Gavin Newsom Warns of Dire Results Without Health Care Reform

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Gavin Newsom Warns of Dire Results Without Health Care Reform stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 07-24-09 05:45 PM   |   Updated: 08-24-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Newsom

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom warned on Friday that local governments throughout the country would find themselves bankrupt if the current health care crisis is allowed to continue. .

In an interview with the Huffington Post, the 2010 Democratic gubernatorial candidate also urged the White House to simplify its health care message, and warned Congress that further delays could be politically fatal.

"There is a growing concern with what is happening and what is not happening," Newsom said. "There is a concern about this being delayed past the recess and what that means.... All of us are experiencing state budget cuts. And the fact is when the president talks about the status quo impacting our budgets, he talks about it on the federal level. But at the end of the day it is the local budgets being impacted."

This Congress has "gotten farther than any other Congress ever has," he added. " They are so close. We cannot afford to make a 90-yard dash and then not finish. We are just concerned that if they do go on recess [without getting bills passed in each chamber] that all of that will be lost. It just emboldens the opposition. And it is much easier to oppose something than to support something."

Newsom, who is taking a leading role among mayors in pushing for the president's reform agenda, made his remarks just minutes after he participated in a phone conference with dozens of other mayors from across the country along with representatives from the White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office. Over 100 mayors, Republicans and Democrats alike, launched a national campaign on Friday in support of Obama's health care reform effort -- including a public option for insurance coverage. As a template for their effort, he cited the work done by the U.S. Conference of Mayors in combating climate change after the United States pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol agreement.

"Right now, there are more voices of opposition than support that we are hearing out there," he said. "And I think that there are thousands of mayors that literally can't afford this thing dragging out."

The call with the White House and the Speaker's office, Newsom said, was generally bullish on health care reform's prospects. But even he, an erstwhile supporter of the administration, wasn't without critiques of the president's approach to getting legislation passed.

"I am immensely approving of what the president is doing and I am extraordinarily impressed with his knowledge of the issue," Newsom said. "But sometime you listen to him and the average person... comes away a little confused because this is very complicated," he said. "And I think in order to sell that to a broader audience we do need to simplify the message in terms of what it does and how we pay for it."

The effort being launched by Newsom and his colleagues is, in part, aimed at simplifying and localizing the debate for the White House. As chair of the U.S. Conference of Mayors Health Care Reform Task Force, Newsom is urging other mayors to introduce resolutions in their city councils to support the administration's health care reform principles. He also called for an increased grassroots efforts -- including rallies, op-eds, and town halls -- focused on passing health care legislation in the weeks and potentially months ahead.

The goal, he said, was to put local pressure on national officials. But for a case study, Newsom didn't need to look further than his own state. Senator Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., remains non-committal on a public option for insurance coverage, something both Newsom and the White House vehemently support. Asked whether he would push his fellow California Democrat and potential gubernatorial opponent in the weeks ahead, Newsom noted that San Francisco -- where Feinstein herself was once mayor -- currently "has the only public option in America" and a successful one at that. "Nearly 75 percent of our previously uninsured residents are now in the program," he said.


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!


"We are still counting on [Feinstein's] support," Newsom said, "and I have confidence she will"

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom warned on Friday that local governments throughout the country would find themselves bankrupt if the current health care crisis is allowed to continue. . In an interv...
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom warned on Friday that local governments throughout the country would find themselves bankrupt if the current health care crisis is allowed to continue. . In an interv...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
251
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

Gavin Newsom is a fraud. The San Francisco Chronicle, which is his hometown paper that endorsed him twice for mayor, recently did an exposé showing how Newsom now is taking credit for successful policies -- such as Healthy San Francisco -- which he actually opposed. Please read this:

"Newsom on the stump: facts - or exaggeration"
by Carla Marinucci, Joe Garofoli,Heather Knight San Francisco Chronicle, July 22, 2009 www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/22/MNL118S5QA.DTL

As someone who lives in SF, I can tell you that Newsom has shown little leadership for the last eight years. He is one of those "leaders" that says/does things based on what the polls tell him. He and his political consultant, Eric Jaye, have been plotting his every move up the career ladder, either the U.S. Senate or Governor, as their guide. Though a few areas where I give him some credit for showing leadership are on gay marriage and green urban policies (though the latter mostly have been symbolic, he hasn't been willing to push anything that really might impact San Francisco's energy usage).

Having watched him as mayor, I can’t imagine Newsom as governor. I realize Jerry Brown does not exactly inspire either -- is this the best that the Democratic Party can do? At any rate, read the Chronicle article so you can learn more about the TRUE Gavin Newsom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 07/27/2009

Gavin is the dems Sarah palin..an incompetent opportunist

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 07/27/2009
- jmundstuk I'm a Fan of jmundstuk 8 fans permalink
photo

Why is it that Newsom is suddenly blogging frequently on HuffPost? Sure seems like someone is supporting him for Gov.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 AM on 07/27/2009
- Acidic I'm a Fan of Acidic 6 fans permalink

And?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 AM on 07/27/2009
photo

And? squared..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 07/27/2009

And he's just machine politics as usual--ambtion without accountability--he had nothing to do with writing or negotiating Healthy SF and in fact was against key components of it. Thje credit goes to Tom Ammiano who should be running for Gov

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 07/27/2009

In addition to his point about local governments, I wonder if any or all of the following could happen:

> Plan premiums/copays hit the unaffordability "tipping point" (for the core segment of the wage "bell curve"), resulting in MASS uninsured. (we ain't seen nothing yet)

> Corresponding bloat of Medicaid/ Medicare/ State Plans enrollment and costs.

> Popping of the "Healthcare Bubble-- Big Healthcare profitability declines drastically due to unending enrollment drops. (A shift of their core business to "Medicaid/Medicare Provider" is possible.. but at drastically reduced profit margin.)

> NGO relief workers - basically "healthcare tents" as featured in the Bill Moyers segment - becomes commonplace. Possible growth of small-scale healthcare nonprofits. Possible expansion of "Walmart/Walgreens" care.

> Global loss of confidence in US... belief/acceptance that US is unable to control budget / protect its citizens. Corresponding decline of foreign investment, possibly divestment. Possible collapse of dollar.

> Longer-term: state enactments of right-to-die; cottage industry of suicide clinics/physicians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 07/27/2009
- MIKEBC I'm a Fan of MIKEBC 26 fans permalink
photo

Hey americans! do you like double didget healthcare cost increases every year? do you like spending up to 1/3 of your income for healthcare expenses? do you like having some insurance company bigshot getting between you and your doctor? well this is the kind of life the republicans want for you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 07/26/2009
- DosGatos2 I'm a Fan of DosGatos2 23 fans permalink

If we do not pass health care reform in this country, we will remain the only developed nation without such a program, and still have the highest per capita spending on health care in the world, with one-quarter of the population "self-insured" and vulnerable to losing a lifetime of savings (or bankruptcy) due to one catastrophic health event. Shame on us.

The health benefits of EVERY member of Congress should be suspended during the August recess and not reinstated until they have passed single payer legislation. If our representatives got to experience the feeling of being self-insured for health expenses for a time, perhaps they would get busy passing that reform bill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 07/26/2009
- Raster I'm a Fan of Raster 23 fans permalink

That might be the "next big thing" after whatever health care reform that isn't passes Congress. An avalanche of municipal and county government bankruptcies, along with public hospitals, might serve as the shock that's needed to get the US on the road to a national single payer health insurance system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 07/26/2009
- PaxEterna I'm a Fan of PaxEterna 65 fans permalink

Gavin, like Obama, is trying to be on the right side of history, aka, the politically correct side, but doesn't want to get his hands dirty.

Why doesn't he just come out and say that we need Single Payer?

Why doesn't Obama?

Why doesn't anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 07/26/2009
- Raster I'm a Fan of Raster 23 fans permalink

Reason 1 is the Dem "Leadership" is tentative and timorous by definition, or haven't you noticed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 07/26/2009
- bobsee I'm a Fan of bobsee 18 fans permalink

because they have all received a lot of money from the health care industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 07/26/2009
- slowtono I'm a Fan of slowtono 5 fans permalink

No Gavin not all states and local governments are going broke, that's something California is going to have to figure out and testify to. Why?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 07/25/2009
- rxvette I'm a Fan of rxvette 34 fans permalink

As a medical professional and self conscious health person I've come up with solutions not only for reforming the health care system but for things that we as individuals can do to decrease our health care costs. I've included many references in my article for others to pursue if they wish as well. You can read it hear - http://bit.ly/9QLV8

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 07/25/2009
- stylenease I'm a Fan of stylenease 18 fans permalink
photo

...but what about those people with serious preexisting conditions? How does "your plan" help anyone who already has many thousands in fixed costs for medication annually?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 07/26/2009
- julia23 I'm a Fan of julia23 27 fans permalink
photo

Part of his plan is a public option that anyone can buy into. I don't see how its different from the one proposed, just more emphases on prevention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 07/26/2009
- rxvette I'm a Fan of rxvette 34 fans permalink

Maybe you didn't see the part about pre-existing conditions being eliminated from any public or private plans language. Also there would be no caps on annual or lifetime benefits. It's all covered in there if you glance over it again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 07/26/2009
- jmundstuk I'm a Fan of jmundstuk 8 fans permalink
photo

I warn of dire consequences if Newsom is nominated by the Dems for gov.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 07/25/2009
- Tulka2 I'm a Fan of Tulka2 250 fans permalink
photo

Oh, yeah. Because California is doing so well now?

I was in California for a few years at the time the old folks decided to pass Prop 13, the beginning of all California's troubles. That's when the "greatest generation" decided they would have no part in paying for the future. All downhill from there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 07/25/2009
- Nonpartay I'm a Fan of Nonpartay 84 fans permalink
photo

Ain't that the truth? And now I hear that Prop 13 benefits can be passed down as an inheritance. We'll never get out of this mess until that law goes away, as well as quite a few other disasters, like term limits. Sheesh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 07/25/2009
- jmundstuk I'm a Fan of jmundstuk 8 fans permalink
photo

I see what you're saying about old folks but Prop 13 passed by a very large margin. It's not just the old folks; the problem is deeper. Also recall that at that time, property values were shooting up and under existing law, assessments and taxes went up concurrently. Long-time homeowners, old people if you will, were finding themselves being taxed out of their homes. It was also the front edge of the conservative, anti-tax wave that took over politics in the U.S. Due respect, but you don't have the facts and are blaming simplistically.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 07/27/2009
- blaharumph I'm a Fan of blaharumph 14 fans permalink
photo

link please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 07/26/2009
- jmundstuk I'm a Fan of jmundstuk 8 fans permalink
photo

A bit of a snark based on the article headline. Dire consequences because first, he would lose, giving us Meg Whitman or somebody; and second, because I think he panders, does not have a strong character, and is not reliable in general. The affair with best friend's wife pretty much tore it for me, but there are policy matters that I think show bad judgment. For example, the "here it comes" outburst on same-sex marriage. Not smart and we now see, very not helpful. Okay?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 07/27/2009

Eliminate the words 'option' and 'competition' from the package. Single payer is the answer.
Private insurers and pharmaceuticals had their shot and showed us exactly where their priorities lie--and it's certainly nothing to do with health care for all.
Coverage is expensive now, yet these latter day robber barons still retain the ability to refuse that coverage and still accept our premiums.
Single payer will not be more expensive and will offer quality health care. Those citizens who deny this reasoning, have coverage--this is the real tragedy. It's not really so much that they deny the reasoning, as they are complacent­--believin­g they are secure in their circumstances, not understanding that when they really need coverage (i.e.; when they've suffered a catastrophic injury or disease that will prevent them from earning the living required to pay the premiums) it is a foregone conclusion that they will not be able to obtain it--it is a foregone conclusion that the insurer, at some point, will deny they even exist. Single payer eliminates this possibility. Sure, there'll always be problems, but the ones that may occur with single payer are much more palatable than the ones that are force fed to us with private insurers and conglomerate pharmaceuticals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 07/25/2009

Gavin is hot!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 07/25/2009
- jmundstuk I'm a Fan of jmundstuk 8 fans permalink
photo

And a jerk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 07/25/2009
- chronic I'm a Fan of chronic 71 fans permalink
photo

He said Gavin, not you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 07/25/2009

Hot, hot, hot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 07/25/2009
- layman I'm a Fan of layman 21 fans permalink

going around try to s c r e w other people's wives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 07/25/2009

You think healthcare is expensive now? Just wait until its FREE!!!

Trickle Up Poverty!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 07/25/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

Well someone has to pay for it. Do you think the money comes out of thin air? Have fun with those 50% tax rates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 07/25/2009
- Tulka2 I'm a Fan of Tulka2 250 fans permalink
photo

Where do you get those numbers? Do you have any interest in the truth? Are you aware Eisenhower taxed millionaires at the rate of 10%? The Dems are considering a rate for millionaires of 3 to 5 %. Where is the patriotism of rich Americans? Only in America could they have acquired such a fortune and now they act like ingrates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 07/25/2009

Actually starkcr31 we could save 100 billion dollars a year in taxes just by putting all gov. employees (federal, state, and local) into a single payer system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 07/25/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

Everything's an emergency with these liberals. We've had the same health care system for 60 years but if this health care reform is not passed WITHIN DAYS, the results will be CATASTROPHIC! AHH! It was the same deal with the "stimulus package". If that hadn't been passed THAT DAY, our economy would have been in cinders. That's funny because only 5% has been spent so far and most of it isn't even accounted for. Man, I'm glad our economy was saved due to Obama's superior economic skills.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 07/25/2009
photo

Just like the Iraq war with THOSE conservatives.

Question: What EXATELY did Dick & George see in those "top secret" memos that the other world leaders didn't see?

Answer: Oil for Dick & revenge for George's dad. Makes me wonder if Jr, isn't still looking for dad's approval.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 07/25/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

I wouldn't know, I didn't see the memos. Did you? If not, you have no leg to stand on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 07/26/2009
photo

Just like the Iraq war with THOSE conservatives.

Question: What EXATELY did Dick & George see in those "top secret" memos that the other world leaders didn't see?

Answer: Oil for Dick & revenge for George's dad. Makes me wonder if Jr, isn't still looking for dad's approval.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 07/25/2009
- bbkenn92 I'm a Fan of bbkenn92 8 fans permalink
photo

Obviously this economic crisis has nothing to do with Republican control of Congress and the White house for 6 out of the 8 years of office that Bush was in charge of. Instead of using the surplus he was left with for continuing to pay down the deficit which is what Clinton was doing, he launches 2 wars, one justified (Afghanistan) and one fake (Iraq), and does NOTHING to reign in spending, and you have the gall to criticize Obama's attempts to do something???? You are nothing but a hypocrite. I am sure you have good health care, or you would not be saying this. My question is, are you sure it will be there for you if we don't do anything now, and you, God forbid, get a health concern that could cost your insurance company millions of dollars. Are you sure, you won't be dropped? Well millions of Americans are experience just that and for them it is catastrophic and why now, because we know that every delay leads to INACTION. The republicans have said outright that their goal is to DELAY, DELAY and DEFEAT. You've bought into their talking points.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 07/25/2009
- starkcr31 I'm a Fan of starkcr31 14 fans permalink
photo

I have the gall to criticize Obama for spending all of our money on pork and trying to get his broken bills passed before anyone can read it? Yes, I do, because he's destroying the country. I'm not talking about what Bush did. He screwed up too. I'm all for health care reform, but how about we do it right instead? Sound good?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 07/25/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect