Gov. Sanford Used State Aircraft To Travel To Vacation Spots, Kids' Sporting Events, His Hairdresser: AP Investigation

JIM DAVENPORT | 08/ 9/09 09:19 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this Tuesday, June 30, 2009 file photo, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford talks to Associated Press in his Columbia, S.C., Statehouse office. Sanford used state aircraft for personal and political trips, often bringing along his wife and children _ contrary to state law regarding official use, an Associated Press investigation has found, Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009. (AP Photo/Mary Ann Chastain, file)

COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford used state aircraft for personal and political trips, often bringing along his wife and children – contrary to state law regarding official use, an Associated Press investigation has found.

Records reviewed by the AP show that since he took office in 2003, the two-term Republican has taken trips on state aircraft to locations of his children's sporting events, hair and dentist appointments, political party gatherings and a birthday party for a campaign donor.

According to state budget law, "Any and all aircraft owned or operated by agencies of the State Government shall be used only for official business."

On March 10, 2006, a state plane was sent to pick up Sanford in Myrtle Beach and return him to Columbia, the state capital, at a cost of $1,265 – when his calendar showed his only appointment in Columbia was "personal time" at his favorite discount hair salon. He had flown to Myrtle Beach on a private plane and attended a county GOP event.

The trip home on the state aircraft took off at 1:50 p.m. and arrived in Columbia at 2:35 p.m., enabling the governor to keep his plans for a 3 p.m. haircut across town. There were no other appointments on his official schedule that afternoon; the trip back to Columbia would have taken about three hours by car.

Also, on five of the last six Thanksgiving weekends, Sanford used a state plane to fly himself, his wife and their four sons from the family's plantation in Beaufort County to Columbia for the state Christmas tree lighting. The cost for those flights alone: $5,536, including $2,869 for flying the plane empty to pick them up.

Sanford, 49, has been under increased scrutiny since he admitted in June to having a mistress in Argentina. He's vowed to stay in office and says he is trying to reconcile with his wife, though she moved out of the governor's official residence on Friday with their sons and plans to spend the school year at the family's beach house.

The governor has made a political career out of being outwardly thrifty – known to demand that state employees use both sides of Post-It notes. He has frequently railed against government spending, and attempted for months to block federal stimulus money for South Carolina schools.

Story continues below
advertisement

Last month, the AP revealed how Sanford had flown first class and business class on commercial airlines at taxpayer expense, despite a law requiring lowest-cost travel.

On many occasions, records show, the governor mingled his non-official travels with official business.

For example, on March 23, 2005, Sanford flew on a state plane from Columbia to Mount Pleasant, near the beach house, where the governor was scheduled for a 5 p.m. appointment with a dentist. Later that day, he had a TV interview before speaking at a Republican Party event for Charleston, Berkeley and Dorchester counties along with U.S. Sens. Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint.

Such mingling also is problematic under South Carolina regulations.

Aeronautics Division rules say that "under no circumstances shall aircraft owned and operated by" the division "be used for personal or politically partisan purposes." But there's no clear enforcement mechanism for such violations; the division says it simply lets citizens know that statements attesting to official use of the planes are open to public inspection.

Still, misuse of state resources arguably could subject Sanford to civil or criminal penalties under the state's ethics laws, which are enforced by the South Carolina Ethics Commission. Any public official found to have used state property for personal financial gain is subject to as much as a $5,000 fine and five years in prison. Only incidental use that does not result in additional public expense is exempt.

On April 29, 2006, a state plane flew Sanford from Greenville, not far from where one of his sons was in a soccer tournament, to Charleston, so the governor could attend a National Republican Senatorial Committee meeting on Kiawah Island.

"That's personal use and political use. That's not what the state plane is for," said former Gov. Jim Hodges, a Democrat who said he occasionally mingled official state business with political and public events while using state aircraft, but only if the main purpose of the trip was official business.

Peggy Kerns, ethics director for the National Conference of State Legislatures, said she knows of no state that allows its property to be used for personal or campaign purposes. "It's like a no-brainer," she said.

Government watchdogs said federal officials have to repay the cost of flying government planes for personal or campaign events and said they didn't know of a state that permitted planes to be used for such trips.

The AP review also raises questions about how South Carolina polices the use of its aircraft and reveals a system rife with shoddy record keeping and violations of laws that require the public be able to see documents.

In South Carolina, governors are able to use aircraft run by different agencies: a King Air twin turboprop run by the Aeronautics Division that can seat nine passengers, and smaller, slower propeller-driven planes managed by the Department of Natural Resources.

As governor, Sanford has flown 353 hours aboard the larger plane and an additional 73 hours on the smaller, propeller planes – a total cost of nearly $373,000, according to Sanford's office and other state records.

Sanford's children spent more time on the bigger state plane than the children of the past two governors, records show. At least one of Sanford's sons was aboard 43 flights during his first term alone. That compared with 11 during Hodges' single term and 12 during David Beasley's one term.

Overall, flights that included his children cost taxpayers more than $50,000, or about 14 percent of his total travel on state planes.

"If it was somewhere the governor was going, sometimes the kids tagged along. There is no additional cost to the taxpayers for the kids to be on the plane if it's somewhere the governor is headed anyway," said Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer, who stepped down Aug. 5.

Additional matches of flight documents and Sanford's schedule show:

_ An Oct. 14, 2004 pickup in Bishopville, where his schedule shows his son Marshall's private school football team was playing. Afterward, the plane took him to Charlotte, N.C., for a commercial flight to Dallas, where his schedule placed the governor at a lake house in Texas for a gathering of Republican donors.

_ A Nov. 14, 2006 flight to Mount Pleasant, where he attended a book signing. He then flew to Aiken for the 65th birthday party for a business owner who had donated more than $12,000 to his campaign.

_ A July 8, 2005 use of the state's turboprop to fly from Charleston to Greenville, where Sanford lists the official use of the King Air for a round-table discussion with business leaders, interviews and "Greenville County Bronze Elephant Dinner," a county GOP event.

Sawyer said the governor had fewer hours on Aeronautics Division planes in his first term than his two predecessors: 229 hours, compared with Beasley's 303 hours and Hodges' 310 hours. Sawyer characterized the review of Sanford's flight schedule as "continued cherry picking," a term he used when the AP examined the commercial flights.

"Every time the governor used the plane it was for an official state purpose and that state purpose was documented," Sawyer said.

He also said Sanford's schedule doesn't chronicle all his official activities. "The governor's schedule is not reflective of everything he's doing that day," he said.

Former state Rep. Margaret Gamble, a watchdog on political travel issues, said Sanford should get the benefit of the doubt on a case-by-case basis. For instance, one of Sanford's flights took him from Anderson to Marion County for a soldier's funeral and then to Greenwood so he could get to a McCormick County GOP fundraiser. "Maybe he had a prior commitment," she said, but needed to go to the funeral, too, and the plane was the only way to keep his promise.

Other governors have faced questions about aircraft use, including Beasley for using a state helicopter to get to a speech and then back for a golf game. John Crangle, state director for government watchdog group Common Cause, said governors "have been given almost unlimited latitude to do as they please, to come and go as they please or when they want to and to use the state's resources for travel when they want."

He said the AP research indicates Sanford repeatedly made mistakes.

"This was the Wild West for the governor's travel when basically anything was permitted or done and accepted as normal," Crangle said.

In fact, state law requires the Aeronautics Division to collect and keep sworn statements from aircraft users certifying flights were for official business within 48 hours of flights. Sanford's office routinely filed that paperwork days or weeks late and the division destroys documents more than three years old.

"They're actually destroying data that the Legislature gave them no permission to destroy. That's like destroying evidence," said state Sen. David Thomas, a Republican congressional candidate who has begun holding legislative hearings into Sanford's use of state funds.

The same law requires the agency to post those records on its Web site. That was done briefly earlier this month, but the Aeronautics Division pulled the link to the records as the commission that oversees its operation reviews the law. Until July 1, the agency reported to Sanford's cabinet.

And the law required the natural resources agency to keep official statements on flights, which it never has. Governors appoint the entire board overseeing the agency.

"The situation is one that's dramatically out of control and needs to be completely overhauled," Crangle said.

Added Thomas: "It's an overwhelming ethical issue here. To me, this is clear misuse of state property."

COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford used state aircraft for personal and political trips, often bringing along his wife and children – contrary to state law regarding officia...
COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford used state aircraft for personal and political trips, often bringing along his wife and children – contrary to state law regarding officia...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
931
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
- nick1936 I'm a Fan of nick1936 17 fans permalink

Why is it that every time one of these Repuks gets caught he just wants to pay the money back which leads me to think it's OK for them to steal from the tax Payers as long as no one finds out CROOKS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 08/22/2009
- AZ85283 I'm a Fan of AZ85283 9 fans permalink

I posted before that most people don't understand the Rep. version of family values. It is for the women to follow not the men. Women shouldn't have sex outside of marriage, single women should have sex and respectable women don't get pregnant. But men can and will have sex and because respectable women don't do "that kind of sex", it is perfectly OK for the men to go prostitutes or have mistresses. Besides what is it with the southern men, Edwards, Vitter, Sanford, Clinton? Maybe because they know southern women will accept them because they don't want to give up their positions? Anyway, look out for people claiming the high road on anything--­especially people or groups with a do as I say not as I do attitude. Notice how many GOP excuse Ensign and Sanford and Vitter but not Clinton? Guess being a GOP adultery is OK. The frugal conservations getting caught being a spend thrift, the family values folks caught with their zippers down we keep letting them off the hook. Too bad the wives don't have enough self respect to smack them upside the head and leave. But I guess for them they would rather be a disgraced and humiliated senator, gov or congressman's wife than a plan on nobody.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 08/22/2009

If this is all true and there seems to be a high amount of truism and a personal deficet of honesty and transparency, then it's high time to send the gov home with a sticky note attached to his walking papers that says on one side "you are" (flip on the other side of the stickey note), "fired, and have a nice day".

Just like they did to the IL gov. Unemp. rate is sky high, folks are starving, loosing their homes and with no end in sight! It's time to cut the losses and have the Lt. gov. take over. The state legislature should address consequenses for such abuse of state abuse of privledges.
I wish the "PEOPLE" of South Carolina luck and God speed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 08/22/2009
- chaserblue I'm a Fan of chaserblue 5 fans permalink
photo

For a haircut? He took a plane to a haircut?!? What a tool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 08/22/2009
photo

Today's roll call is just as impressive: Men under the Family's religio-political counsel include, in addition to Ensign, Coburn and Pickering, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Jim DeMint and Lindsey Graham, both R-S.C.; James Inhofe, R-Okla., John Thune, R-S.D., and recent senators and high officials such as John Ashcroft, Ed Meese, Pete Domenici and Don Nickles. Over in the House there's Joe Pitts, R-Penn., Frank Wolf, R-Va., Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., Ander Crenshaw, R-Fla., Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan., Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., and John R. Carter, R-Texas. Historically, the Family has been strongly Republican, but it includes Democrats, too. There's Mike McIntyre of North Carolina, for instance, a vocal defender of putting the Ten Commandments in public places, and Sen. Mark Pryor, the pro-war Arkansas Democrat responsible for scuttling Obama's labor agenda. Sen. Pryor explained to me the meaning of bipartisanship he'd learned through the Family: "Jesus didn't come to take sides. He came to take over." And by Jesus, the Family means the Family.--Salon

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 08/22/2009
photo

The latest bombshell about the congressional Christianists’ residence and meeting house on Washington’s C Street comes in the form of a lawsuit in which the soon-to-be ex-wife of former Rep. Chip Pickering (R-Miss.) is suing his alleged longtime mistress, Elizabeth Creekmore Byrd, for alienation of affection.

Rep. Pickering bunked at the C Street house when he served in Congress and Leisha Pickering alleges that Chip and Elizabeth were intimate in the C Street house — which, by the way, is listed in tax records as a church.

If you are keeping score, Pickering the third philandering Christian extremist politician connected with the C Street house to be outed as an adulterer in the last few weeks. The others are Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) and Gov. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.). Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who is also a C Street resident, has also been mentioned in the scandals. It was allegedly he who counseled Ensign to arrange payments to the family of Ensign’s former mistress.

The house was profiled in the Washington Post on June 2

Want the gory details? Look up flirty fishing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 08/22/2009
photo

Such obvious religion-and-sex hypocrisy, however, obscures the fact that C Street House is a whole lot more than a love shack. I’ve chronicled the Family over the past seven years, but it’s only in the past few weeks that I’ve seen how it acts like a lobby, even as it does not register as one. It reaches out to congressmen, providing below-market housing at the C Street House for half a dozen at a time and hosting many more for prayer and policy sessions. It also funds their travel around the world, makes matches with businessmen backers

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-07-26/conspiracy-on-c-street/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 08/22/2009
photo

C street fun house, brainwashing session.

David returned to his chair. "We elect our leaders," he said. "Jesus elects his."

He reached over and squeezed the arm of Pavel. "Isn't that great?" David said. "That's the way everything in life happens. If you're a person known to be around Jesus, you can go and do anything. And that's who you guys are.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106115324

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 08/22/2009
- moutonnoir I'm a Fan of moutonnoir 46 fans permalink
photo

Jesus loves a cheater. So do the American people.. What right-wing-slob dosent fantasize about Brazilian women? They, of course, would never goto Brazil - they are happy with colonized Hawaii.. no Hawaiian woman will sleep with an 'actual' American..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 08/22/2009
photo

Ah, the model of fiscal conservatism, force everyone to be frugal except yourself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 08/22/2009
photo

after telling this group of men (mostly) and women (with at least two Democrats that I count in the current group) that they are “Chosen by God”, they are told that there is nothing that they can do wrong, as long as they were doing it in the service of the work (of gaining power) that they were chosen for. So they are accountable to no one — not even the people who vote them into power in the first place. This explains alot about the wide and deep strain of GOP hypocrisy (Christianists mostly) — they can say and do anything they need to in the service of power, but being accountable for actions or what they say never has to be part of the calculus. It would explain how David Vitter could get away with visiting prostitutes and keep his job while Eliot Spitzer is working his way out of his own disgrace. It would explain how a group of people who badly want to have the 10 Commandments posted damn near everywhere don’t mind relying on routine lying and character assassination to achieve heir ends. Apparently the ends are more important than living by the Commandments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 08/22/2009

Between this guy and John Edwards.......

What is it with people with money who spend the most on a haircut just to look like they went to someone who stepped out of the 70's? Either that or they're letting straight people cut their hair.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 08/22/2009
- redsongia I'm a Fan of redsongia 90 fans permalink
photo

Both of them are emotionally immature to a wild degree. Sanford is so floored by the fact that he's "in love" that he doesn't really focus on anything else. He strikes me as a guy who went to church for the sole purpose of telling himself that sex was dirty to the point that he deprived himself of any opportunity to explore human relationships and his own feelings.

Edwards is just the typical version of a guy who doesn't understand that the world is not willing to sacrifice for his happiness the way, perhaps, his mother and his wife are. I'd put Ensign and Spitzer in this category too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 08/22/2009
- hootie1fan I'm a Fan of hootie1fan 12 fans permalink

You've got to read "The Family" by Jeff Sharlet to get why Sanford and his kind do this stuff and why they think they can get away with it. All in the name of Jesus Christ of course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 08/22/2009

Oh you are so right! If only 99% of American's understood this. I'll give slack to the 1%. What in the world does "The Family" have to do with religion anyway? And more importantly why are they TAX FREE! Why in the world do we put up with this .... the Ports contracts everyone got up in arms about and they weren't given to the Saudi's but this just slides by. I realize the gov't. probably won't touch because of the votes of the religious right etc. Guess that is it. These jerks and misguided men are running our government!!!!!! Help! Get them out of Washington, tax that group and get real.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 08/22/2009
photo

South Carolina has been down this particular road before: previous governors decided they didn't like a federal law and introduced the notion of nullification. Then President Andrew Jackson saw this as a threat to the United States.

In general, nullification means "If I don't like/don't agree with/don't support a law, then it isn't a law that applies to me."

Gov Sanford has apparently had someone look at the state rules governing travel and gifts and either decided they don't apply to him because what he did was within the regulations, or they don't apply to him because he thinks they're wrong. Either way, the man has clearly decided that he doesn't have to abide by the rules.

Full disclosure--I'm a retired 30 year career federal civil servant who traveled a fair amount at different times, and I relied on a specialist, a full time travel specialist, to tell me what I was and was not allowed to do. Never, ever, not even once, did I get to travel at better than "bucket" class, and toward the end, I avoided travel as much as possible, because the rules said you had to take the "contract airlines" even if it took you 12 hours out of your way. There is nothing more arcane or difficult to understand that government travel regulations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 08/22/2009

This clown has a "hairdresser?" Well, OK, a "discount hairdresser." Obviously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 08/22/2009

Americans shouldn't have a problem with all this because if they have been paying attention to the Republicans Sanford is one of the chosen at C Street and is above following the law or any lousy code of ethics.

Having said this all the birthers, deathers and tea baggers will be lauching protests in front of the Governor's mansion as soon as Rush, Sean, Lou, Bill "O" and Glenn point them in that direction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 08/22/2009
- hootie1fan I'm a Fan of hootie1fan 12 fans permalink

As long as they do what they do for Jesus.....­..........­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 08/22/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (28 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect