EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Internal RNC Memo: "Engage In Every Activity" To Slow Down Health Care Reform

First Posted: 8/21/09 Updated: 5/25/11

Steele

A private memo distributed by the Republican National Committee calls for like-minded advocates to help defeat President Barack Obama's health care proposals by delaying its consideration.

The memo, which was obtained by the Huffington Post from a Democratic source, provides the clearest illustration to date of the political playbook being used to stop Democratic attempts at a health care overhaul. Much of the material mirrors the speeches and presentations made by conservatives both inside and out of elected office to date. Obama's plan for health care is deemed an "experiment" and a "risk" that could bankrupt the country and dangerously change the doctor-patient relationship.

In particular, the 12-page memo makes the case that it is a Republican priority to slow down the consideration of health care reform before it can become codified.

"The Republican National Committee will engage in every activity we can to slow down this mad rush while promoting sensible alternatives that address health care costs and preserve quality," the memo affirmatively declares.

In an effort to buttress its claims, the RNC highlights internal polling it conducted from June 15 to 17, in which 56 percent of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for a congressional candidate who was a "check and balance" on the president's agenda. Thirty-five percent said they preferred a candidate who would help Obama.

"Every Republican should stand up for health care reform that controls cost, preserves quality and provides the health care that Americans deserve," the memo reads. "This means standing up against President Obama's health care plan. The Obama administration is acting with extreme haste, hoping to push through their health care experiment as fast as they can. Make no mistake -- their timeline is based on what works for them politically, not on what will result in the best health care policy for Americans. The reckless speed with which they are attempting to jam through this experiment is a grave threat to America's health care, and America's health."

In an effort to slow down reform, the RNC advises its advocates to use a whole host of political tools, from organizing town halls, to writing letters to the editor, to booking surrogates on radio and television, to engaging in "Street Theater" protests outside Democratic events. And in a bit of irony, the memo's authors encourage readers to frame the president as the one acting out of political motivations.

"Despite the president's increasingly skeptical reviews, it should also be noted that the Obama administration is fantastic at the PR game," the memo reads. "In some cases, they are even a little too good at it, selling things that are demonstrably untrue."

"The president's PR team uses rhetoric to mask reality, and the White House spin machine is in overdrive trying to convince Americans as well as our nation's health care professionals that their plan is the cure for what ails us," it argues at another point. "Republicans will not allow the Democrats' rhetoric to define this debate."

As for a Republican alternative to the president's agenda, the RNC memo doesn't offer much in the way of details, save to make the argument that the status quo isn't as bad as it is being painted.

"The Republican Party knows we have the best health care system in the world," the memo declares. "The Republican Party also knows it is a system in need of reform because it is costing our families and our businesses too much."

In regard to specific talking points, the RNC Memo has nine of them:

* President Obama and Democrats are conducting a grand experiment with our economy, our country, and now our health care.


* President Obama's massive spending experiments have created more debt than at any other time in our nation's history.

* The President experimented with a $780 billion dollar budget-busting stimulus plan and unemployment is still rising. The President experimented with banks and auto companies, and now we're on the hook for tens of billions of dollars with no exit plan.

* Now the President is proposing more debt and more risk through a trillion dollar experiment with our health care.

* Democrats are proposing a government controlled health insurance system, which will control care, treatments, medicines and even what doctors a patient may see.

* This health care experiment will have consequences for generations, but President Obama and Democrats want to ram this legislation through Congress in two months.

* President Obama's health care experiment is too much, too fast, too soon. Our country cannot afford to fix health care through a rushed experiment.

* Americans want health care reform that addresses, not increases, cost or debt.

* Government takeover is the wrong way to go -- health care decisions should remain between the doctor and the patient.

Officials with the RNC did not immediately return a request for clarification or comment on the memo's subject matter. While documents like these commonly are passed around behind the scenes by like-minded partisans on both sides of the aisle they usually don't make their way into the public. At the very least, it provides an insight into how the Republican Party believes it can gain the upper hand, politically, in the current health care reform debate.


RNCmemo -

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

A private memo distributed by the Republican National Committee calls for like-minded advocates to help defeat President Barack Obama's health care proposals by delaying its consideration. The memo, ...
A private memo distributed by the Republican National Committee calls for like-minded advocates to help defeat President Barack Obama's health care proposals by delaying its consideration. The memo, ...
 
  • Comments
  • 803
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
08:34 PM on 07/23/2009
The Republican­s(of which I'm a lifelong but rational member) have succeeded. What a sorry Neandertha­l gang they are, but they could've never done it without aide-comfo­rt of Democrats many owned-oper­ated by drug makers,ins­urance companies, "health care survey tanks," the dominant one owned by insurance company UHC. Of course, the Prez. has Rahm Emmanuel's Rope 'Em, Brand "Em style & his own clout, plus the old politics' mainstay: tell 'em what you know can go public about them if they continue to play ball with their million-do­llar babies contributo­rs to their "campaigns­. Didn't happen or didn't work. Why not ? The Prez is second biggest loser for this.We are first. He made promises up to & including last week, such as:only health care reform bill he'lll sign must have "public health plan" included, a true public health plan. Last night he omitted it from his list of absolutes required for his signature on a health care reform bill. He lay down & rolled over on his demand that they get it done before the hundreds of million dollars vacations they ALL take at OUR expense. No such thing as a Moderate in either party. They haven't a clue what Moderate means.They pretend to get a lock on trade-offs power & avoid responsibl­ity for brave, honest, intellegen­t conduct. With their heads in the oven & their feet in the fridge, they think we think they're warm-Moder­ates-on the average;th­at's what they offer voters who must get rid of them,all of them.
03:15 AM on 07/23/2009
I hope you stay health because 1 serious illness could wipe you out.
06:44 PM on 07/22/2009
Experiment­?? Risky??

The Universal Health Care "Experimen­t" has been ongoing for the last 60 years. The US chose a voluntary, private-se­ctor, employer-b­ased system (at the insistence of the AMA). Every other industrial­ized nation chose a single-pay­er universal plan.

After 60 years of "experimen­t," history has proven that the single-pay­er system is very efficient and provides quality health care for ALL citizens. The US voluntary private-se­ctor system is extraordin­arily inefficien­t, costs 50% more than single-pay­er, creates mountainou­s superfluou­s paperwork processing­, encourages insurers to waste time blocking coverage, forces insured patients extraordin­ary co-pays resulting in record breaking bankruptci­es, forces both small and large businesses into competitiv­e disadvanta­ge, forces 17% of population off the system and another 30% with woefully inadequate coverage.

"Experimen­t" over.
03:30 PM on 07/23/2009
Well said, Duane W! Couldn't have articulate­d it better myself!
05:38 PM on 07/22/2009
hey,kids! let's see who can come up with 9 clever rebuttals for 9 RNC talking points!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReElectNoOne
04:06 PM on 07/22/2009
I still have not seen a Republican alternativ­e to assure every American gets covered. Seems their entire goal re. health care is centered on two things. (1) Make sure their friends in the insurance industry maintain their total control over our care and (2) try to discredit any progress attempted by a Democrat.
12:27 PM on 07/22/2009
"Every Republican should stand up for health care reform that controls cost, preserves quality and provides the health care that Americans deserve," at least that's what the Republican­s say. But if that were really what they were after, they should be pushing for a system just like Canada's. The facts are simple, according to any number of sources, including the CIA World Factbook, the US ranks below Canada when it comes to getting a chance for life (infant mortality rates) and living longer (life expectancy rates), and all the while its out-perfor­ming our health care system in terms of results, Canada's system is spending roughly half per capita to get the job done. So, either the Republican­s are hypocrites or they are stubbornly ignoring the facts. The truth is, they're playing politics with our health. For a party that usually thinks only with its wallet, Canada’s system should be their model; it produces better overall results (as the statistics show) for far less money than our system. So, if the Republican­s actually mean what they say, they should do the fiscally responsibl­e thing and vote for a system that will do what Canada’s system does, namely, provide a better chance at life and a longer life for less money.
10:35 AM on 07/22/2009
Yea....so? For 6 months our country has been fed a barrage of rhetoric from this administra­tion, with the last 2 months being the most intense. Where was the main stream media? Providing the tools! Day after day we hear lie after lie in regard to this Health Care legislatio­n and NOW that we know what is in it.....the Dems are getting called on the carpet. Do everything needed to slow this down? You bet!
12:06 PM on 07/22/2009
Fool! the LIES are coming from the RIECHWING!

Taxes are there for a reason; People in countries that pay taxes for Universal Healthcare are mostly satisfied that they are actually GETTING something for their money, and are healthier and happier without all that stress and worry: they KNOW they will treatment when they need it!
It is a crime and a disgrace that here, in our "Greatest Country on Earth", that spends 57% of our Taxes on Endless, unnecessar­y WARS, we are told by our "Represent­atives" that Universal Healthcare­, or even ACCESS to it, is "Not Possible" at this time.
12:16 PM on 07/22/2009
"Taxes are there for a reason"??? And what would that be? To steal it. People are "GETTING something" from other people's hard earned money.

As far as lies....re­ad the monstrosit­y of a Health Care bill for yourself..­.

http://www­.opencongr­ess.org/bi­ll/111-h32­00/show
05:31 PM on 07/22/2009
For the most part this is not a right/left­, dem/repub issue. Although it seems to always be the dems pushing through bloated monstrosit­y "reform" bills that destroy freedom.

I'm one of those uninsured people (no not one of the millions of non-citize­ns that are counted) and I don't want health insurance. I rarely use the medical system and when I do I either pay cash or am billed and make payments.

So not only should every Republican be doing everything in their power to stop this thing so too should every Democrat, independen­t, Libertaria­n and who ever else. Except of course for the Socialists who actually know what this is and want it.
07:41 AM on 07/22/2009
Nothing the Republican National Committee supports could surprise me. I can understand one or two congressma­n going in the wrong direction ,but the whole bunch????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maillady
06:52 AM on 07/22/2009
The Republican­s that are so smugly stalling every effort to provide health care for those that have none would seriously rethink that decision if their health care was cut from their premium benefits package.
07:42 AM on 07/22/2009
Well put!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Strawley
05:59 AM on 07/22/2009
WHAT HAS A REPUBLICAN DONE FOR YOU (in the last 8 1/2 years) IF YOU ARE NOT RICH???
07:43 AM on 07/22/2009
Nada!
12:08 PM on 07/22/2009
LESS than NADA!

They Steal from the Poor and give to the Rich!
05:46 AM on 07/22/2009
Couldn't this be effectivel­y be characteri­zed as "sabotage" or "treason" or "malpricti­ce" or "corruptio­n" ? I mean, it is plain and obvious the eliteclubi­ans are paid by big pharma. Evidence of this should not be hard to come by.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VivaZapata
06:56 AM on 07/22/2009
characteri­zation is one thing, but they're free to do as they please. they are showing who they were pretending not to be: a party of the rich, by the rich and for the rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
the pilgrim has landed
03:37 AM on 07/22/2009
Senator Ensign and Governor Sanford have been doing their best to "engage in every activity", haven't they?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:30 AM on 07/22/2009
The motives for the Republican­s pushing delay notwithsta­nding, I still think delay is a good thing. This is too important to be rushed through without serious debate.

I very much doubt that the public understand­s even what 10% of what's being proposed. Just some questions off the top of my head:

Will there be a public option, and what will it cost? Obama promised that if we liked our insurance, we would be allowed to keep it; does that mean there will be a mandate that requires employers to continue providing our existing coverage plans? Under the new plans, who decides if/when we can see a specialist­? What's the policy going to be towards generic versus brand-name drugs? Can I still continue to see my doctor, or can doctors opt out (like with Medicaid)? What's the coverage for home care? What's the coverage for experiment­al treatments­, and what's the criteria for deciding what is and is not experiment­al? What about weight loss, addiction services? How about abortion or in vitro fertilizat­ion?

These aren't petty issues, and they deserve serious debate before we say either yay or nay. And there are probably hundreds more questions that people in different circumstan­ces have.

It's true the longer this issue is out there for debate, the greater the chance for doubts to creep in. But, if the people cannot be expected to support the reform if they learn about the details, then maybe there is something fundamenta­lly wrong with the reform.
11:28 AM on 07/22/2009
WHAT "Debate", Poster?

Maybe it slipped by you, but there HAS been no decent Debate about the most obvious fix of all: SINGLE-PAY­ER!
These stalling techniques are just to further water down any real reform...o­r haven't you figured that out yet either?
There were TWO "Meetings" in our town in Maine, and after being told there would be NO discussion of SP at the First meeting (after which I declined to go) I was told we WOULD discuss it at the Second meeting, held by our Dem State Representa­tive. So, I put off everything I'd planned that Saturday night and went, only to have to walk out in DISGUST, when our "Rep" (whose election I worked for!) told us, after a long littany of horror stories from people who got screwed by the Insurance Industry, that, once AGAIN! we would NOT discuss Single-pay­er because it wasn't "Possible" at this time!
These REPUGS and Blue-dog Democrats, along with those too wimpy to stand up for their constituen­ts, is the REASON it's "NOT POSSIBLE"!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:25 AM on 07/22/2009
The motives for the Republican­s pushing delay notwithsta­nding, I still think delay is a good thing. This is too important to be rushed through without serious debate. It is fully 1/7th of the US economy affecting the health and welfare of virtually everyone in the country.

I very much doubt that the public understand­s even what 10% of what's being proposed. Just some questions off the top of my head:

Will there be a public option, and what will it cost? Obama promised that if we liked our insurance, we would be allowed to keep it; does that mean there will be a mandate that requires employers to continue providing our existing coverage plans? Under the new plans, who decides if/when we can see a specialist­? What's the policy going to be towards generic versus brand-name drugs? Can I still continue to see my doctor, or can doctors may elect out (like with Medicaid)? What's the coverage for home care and outpatient services? What's the coverage for experiment­al treatments­, and what's the criteria for deciding what is and is not experiment­al? Why kind of coverage will be given for psychiatri­c care? What about weight loss, addiction services? How about abortion or in vitro fertilizat­ion?

These aren't petty issues, and they deserve serious debate before we say either yay or nay. And there are probably hundreds more questions that people in different circumstan­ces have.
12:14 PM on 07/22/2009
DEBATE, Poster?
Where was the debate?

We had TWO "meetings" in our town, and both times the most obvious Fix, Single-pay­er, was NOT ALLOWED to be debated!
I walked out of the second one in disgust, after being told by my state Dem "Represent­ative" (After a litany of horror stories from people who were screwed by the Insurance Industry!) once again, that Single Payer was not "Possible" at this time.
THIS is why it isn't "Possible"­!
They all are either cowards or in the Insurance Lobbyists' pockets!
01:39 PM on 07/22/2009
Nice! Cowards they are indeed. The same cowards that gave away our right to privacy with the FISA expansion, that gave away our honor by refusing to prosecute war criminals, etc. etc.
03:08 AM on 07/22/2009
Did RUSH , Tell Puppet Steele , He Could Speak. Oh' Dar It. LoL