Healthcare FLASHBACKS (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Healthcare FLASHBACKS (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post
First Posted: 08- 9-09 12:30 AM   |   Updated: 08-13-09 05:16 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

How Barack Obama has changed!

We recently learned that President Obama has secretly made a sweetheart deal with Billy Tauzin, the former congressman turned chief lobbyist for the pharmaceutical industry. In return for $80 billion in projected cuts -- and $150 million in supportive television ads Obama has apparently sworn to protect the industry from congressional efforts to, among other things, let the government use its bargaining power to lower prescription drug costs.

Now flash back to April 2008, when the Obama campaign put out this ad, in which Obama held Tauzin up as an example of everything that was wrong with the game-playing in Washington.

The pharmaceutical industry wrote into the prescription drug plan that Medicare could not negotiate with drug companies. And you know what the chairman of the committee, who pushed the law through went to work for the pharmaceutical industry making 2 million dollars a year.


Imagine that.

That's an example of the same old game playing in Washington. You know I don't want to learn how to play the game better, I want to put an end to the game playing.

It's not the only time Obama's words on the campaign trail contradicted his campaign remarks about health care reform and Big Pharma.

Obama: "Congress exempted Medicare from being able to negotiate for the cheapest available price. And that was a profound mistake."


"Of course," Obama said on June 3, 2007, "part of that has to do with the fact that, with the Medicare prescription drug bill, for example, the Congress specifically exempted Medicare from being able to negotiate for the cheapest available price. And that was a profound mistake."

Story continues below
advertisement

--

Obama: "Unless we change that politics, we're going to continue to see the waste that we're seeing in the entitlement programs":


From December 13, 2007:

SEN. OBAMA: But one thing I have to say, we are not going to make some of these changes unless we change how business is done in Washington. The reason that we can't negotiate prescription drugs under the Medicare prescription drug plan is because the drug companies specifically sought and obtained a provision in that bill that prevented us from doing it.


MS. WASHBURN: Thank you.

SEN. OBAMA: And unless we change that politics, we're going to continue to see the waste that we're seeing in the entitlement programs.

--

Obama campaign doc pledged to "repeal the ban on direct negotiation with drug companies":

From the Obama-Biden campaign document:

Allow Medicare to negotiate for cheaper drug prices. The 2003 Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act bans the government from negotiating down the prices of prescription drugs, even though the Department of Veterans Affairs' negotiation of prescription drug prices with drug companies has garnered significant savings for taxpayers. Barack Obama and Joe Biden will repeal the ban on direct negotiation with drug companies and use the resulting savings, which could be as high as $310 billion, to further invest in improving health care coverage and quality.

--

From October 2008 Wall Street Journal blog post titled Big Pharma Could Be Big Loser Under Obama Health Plan:

If Barack Obama wins Nov. 4, it's the pharma industry that stands to take the biggest hit, according to Boston Consulting Group. Its analysis concludes that Obama's plan to let the federal government negotiate Medicare drug prices could cut industry revenues by a whopping $10 billion to $30 billion [a day].

--

In campaign speeches, Obama often used heated rhetoric decrying the "stranglehold" of the big drug companies.

Obama says: "We will break the stranglehold that a few big drug and insurance companies have on the health care market.... It's become clear that some of these companies are dramatically overcharging Americans for what they offer.... We're not going to get change unless we can overcome the resistance the drug companies, the insurance companies, the HMOs, those who are making a major profit from the system currently. Now I think all these industries have a roll to play.... We want to listen to what they have to say. They should have a seat at the table, but they can't buy every chair."

--

Here are Obama's comments during a campaign speech in Newport News, Virginia on October 4, 2008 (skip to 23:00 for his comments):

Obama passionately stated (starting at about 23:00):

"First, we'll take on the drug and insurance companies and hold them accountable for the prices they charge and the harm they cause... And then we'll tell the pharmaceutical companies, 'Thanks but no thanks for overpriced drugs'. Drugs that cost twice as much here as they do in Europe and Canada and Mexico. We'll let Medicare negotiate for lower prices. We'll stop drug companies from blocking generic drugs that are just as effective and far less expensive. We'll allow the safe reimportation of low-cost drugs from countries like Canada."

--

In some of his strongest comments, Obama promised to televise his negotiations with drug companies and other interests in the health care reform debate, airing them live on C-SPAN during a campaign speech in Parma, OH on March 4, 2008:

I'm going to listen to everybody. We'll have the doctors and the nurses and the members of Congress and patient advocates. I'll have the insurance and drug companies at the table. They just won't be able to buy every chair. And we will... And I'll be at the table. I'll have the biggest chair, because I'm president. If people have other ideas and I don't assume that I've got every single idea. It can be improved and I want input. We're going to have to make some compromises.


But here's the thing. We're going to do all these negotiations on C-SPAN.

The American people will be able to watch these negotiations so if they start seeing a member of Congress who is carrying the water for the drug companies instead of for their constituents and says, 'Oh, you no. we can't negotiate for the cheapest available price on drugs because the drug companies need these profits to invest in research and development', I'll say, 'OK, let me bring my health care expert in here'. And on TV, we'll ask my health care expert, 'What do you think about what the drug companies are saying?'

And what that drug expert will undoubtedly say is 'Well, drug companies do need some profits to invest in research and development but a lot of what they're calling research and development is actually marketing costs for some of these TV ads you see' ... where everybody is, you have all these people dancing in fields, looking all happy. You don't know what the drug is for. Right? Except for that one drug, you know what that's for. You know what that one is for.

Anyway, you get my point. Open this. Transparency. You will hold me accountable, you will hold Congress accountable. That's how we'll get welfare... uh health care reform passed.

How Barack Obama has changed! We recently learned that President Obama has secretly made a sweetheart deal with Billy Tauzin, the former congressman turned chief lobbyist for the pharmaceutical indus...
How Barack Obama has changed! We recently learned that President Obama has secretly made a sweetheart deal with Billy Tauzin, the former congressman turned chief lobbyist for the pharmaceutical indus...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
2568
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (39 pages total)
- Alok Kumar I'm a Fan of Alok Kumar 2 fans permalink
photo

Revoke the corporate charter of UHC and any other corporation that has paid/bussed agitators.
http://www.resveratrolsources.net http://www.acaiberrystudy.net

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 AM on 09/03/2009
- Jezreel I'm a Fan of Jezreel 62 fans permalink
photo

I almost puked when I read this by Marc Ambinder:

"The White House and Senate Democrats won't buckle to demands from liberals that they revise their health care strategy, officials said today....A White House official conceded today that Obama would have to weather anger from liberals for a while.

More worrisome, (than Liberal anger insert added) officials said, was the growing belief that Obama's brand is being tarnished. A new Pew poll shows that voters don't think Obama is working with Republican leaders, and that a plurality blame Republican leaders. They believe that Obama's favorability rating declines, largely from independents (and within that group, women), can be reversed if he reminds these voters of the bipartisan instincts in his bones....

Privately, White House aides have communicated to the House leadership that the onus on changing minds about the public plan is on Congress, not on the president....

The president continues to operate under the belief that liberals will warm to the bill when presented with a goodybag ...Quietly, to secure and keep Democrats on board, the White House is going to bargain, providing inducements, like more money for favored projects, etc., in order to secure individual votes.

On the other hand, the left is getting tired of being given the proverbial back of the hand by a White House that looks at the world in increments of four years, rather than two."

http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/08/forget_liberals_white_house_senate_double_down_onbipartisanship.php

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 08/30/2009
- unch I'm a Fan of unch 16 fans permalink

one should not blame the prez, it is fault of the teleprompter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 08/26/2009

The basic problem is that he promised to end corruption and turn Washington on its collective ear. Admittedly, he knew little about the enormity of what he was fighting, having not completed even one full term as a Senator. Instead, He is playing the Games he said he would put a stop to. He is ruining the reputation of the Democratic Party. Add to that point that Pelosi is really looking bad for trying to say that protesting the Health care is Unamerican and that is being contrasted sharply with how she was lauding praise upon those protesting against Bush. He embraces corruption and ruins us. She promulgates hypocrisy and ruins us more. Soon, all political capital will be spent with the middle class. We need to hope that the middle class collapses into the lower class, because soon that will become our only hope -- their terror! (I am being sarcastic, but the edge of truth in that is frightening, for some of our colleages may soon believe just that, and that is a terrible thing to think about...)

He talks the talk. However, people clearly see he is not walking the walk. He has to make tough choices. He promised a willingness to be a one term president to get things done. He needs to be truely willing to do that! Victory at all costs!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 08/19/2009
photo

I don't know why there's all this fuss about Obama's health care reform - the right says socialized medicine and death panels, the left upset about no single payer and selling out to insurance and pharma...

Just shut up and take The Blue Pill like Obama has told you to do...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqRaGCqWECM&feature=related

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 08/11/2009

But I want the Red pill...

LOL!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 08/19/2009
- Bronxdude I'm a Fan of Bronxdude 298 fans permalink

The new Hippocratic symbol: $$$$$$
The new Hippocratic Oath: screw the patient; eviscerate the country and make money

Teamsters and the UAW: The democratic response to sleazy tea baggers and cowardly birthers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 08/11/2009
photo

Way to throw the baby out with the bath water.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 08/11/2009
- Bronxdude I'm a Fan of Bronxdude 298 fans permalink

Tort reform is the republican answer to the health insurance crisis undermining America. Incompetent and substandard doctors kill or injury thousands of people everyday, and the republican response to this spiraling epidemic is to place a cap on liability claims, which in their advanced state of delusion will reduce healthcare cost by reducing malpractice settlements. Making shoddy doctors unaccountable will not lower healthcare cost, just their malpractice exposure. Like any profession, if greed-driven entrepreneurs masquerading as doctors want lower liability premiums, then they need to police and purge their ranks of those responsible for driving up the cost of malpractice insurance. While doctors will talk amongst themselves about incompetent and thieving doctors, they never report them to the Medical Board or police. Instead, they allow them to quietly relocate, so they can continue practicing. It’s no surprise why degenerate republicans silenced by medical industry payoffs would push reform that punishes the victim and rewards the criminal. The military is notorious for commissioning doctors who have had their license revoked. Unlike civilian doctors, military doctors don’t have to have a license from the state where they practice; instead, they can shop around, conceal their malpractice history, and get licensed in a state with less stringent requirements, since the military does not require their doctors to carry liability insurance, and they can’t be sued for negligence. Being accountable to your patients and your profession will lower your malpractice insurance. Public option now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 08/11/2009

Tort Reform with caps is actually a viable/needed option, with one important provisio:

If it rises even to a misdemeanor criminal offense, then those convicted of an actual crime can be sued to the walls. Unfortunately, there are some cases of lapses in concentration, being overworked, even caring too much and taking risks that were ill advised based upon compassion -- all leading to frivolous, yes, frivolous amounts being awarded in lawsuits. The truth is that most politicians are Lawyers. Lawyers make big money, and they don't want to limit that big money. The care is not for the people who should be able to sue for reasonable compensation. They say that only because it reads good. Look at Michele Obama a little closer if you want to see the real heart, and she is only married to a politician.

Caps should not be put on compensation for 'black ink' (money actually spent in care) losses. Caps should only be put on 'Pain and Suffering' and 'Punitive' losses. Some get $1,000 for Pain and Suffering that was worse than some of those who got $1,000,000 settlements just because they had a good lawyer. That is not equitable and we do all pay for that inequity, even though it is indirect.

Another proposal: Allow Doctors to post an additional fee (for insurance costs) for those who do not want the limitations. Limit liablity only for those unwilling to pay for that access. The fees *must* be used to pay for insurance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 08/19/2009
- Bronxdude I'm a Fan of Bronxdude 298 fans permalink

Contrary to John McCain’s mendacious scare tactics, generational debt paid for WWII, Korea and Vietnam and will pay for Iraq and Afghanistan. Since the cost associated with goods and services increases exponentially, those currently paying into the social security fund with 2009 dollars are not doing so to safeguard their future access to fund benefits, but, instead, are paying to make up for the short fall in revenue necessary to cover the cost of guaranteed benefits that were purchased by today’s fund recipients with the now substantially decreased buying power of 1960 dollars, which when adjusted for inflation to compensate for the difference in buying power between 1960 and 2009 dollars, meets the operational definition for generational debt; thus, those who pay today are paying to insure access for those who paid in the past. Giving everyone the option to buy into the Medicare pool would increase the fund’s revenue, with the end result being enhanced benefits, lower costs and greater access to healthcare. Of course republicans would oppose such a move because opening up Medicare to everyone would decrease the profit margin for the health insurance industry, which in turn would reduce payoffs and kickbacks provided to republican hacks by immoral corporations like UnitedHealthcare. Republicans have blood on their hands: Iraq and the failure to provide healthcare for every American.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 08/11/2009
- Bronxdude I'm a Fan of Bronxdude 298 fans permalink

Collectively, parasitic health insurance vampires are spending $1.4 million per day to buy republican votes, curry favor and defeat healthcare reform. Since obstructionistic republicans sanction the bilking of the middleclass by the same ruthless industry they deregulated, we need the government between the public and greed-driven insurance profiteers. Making money off human pain is a republican principle. Real competition will lower the costs of health insurance. Georgia state employees have no due process patient protection rights, a negotiated constraint that gives UnitedHealthcare carte blanche to restrict coverage and deny care. Real competition will end the monopolistic stranglehold enjoyed by morally corrupt insurers like UnitedHealthcare. If competition is the lynchpin of free-market capitalism, why is UnitedHealthcare afraid to compete on a level playing field? Limiting choice drives up cost, benefiting the health insurer, which is why slime-dog republicans defend the middleclass being plundered by corporations like UnitedHealthcare. Through mendacious scare tactics, lying republicans curry favor and fear monger by preaching that reform will lead to rationed healthcare and restrictions on patient/doctor choice. Contrary to specious talking points propagated by solution-less republicans, as it stands right now, without true marketplace competition, insurers not only dictate the cost of medical care, but they also get to pick and choose who receives coverage and care. Sleazy and despicable republicans will not retreat quietly from millions in payoffs. I want access to the same slate of affordable options enjoyed by Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 08/11/2009
- Bronxdude I'm a Fan of Bronxdude 298 fans permalink

Forget bipartisanship; true reform will provide affordable options that include a public offering. As it stands right now, UnitedHealthcare can deny medical care, restrict physician choice and authorize exorbitant copays and deductibles with no oversight. Real reform will end the monopolistic strangle-hold enjoyed by ruthless insurers like UnitedHealthcare. In Georgia, UnitedHealthcare executives colluded with sleazy republican politicians to eliminate competition, with the end result being higher premiums, reduced benefits, and greater profits for UnitedHealthcare. With no real competition, UnitedHealthCare is free to bilk and rob consumers. When compared to the second quarter of 2008, profits for UnitedHealthcare increased by a whopping 155 percent, yet premiums continue to climb 4 times faster than wages. UnitedHealthcare is leading the charge to defeat healthcare reform by paying out millions in hush money to their republican whores. The health insurance industry (and the corrupt republicans they bankroll) will not retreat quietly from billions in annual profits. Repelling the Bush tax cuts for the top 2 percent and ending the Iraq War would generate $1.8 trillion in immediate revenue, more than enough to pay for universal healthcare over the next ten years. In comparison, the Iraq War will cost $2.6 trillion over the next ten years. I want access to the same slate of affordable options enjoyed by Congress and 8.5 million federal employees. The public option will control costs, expand coverage and end the single profiteer health insurance system currently bilking Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 08/11/2009

Forget Bipatisanship? Dude, you will *never* negotiate for me. You speak of the poison of others? Look in the mirror bub! It is people like YOU who give people actually trying to do some good a bad name. I have nothing to do with people like you other than to tolerate you long enough for you to vote for *my* candidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 08/19/2009
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 79 fans permalink


Thank you for the collection of videos that makes it absolutely clear that Obama is a hypocrite.

C-Span hearings? Not one so far and the administration wanted a vote before the recess we're already in.

Negotiate with pharma? No, last week Obama traded that away for support on the bill and a little advertising cash.

Unfortunately, I could go on.

One thing, though, he did say in one of the videos above that he wouldn't create a public system, and apparently he's not. So, he's not a _total_ hypocrite...
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 08/11/2009
- CitizenRob I'm a Fan of CitizenRob 13 fans permalink

PUT A REAL END TO THE GAME!

Revoke the corporate charter of UHC and any other corporation that has paid/bussed agitators.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 08/11/2009
- naturesway I'm a Fan of naturesway 12 fans permalink

Meet the new boss....same as the old boss.

we told you so!
PUMA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 08/11/2009
photo

WHO K1LLED MA1N STREET?

Bush+Obama+FED have given the Wall Street Banks

$237,000 from every Family in America!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 AM on 08/11/2009
photo

$7,000,000 More to be taken from every American Family!

Yes! ($700 TRILLION in T0XIC Derivatives) / (100 Million Families) = $7 Million per family!

We must stop them!

Federal Agency, the 0ffice of Comptroller of the Currency, 0CC, issues a quarterly Report that has the following info:

1 JPM0RGAN $81TRILLION in Toxic Derivatives
2 BofA $78TRILLION
3 G0LDMAN $48TRILLION
4 M0RGAN $39TRILLION
5 C1T1GROUP $32TRILLION

http://www.occ.gov/ftp/release/2009-72a.pdf
Page 23!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 AM on 08/11/2009
- PaxEterna I'm a Fan of PaxEterna 63 fans permalink

If they'd given every American family defined in the last century as "middle class" or lower 1Million dollars and had supervised debt pay down, We the People would be in a lot better shape to go spending again - or whatever. Further to the point, it would have been a whole lot cheaper - do the math.

Instead they gave it all to the banks. Why?

Because the banks are insolvent and need the cash on their books to even remotely pass a stress test for solvency. They leveraged themselves into oblivion, taking millions out of the system in salaries, bonus, exec compensation etc. That food chain extended all the way down to the local real estate agent, the local home buyer who thought that owning a home would create instant and lasting wealth etc. and given them a way through equity to pay for college, retirement etc. that typical American wages just don't support.

The only people who extorted instant and lasting wealth were Wall St. institutions and the banks that traded with them.

The rest of the food chain was hung out to dry,

Meanwhile, the debt to China goes on, the toxic assets remain on the ledger sheets, and no one can connect the dots for a decent life anymore except the super rich.

Read Bob Herbert's piece in the NYT today if you want to get a handle on the new reality which, unfortunately, is not going away any time soon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 08/11/2009

What a piece of $hit article. Check your damn sources.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 AM on 08/11/2009

LOL!!!

Explain to me. The sources are reruns of the election campaign. Sure, some of it is a little out of context, but they general jist of what was being promised to America is pretty much as presented here.

Check you language. A more clear violation is right there. You must be taking lessons in hypocrisy from Pelosi...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 08/19/2009

BTW, Pelosi is hurting us way worse than Obama is. Sorry to tell you that about your HERO...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 08/19/2009
- Jezreel I'm a Fan of Jezreel 62 fans permalink
photo

Were it not for Pelosi, we would not have passed the outstanding socio-economic legislation that's passed so far this year. That includes the Lillie Ledbetter Bill, SCHIP expansion and other major Democratic agenda items.

Reid is just another corporate-owned Democrat. He's not interested in improving the lot of the middle class.

Notice that Conservatives never mention Harry Reid when caricaturing Democrats. Republicans don't see Reid as a threat to their agenda.

Pelosi on the other hand, like Ted Kennedy is always held up by Republicans as a symbol of all that is wrong with our politics. Why? It's because Pelosi, like Kennedy is a true Progressive who believes in improving the lives of ordinary citizens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 08/30/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (39 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect