iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Schwarzenegger Terminates Funding For Child Welfare, AIDS Prevention

JUDY LIN   07/28/09 10:57 PM ET   AP

Arnold

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a revised $85 billion budget Tuesday that he said contained "the good, the bad and the ugly," including additional cuts to child welfare programs, health care for the poor and AIDS prevention efforts.

Schwarzenegger used his line-item veto authority to save an additional $656 million that will let the state restore a reserve fund he said is needed for tough times.

Democrats immediately protested the social spending reductions and threatened to block his political agenda during his final months in office.

"This kind of game playing by the governor doesn't bode well for success in terms of water, corrections, pensions or any of the other items the he is looking to in order to build some kind of real legacy," Assembly Speaker Karen Bass said.

The new budget should help the state's cash crisis. It remained unclear, however, how soon the state could stop issuing thousands of IOUs to vendors and contractors.

The governor's vetoes included $80 million from child welfare programs; $61 million from county funding to administer Medi-Cal, California's version of Medicaid; $52 million from AIDS prevention and treatment; $50 million from Healthy Families, the low-cost health insurance program for poor children; and $6.2 million more from state parks.

"Those are ugly cuts and I'm the only one that is really responsible for those cuts because the Legislature left, they didn't want to make those cuts," he said after signing the budget in his office.

Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, a Democrat who negotiated the original budget compromise with Schwarzenegger, immediately questioned the legality of many of the governor's vetoes.

"We will fight to restore every dollar of additional cuts to health and human services," Steinberg said in a written statement. "This is not the last word."

The vetoes also drew sharp criticism from advocates who said more children would go without insurance, foster families would receive less money and the state would cut HIV/AIDS testing.

"The governor's heartless act is not only deadly, but guaranteed to cost California taxpayers millions more in the future," said Michael Weinstein, president of AIDS Healthcare Foundation, in a statement.

Schwarzenegger called the budget package aimed at balancing the state's budget through June 30, 2010, the toughest since he took office in 2003. Still, the Republican governor said the package included reforms he has long sought and forces government to live within its means.

He said additional cuts were needed to build a $500 million reserve fund after the state Assembly rejected about $1.1 billion in revenues from local transportation funding and by allowing new offshore oil drilling.

With much of state spending tied up by federal and constitutional requirements, the Schwarzenegger administration wants to ensure the state has a cash cushion in case of emergencies such as earthquakes and wildfires.

California's economy has been hit by the housing market slump and high unemployment, and the latest efforts to close a $26 billion shortfall came just five months after lawmakers and the governor ended months of negotiations to close a previous $42 billion deficit.

The governor and lawmakers hope the revised spending plan will end California's cash crisis and let the state stop issuing IOUs. As of Monday, the state had handed out nearly 210,000 registered warrants worth $1 billion, according to the controller's office.

Schwarzenegger's finance director, Michael Genest, said it would take days for finance officials to finish analyzing the revised budget's impact on cash flow.

"It's not going to happen overnight, but they're going to work on it," Schwarzenegger said of Genest and the state treasurer and controller.

Genest warned that even with the revised budget deal, California will need to borrow $8 billion to $10 billion to cover its cash needs this year, and the state is likely to face another $7 billion to $8 billion deficit in the 2010-11 fiscal year.

Matt Fabian, a bond analyst at Municipal Market Advisors, based in Concord, Mass., said California's plan was filled with accounting tricks and will likely do little to improve the state's poor credit rating.

Among the questionable maneuvers in the plan, the state will accelerate income tax withholding by 10 percent to inflate revenues during the year and shift state employee payroll by one day for a paper savings of $1.2 billion. The state also will sell a portion of the state's workers compensation insurance business for $1 billion, which the Legislature's nonpartisan analyst doubts could be done within the fiscal year.

Fitch Ratings rates California's general obligation bond debt at "BBB," which is still investment-grade. Most states have a higher-quality "AAA" or "AA" ratings.

The package lawmakers agreed to included about $15 billion in spending cuts, as well as reforms that include tougher sanctions on CalWORKS recipients who don't meet work requirements. Also, in-home support workers will have to undergo background checks and have their fingerprints taken.

In earlier rounds of cuts, California reduced Medi-Cal reimbursement rates for health care providers and eliminated optional benefits such as dental and eye care for adult recipients.

With the vetoes announced Tuesday, the cut to California's state parks totals about $14 million. Genest said that will likely force as many as 100 of the state's 279 parks, beaches and attractions to close, although he cautioned that figure wasn't firm.

State parks director Ruth Coleman said closures will begin after Labor Day but the state was actively seeking partners, including cities and counties, to take over some parks. She said Hearst Castle and urban beach parks would be exempt.

"We're not willing to give up on these parks," Coleman said. "We're hoping Californians will step up in saving these parks."

The additional cuts Schwarzenegger made Tuesday also include $37.5 million from the In-Home Supportive Services program, $50 million from the Early Start program to screen children for developmental disabilities, and more than $6 million in cuts from programs for the aging.

For the first time since the recession began in late 2007, the state will reduce county funding for child protection and foster care services. Under the governor's cut to AIDS prevention and treatment, Genest said the state will continue to provide patients with drugs and monitor the spread of the disease.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Rachel Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,896
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (76 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chantal Sicile-Kira
Author, Advocate, Founder of AutismCollege.com
10:09 PM on 08/04/2009
You know, with all this bad news, I need a martini, but I can't afford the vodka. Maybe I'll go to the beach. The state beach is still open for a few more days I guess... Darn - my car's on empty and I don't have $50.00 to fill it up. And the there is the parking... Oh well, guess I'll just have to keep on blogging till they cut off the electricity.

Hey Arnie, please read my letter!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chantal-sicile-kira/open-letter-to-governor-a_b_250517.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gtalkspolitics
03:01 PM on 08/02/2009
Hey Judy Lin when you say low income, is that low income people that's not documented or just low income across the board, it's this kind of news reporting that makes you guys untrustworthy. MAKE THIS CLEAR to the American public, Please
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gtalkspolitics
02:56 PM on 08/02/2009
SCHWARZENEGGER is correct !!!Calf. is burden down with illegal aliens people paying nothing into the system but getting everything out is going to brake any system, when we start telling the truth and stop with this political correctness crap we began to change this system for the better, Why is it fair for people to commit crimes (entering this country illegally) and get rewarded for it, try .
02:47 PM on 07/31/2009
What did Californian's expect when they elected a republican actor, (and not a very good actor)? Doesn't really take a rocket scientist to realize this was not a good idea.
09:59 PM on 07/29/2009
Cutting the already meager health care support will flood emergency rooms even more than their current crisis levels. More private, for-profit hospitals will just eliminate their emergency department. That results in increasing the flow and burden on already overburdened public hospitals. I gotta believe that at somepoint things have to collapse.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalDemIda
You can't spell "Conservative" without Con.
12:46 PM on 07/29/2009
"The reality of the immigration debate is it's nothing to do with economic impact," David Card, an economics professor at UC Berkeley said. "That's just a smoke screen. It's all about cultural protectionism and fear of change."

Set your fear, bias, and cultural protectionism blinders aside a moment and read this article. Undocumented workers in the United States have proven to have more advantages than disadvantages since 1980.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/05/21/MNGFQIVN991.DTL&type=printable

If you're going to make an argument, include all the facts.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mouselion
02:14 PM on 07/29/2009
There's two racist/culturalist sides working against undocumented workers and low income legal immigrants (not just Latino, but also eastern European, African, Asian). On the one side are the conservative business owners quietly recognizing the economic advantage to themselves of low wage exploitation and working class conservatives who decry the competition for lower skill/lower wage jobs.

Fear and loathing is there behind both groups, to a more or less vocal degree.
11:00 AM on 07/29/2009
What are the unemployment numbers for democrat vs republican in preparation for this insurance screw up.......i know of many businesses doing targeted layoffs 90-95% democrat or non-voters. get someone not of your state to get the voter lists and someone else gets their voter lists meet in the middle and trade lists. now there is no paper or electronic trail.......terminate until the layoff number is near then toss the rest to republicans........of course these practices are unethical and i would never practice them in my company....or just walk the parking lot and look at bumper stickers.......since a greater percentage of businesses or owned by conservatives........

i bet CA employers are targeting democrats and non-voters more than the mid-west
but no one will ever know the effect as those numbers are not tracked

laughing
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalDemIda
You can't spell "Conservative" without Con.
11:46 AM on 07/29/2009
Hearsay and conjecture.

Show us the link. Prove it or can it.
11:48 AM on 07/29/2009
laughing......nice retort
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kesmarn
12:27 PM on 07/29/2009
It would be poetic justice if Dems were being targeted for layoffs because it would be so satisfying to think of Repubs going to work day in and day out to pay for OUR health insurance!

laughing
12:32 PM on 07/29/2009
this bill is dieing on the vine

so good luck with that one
10:48 AM on 07/29/2009
Arnold should ask himself what his father in law with alzheimers would do if the family didn't have the money to pay for round the clock nurses to change his diapers. Arnold should offer to do it one day. I doubt he would still have the temerity to cut services to the poor.
10:45 AM on 07/29/2009
RFK would be ashamed as I imagine most of his wife's living relatives are. One day Arnold will know what it is to be down and dependent on other peoples' help. Eventually we all get there even if is through age. I hope at that time, leaves him sit in his own excrement.
11:46 AM on 07/29/2009
who cares what anyone believes in a family starting its wealth with criminal activity as the Kennedys have or if a dead man would be ashamed
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalDemIda
You can't spell "Conservative" without Con.
11:49 AM on 07/29/2009
In the United States, it's not what you know that gets you the megabucks, it's *who* you know. Schwarzenegger k!sses behind like nobody's business and he found himself the golden derriere - the Bush Fam.

No way will he ever know what it's like to be in dire straits and find himself dependent on people's help - unless it's at the Country Club.
12:54 PM on 07/29/2009
He married a Kennedy!! The Bushes are paupers in comparison.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
peacekitten
primum non nocere.
10:15 AM on 07/29/2009
just so you know, threadnazis, today's episode is going straight over to the right wing sites.

it's obvious you have personal grudges against some of us that don't allow you to do your jobs properly.

you're lucky your employer doesn't seem to demand much out of you.

here, it's the silences of the masses.
10:29 AM on 07/29/2009
no it is just the fact we are no longer silent

laughing
photo
BlackWidowPilot
"Fu! Rin! Ka! Zan!"
10:32 AM on 07/29/2009
No longer silent? Does that mean you'll regale us once again how you're "OK with waterboarding?"

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prettyinpink
Liberalism-Ideas so good-they're MANDATORY
10:12 AM on 07/29/2009
Not a word about sending the millions of illegals back to where they came from? This alone would allow American taxpayers to contribute their fair share. In addition it would free up billions in education, child services, and health care.

We have done this twice before and the only reason it will not be done again is the dems think if they can make them voters they will have an expanded base.
10:15 AM on 07/29/2009
very true
11:11 AM on 07/29/2009
And who would mow your lawns, dig your ditches, work in the fields, etc., etc.? Your precious little white children? Nope -- you like to complain about Mexicans, but you also continue to take advantage of them and live the good life on the backs of their labor!
11:26 AM on 07/29/2009
no i have 3 men that show up every week to maintain the landscaping.....all are legal.....

but thanks for playing
photo
Lemmy
There Are Americans, then there are Liberals . .
11:43 AM on 07/29/2009
"precious little white children". Sounds a little r@cist!

Services for illegal aliens, including health care and incarceration, are estimated to cost CA state taxpayers between $7 and $10 billion a year. Maybe we could start cutting spending there?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
peacekitten
primum non nocere.
10:01 AM on 07/29/2009
my response: part 1

================================

california has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country.

and your statement about there not being enough rich people to foot the bills?

h0ly c0w, have you ever even visited the state of reality?
09:55 AM on 07/29/2009
What? What are you all gasping about? He's just doing what Republicans normally do- throwing the poor and sick under the bus. They don't matter, you know. Survival of the fittest and all. Wait, isn't that Darwinian? I thought Republicans didn't believe in Darwin's theories. I'm confused. Thank God I'm not a Republican. I'd hate to be constanly contradicting myself like that all the time.... and dumping on poor people.
10:14 AM on 07/29/2009
i'm conservative.........believe in Darwin's theories and yet i'm not religious
photo
BlackWidowPilot
"Fu! Rin! Ka! Zan!"
10:36 AM on 07/29/2009
You no more *accept* science and the scientific method than you do any other empirical evidence you have been presented with on this or any other forum.

*Darwinism* only fits into your screed if one puts the prefix *Social* in front of it.

And one need only review the content of your HuffPost profile to recognize that you do indeed have a religion, your chosen deity being The Almighty Dollar.

By your own words you are well-and-thoroughly exposed for the Social Darwinist disciple of Ayn Rand that you are.

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maggiee
09:53 AM on 07/29/2009
Much as it pains me to say this, it's not entirely down to Arnold. The whole system in California is out of whack. It is a prime example of why a representative democracy is better than a direct one when you're dealing with more than a couple of hundred people. All those ballot initiatives obligating the state to all sorts of crazy, one issue interests...it's a recipe for a mess.

Of course, I live in a big ole' glass house (NYS) so it's just an observation, not a judgement.
09:51 AM on 07/29/2009
We won't raise taxes, but we will completely screw over the tired, the sick and the children.

God bless America.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalDemIda
You can't spell "Conservative" without Con.
12:18 PM on 07/29/2009
It's the Republican way, dontcha know?
02:18 PM on 07/29/2009
It's the American way. We have a 100 million dollar man skipping off into the sunset and we have to cut out the little guy. In this case, the little guy is a small child and has AIDS.
07:49 PM on 07/29/2009
It's not the tax payer's responsibilty to take care of people who refuse to take care of themselves...

Freedom means responsibility and the big-daddy take care of your state here in CA. is proof that this does not work.

No-one is getting screwed except the tax payer, the losers will have to work, invent something or move...
10:46 PM on 07/29/2009
And the winners, as we have seen from the examples of Madoff & Goldman-Sachs, need do nothing more than erect Ponzi schemes and and take short positions on the sucker bets they sell to pension funds. I suppose this falls into your "invent something" category.

Of course, your "losers" will not "move", and they will fail to please you by simply evaporating or dying. Something will need to be done with them, and it will not involve "freedom"--the prisons will swell and burst, and we will no doubt witness "freedom fighters" such as yourself recommending camps and mass roundups of the indigent. This has all happened before, and results in much more cost and disfunction than "welfare" ever did. A typical outcome of deluded "thought".