iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Flogging Women: 150 Maldivian Adulteresses To Be Flogged

First Posted: 08/22/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:40 PM ET

Maldivian Women

By Andrew Buncombe | The Independent

Almost 150 women living in the Maldives face a public flogging for indulging in extra-marital sex after being convicted by the Muslim country's conservative courts. Around 50 men also face the punishment.

Earlier this month, an 18-year-old woman fainted after she was flogged 100 times having been found guilty of having sex with two different men. The woman, who was pregnant at the time of sentencing, had her punishment deferred until after the birth of her child and the court said the teenager's pregnancy was proof of her guilt. In contrast, the accused men were acquitted, with one of them escaping punishment simply because he denied the charge.

The head of the country's Criminal Court, Judge Abdulla Mohamed, told the island's Minivan News that flogging was a deterrent and not designed to cause injury and said the person carrying out the punishment was prohibited from raising his arm higher than his shoulder. "The public should know this lady or man have done these things and they will stay away from these things," he said. As to why fewer men were prosecuted, he said: "A man, after making this problem, will go away and maybe the woman will have relations with more than one man and won't know who was responsible. Or the man denies it."

But Amnesty International's Maldives specialist, Abbas Faiz, called flogging "a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment which is banned by international human rights law. The practice is humiliating and leads to psychological as well as physical scars for those subjected to it for years. [It is] a form of torture." The most recent official statistics available to the group date from 2006 and show that a total of 184 people were sentenced to flogging for extra-marital sex under a penal code that includes elements of Sharia law. Of those 146 were women, with the majority of the punishments still to be carried out.

In the Maldives, an island nation made up of more than 1200 atolls, the issue of flogging has become a political battleground following the whipping of the teenager earlier this month outside a government building in the capital, Male. Reports said that the women required hospital treatment after she was flogged in front of a jeering crowd of men.

Since then there have been a number of demonstrations in favour of flogging and several articles published defending its use. Since the case was publicised there have been a number of demonstrations in support of flogging, some calling for the deportation of a British journalist, Maryam Omidi, who published reports of the incident in the local Minivan News. "It's hard to tell whether this is indicative of a wider feeling, because people are afraid to speak out," Omidi said. "But I had people calling me up to offer their support."

In its first free polls held last year, the Maldives elected as its president Mohammed Nasheed, a former prisoner of conscience. But campaigners say the liberally-inclined Mr Nasheed feels prevented from speaking because of his dependence on Islamist coalition allies and because of opponents who are using a debate over Sharia law as political lever.

The Islamist Adhaalath Party, which is a member of the coalition government, has denied organising these demonstrations.

Yet, some voices have spoken out. "We don't cut off the hands of all those who steal and we don't implement the death sentence so why do we continue with these very inhumane practices, especially when the statistics show that the victims are women," said MP Eva Abdulla.

Reports suggest that in recent years, many mosques in the Maldives have fallen under the influence of foreign, conservative imams. The previous president, Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, who had been Asia's longest-serving ruler and who positioned himself as the country's "defender of Islam", had sought to use the religion to bolster his dwindling. The government in turn said that more conservative forms of the religion had been able to spread as restrictions on freedom of expression were lifted.

For Mr Nasheed, a former political activist who served six terms in jail, the controversy is a severe test. While his inclinations may be of a moderniser, he remains dependent on the support of the conservative Adhaalath Party. Indeed, the party is said to have a grip on the ministry of Islamic Affairs which Mr Nasheed created last year, apparently a political reward for its support.

Last night, presidential spokesman Mohamed Zuhair told The Independent the government was committed to fulfilling its obligations to international treaties that prohibit torture. He added: "The president is holding meetings with all concerned parties to try and deal with this."


Get HuffPost World On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

By Andrew Buncombe | The Independent Almost 150 women living in the Maldives face a public flogging for indulging in extra-marital sex after being convicted by the Muslim country's conservative court...
By Andrew Buncombe | The Independent Almost 150 women living in the Maldives face a public flogging for indulging in extra-marital sex after being convicted by the Muslim country's conservative court...
Filed by Stuart Whatley  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 165
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:28 PM on 07/23/2009
Who are they having affairs with- each other???? Where is Angelina Jolie for this debacle? So much more publicity in Iraq. So many more opportunities for that sappy pout.................
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:36 PM on 07/23/2009
It would be helpful if some of the super rich and famous would make a statement about this situation, particularly as many of them go to the Maldives on vacation with significant (or not) others. Didn't Bill and Kate go there last year and Leo and Gaby?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
11:27 AM on 07/23/2009
And the guys get away scott free just by denying it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
10:09 AM on 07/23/2009
The worlds great religions are not monolithic. All have a large majority of believers tolerant of other faiths and quite willing to live in a pluralistic society of equal rights for women, secular legal systems and other features of western democracies. Unfortunately any place where the extreme fundementalist factions have local political control, dogma and authoritarian repression quickly replaces reasonableness. If women have no say in the creation or enforcement of laws - it isn't long before the system is gamed against them. The evil is not religion per se as much as it's exploitation for social control and male dominance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DocBoon
09:18 AM on 07/23/2009
What so often astonishes me is how hard it is for people to take an honest look at religion (any religion). Every time something horrendous occurs in the name of religion (and I shouldn’t need to reproduce a long list here), people jump in and claim that religion has done so much good. In reality, human compassion and sense of mutual concern has done good, not religion. You can’t credit religion for the good that is done anymore than you can claim the entertainment industry is responsible for Tyler Perry’s gracious gift to children from the Philly day camp. The credit doesn’t belong to religion; it belongs to people. We have plenty of evidence that belonging to a religion doesn’t make you a better person and that you can be a better person without belonging to a religion. Brad Pitt has helped out Katrina victims and a report recently came out saying he doesn’t believe in God. So, do we credit atheism with Pitt’s kindness? No. We credit Pitt. The same is true for religion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BunnyFooFoo
08:57 AM on 07/23/2009
Don't tell me that 100 floggings is not designed to cause injury.
08:53 AM on 07/23/2009
And yet, people continue to have extramarital affairs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:26 PM on 07/23/2009
Good point.
08:47 AM on 07/23/2009
If the so-called "Christians" who are denying others' rights in the name of "protecting traditional marriage and morals" had the courage of their convictions, this would be happening in the US. Where are the State ballots to flog adulterers? The anti-marriage equality "Christians" in the US are hypocrites. Muslim theocracies are evil, but at least they are honest about it.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Matt7
09:04 AM on 07/23/2009
So, what are you sayin? Honest evil is better than wimpy Christians?
09:42 AM on 07/23/2009
No, just showing that they are hypocrites who want to pick and choose which portions of the Bible they want to follow. What does the Bible say about adultry? A stone and a good throwing arm comes to mind.
05:25 PM on 07/23/2009
Interestingly, this pretty much sums up Nietzsche's attitude toward Islam! (Mind you, he knew basically nothing about it during his life.)

Check out ch.1 of this book for details: "The New Orientalists: Postmodern Representations of Islam from Foucault to Baudrillard" by Ian Almond

http://books.google.com/books?id=40sn3WHnIf4C
08:32 AM on 07/23/2009
When I've commented about the fascist , unelected, theocratic dictatorship in Iran I have received responses that it's their culture and that I should defer to their sensibilities and butt out.

How come I don't see any of that here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCMinistry
Your Father
10:40 AM on 07/23/2009
LOL, because here there is an inner need to to relate this to our own disgusting lifestyles. Which we promote and defend in this country to the bitter end. Our right to destroy and tear apart families, and to get down with strangers and have our body pleasured is our right without regard for the emotional harm it may cause. We are animals and have no desire to act with any higher level of restraint. SO you see to criticize this reinforces that the way we are behaving is right. And no one will argue that with you.
photo
Epiphany2b
Always waiting for the light to dawn
01:12 PM on 07/23/2009
Yet it is not possible to legislate morality. You can pass all the rules and laws against a certain behavior and mind set that you want, and it's not going to stop it. It's just going to drive it into secrecy. They way a person thinks and believes is carefully instilled in them from infancy, or otherwise influenced by life's experiences. Religious zealots or moralists aren't going to change the world through punishment.

It is interesting to note, however, that once again the theory that a man's actions are directly the result of the woman's behavior is alive and well. For every woman caught in adultery there is at least one man involved, but since they are weak willed and not responsible for their behavior, they get a free pass. What would happen, I wonder, if women refused to be a part of it. Would they be then stoned for gay activities??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:27 PM on 07/23/2009
How do you explain that 150 women are being flogged but only 50 men? Were 100 of the women lesbians?
07:47 AM on 07/23/2009
I guess Islam is still persecuting his(Muhammad) wife for calling him out.........
07:11 AM on 07/23/2009
If people were more spiritual then religous this would be a better world.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elizlucinda
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
06:59 AM on 07/23/2009
There are some terrible things done in the name of religion.. This is just another example
07:16 AM on 07/23/2009
There are a lot of great things done in the name of religion as well, but people tend to see what they want to rather than what is there...
07:27 AM on 07/23/2009
Religion is a great tool and it can and has been used for good, but the fools who actually believe the hocus pocus are tools.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
pinkyboo
Answer: 42
06:50 AM on 07/23/2009
It's 2009 right?
07:26 AM on 07/23/2009
Hope you said the same thing in response to Guantanamo Bay.

But perhaps timing is more relevant in this case, seeing as how Muslims are routinely caricatured as 'pre-modern'. Is that what you were getting at?
07:53 AM on 07/23/2009
Umm. Sounds like you're defending flogging. Is that intentional or purely accidental?

Since the flogging didn't happen at Guantanamo (that we know of), how about we stick with the story at hand.

As for Muslims being "caricatured" as "pre-modern"--I would say the BEHAVIOR certainly is. And I don't care where it happens or who's doing it--and I'm not a bigot for saying so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCMinistry
Your Father
10:41 AM on 07/23/2009
agenda much?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mono
06:50 AM on 07/23/2009
These stories are becoming staler as in the name of BEARD (All_ah) Mus-lim men will keep moles-ting young girls, 4 direct witness cannot be produced and then on top the poor girls are flogged in front of a jeering male-chauvinists after the Friday prayer.

My problem is not with people who live in stone age like Taliban but with people who migrate to America and European countries and still sing the song of Sharia law.
06:15 AM on 07/23/2009
I wonder if 4 *direct* eye-witnesses were produced in each case, as per the standards of Islamic law (excluding a confession). If not, the accuser is to be flogged 80 times.

Regarding Islamic law in general, I would have to agree with the words of the scholar below (note: 'hudud' in Islamic law refers to the class of punishments for offences mentioned by God):

"In all the four instances where the Qur’an specifies a punishment [i.e. theft, adultery, slanderous accusation and highway robbery], it also makes provisions for repentance and reform. This aspect of the hudud has been totally ignored in the juristic discourse of fiqh. Our argument is that the Qur’an has prescribed punishments for these offences which are, however, not fixed and mandatory simply because references to these punishments are immediately followed by provisions on reformation and repentance, a combination which cannot accommodate the idea of fixed and mandatory enforcement. Yet conventional fiqh has overlooked this combination and has simply opted for mandatory enforcement." (brackets mine)

("Shari'ah Law: An Introduction" by Mohammad Hashim Kamali, pp.191-92)
10:02 AM on 07/23/2009
I'm sorry but the whole requirement of 4 adult male eyewitnesses for these crimes in order for them to be prosecuted is a direct permit to commit them with impunity.

Want to beat your wife to a pulp or assault the young woman in the household next door and get away with it? Just make sure no sees it happen. Or, make sure those who do know about it are your buddies who will defend you if you unexpectedly draw the attention of the police. Which is probably not much of a risk as even if you do, you can divert their wrath towards the woman who is obviously to blame in the first place for being a bad wife or an unvirtuous young woman. Or whatever.

The problems with Sharia law practices aren't unique. Christian, Jewish, Hindu and other faith communities also inherited legal systems that cemented the victim status of various populations. But it didn't do them any good to perpetuate that, and it isn't doing Islam any good now. Either update the law or replace it with a civil system that offers the same protections to all citizens.