Dozens Of Gitmo Cases Sent To U.S. Prosecutors

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Dozens Of Gitmo Cases Sent To U.S. Prosecutors stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 08- 3-09 02:40 PM   |   Updated: 09- 3-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gitmo

(WASHINGTON - AP) Dozens of Guantanamo Bay detainee cases have been referred to federal prosecutors for possible criminal trials in the nation's capital, Virginia and New York City, officials told The Associated Press on Monday.

The Justice Department's strategy of holding trials in East Coast cities could be a sharp departure from a Pentagon plan to hold all Guantanamo-related civilian and military trials in the Midwest.

The politically volatile decisions about where and how to try Guantanamo Bay detainees ultimately will rest with President Obama as he tries to meet his self-imposed January deadline for closing the island prison.

Obama administration officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss internal deliberations, said Attorney General Eric Holder met privately last week with the chief federal prosecutor in each of the East Coast areas to discuss the preparations for possible indictments and trials in those districts.

One official said prosecutors and military lawyers are now reviewing the individual cases. The work is aimed at indicting individuals in civilian courts, but final decisions have not been made on the cases and some of the inmates whose cases were referred could still end up before military commissions instead.

Officials said the districts which have been referred Guantanamo cases are: Washington, D.C.; the Eastern District of Virginia, which has a courthouse in Alexandria, Va.; the Southern District of New York, which is based in lower Manhattan in New York City; and the Eastern District of New York, which is based in the New York borough of Brooklyn.

Each district has experience prosecuting high-profile terrorism cases, and each courthouse has high-security facilities for holding particularly dangerous inmates.

Yet the plan to hold terror trials in those cities may run afoul of a separate initiative being considered to build a courtroom-within-a-prison complex in the U.S. heartland.

Story continues below
advertisement

Several senior U.S. officials said the administration is eyeing a soon-to-be-shuttered state maximum security prison in Michigan and the military penitentiary at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., as possible locations for a heavily guarded site to hold the suspected 229 al-Qaida, Taliban, and foreign fighters now jailed at Guantanamo.

The president has said some detainees will be tried in civilian courts, some in military commissions, and some will be held without trial because they are simply too dangerous but the evidence against them cannot be aired in any courtroom.

The proposed Midwest facility would operate as a hybrid prison system jointly operated by the Justice Department, the military and the Department of Homeland Security.

This plan, according to three government officials, calls for:

-- Moving all the Guantanamo detainees to a single U.S. prison. The Justice Department has identified between 60 and 80 who could be prosecuted, either in military or federal criminal courts. The Pentagon would oversee the detainees who would face trial in military tribunals. The Bureau of Prisons, an arm of the Justice Department, would manage defendants in federal courts.

-- Building a court facility within the prison site where military or criminal defendants would be tried. Doing so would create a single venue for almost all the criminal defendants, ending the need to transport them elsewhere in the U.S. for trial.

-- Providing long-term holding cells for a small but still undetermined number of detainees who will not face trial because intelligence and counterterror officials conclude they are too dangerous to risk being freed.

-- Building immigration detention cells for detainees ordered released by courts but still behind bars because countries are unwilling to take them.

Both the Justice and Pentagon plans face legal and logistical problems.

If a significant number of civilian trials were to be held in the Midwest, the government might have to send in prosecutors and judges experienced in terrorism cases, and lawyers for the detainees could object to the jury pool.

Such a plan would also require an expensive upgrade of the facilities in Kansas or Michigan, and it's unclear if there is enough time for such work under the president's deadline.

But trying them on the East Coast could generate more of the kind of public opposition that led Congress earlier this year to yank funding for bringing such detainees to U.S. soil until the administration produces an acceptable plan for shuttering the Guantanamo facility.

The Obama administration has already transferred one detainee to U.S. courts: Ahmed Ghailani was sent to New York in June to face charges he helped blow up U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998.

(WASHINGTON - AP) Dozens of Guantanamo Bay detainee cases have been referred to federal prosecutors for possible criminal trials in the nation's capital, Virginia and New York City, officials told The...
(WASHINGTON - AP) Dozens of Guantanamo Bay detainee cases have been referred to federal prosecutors for possible criminal trials in the nation's capital, Virginia and New York City, officials told The...
Loading...
 
Filed by Susan Crile  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
15
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 167 fans permalink
photo

It's about time...!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 AM on 08/04/2009
- Scent I'm a Fan of Scent 32 fans permalink

I can not but feel deeply ashamed that in my name people are held without proof, trial, human rights, genever conventions, and even food or sleep for months and years. That people are tortured to make confessions the torturers know are false is insane. - Or it would be if there was no purpose behind it.

It was US who trained and funded Bin laden. It is US who now shield him. It is US who were not told when the FBI said there is NO EVIDENCE of bin Laden being involved in 911. It was US who looked the other way when Cheney and hios bunch started torturing innocents.

Sure, we talked ourselves into the fear frenzy and believed oh so strongly that these goatherders from the land we now ravaged three times are the terrorists our oh so hones leaders claimed. We did not flinch when they told us this lie even while we knew without a doubt about so many other lies. We believed them when they said Iran wants nuclear weapons when they couldn't find them in Iraq. It was us who supported one war after the other. It was us who nodded through their destruction of our rights and welfare.

And it has to be us who demand back what was taken.

But for that to happen we have to do something very hard:

We have to admit we were wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 08/03/2009
- getoffmedz I'm a Fan of getoffmedz 111 fans permalink
photo

A BIG step in the correct direction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 08/03/2009
- somsoc I'm a Fan of somsoc 64 fans permalink
photo

There is no basis to fail to provide judicial relief to ALL of these people. Failing to do so is nothing short of a crime against humanity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 08/03/2009
- azbird I'm a Fan of azbird 2 fans permalink

The crime against humanity is what they did. they need to be tried in another country. I don`t want them running amok in this country. Let their country of origen provide their defence, why should our tax dollar go for that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 08/03/2009
- Lemmy I'm a Fan of Lemmy 19 fans permalink

Most countries won't take them. Next time, kill them where they stand on the battlefield.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 08/03/2009
- getoffmedz I'm a Fan of getoffmedz 111 fans permalink
photo

Since YOU have all the "facts" never have been out of AZ share your factual knowledge on this topic?

Have you or any member of your kin ever been denied due-process?

This decision protects everyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 08/03/2009
- Scent I'm a Fan of Scent 32 fans permalink

Oh. So you have the proof of what they DID? - Without trial, without anyone EVER having presented even evidence, YOU have proof. - How interesting.

Care to share that information?

sorry hun, but they took some goatherders out of Afghanistan to present us with "terrorists". Then they tortured confessions out of people THEY told us are PROUD of what they did. - Even someone like You has to see the paradox there.

Just one of them You "know" did so much: Bin Laden. He did 911 right? - And that the FBI says theat there is NO EVIDENCE even in their files that supports that claim has not reached you.

Care to tell us why?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 08/03/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect