Sotomayor Confirmed By Senate Judiciary Committee

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Sotomayor Confirmed By Senate Judiciary Committee stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | 07/28/09 09:42 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Senate Judiciary Committee members Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., left, and Sen Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., talk on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 28, 2009, during the committee's markup vote on the nomination of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

WASHINGTON — Pushing toward a historic Supreme Court confirmation vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the first Hispanic justice, over nearly solid Republican opposition.

The panel's 13-6 vote for Sotomayor masked deep political divisions within GOP ranks about confirming President Barack Obama's first high court nominee. Just one Republican, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, joined Democrats to support her, although four others have said they'll vote for Sotomayor when her nomination comes before the full Senate next week – and that number is expected to grow.

"I would not have chosen her, but I understand why President Obama did. I gladly give her my vote, because I think she meets the qualifications test," Graham said. Obama's choice to nominate the first-ever Latina to the highest court is "a big deal," he added, declaring that, "America has changed for the better with her selection."

The near-unanimous Republican vote against Sotomayor on the Judiciary panel reflected the choice many GOP conservatives have made to side with their core supporters and oppose a judge they charge will bring liberal bias and racial and gender prejudices to her decisions. Others in the party, however, are concerned that doing so could hurt their efforts to broaden their base, and particularly alienate Hispanic voters, a fast-growing segment of the electorate.

Hispanic and civil rights groups hailed the Judiciary Committee's action as a turning point in the march toward embracing diversity and racial equality in the United States.

Wade Henderson of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights called it "a significant milestone in our country's journey toward providing equal justice under the law."

Several strategists on both sides who have been closely tracking the nomination said as many as five more Republicans could join the five who have already announced their intention to vote for Sotomayor. They spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid publicly predicting the outcome.

Conservative activists are pressing for the GOP to keep up a united front against Sotomayor, whatever the political consequences. "Republican senators on the Judiciary Committee deserve praise for putting principle above identity politics today in voting against Sonia Sotomayor," said Curt Levey of the conservative Committee for Justice.

Story continues below

Hours after the panel's vote, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, announced she too would oppose Sotomayor, citing the nominee's views on the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The vote had posed a particularly sticky dilemma for Hutchison, who is seeking her party's 2010 nomination for governor in Texas, where the population is more than one-third Latino.

Democrats, for their part, are lining up solidly in favor of the 55-year-old federal appeals court judge, the daughter of Puerto Rican parents who was raised in a South Bronx housing project and educated in the Ivy League.

"There's not one example – let alone a pattern – of her ruling based on bias or prejudice or sympathy," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the Judiciary Committee chairman. "She has administered justice without favoring one group of persons over another."

The senior Republican, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, countered that Sotomayor's speeches and a few of her rulings show she would let her opinions interfere in decisions.

"In speech after speech, year after year, Judge Sotomayor set forth a fully formed, I believe, judicial philosophy that conflicts with the great American tradition of blind justice and fidelity to the law as written," Sessions said.

Sotomayor is not expected to tip the court's ideological balance, since she's replacing Justice David Souter, a liberal nominated by a Republican president. "She can be no worse than Souter from our point of view," Graham remarked.

Still, Republicans pointed with particular concern to Sotomayor's record on gun and property rights, as well as a much-discussed rejection by her appeals court panel of the reverse discrimination claims of white firefighters denied promotions. And every GOP senator who spoke alluded critically to the now-infamous remark Sotomayor made in 2001 that she hoped a "wise Latina woman" would often reach better conclusions than a white male without similar experiences.

Sotomayor dismissed the comments during her confirmation hearings as a rhetorical flourish gone awry, a defense that rang hollow with many of her critics.

"I can't vote for her because she wouldn't defend what she said, and stand up and say, 'I really believe this, but I can still be a great judge anyway, because I will never let that interfere with my judging,' " said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.

The debate over Sotomayor's fitness for the court is as much about Obama – who will likely have at least one more chance to fill a Supreme Court vacancy – as it is about the judge herself.

Democrats said Sotomayor's background and her willingness to acknowledge how it might influence how she sees cases was an asset.

"She knows the law, she knows the Constitution, but she knows America, too," said Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.

Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican recently turned Democrat, said Sotomayor's much-maligned comment reflected a woman standing up for women and someone exhibiting ethnic pride. "I didn't find fault with 'wise Latina woman,' I found it commendable," he said.

Even though they never stood a chance of defeating Sotomayor, her Republican opponents said they gained ground during the confirmation process by getting Democrats to agree that judges should above all be faithful to the law – an idea they said counters Obama's stated view that a justice should have "empathy."

"We agreed that judges should be impartial and not pick winners and losers based on some subjective empathy standard or whatever is in the judge's heart," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. "We've defined where the judicial mainstream is ... and we've set expectations, I believe, for future nominees."

___

Associated Press writers Ann Sanner and Suzanne Gamboa contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Pushing toward a historic Supreme Court confirmation vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the first Hispanic justice, over nearly sol...
WASHINGTON — Pushing toward a historic Supreme Court confirmation vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be the first Hispanic justice, over nearly sol...
Loading...
 
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1118
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (23 pages total)
- Iccallie I'm a Fan of Iccallie 6 fans permalink

Congratulations, Judge Sotomayor

A battle well won !!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 AM on 07/30/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 213 fans permalink
photo

In case you haven't heard of Jeffrey Deskovic. This was a 16/17 year old man who was tried and convicted of murder and rape. One which he had absolutly nothing to do with. Judge Sotomayor refused his appeal on a technicallity that was based on a procedural issue. He was asking for the DNA that was available in his case to be used to prove his innocence. Years later the Innocence Project used the DNA and tested it against a data bank. They found out that it was a match to a man who was already behind bars for killing a person three years after Jeffrey Deskovic's conviction. Jeffrey Deskovic was released from prison 6 years after Judge Sotomayor refused the appeal of an innocent man who was asking the court to review DNA that they knew might exonerate him.

Jeffrey Deskovic has repeatedly asked to be put on as a witness in the congressional hearings. Not only was his request denied but the MSM has for the most part ignored this request as well. The leadership of both parties are to blame and he should have been allowed to take the stand one more time.

If nothing else this shows the hipocracy of the Democratic party. If this had been a Republican nominee you can bet they would be having fits over it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 AM on 07/29/2009

Then why weren't the Republican talking heads screaming from the roof tops about this? At the very least, this guy could have filled HOURS on Fox News. Not knowing anything about this case, maybe the reason she denied his DNA review was the fault of his lawyers. I'm sure Rush would have loved to sink his jowls into this. Why didn't he? (Or did he? I don't listen)

A judge is restrained by law. Perhaps they did something that violated the process. You don't mention why she refused the appeal, only that she did.

I'm glad the guy got out of a situation he never should have been in. Maybe they didn't want the case to come to light because of the possibility that it would be obvious that this guy was railroaded by over zealous prosecutors and and lousy legal system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 AM on 07/29/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 213 fans permalink
photo

The Repugnats don't like to show the faults in the Legal system. I think many of them would prefer an innocent man to rot in prison rather that make a judge and prosecutor look bad.

As for Sotomayor's reasons look them up for your self and you will see what poor judgment it was. I don't think this is even so much an indictment on her as on the Dems and Reps for not asking these kind of questions which seem much more relevant than most of the fluff they gave her. This is only one case however, if they ignored this what else have they ignored.

I don't watch much TV but I know if they chose to make a big deal out of it I would have at least heard that much. I have never in my life listened to Rush other than the quick hit peices out their making fun of him. I won't watch Faux news either. Unless it is clips form Judge Napolitano

If she is as good as everyone is hyped her up to be she should be able to handle a little genuine criticism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 07/29/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 213 fans permalink
photo

Furthermore, if she actually had done nothing wrong, this would have given her the chance to look this man in the eye and explain to him and the nation why she made the decision she did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 07/29/2009
- drummer4 I'm a Fan of drummer4 2 fans permalink
photo

It is only logical that Graham be the Republican vote "for", since he is known to be a little Republican "worm"!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 AM on 07/29/2009
- Gladys1963 I'm a Fan of Gladys1963 62 fans permalink
photo

". . . who hasn’t lived that life"

WHY do all of her opponents forget the end of that quote?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 07/29/2009
- OverIt I'm a Fan of OverIt 79 fans permalink

I think even the GOP knew they couldn't go down as totally blocking Sotomayor
so they bit the bullet and let Graham do it.

I think there were actually more GOPers who wanted to vote FOR her and they were convinced/pressured NOT to. So that she would go thru, but with the bare minimum.

I suspect Hatch is one who would have gone for her if he had been free. For no reason at all,
he kept emphasizing just how much he wrestled with his decision and how close he came to voting for her in a way that seemed just short of an SOS to save him from his evil GOP colleagues. Too bad he doesn't have a spine to stand up to them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 PM on 07/28/2009
photo

lol the republicans will reap what they sow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 07/28/2009
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 60 fans permalink
photo

Republicans just don't like those "ethnics".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 07/28/2009
- BossBabe I'm a Fan of BossBabe 8 fans permalink

Having empathy is NOT counter to being faithful to the law. What is the MATTER WITH THESE PEOPLE?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 07/28/2009

True, but it can get in the way when you are determining if something passes Constitutional muster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 07/28/2009
- OverIt I'm a Fan of OverIt 79 fans permalink

How any one who still supports the Republican Party after Cheney's attempt to turn us into a dictatorship can even dare to say/type the word Constitution nowadays without choking on the palpable hypocrisy is beyond me.

I am firmly convinced that only those with no conscience are still among the GOP ranks. Any sincere, true fiscal conservative/small government folks have at least moved over to the Independent column by now.

And lgb, you have already shown your stripes in your other hateful posts. So no sense trying to pass for a rational defender of our Constitution now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 07/28/2009
- miketothad I'm a Fan of miketothad 23 fans permalink
photo

Keep up the good work...
The GOP will only continue to lose voters....period.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 07/28/2009

That's good because the ranks of us indies are growing like crazy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 07/28/2009
- solarian I'm a Fan of solarian 14 fans permalink

hope every republican who voted against her are not re-elected

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 07/28/2009

Why?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 07/28/2009
- yukoner1 I'm a Fan of yukoner1 4 fans permalink

Jeez, I don't know, maybe they don't believe what solarian believes? Isn't that what democracy is? You vote for those who you believe in and I do the same?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 07/28/2009
- Jazzman323 I'm a Fan of Jazzman323 54 fans permalink
photo

This is not a big deal, since the Democrats have the votes necessary to confirm Sotomayor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 07/28/2009

Good point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 07/28/2009
- Clarabell I'm a Fan of Clarabell 67 fans permalink
photo

Every one of the Repubs who voted against her had to read a script explaining their reason. It seemed to me like someone prepared the scripts and then they all pulled one out of a hat to read when it was their turn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 07/28/2009

Judging with empathy directly conflicts with the oath of induction into the Supreme Court. Sotomayor will be violating the oath on the day she is sworn in, its as simple as that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 07/28/2009
- boboyaya I'm a Fan of boboyaya 3 fans permalink

weird comment, she never said she judged with empathy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 07/28/2009

That's not so odd considering Obama wants to fundamentally change the way we operate. As an example, take a look at all the power he is accumulating under the executive branch.

So changing how the SCOTUS operates seems right in line with whatever devious plans Obama has for America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 07/28/2009
- Clarabell I'm a Fan of Clarabell 67 fans permalink
photo

Too dumb for a response.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/28/2009
photo

were you asleep or drunk during the 8 years of Bush/Ch e n e y? If you want to talk about power grabbing and expansion (illegal) of executive power...review those 8 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 07/28/2009
- drummer4 I'm a Fan of drummer4 2 fans permalink
photo

Yes, we can see that you listen only to Faux 4 and all of the AM Republican pundits and they control your brain also!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 AM on 07/29/2009
- Theo67 I'm a Fan of Theo67 8 fans permalink

What a silly comment, so loaded with talking points it's barely worth addressing. But, I will. You clearly didn't notice that the first President Bush actually used the word "empathy" in the nomination of one of his appointees. And you also have been swallowing wholeheartedly the nonsense you've been fed so that you weren't able to pay attention to Judge Sotomayor's testimony, which clearly showed that she judges based on the law. Listening to ignorant people on the matters of debate these days is really a source of entertainment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 07/28/2009

Theo,

And if I remember correctly, the one with the empathy got tossed to the side. And why would someone consider it ok to use empathy after it was determined to be NOT ok when Bush did it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 07/28/2009
- Tommygun264 I'm a Fan of Tommygun264 222 fans permalink
photo

So where are your posts condemning Alito and Scalia for saying basically the same thing Judge Sotomayor said, or does it not count when white men allow their own personal experiences to influence their rulings? Did you oppose Justice Thomas when Papi Bush said he was nominating him because "he is a man with a great deal of empathy"?

If human empathy, compassion and basic common sense weren't necessary, we wouldn't need human judges or juries - legal decisions could be made by a computer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 07/28/2009
- Kingstone I'm a Fan of Kingstone 2 fans permalink

Who cares about Republicans' votes? I would love to no votes on this Qualified Judge, then they suffer for a long time. Immigration Bill is coming soon and they will be jumping all over. See yaa 20..........50.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 07/28/2009
- Promote I'm a Fan of Promote 9 fans permalink

Now its time for an , ASIAN & NATIVE AMERICAN to serve on the SUPREME COURT , this will reflect the real America. CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN !

Peace & Blessings !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 07/28/2009

NO! NO! NO!

Don't you get it. We should not be picking people for the Supreme Court because they are Asian, Native American, Latino, whatever. We are supposed to pick the most qualified! Empathy is not a qualification for the Supreme Court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 07/28/2009

I agree, the rule starts now after over 100 white male SC justices. We all know that the slaves weren't qualified. Women weren't qualified either because they really didn't matter back in those days so the white male got in because they were the most qualified.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 07/28/2009
- taptaptap I'm a Fan of taptaptap 17 fans permalink

Judge Sotomayor is the most qualified. Being wise, empathetic, passionate and Latina are bonuses. Don't get your knickers in a knot, she was confirmed because she is highly qualified.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 07/29/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (23 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect