iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Stephen Quake, Stanford Prof, Sequences Own Entire Genome In A Week

MARCUS WOHLSEN   08/10/09 04:27 PM ET   AP

Genome

SAN FRANCISCO — It might not be long until there is a gene scanner in every doctor's office, as DNA sequencing becomes faster and cheaper.

A Stanford University professor reported Monday that he has sequenced his entire genome in a week for under $50,000 using a single machine.

Six years ago, hundreds of researchers at the Human Genome Project completed the same task for $300 million. It took 13 years.

The breakneck pace of technological progress in the field of DNA sequencing has raised hopes that affordable gene scans will be available to all patients soon.

Researchers hope cheap gene sequencing will lead to highly customized disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment tailored to an individual's genetic code.

Only a handful of human genomes have been sequenced so far. Typically those scans have used several machines working side-by-side to read the four chemicals that make up a "letter" in the DNA sequence.

"We've shown it can be done with one machine and just three people, with just one operating the machine," said Stanford bioengineering professor Stephen Quake, whose results were published in the journal Nature Biotechnology on Monday.

"It makes genome science accessible to a much broader segment of the scientific community," he said. "It's really democratizing the fruits of the genome revolution."

Still, the cost of entry remains high. The machine Quake used to read his DNA retails for $1 million. The $48,000 cost of his scan was determined as an average based on the total number of scans the machine is expected to be able to perform, he said.

Quake's machine is sold by Helicos Biosciences Corp., a company he co-founded. Competitors say their machines can sequence human genomes for the same or lower costs at a similar speed.

Richard Gibbs, director of the Human Genome Sequencing Center at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, called Quake's results impressive.

But he also said that as improvements in speed and cost become more common, the real test of a gene scan's quality is its accuracy. Quake estimates his scan captures about 95 percent of his DNA.

Missing just a few of the 3 billion letters that make up the human genome could mean not finding clues to a serious disease hidden in a patient's genes, said Gibbs, who was not involved in the study.

"The genome is enormous," he said. "What can be a small percentage of difference can add up to a large number of events that you can get or might miss."

The success of so-called personalized medicine depends not on just reading the letters that make up human genes but in understanding what they mean.

In recent years, an avalanche of research has delved into how variations in just a few letters between individuals can mean a greater risk of developing a disease.

Scientists have also used genetic differences to predict how individuals will respond differently to the same drug.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

SAN FRANCISCO — It might not be long until there is a gene scanner in every doctor's office, as DNA sequencing becomes faster and cheaper. A Stanford University professor reported Monday that h...
SAN FRANCISCO — It might not be long until there is a gene scanner in every doctor's office, as DNA sequencing becomes faster and cheaper. A Stanford University professor reported Monday that h...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 85
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
06:53 AM on 08/11/2009
This is a fascinating subject. A friend of our recently advised us to buy into a genome company with the symbol of SQNM? We'll see if she was right.
GodYesOrNo.com
03:58 AM on 08/11/2009
This has the potential to make Obama's health care program work. By identifying deseases before they start, preventitive actions can save hundreds of billions.

Soon we will be able to figure out statistical predispositions for many health issues by systematically sequencing 20,000 people covering hundreds of health issues (100 people sequenced who have a particular desease. Done for 200 deseases). That way preventative health care can be targeted where it is necessary (e.g. Breast cancer, diabetes).

Also as a benefit accurate diagnosis can often be made. Also as another benefit beter understanding of deseases through understanding unique proteans generated by bad genes can be identified and thus lead to better medicine.

Today a $100 million investment with 300 techs could sequence 5000 people a year. Probably a lot cheaper than $10,000 per person.

This could help make Obama's health cost savings through prevention work well. Every 1% drop in health costs over 10 years is 1.7% of the annual GDP or savings of $220 billion
02:01 AM on 08/11/2009
Hmmm 95% accurate...well look at the diversity now of humans with our DNA 99.9% the same.Even the chimp has 98% of our DNA.The reason we have diseases is one of these 3 billions letters during the copying process of the DNA helix fails or mutates causing amino acids or longer molecules (proteins) to take on a totally different organism function.
01:02 AM on 08/11/2009
I'm going to get involved in the Folding@Home program. Its a distributed computing project done by Stanford regarding protein folding and other molecular models. You download a client that runs in the background on your computer that crunches number calculations, kind of like the SETI@home project does. The difference is you can join teams and combine the data you're collecting and gain bragging rights over productivity.
12:28 AM on 08/11/2009
When will they be able to link this info to match.com.?
12:22 AM on 08/11/2009
gee... now all we need is universal health care... na, that's impossible isn't it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
macmanchgo
"You don't need a weatherman...."
10:30 PM on 08/10/2009
gosh these comments are so dang funny....too bad the scientists that publish this stuff don't have a sense of humor and also too bad for all the people that think they will get rich off this stuff. the only ones that get rich are the lawyers... pity the poor investors too.. how many times do we have to read this same story about the $10 genome? its an exaggeration, and its useless.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:59 PM on 08/10/2009
Human Genome? There's an iPhone app for that!
09:43 PM on 08/10/2009
$50K a pop? It'll be included in the public plan.
09:35 PM on 08/10/2009
He better put that sh*t in a safe or patent it. Can't leave your genome lying around.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sepulchre
A neutron walks into a bar...
09:34 PM on 08/10/2009
The one I work with is fairly fast, a bit slower than that one but didn't cost any where near a million dollars, and averages about a 97% accuracy. Though I suspect I will be putting in for an upgrade when the next generations of machines hits hits the market. We switch machines quite often compaired to a lot of other branches of biological science.
09:14 PM on 08/10/2009
Publicly Funded Research.... may i point that out?
NIH, NSF
01:55 AM on 08/11/2009
I was going to make that comment. Thanks. It's always good to point out to the anti-government types that their tax dollars are being used to do research that may one day save their lives and that private industry is not the only source of invention and progress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Synoia
08:58 PM on 08/10/2009
Hmm, one week....
In 10 years, processors have gone form 90MHz to 3 GHz (roughly 30 times)

In 10 years from now this scan would take 3-4 hours?

Cost $2,000, billed to insurance company, $120,000....

Nope. Wont work. Get a scan, provide evidence to have insurance cancelled due to some undisclosed pre-existing condition.
photo
Harvee Wallbanger
Republicans... I got no use for you.
09:28 PM on 08/10/2009
Yep, insurance companies will probably begin mandating these as part of a physical. In this event, single payer cost sharing health insurance would be the only way to go.
12:31 AM on 08/11/2009
Another reason to get health care reform passed.
08:30 PM on 08/10/2009
So when do I get my scan???
photo
drjasonmd
Shalom, compa!
08:26 PM on 08/10/2009
"The machine Quake used to read his DNA retails for $1 million. The $48,000 cost of his scan was determined as an average based on the total number of scans the machine is expected to be able to perform, he said."

So this thing only runs like 20 scans over its lifetime?

Talk about planned obsolescence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MTGradwell
08:50 PM on 08/10/2009
This is one case where planned obsolescence kind-of makes sense. If one scan takes a week, then twenty scans will take twenty weeks. After that,although I suppose you could continue to make use of the machine, it will make much more sense to switch to the new generation machines which will be available then, which will be able to sequence one genome per minute and which will come free with every packet of cornflakes.
photo
drjasonmd
Shalom, compa!
09:17 AM on 08/11/2009
I don't think the technology will advance as fast as that, and I seriously doubt the numbers presented here. A million dollars for a sequencer, sure, but only a 20-week lifespan? Very unlikely. Most university labs are still using equipment from the mid 90s, twice as old for simpler technology like centrifuges and the like. Someone's either padding the bill or the price was not calculated as it was presented in the article.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Synoia
09:30 PM on 08/10/2009
You don't understand. The $48,000 fee-for-service covers the cost of the machine, the yacht and fourth home in the Bahamas. If used well it might even cover the cost of hte mistress.
photo
drjasonmd
Shalom, compa!
09:15 AM on 08/11/2009
You'd be hard pressed to find a university professor who even has a new car, let alone a yacht.