.

The bank is also the nation's biggest lender for entrepreneurs and minority-owned businesses.

It's not clear what percentage of the country's small business lending market CIT Group holds, but the company is the ninth-largest commercial and industrial lender in the United States, according to Foresight Analytics.

As of March 31, CIT Group held 1.7 percent of the $1.4 trillion in commercial and industrial loans on bank balance sheets. (Those include loans to businesses of any size.)

Q: What role do small businesses play in the broader economy?

A: Small businesses provide about half of all private-sector jobs. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, small firms generated 60 percent to 80 percent of net new jobs every year over the past decade.

Small businesses – defined as having fewer than 500 workers – made up 99.9 percent of the 27.2 million businesses in the country in 2007, according to the SBA. Just 17,000 were large businesses.

The odds aren't great for small firms, however. The SBA says that while two-thirds of new businesses survive at least two years, only 31 percent survive at least seven years.

Q: If CIT files for bankruptcy, would its clients' credit lines be immediately shut down?

A: That depends on the type of bankruptcy CIT would enter.

To reorganize under Chapter 11 bankruptcy, CIT Group would need to line up financing sources to enable operations to continue.

In the event that financing can't be found, however, the company might have to liquidate its business and close down under Chapter 7 bankruptcy. That would mean clients would likely not be able to tap credit lines.

The impact of the latter scenario would be diminished since CIT has already been cutting back on lending in recent months. In March, CIT had $5.3 billion in credit lines to customers, down from $6.1 billion at the end of 2008.

Q: Where else could CIT's clients get loans if the company failed?

A: There are 8,300 banks in the U.S., most of them healthy enough to offer loans to small businesses, said Bob Seiwert, senior vice president of the American Bankers Association's Center for Commercial Lending and Business Banking.

"The market over time will fill the void. The challenge for CIT borrowers would be finding new lenders in a time frame that works for them," Seiwert said.

Since many of CIT's customers are in riskier industries, Seiwert said it could be harder for them to find loans given the tight credit market.

Q: How did CIT get into its current predicament?

A: At the height of the credit bubble, CIT Group made the mistake of straying into subprime lending and student loans, said Kathleen Shanley, an analyst with corporate bond research firm Gimme Credit.

The company quickly recognized its mistake and pulled back from those segments more than a year ago, but the damage was done. CIT tapped much of its own credit lines in March of last year, and ever since has had trouble finding funding, Shanley said.

The problem was exacerbated by CIT's reliance on credit markets for financing, said Matthew Anderson, an analyst with Foresight Analytics. Unlike traditional banks, CIT can't lean on customer deposits when it needs money.

And now, CIT is facing $7.4 billion in debt that's due in the first quarter of next year.

At the same time, CIT has a higher delinquency rate on its loans than other banks. CIT's delinquency rate for commercial and industrial loans was 5.4 percent at the end of the first quarter, compared with an average of 3.5 percent for all banks in the country, according to Foresight Analytics.

Q: What are the arguments for letting CIT Group fail?

A: CIT already received $2.3 billion in federal aid last December after converting to a bank holding company. CIT and its representatives have warned that a failure to provide additional government help could prove fatal to the small businesses that rely on it for money.

"The cost of a cash infusion is less than the negatives their failure would cause," said Scott Talbott of the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents CIT and other big financial firms.

But CIT is one-eighth of the size of Lehman Brothers, which went into bankruptcy last fall after suffering massive credit losses. And Wall Street's concern about CIT Group was relatively subdued – major stock markets didn't really move much in response to the news about the company during the regular trading session.

Optimism about good earnings from big technology companies ultimately outweighed the concerns and pushed the market higher.

In other words, there doesn't seem to be widespread panic that a failure at CIT would do serious damage to the markets or the economy.

NEW YORK — You may not have heard of CIT Group Inc., but there's a good chance you've shopped in stores that it helps keep in business. The New York-based bank is one of the nation's largest le...
NEW YORK — You may not have heard of CIT Group Inc., but there's a good chance you've shopped in stores that it helps keep in business. The New York-based bank is one of the nation's largest le...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
37
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- 02bmw76 I'm a Fan of 02bmw76 10 fans permalink
photo

Welcome to the oligarchy. We will be emulating our world neighbors starting yesterday. Sorry if you didn't see it coming.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 07/19/2009
photo


this economy is in such deep *&^ yet Obamma & Summers live on another astral plane, unwilling to aknowledge reality, even though 995 of Americans expiernceit and KNoW what's going on, and are tired of the BS.

good articles: http://www.iamned.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 07/18/2009
- sueinmn I'm a Fan of sueinmn 101 fans permalink
photo

My take on this is that CITI lent to regular people and small businesses. They didnt play into the "good ole boys" games as well as Goldman did They may have wanted to but the rich and famous just wouldnt let them in because they represented the real people (lower classes). How else can the rich and powerful wipe out the middleclass but by wiping out the financial backing for those middleclass. Its just another step of supression to the middle class. We are seriously in trouble of what might emerge at the end of all this. I dont think Democracy, Capitolism (in its TRUE form will NOTsurvive).

Corporatism (corporations in bed with governments control) will be the winner and we will realize the realities of true supression and polverty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 07/18/2009
photo

Contrary to the last statement in the blog, there IS serious and widespread concern among CIT's clients and it will be virtually impossible for them to find other lenders who will grant them credit . CIT was giving credit to hundreds of thousands of stores so that their manufacturers /suppliers would be guaranteed payment for providing the products or services to the businesses. If there is a collapse of CIT, it will take months and months for these stores to obtain new credit sources, if at all. This will cause most to close and the stores' manufacturers / suppliers will also be forced to layoff employees or close, adding almost a million more people to unemployment lines . CIT has different types of lending /credit issuance like factoring. Factoring is a major type of lending in which companies like CIT loan money to manufacturers / suppliers based on invoices for products and services. Under bankruptcy law, if CIT goes into bankruptcy, monies received by CIT for a particular suppliers' invoices will go into a common fund to be distributed among ALL CIT creditors. Suppliers stand to lose billions because they will not receive full payment for which they were entitled to receive. Though I voted for Obama and I still think that he was the best choice for President, I do not think that he fully realizes the full and critical impact that CIT's bankruptcy will have on a huge number of people and the economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 AM on 07/18/2009
- Tinsdale I'm a Fan of Tinsdale 16 fans permalink

CIT is called "inconsequential” by people who know nothing about the company and its role in business funding. CIT, IBM Global Financing, Dell Financial Services and GE Capital provide key financial resources to American mid-market businesses.

My company is heavily involved in the technology industry. We represent and provide product from the largest names in this market. CIT has provided a number of our clients with equipment leasing and other financial assistance. Many of these transactions involved well grounded entrepreneurial companies, small to medium sized enterprises; many with 1000 employees or less, others were medical facilities in smaller towns and rural areas. In case anyone has slept through the last 10 months, money is tight, especially for this segment of the market and YES, CIT IS IMPORTANT. Its failure will have consequences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 07/18/2009
- aj88 I'm a Fan of aj88 3 fans permalink

According to progress.org citigroup has paid 15 million in campaign and lobbying efforts, GM has paid 15 million, Goldman Sachs 1 million, UAW over 4 million....well, you get the picture. I am unable to find where CIT group has paid the administration any money. If you want to know which companies are "too big to fail" all you need to do is to research which companies made political contributions and to whom. Following the TARP money and seeing where it has gone will turn your stomach.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 07/17/2009

According to my information, a failure of CIT is completely inconsequential. So let's say they had paid the government to keep it alive, would you feel better about yet another loser getting your money for no return whatsoever?

Just asking...

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 07/17/2009
- aj88 I'm a Fan of aj88 3 fans permalink

Actually, I would feel a bit better to know that a corporation that did not pay off the government was lent a helping hand. It's sickening to follow the money trail, where only those corporations and unions who have, in essence, laundered money back have received bailouts, corporate ownership etc. How is this even legal?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 07/17/2009

It thought Obama started a plan to open lending directly to small businesses using TARP funds? Why can't the bailout money that would have used to bailout CIT be given to their clients directly while they transition to other banks? The loans could be short term. Clients that are dead weight, too high, risk and who can't lower their spending habits after that would get weeded out with very little systemic shock. CIT is badly managed and needs to go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 07/17/2009

Because what you're basically proposing is Obama creating a bank, which he has neither the established infrastructure nor the fiduciary expertise to do (and neither do most of his political appointees and associates with a few obvious exceptions). Why would the government start acting like a bank when all of the banking structures necessary exist already? If need be they could just nationalize CIT and do what you're asking. The government itself acting like a lender is a bad idea though (not to say nationalization is a good one).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 07/17/2009
photo

At some point you have to flush bad management and clean the system!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 AM on 07/17/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 125 fans permalink
photo

watch, they will go into bankruptcy and end up being taken over by one of the huge, government preferred must not fail companies. Not long in our distant future there will be 2 or 3 companies that own everything, and the US gov will get the burden responsibility of making sure they have enough money to support the lash taste of the owner of each company. In other words, it will be all for one, and that one ( corporate America) will not be for the all.
Lets hope not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 AM on 07/17/2009
- elsellel I'm a Fan of elsellel 2 fans permalink

You know, if a business is doing "bad" business, has improper management, is a business that's failing its marketplace, or is otherwise a business that profits on the misery of others - immoral practices no matter how they're scrutinized; let's be honest - than it deserves to fail.

Oh, but wait, the profiting on the misery of others part... shoot, that encompasses 50% of the large corporations on the planet; what are we to do?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 07/17/2009

"nation's biggest lender for entrepreneurs and minority-owned businesses."

Obama is really looking out for Main Street not Wall Street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 07/17/2009
- rbchilds I'm a Fan of rbchilds 13 fans permalink
photo

Sarcasm!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 07/18/2009
- Raster I'm a Fan of Raster 22 fans permalink

This company has so many strikes against it no wonder it can't get anywhere.

First, it's name is not Goldman Sachs.
Second, it's not part of the appropriate Wall Street circle: Citi, Bank of America, AIG...
Third, it's business is lending to SMALL and MEDIUM size businesses, like those on Main Street Americas, not "too big to fail" concerns.
And so on, and so on, and...
What nerve even thinking about asking for help!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 07/16/2009
- Tinsdale I'm a Fan of Tinsdale 16 fans permalink

Thanks for a great post.

There is a dark irony in all of this mess. Hank Paulson pulls out the rug from under Lehman ,Brothers, brings down the world economy and, as a result, Hank and his buddies walk away with the world’s largest jackpot. Nice, huh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 AM on 07/18/2009

CIT is indicative of the systematic failure of the United States capitalist system. Obama, thank god, understand this and realizes that the SYSTEM has to change, not just be propped up so that it can repeat the same mistakes again. Let CIT fail - loudly and with much publicity. Borrowers, even struggling young businesses, must learn a very difficult lesson: that "something for nothing" does not cut it anymore and that "pay as you go" is the new way to survive and thrive. And if you cannot stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Start your business in the dining room instead. Be a little more modest and don't expect others to bail you out when you decide to dive into the deep end of the pool without your water-wings. If you cannot swim without somebody holding you above the surface of the pool with loans, maybe you shouldn't have started your business in the first place. Wait until you have actually SAVED the money to do so. Yeah, I know. We are an impatient lot. But there you are? Would you prefer the predicament you find yourself in now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 PM on 07/16/2009
- Tinsdale I'm a Fan of Tinsdale 16 fans permalink

There will be a time in the life cycle of any business that funding will be needed to expand its facilities, increase productivity, or take advantadge of an opportunity.

One simple example, good luck with a tooth ache, your average family dentist would not exist in your community without financial assistance to set up their practice after graduation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 AM on 07/18/2009
- Faraja I'm a Fan of Faraja 2 fans permalink
photo

Any Gamblers over there? I almost bought 10000 shares @ .37 cents. CIT is @ .50 cents after hours ;)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 07/16/2009

A fool and his money are soon parted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 07/16/2009
- Faraja I'm a Fan of Faraja 2 fans permalink
photo

And the winner is? CIT shares jumped to .93 on Friday. Do the maths:
0.90 - 0.37 = 0.53
0.53 * 10,000 = $ 5300

Not too bad for one day job :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 07/18/2009
- bluguy8 I'm a Fan of bluguy8 19 fans permalink

greed again--sho­cking--NOT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 07/16/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect