Capa Spanish Civil War Photo Likely Staged: Researchers

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Capa Spanish Civil War Photo Likely Staged: Researchers stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HAROLD HECKLE | 07/23/09 11:55 AM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A visitor looks at the 'Falling Militiaman' by Robert Capa at the exhibition, 'This is war! Robert Capa at work' at Museo Nacional d'Art de Catalunya, in Barcelona, Wednesday, July 22, 2009. The Robert Capa photograph of the falling Spanish Civil War militiaman that became one of the most famous and enduring images of conflict in the 20th century was probably staged, according to Spanish researchers who have studied events surrounding the picture. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)

MADRID — Robert Capa's photograph of a falling Spanish Civil War militiaman became one of the most famous and enduring images of conflict in the 20th century. Now, Spanish researchers who have studied events surrounding the picture believe it may have been staged.

When first published in September 1936 by French magazine Vu, and later in Life magazine, the caption on the legendary photojournalist's "Falling Militiaman" said it depicted the moment a Republican rifleman was mortally wounded.

The location was given as Cerro Muriano on the Cordoba front, where forces backing Gen. Francisco Franco were engaged in fierce fighting with soldiers loyal to the elected Republican government.

Now Spanish researchers say that not only was the photograph not taken where Capa said it was, but that the militiaman was most likely not shot either.

After studying the photograph and new images released as part of a traveling exhibition called "This is War" now at Barcelona's art museum, four researchers say the photographs were shot 55 kilometers (34 miles) away in an area where there was no fighting the day they were taken.

"It quickly became obvious to us that among the new photographs – 34 attributed to Capa, 6 to his companion Gerda Taro – there were four that revealed the exact place where Capa had taken the shots," filmmaker Raul Riebenbauer told The Associated Press.

Historian Francisco Moreno has taken geographical information in the photographs – the shape of seven hills, the location of two farmhouses and several roads – and found it matched exactly a hillside just east of the town of Espejo.

For Spaniards, "Falling Militiaman" is a searing reminder of a 1936-39 internal conflict that deeply divided a nation along political lines and cost at least 500,000 lives. For Capa it was the image that catapulted his career as the world's foremost war photographer.

Story continues below

The International Center of Photography, founded by Capa's brother, Cornell and custodian of his legacy, has spent 25 years trying to ascertain the veracity of the image, director Buzz Hartshorn told The AP.

"Capa was partisan, he believed in the anti-fascist cause and he saw Spain as one of the last places where you could make a stand," said Hartshorn. He said the truth behind the picture was almost certainly "unknowable."

Filmmaker Riebenbauer said he and colleagues worked extensively with forensic doctors and found puzzling aspects to the photograph which they aired in a film called "The Shadow of the Iceberg."

Among other issues, they find it troubling there is no evidence of a bullet wound in the photograph.

That Vu should have published a separate Capa photograph of another militiaman shot dead at the exact same hillside spot has also always raised eyebrows. Even Capa's otherwise reverential biographer Richard Whelan had doubts about "Falling Militiaman."

"I have wrestled with the dilemma of how to deal with a photograph that one believes to be genuine but that one cannot know with absolute certainty to be a truthful documentation," Whelan wrote in his book, "This Is War! Robert Capa at work."

To David Valsells, curator of the Barcelona show, the image reveals the full historical context of war photography at the time.

Capa and Taro – who co-founded Magnum Photos – had recently arrived in Spain keen to make their names, he said.

"They traveled to the Cordoba front bearing safe passages issued by the Republican government's Barcelona-based Propaganda Commissariat," said Valsells, raising the issue that embedded photographers on both sides of the conflict were required to take carefully staged shots for propaganda purposes.

No one doubts Capa's commitment, said Riebenbauer.

Taro – who also photographed in Cordoba – was killed in Spain by a tank while Capa – whose motto had been: "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough" – died when he stepped on a land mine in Vietnam, camera in hand.

MADRID — Robert Capa's photograph of a falling Spanish Civil War militiaman became one of the most famous and enduring images of conflict in the 20th century. Now, Spanish researchers who have s...
MADRID — Robert Capa's photograph of a falling Spanish Civil War militiaman became one of the most famous and enduring images of conflict in the 20th century. Now, Spanish researchers who have s...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
12
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 81 fans permalink

You know what's really more important ?

The picture that stands at the heading of this topic - The World - of the little boy with the bazooka.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 07/24/2009
- LMPE I'm a Fan of LMPE 74 fans permalink

Peter Weir's "Gallipoli" ended with a scene based on that photo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 07/23/2009

"Gallipoli" was also staged.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 07/23/2009
- wm1066 I'm a Fan of wm1066 34 fans permalink
photo

With film technology Capra didn't see his proof sheets right away, it could have been days before he got back to a dark room to process his film, so if he got the place wrong or the day wrong, big deal, he was in a theater of war, he was probably was still shaking from the experience.
And as far as not seeing a wound, it could be on the side of the body thats hidden from the viewer, and blood might not show right away, he is after all just getting shot. I would say he got hit on his left side of the front of his body, maybe right in the heart, his left side is being twisted to the left.
Capra never had a history of faking images so why would he do it with this shot?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 07/23/2009
- PWM I'm a Fan of PWM 282 fans permalink
photo

I always suspected it was staged. What are the odds of a cameraman being in the right place at the right time for that shot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 07/23/2009
- Weirdwriter I'm a Fan of Weirdwriter 330 fans permalink
photo

The photographer was "partisan," so the photo had to have been staged, is that the reasoning?

I would say if staging a photo was not in character for Capa, then its authenticity should be given the benefit of the doubt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 07/23/2009
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 50 fans permalink

Typo festival: Finding should read finding; raisin should read raising. I think that I'd be better off looking for the Hindi porno comic strip or the nude photo(s) & video of popular female sports reporter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 07/23/2009
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 50 fans permalink

These finding may be used to once again show that truth is the 1st casualty of a war. The photo(s) of Marines raisin a flag on Iwo.. was a recreation of the alleged event. One wonders if any photo Brady & his employees took in the US Civil War wasn't staged.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 07/23/2009

"The photo(s) of Marines raisin a flag on Iwo.. was a recreation of the alleged event."

On February 23, 1945, two flags were raised on Mount Suribachi. The first was a smaller one that was replaced by a larger one a few hours later.

Those who planted the larger, replacement flag were just as gallant and inspiring as those who raised the smaller one. They were still engaged in combat, and combat operations were still going on throughout the island. The difference is that the larger flag could be seen by more troops on land, at sea, and in the air. The battle was still underway and it provided inspiration for those who were still fighting it.

It's true that a photograph taken of the raising of the second flag was later reproduced as an inspiration to others. The Marine Corps, however, has never claimed that there was only one flag raising on Iwo Jima or on any of the other islands. More than one flag could have been raised on any of the islands at any time. If you concluded that only one flag could be raised on Iwo Jima or that only one flag could be raised in the Pacific, you did so without any facts.

This was not an "alleged event."

It certainly was not "a recreation of the alleged event."

No raisins were involved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 07/23/2009
- ICorpsDoc I'm a Fan of ICorpsDoc 17 fans permalink

Read some history.

Two flags were raised. Both while under fire. The 2nd not a recreation of anything. They wanted a much larger flag up. For all in the area to see.

One picture turned out to be really good. The other is well beyond good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 07/23/2009

The most compelling evidence I've heard for either argument was that proposed by a forensic scientist who noted the relaxed hand, claiming that a live human being would reflexively use that hand to try to break his fall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 07/23/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect