iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dem Senators: White House Says It Cut No Deal With Drug Makers

First Posted: 09/06/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:45 PM ET

Congressstimulus

A senior White House aide told Democratic senators Thursday that the administration did not make a deal with the pharmaceutical lobby that would prevent Congress from using the government's clout to negotiate for lower drug prices, according to three Democratic senators who were in the meeting.

The New York Times had reported on Thursday morning that the White House affirmed that a deal barring price negotiations had been struck.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) asked two top White House aides, David Axelrod and deputy White House chief of staff Jim Messina, if the administration had cut such a deal with PhRMA.

"He says there's no deal. I take him at his word," Brown told the Huffington Post.

The drug makers, according to the Times, had agreed to trim $80 billion in costs over ten years and the White House agreed not to go after deeper cuts by negotiating lower drug prices as part of comprehensive health care reform. The paper reported that Messina confirmed the deal on the record.

Brown said the article inspired his question. Both Messina and Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) answered.

"Baucus said there was no deal and the White House said there was no deal," said Brown, referring to the reported deal to bar the government from negotiating for lower drug prices.

Brown added that the answer didn't necessarily mean the White House was contradicting what it told drug makers.

"It contradicts what Billy Tauzin said [the White House] told the drug makers, but Billy Tauzin has not always been all that straight with the truth," said Brown, referring to PhRMA's president, a former Republican congressman from Louisiana. Tauzin pushed through the original law that barred the government from negotiating for lower prices. Shortly thereafter, he left to lobby for the drug makers.

"It was one of those things that was a well-crafted answer," Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) told the Huffington Post. "I think they said there was no deal. It was about three paragraphs, at the end of which, [he said] there was no deal. But it took three paragraphs. Maybe there's an answer somewhere in those three paragraphs."

Brown read it as a firm denial. "I take them at their word, but I also know that PhRMA doesn't ever give up and we keep watching them," he said.

Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said that a White House representative told the caucus that "as far as he is concerned, there is no deal." Durbin made his comments on Bloomberg TV, but said that Axelrod, not Messina, had been the one to say there was no deal. Both Axelrod and Messina met with the Democratic caucus.

Democrats, said Durbin, were therefore free to craft legislation that allowed the government to negotiate for lower drug prices. "He told us there was no agreement, not in that regard," Durbin said of drug-price negotiations.

The White House reached the deal with the pharmaceutical lobby so that the powerful group wouldn't use its clout to crush health care reform. The Times article was a response to a demand from the drug makers that Obama publicly announce that the deal had been reached.

"Who is ever going to go into a deal with the White House again if they don't keep their word? You are just going to duke it out instead," Tauzin told the Times. A PhRMA lobbyist didn't immediately respond to an e-mail.

Tauzin and the drug companies had been surprised that the House bill ordered the Health and Human Services secretary to negotiate with drug companies to get lower prices.

Tauzin told the Times that the White House instructed him to negotiate with Max Baucus (D-Mont.), chairman of the Finance Committee, who it said was a party to the deal. Baucus is leading bipartisan negotiations in his committee.

But those negotiations don't seem to be taking into account whatever deal the White House struck with the drug makers. "As I understand it, the committees weren't in on this negotiation. I mean, I certainly wasn't," said Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), who has been actively negotiating with Baucus for months and is part of the bipartisan Gang of Six working on a compromise package.

A reporter told Baucus that when the deal had been announced earlier, questions had been deferred to Baucus, who was given credit for cutting the deal. "You know more than I know," said Conrad.

Even if a deal has been made by the White House and the drug makers, several members of Congress said they wouldn't feel bound to it no matter what Axelrod or Messina said.

Congress doesn't take kindly to such intrusions. Even Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, a Republican member of the Gang of Six, thought the White House was too lenient in the deal outlined in the Times. "I think we could do more, frankly," she said. Asked if she was surprised by the deal's explicitness, she said, "Yes, I was, and secondly there wasn't enough."

Conrad said the Senate was "not necessarily" bound by any deals the White House cuts.

"I don't think it flies," said Dodd. "I think if you went out on the floor today and said, 'Look, there can be no reimportation.' You've gotta do something with Medicare bulk purchasing and [the White House] said, 'No, you can't do that now.' No, I don't think that would be warmly received. I don't think it would hold up."

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) said that "No United States Senator gives up their election certificate," meaning that they would continue to act how they saw fit regardless of a deal.

"It's not up to him," said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H). "It's up to Congress."

Using the government's purchasing power to reduce drug costs is a top priority of most Democrats and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has repeatedly pushed for it, saying the House is not bound by any deals the White House makes.

Brown, too, said that regardless of the White House answer, his branch of Congress isn't obligated to abide by a White House deal. But for now, he's glad there isn't one.

"I take them at their word. They got help from PhRMA, but they didn't make any deal," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

A senior White House aide told Democratic senators Thursday that the administration did not make a deal with the pharmaceutical lobby that would prevent Congress from using the government's clout to n...
A senior White House aide told Democratic senators Thursday that the administration did not make a deal with the pharmaceutical lobby that would prevent Congress from using the government's clout to n...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:50 AM on 08/07/2009
That is pure bull spit, and if you believe it, I've got some waterfront property in Arizona to sell you.
10:38 AM on 08/07/2009
I am so thankful that the people making these health care laws don't have to live by them. They get free health care for life.
10:30 AM on 08/07/2009
The bottom line is simple. Americans should pay no more for drugs than people in any other country. The government must be able to negotiate for Medicare drugs, etc. It should be required to benchmark with prices in Canada, France, etc. as well as the VA. Imports should be allowed from Canada and other approved places with controls to ensure that there are no fakes.

Big Pharma has plenty of places it can cut costs to fund research and development, starting with grossly excessive executive pay. If they need more government subsidies, then they should have to accept pay caps and the like. A hidden tax on Americans to pay for rich lifestyles is not acceptable.
12:38 PM on 08/07/2009
Outlandish executive pay is offensive enough, sure, but the elephant in the room as far as I'm concerned is direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription pharmaceuticals. The USA and New Zealand are the ONLY two countries that allow the pharmaceutical companies to advertise directly to consumers, and we've only allowed it since 1997. It hurts the system for myriad reasons; first it makes drugs more expensive, second it creates an artificial motivation for consumers to obtain specific name-brand drugs even when cheaper, identical generics are readily available, third it fosters an already-overflowing culture of self-diagnosis... How I wish this was an aspect of health care reform that was really talked about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
08:46 AM on 08/07/2009
Yesterday obama was standing by his agreement and today their was no agreement! Makes me wonder just how badly that agreement affected the health care program. Clearly they need to step back and redo the socialistic oriented health care program into something that will address the REAL issues, insurance companies and big pharma. Time for obama to work FOR the American people and not big business.
08:30 AM on 08/07/2009
Of course a deal has been made and I bet that it favors the taxpayer. NOT. Its the way business is done. Now as Deep Throat told Woodward and Bernstein, "Just follow the money."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaxEterna
08:22 AM on 08/07/2009
Of course they cut a deal, just like they did with the insurance cos. Read the other post.

This administration, whose best if not only skill set is words, is now denying yet again what is true.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/06/dem-senators-white-house_n_253502.html#
08:15 AM on 08/07/2009
I'm so sick and tired about the LIES that are being peddled about this healthcare plan and President Obama. People dont know how to do journalism anymore they pass of rumors gossips hearsay as investigative journalism and its really sad.

This goes for LIberal blogs newspapers etc: When you report constantly on lies without solid evidence to back up what you are saying people BELIEVE lies the more LIES you report the MORE LIES they believe.

STOP it with the rumors hearsays assumptions. If you keep doing it you KILL healthcare before it has a chance. THis is the major reason why Obama's poll numbers are slipping they are LIES being told and its just downright sad to see everyone falling into pattern and reporting on rumors and lies. Its like they are in competition to see who can report rumors. That is NOT what NEWS is about. The birthers is the biggest example of this. They should NEVER NEVER have been covered even here at Huffpost. Yet they were covered and then we wonder why more rethugs are believing the birther story. You VALIDATE it when you cover it and they KNOW it.
07:23 AM on 08/07/2009
We are asked once again to trust politicians. We have Obama mimicking Ronnie Reagan's Trickle Down Economics dogma (yup, it's only a trickle, folks! Heck, may be nothing at all!) and Biden parroting Cheney with his secret meetings.
07:22 AM on 08/07/2009
In this case, the last people I'd believe would be the Obama White House.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Stephen C. Rose
Fulltime writer, blogger, thinker, activist.
07:12 AM on 08/07/2009
This is another reason the President should bring David Plouffe back into a central role to get this thing passed. The issue is confusing enough without these back and forths.

http://stephencrose.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/does-anyone-agree-it-is-david-plouffe-time/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
08:49 AM on 08/07/2009
Getting it passed should not be the issue, changing it so that it addresses the core issues, insurance companies and big pharma. We don't need bad legislation, we need legislation that accomplishes something without bankrupting the country or pushing us toward socialism.
02:41 AM on 08/07/2009
Be nice FOR ONCE if this White House, instead of cutting back room deals with Big Health Care and the banks, would cut a private deal with THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!! I wonder what it will take to finally get the White House to work for us----22 trillion to the banks, while Main Street goes down in flames. We were punked by Obama in the campaign.
06:45 AM on 08/07/2009
It is always easier to be cynical when you are lacking facts. Ths capitalistic system is designed for main streeet to go down in flames in a recession. That's why people are still losing jobs. Capitalism is based on an ownership society. If go to jail and get out no one cares. But if you are Michael Vick, the system have a greater interest in you. etc.!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
01:42 AM on 08/07/2009
absolutely. Now deal with cut. Like any good politician, the white house just gave them what they wanted and is going to promote it as a great thing to the American public. And in return, the drug companies will slip a few million into democratic coffers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nutcase
From Nashville, Tennistan.
01:07 AM on 08/07/2009
It appears that Obama got caught with his pants down.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow
12:45 AM on 08/07/2009
Have paid health care removed from our representatives in Congress until such time as they reform health care - to include a strong public option - for 'we the people' who they are supposed to represent. Thank you! And, by all means, pass the link along!

http://www.petitiononline.com/PubOp676/petition.html
12:25 AM on 08/07/2009
Obama is dealing with issues that no prez wanted to touch except clinton. Doing hard things wount get you popularity. I respect Obama for wanting to take things on thats why we elected him president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
01:56 AM on 08/07/2009
No doubt