iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Joe Arpaio Ignores Feds, Won't Stop Arresting Illegal Immigrants

AMANDA LEE MYERS   07/31/09 04:45 PM ET   AP

Joe Arpaio

PHOENIX — The self-proclaimed "toughest sheriff in America" has never gotten so much resistance from the federal government.

The Homeland Security Department wants Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., to stop arresting illegal immigrants whose only crime was crossing the U.S.-Mexico border without documents.

The thing is, Arpaio doesn't much care.

"I'm not going to bend to the federal government, I'm going to do my job," he said. "I don't report to the federal government, I report to the people."

Shifting winds in Washington have led the Homeland Security Department to rework a federal program that has allowed Arpaio's deputies to make federal immigration arrests since February 2007.

It's not yet known whether Arpaio – who has 160 deputies and jail officers trained to make federal immigration arrests and speed up deportations – will sign the new deal.

If he doesn't, the feds say he would lose his authority to make any federal immigration arrests.

The revamped program would require Arpaio to clear plans for immigration sweeps beforehand with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and coordinate with ICE before releasing information about such enforcement actions to the news media.

Those requirements don't sit well with the sheriff, who is known for his independence and well-oiled media operation.

Even as he considered whether to sign the deal, Arpaio launched a three-day immigration sweep east of metro Phoenix on July 24. Deputies arrested 74 people; 25 of them were illegal immigrants.

Ten of the illegal immigrants were released because they had committed no other crimes, and that fact pitted Arpaio against Homeland Security. Arpaio says the feds told his deputies to let them go, while Homeland Security says the decision was exclusively Arpaio's.

That sweep was the latest of 10 Arpaio has conducted in the last two and a half years. Many were held in heavily Latino areas in metropolitan Phoenix, with deputies stopping drivers for traffic violations.

The sweeps sparked several angry protests from critics who said they amounted to racial profiling and led to a Justice Department investigation of Arpaio. Arpaio said the people who were pulled over were approached because deputies had probable cause to believe they had committed crimes.

Homeland Security's revamped program focuses on the most serious criminals and creates three priority levels for immigrants who are to be arrested and detained. Immigrants convicted or arrested of major drug offenses or violent offenses such as murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery or kidnapping are the top priority.

The other two levels pertain to immigrants with prior convictions, but people whose only crime is being in the country illegally are not covered under the program.

Eleven agencies in the country have signed the new so-called 287(g) agreement, while 66 agencies operating under the old program – including Arpaio's – were given 90 days starting July 10 to decide whether they want to agree to follow the revamped program, said DHS spokesman Matthew Chandler.

Arpaio called the new program an amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Chandler said changes to the new program were designed to spend Homeland Security resources wisely. "We feel that, you know, with the limited resources we have we need to be focused on criminal aliens who pose a public safety threat," he said.

Chandler declined to say whether DHS could take away Arpaio's option to sign the agreement.

Even if Arpaio doesn't sign it, he vows to continue cracking down on illegal immigration. He will do so by enforcing more limited state immigration laws that prohibit immigrant smuggling and ban employers from knowingly hiring illegal immigrants. Just on Wednesday, his deputies arrested 52 illegal immigrants, 48 of whom will face human smuggling charges.

In a news release about the arrests, Arpaio said: "This is yet another example of my continued promise to enforce all the illegal immigration laws in Maricopa County regardless of the ever-changing policies emanating from Washington, D.C."

Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the anti-illegal immigration group Federation for American Immigration Reform, said it supports allowing local law enforcement agencies to make federal immigration arrests and that Arpaio should not be limited to targeting only serious criminals.

"If all police departments did was go after serious crimes, most of their other functions would fall by the wayside," he said. "Just because there are murderers in Phoenix doesn't mean cops shouldn't pull someone over for speeding and running a red light."

Alessandra Soler-Meetze, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, said her group doesn't believe local agencies should be allowed to make any immigration arrests and that Arpaio has abused his power long enough.

"He's a rogue sheriff, and he is the clearest, most visible example of why these 287g ordinances are bad for local communities," she said. "Arpaio demonstrates what happens when there's absolutely no federal oversight of a program that has really led to some serious civil rights abuses."

___

On the Net:

Maricopa County Sheriff's Office: http://www.mcso.org

Homeland Security Department: http://www.dhs.gov/

American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona: http://www.acluaz.org/

Federation for American Immigration Reform: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

PHOENIX — The self-proclaimed "toughest sheriff in America" has never gotten so much resistance from the federal government. The Homeland Security Department wants Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricop...
PHOENIX — The self-proclaimed "toughest sheriff in America" has never gotten so much resistance from the federal government. The Homeland Security Department wants Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricop...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,283
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
04:02 AM on 08/04/2009
Victor the crab and article friendly continuously lose to AllieMD ......bummer for them
09:44 AM on 08/02/2009
A blunt question for all you supporters of illegal immigration: Why aren't the Feds enforcing existing immigration law?

Another blunt question: Since the Feds have no intention of seriously enforcing immigration law, why doesn't the Congresss change this law?
03:52 PM on 08/03/2009
Next question...Who decides which laws to enforce and which ones to ignore?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
08:26 PM on 08/03/2009
They are enforcing the law.
11:44 PM on 08/01/2009
This country is in chaos.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:43 AM on 08/02/2009
When was it not?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:18 PM on 08/01/2009
One of the kind the right-wing lionizes and the progressives hope will fade away fast. This guy is just a hoshot egotist; it's all about him, but wrapped in the flag. But what do we expect from Arizona?
04:05 AM on 08/04/2009
Same thing we expect from you in West Virginia....thats where you said you were from last time.

Still want to stick to that ??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:52 PM on 08/01/2009
Night all!
10:18 PM on 08/01/2009
"I'm not going to bend to the federal government, I'm going to do my job," he said. "I don't report to the federal government, I report to the people."
Don't listen, they need to arrest his a-s....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:23 PM on 08/01/2009
agreed .. put him in his own outdoor jail with pink underclothes and only green bologna & beans to eat, and make him pay for even that ....
10:09 PM on 08/01/2009
To all the fans of Joe, and you feel he's doing a great job with "illegals," ask yourself why the those who employ these illegals aren't going to jail? Where is their chain gang? If you shut down the people who hire them, you shut down the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:14 PM on 08/01/2009
Exactly.. for more years than Joe's been around, the INS has rounded up illegals and deported them as the immigration laws require... Unless they commit some some other crime along with being in the USA without documentation, they are simply deported. A civil, and not criminal action...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 PM on 08/01/2009
Unless they just sit around all day they are violating the law everytime they go to work.
10:16 PM on 08/01/2009
Got no problem with that at all! We actually had some immigration raids here in Maryland to round up the criminals - shocking as the state is filled with Democrats. And they seized the assets of the company and indicted the owners.

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/md/Public-Affairs/press_releases/press07/BaltimoreEmploymentAgencyOwnersIndictedforConspiracytoHarborAliensandLaunderMoney.html
10:04 PM on 08/01/2009
Someone earlier was making the comment that all LEOs including State and City LEOs can make arrests in all cases of Federal Law including federal immigration laws. Shes wrong. According to this document prepared for congress, this person fails to distinguish between civil and criminal law enforcement where local and state can act on criminal cases but not civil. From the link http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/crs/rl32270.pdf

"Congress defined our nation’s immigration laws in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. §§1101 et seq.), which contains both criminal and civil enforcement measures. Historically, the authority for state and local law enforcement officials to enforce immigration law has been construed to be limited to the criminal provisions of the INA; by contrast, the enforcement of the civil provisions, which includes apprehension and removal of deportable aliens, has strictly been viewed as a federal responsibility, with states playing an incidental supporting role."

Authority to arrest and deport illegal immigrants does not rest with Joe or the people of Arizona according to the laws of this land.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:08 PM on 08/01/2009
Fanned...
10:29 PM on 08/01/2009
Your link is from 2005 :)

You're right in that the charge and RESPONSIBILITY (they are held accountable) for enforcing the immigration law is the Feds (which they are failing to do) - where does any of that forbid a non-federal LEO from enforcing the laws or arresting illegals? It doesn't. In law, what's not specified is as important as what is not specified. Nobody has come up with any law that prohibits LEOs from arresting illegals.

'with states playing an incidental supporting role' - what do you think that means? Think hard.

If it were illegal for him to be doing then the AZ state legislature wouldn't have passed a law affirming that right?

Also, you might want to inform the BP and ICE because they are opening their arms to LEOs in the fight on illegal immigration. Just not Sheriff Joe cuz they don't like him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:39 PM on 08/01/2009
Please provide a current link that shows the law that allows a non-federal sheriff to arrest and detain illegals for deportation, or to do the FBI's job or INS or border patrol.

Please provide a links showing that joe is completely within his rights to continue arresting and detaining illegals for deportation if they have not committed any crime.

Please provide a link about this AZ law you keep referring to that allows Joe to act as a federal agent and arrest/detain/deport illegals despite federal laws.
01:57 AM on 08/02/2009
Where does it forbid a non-federal LEO from enforcing civil federal immigration laws?
In the same article:
"Several Administrations have spoken on the scope of state and local
involvement. For example, a 1983 statement issued by the Reagan Justice
Department emphasized cooperation and joint federal/state law enforcement
operations but still made clear that only INS could make arrests for civil immigration
violations and that state and local cooperation consisted primarily of notifying INS
about, and detaining, suspected illegal aliens taken into police custody for state/local violations. A 1978 press release during the Carter Administration was to somewhat
similar effect, though it placed more emphasis on the exclusive federal role to
enforce civil immigration law and the special training required to do so. More
recently, a 1996 Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion
concluded that state and local police did possess the authority to arrest aliens for
criminal violations of the INA, but lacked recognized legal authority to enforce the
civil provisions of immigration law."

Without proper authority from congress (which this huffpost article is about - rogue sheriff Joe) State LEOs are prohibited from taking on the civil responsibilities of immigration law which includes detaining or arresting someone for simply being an illegal immigrant. A supporting role means making a call to INS and only detaining an illegal immigrant when they have violated state laws. Being an illegal immigrant is not a violation of state law since all direct immigration law is federal alone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissKaren
10:00 PM on 08/01/2009
Arpaio is proof that a nasty person in power acts nasty.
photo
tnkeating
Dyslexic agnostic insomniac
09:41 PM on 08/01/2009
Joe , as someone who used to work with a bunch Mexican guys, I gotta say, these are some of the best people I've ever known, and I would welcome them and there families in my home any time, they are hard working, fine men, sometimes a little hard to get to know, but there is a slight langauge barrier. Its a little hard to call them a bunch of Mexican guys, because besides being legal tax paying Citizens, I concider them my brothers. We don't believe in being hyphenated Americans, but they just happen to be of Mexican heritage and although I believe they would support there brothers that crossed the border illegally, this is where we differ. I do feel however that we on this continent, North America, Central America, and South America, that we are ALL Americans, some are just not citizens of the United States. I support you Joe, anybody who is not a citizen needs to become one according to our laws, thank you for enforcing the laws we have, not the ones we don't have.
10:11 PM on 08/01/2009
What about the law that says it's illegal to HIRE them? Don't read about all the employers in jail, now do we?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:17 PM on 08/01/2009
Poor people can't really give campaign contributions to Joe's (and other politicans) continuing as sheriff such as businesses can.
10:29 PM on 08/01/2009
We finally seized assets and indicted employers here in MD - a real shock - a bastion of Democrats here. And I agree - we need to target the employers too - both at once.
09:14 PM on 08/01/2009
Its a shame ! Something should have been done about this sheriff a long time ago. He's another one of those mean red-nekk conservatives.
10:07 PM on 08/01/2009
It is a shame that he is enforcing our laws and is told NOT to.

Do we want our police to only enforce the laws they want to? Who decides which laws are enforced and which ones are not?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:10 PM on 08/01/2009
What laws specifically is he enforcing and which laws was he told not to support? Please provide links to prove your position.
10:13 PM on 08/01/2009
Indeed! Ask Sheriff Joe why he's not enforcing the law that says it's illegal to hire them? What about that law? Oh yeah, employers are rich and give political contributions - so he's going to throw those laws out the door.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ObamanextPresident
09:07 PM on 08/01/2009
This is the truth.
This article fails to mention who is the Secretary of Homeland Security? It is former Arizona Governor, Janet Napolitano. She knows what Joe is like. He is a bigotracist that goes way beyond the parameters of a sheriff's powers. And all the rich white goodolboys in AZ just love him. Talk about cowboy politics.

There is outrage here in AZ and many lawsuits brought against the sheriff by those who want him to do his job. He is so busy doing his illegal racial profiling roundups that his department 'does not have time' to go after the white collar crime that has taken over Maricopa County. He has taken the appropriated funds for his department to do their job but instead he is paying other old fat white men to be his crony roundup deputies in his illegal political pursuit.

This is the same corrupt sheriff that built "tent city" in 120 degree Phoenix for his prisoners and made pink underwear famous. He and his cronies make $billions off of the privatized prison system in the county.
09:11 PM on 08/01/2009
And that's why the 3 million citizens - Dem and Republican alike - elect him time and time again. And why he's still in office.

*rolling eyes*
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
09:20 PM on 08/01/2009
You are saying every person in Maricopa County (including every man, woman and underage child) voted for the sheriff ? Please provide a link showing that what you say is true.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ObamanextPresident
09:31 PM on 08/01/2009
Exactly. Even with the libertarian it is only

1,324,027 people that voted and Joe only won by 172,000.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ObamanextPresident
09:50 PM on 08/01/2009
I don't know why this got scrubbed. This is from wiki. link above.

2008 Maricopa County Sheriff's Office election, Arizona

Republican Joe Arpaio (incumbent) 730,426 55.2 %
Democratic Dan Saban 558,176 42.2 %
Libertarian Chris A.H. Will 35,425 2.7 %

That's ONLY 172, 250 votes that joe won by! Not 3 million! And Saban was running against a known name in a gop state.
10:12 PM on 08/01/2009
He still was RE-elected AGAIN!

He also won by a greater voter percentage than President Obama.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ObamanextPresident
08:54 PM on 08/01/2009
This article fails to mention who is the Secretary of Homeland Security? It is former Arizona Governor, Janet Napolitano. She knows what Joe is like. He is an e.vil ra.cist that goes way beyond the parameters of a sheriff's powers. And all the rich white goodolboys in AZ just love him. Talk about cowboy politics.

There is outrage here in AZ and lawsuits brought against the sheriff. He is so busy doing his illegal racial profiling roundups that his department 'does not have time' to go after the white collar crime that has taken over Maricopa County. He has taken the appropriated funds for his department to do their job but instead he is paying other old fat white men to be his crony roundup deputies in his illegal political pursuit.

This is the same corrupt sheriff that built "tent city" in 120 degree Phoenix for his prisoners and made pink underwear famous. He and his cronies make $billions off of the prison system in the county.
07:50 PM on 08/01/2009
Yee-haw !

I'M A COWBOY ! ...m'aam....I don' take no orders frum no feds !!!!

YO SOY SHERIFF !!!!

BANG, BANG, BANG !!!!

Yup, mccain's home state is always well-represented....
08:47 PM on 08/01/2009
You are right he is a great sheriff and he is doing the right thing. He even lets his kids play tag. It may put pressure on the one who is it and it may not be politcally correct. But what the heck. You can't be weak in the knees about everything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
09:32 PM on 08/01/2009
How about illegal?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
10:58 PM on 08/01/2009
LoL .. thanks for the laugh!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
07:46 PM on 08/01/2009
So cut off his federal funding to make these arrests. Since he says he reports to the people of Phoenix lets see if the good people of Phoenix are willing to underwrite what he is doing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArticleFriendly
The GOP. Our bridge to the 18th century
07:56 PM on 08/01/2009
Not only will he lose funding, but his authority to arrest and detain illegals that are simply in the USA and haven't committed a criminal offense. He will be forced to make up charges in order to continue his illegal immigrant "Sweeps" ...
08:06 PM on 08/01/2009
No he won't. Any LEO has the right to arrest anyone for any criminal act that occurs in his jurisdiction - being here illegally is a crime - a misdemeanor :) Not to mention the AZ state law giving him the right - and state law can't contravene federal law.
08:49 PM on 08/01/2009
The good man from Rhode Island speaks with authority about illegals.
07:57 PM on 08/01/2009
Nicely put.