iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

GM: New Chevy Volt To Get 230 Miles Per Gallon

KIMBERLY S. JOHNSON   08/11/09 07:25 PM ET   AP

Letterman Chevy Volt

WARREN, Mich. — General Motors said Tuesday its Chevrolet Volt electric car could get 230 mpg in city driving, making it the first American vehicle to achieve triple-digit fuel economy if that figure is confirmed by federal regulators.

But when the four-door family sedan hits showrooms late next year, its efficiency will come with a steep sticker price: $40,000.

Still, the Volt's fuel efficiency in the city would be four times more than the popular Toyota Prius hybrid, the most efficient car now sold in the U.S.

Most automakers are working on similar designs, but GM would offer the first mainstream plug-in with the Volt, which seats four and was introduced at the 2007 Detroit auto show.

The Volt will join a growing fleet of cars and trucks powered by systems other than internal combustion engines.

Unlike the Prius and other traditional hybrids, the Volt is powered by an electric motor and a battery pack with a 40-mile range. After that, a small internal combustion engine kicks in to generate electricity for a total range of 300 miles. The battery pack can be recharged from a standard home outlet.

Hybrids use a small internal combustion engine combined with a high-powered battery to boost fuel efficiency. Toyota's Prius – which starts at about $22,000 – gets 51 mpg in the city and 48 mpg on the highway.

The number of all-electric vehicles available to U.S. consumers remains limited. The Tesla Roadster, a high-end sports car with a range of 224 miles, is perhaps the best known. But its $100,000-plus price tag keeps it out of reach of all but the wealthiest drivers.

The company is working on an electric family sedan that will be priced considerably less.

Nissan Motor Co. unveiled its first electric car, the Leaf, earlier this month. Nissan said the vehicle will go on sale in Japan, the U.S. and Europe next year.

Edmunds.com, an auto Web site, cast doubt on whether drivers can expect 230 mpg from the Volt since fuel efficiency also depends on driving style.

Volt drivers who cruise sensibly on smooth roads without much cargo – and who avoid exceeding 20 or 30 miles between charges – might fill up only rarely. But "for most people, it is not realistic to expect that kind of mileage in real-world driving," said Michelle Krebs, a senior analyst with the Web site.

General Motors Co. is touting the 230 mpg figure following early tests that used draft guidelines from the Environmental Protection Agency for calculating the mileage of extended-range electric vehicles.

The EPA guidelines, developed with help from automakers, figure that cars such as the Volt will travel more on straight electricity in the city than on the highway. If drivers operate the Volt for less than 40 miles, in theory they could do so without using a drop of gasoline.

Highway mileage estimates for the Volt based on the EPA's methodology have yet to be released.

"We are confident the highway (mileage) will be a triple-digit," GM CEO Fritz Henderson said.

The EPA conducts testing to determine the mileage posted on new car stickers. The agency said in a statement Tuesday that it has not tested a Volt "and therefore cannot confirm the fuel economy values claimed by GM."

The EPA is working with the Society of Automotive Engineers and state and federal officials to develop testing procedures to measure the fuel efficiency of advanced vehicles, according to a draft outline of the proposal obtained by The Associated Press.

The plan could be released later this year.

It was not immediately clear how GM reached the 230 mpg in city driving, but industry officials estimated the automaker's calculation took into consideration the Volt traveling 40 miles on the electric battery and then achieving about 50 mpg when the engine kicked in.

Although Henderson would not give details on pricing, the first-generation Volt is expected to cost nearly $40,000, making it cost-prohibitive to many people even if gasoline returns to $4 per gallon.

The price of the sporty-looking sedan is expected to drop with future generations of the Volt, but GM has said government tax credits of up to $7,500 and the savings on fuel could make it more affordable, especially at 230 mpg.

"We get a little cautious about trying to forecast what fuel prices will do," said Tony Posawatz, GM's vehicle line director for the Volt. "We achieved this number, and if fuel prices go up, it certainly does get more attractive even in the near-term generation."

The mileage figure could vary as the guidelines are refined and the Volt gets further along in the manufacturing process, Posawatz said.

Chrysler Group, Ford Motor Co. and Daimler AG are all developing plug-ins and electric cars, and Toyota Motor Corp. is working on a plug-in version of its gas-electric hybrid system.

GM has produced about 30 test Volts so far and is making 10 a week, Henderson said during a presentation at the company's technical center in the Detroit suburb of Warren.

Henderson said charging the Volt will cost about 40 cents a day, at about 5 cents per kilowatt hour.

GM is nearly halfway through building about 80 test Volts that will look and behave like the production model, and testing is running on schedule, Posawatz said.

Two critical areas – battery life and the electronic switching between battery and engine power – are still being refined, but the car is on schedule to reach showrooms late in 2010, he said.

GM is simulating tests to make sure the new lithium-ion batteries last 10 years, Posawatz said, as well as testing battery performance in extremely hot and cold climates.

"We're further along, but we're still quite a ways from home," he said. "We're developing quite a knowledge base on all this stuff. Our confidence is growing."

The other area of new technology, switching between battery and engine power, is proceeding well, he said, with engineers just fine-tuning the operations.

"We're very pleased with the transition from when it's driving EV (electric vehicle) to when the engine and generator kick in," he said.

GM also is finishing work on the power cord, which will be durable enough that it can survive being run over by the car. The Volt, he said, will have software on board so it can be programmed to begin and end charging during off-peak electrical use hours.

It will be easy for future Volt owners living in rural and suburban areas to plug in their cars at night, but even Henderson recognized the challenge urban, apartment dwellers, or those who park their cars on the street might have recharging the Volt. There could eventually be charging stations set up by a third-party to meet such a demand, Henderson said.

___

Associated Press writers Tom Krisher in Detroit, Ken Thomas in Washington, and Bree Fowler and Dan Strumpf in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WARREN, Mich. — General Motors said Tuesday its Chevrolet Volt electric car could get 230 mpg in city driving, making it the first American vehicle to achieve triple-digit fuel economy if that f...
WARREN, Mich. — General Motors said Tuesday its Chevrolet Volt electric car could get 230 mpg in city driving, making it the first American vehicle to achieve triple-digit fuel economy if that f...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,331
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gvscmr
www.seanbond.me
11:05 PM on 08/31/2009
Dear GM... Stop Lying to the American People...

http://seanbond.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/dear-gm/
12:35 PM on 08/15/2009
Electricity must come from somewhere at some production cost. Around 75% of the electricity in this country is generated by burning fossil fuels [coal, oil, or gas].

To better assess the Volt's "fuel economy", consider that it has an onboard generator to extend it's range beyond the roughly 40 miles of battery range. Other reports have estimated the Volt's fuel economy in this extended range at about 35 mpg. So ... if we simply suggest that the Volt must recharge its batteries always from the onboard generator, wouldn't its economy be about 35mpg?

Would GM argue that the onboard gasoline electric generator is extremely inefficient compared to utility companies? I think not. Utilities are able to convert about 30% of the energy in fossil fuels to electricity, then there are transmission line losses to deliver the energy to your house, then there are storage losses to drive the energy into batteries so it can be consumed later.

I think the Volt is, basically a $40k 35mpg car. In fact, some reports put the cost of the battery alone at $16k. You can get a pretty good 35mpg car for the cost of the Volt's battery.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gvscmr
www.seanbond.me
11:06 PM on 08/31/2009
Sid... You are right on the money!

http://seanbond.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/dear-gm/
11:09 PM on 08/13/2009
Good news. Should make GM a contender, especially if they can get the price down to $20K or less. I always thought that the marriage of ICE + Electric was a waste, even if they were PHEVs. The only sensible way was a complete electric drive train with on-board electrcity generation. Good work GM. Now battery development can proceed via normal R&D timelines and new generator technology can totally eliminate hydrocarbon combustion can proceed in a way that can lead to retrofits without having to replace the whole drive train. I'm not a big fan of H2 fuel cells, LNG, or propane, but for powering an on-board generator I say "Bring it on"!
10:29 PM on 08/13/2009
: For most buyers the Volt will get zero miles per gallon because it will always be in the dealership and no one will be able to fix it.

This car is an example of something that was sold before it was properly designed, built and tested. And, worse, by a company run by the likes of Rick Wagoner and Bob Lutz (who does not even believe in global climate change, and will tell you that while chomping on his cigar and zipping up his fighter pilot jacket.)

GM, like Chrysler, despite the brushes with death are still run as they've been run for decades, just on a smaller scale; a bunch of hide bound, balls-on-the-table, 2+2=5 because-I-said-so angry white guys who need to hold on a few more years to get the retirement¬/severence package. None of them could survive in the real world without the corporate welfare packages that keep them propped up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:39 AM on 08/13/2009
I still want to know why, since GM already had the EV1, it's taken so much effort to build the Volt.
04:18 AM on 08/13/2009
It's funny. I see all the anti-American, pro-Toyota garbage on these forums, on the same day that I passed a dealer selling a 1966 Mustang and a 1968 Camaro.

Anyone here own a 41-year-old Toyota in running condition? Anyone?

Thought not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:41 AM on 08/13/2009
I have a 1913 Toyota Swizzlestick that has 17 million miles on it!
photo
pmag88
water and carbon and a bunch of other stuff
07:22 PM on 08/12/2009
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=435202

The technology is already here and in use.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greywolf Borealis
I'm sorry, my micro-bio did not meet HP guidelines
06:22 PM on 08/12/2009
GM has been talking up the Volt for years. I will believe it, when they hit the street and not in someone's dreams.
06:52 PM on 08/12/2009
You're right, Greywolf Borealis. These projects are very expensive and they are probably concerned about whether they will be able to sell the units they produce, but it sure seems like there's plenty of demand. From the marketing blitz, it seems as though they may be serious this time. At least it doesn't look like a transvestite hooker's loogie, like teh Prius.
photo
ohiomark
Rush Geek
06:19 PM on 08/12/2009
Good, now make one that costs $20,000 and maybe someone will buy one

On top of paying $40,000 for a new car, you get a higher electic bill as well.

What a deal!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
GOP-R's Are 4Rich, Corporations NOT People!
05:42 PM on 08/12/2009
Vaporized Gasoline Can get 100 MPG's on a V8 !!!
05:53 PM on 08/12/2009
Cool. Now produce one production V8 that gets 100mpg.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
GOP-R's Are 4Rich, Corporations NOT People!
05:41 PM on 08/12/2009
Why not use Vaporized Gasoline Technology that; the Oil and Auto Industry has been hiding for 30 + Years !!!
photo
pmag88
water and carbon and a bunch of other stuff
05:40 PM on 08/12/2009
Well, 70 plus years after we switched from steam to electric trains, we finally have a car that uses the same technology. The diesel engines in a train don't power the wheels. They power the generator that powers the electric motors that drive the wheels. That's what this car does, and that's why, even after the 40 miles of battery only use, GM is confident that the mpg will still be over 100 or more. (triple digits) Quite an achievement, and for the millions of environmentalists out here who will gladly fork over 40k to own one, quite a bargain. In fact, the only thing wrong with this picture is that GM is only going to make ten thousand the first year and fifty thousand each year thereafter. Not nearly enough to keep up with demand. They should make at least fifty thousand the first year and ramp up from there as the market demands. Anyways, I hope they make millions of these and sell them all. This is the beginning of cleaner air and an end to the tens of billions in subsidies we are spending each and every year to protect our access to foreign oil.
06:41 PM on 08/12/2009
But the real reason for the motor/generator in trains is because a transmission would be monstrous and would tear up under the kinds of loads a train pulls, while an electric motor can just tug away. Also, locomotives are moving away from the traditional two stroke diesel to banks of four stroke truck engines, and that will cut down on their economy, but the engines are a lot cheaper.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
GOP-R's Are 4Rich, Corporations NOT People!
05:36 PM on 08/12/2009
It really desn't sound Pratical yet ?!
Maybe for People in town ?!
We'll see, it is a start !
06:39 PM on 08/12/2009
Was that in reply to my post below?

If so, I was referring to the all electric RAV4 in DrVeruju's link.

The Volt certainly seems practical. The price is well out of reach of many but not unreasonable for such a complicated machine and a smallish sedan with very little power and very small cargo space may not appeal to some people (myself included). The design definitely seems practical. If market forces were allowed to work, reduced demand for gasoline would result in lower prices, too. Any bets on whether that’ll actually happen?
05:10 PM on 08/12/2009
Worth a read

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_RAV4_EV
05:29 PM on 08/12/2009
VERY cool. That has a 100 mile range on a charge as opposed to the 40 mile range of the Volt, despit the fact that it's bigger. It doesn't have to lug around a gasoline engine, though, and it's bigger so it has more room for batteries. I'm guessing that accounts for the fact that it has over double the range on the batteries. The Volt is still probably a bit more practical, desptie the (holee jeebus!!!) FORTY THOUSAND DOLLAR (!!!) price tag.
02:14 PM on 08/12/2009
Wait, they invented a car that uses NO energy? What a fabulous modern world we live in.

What? The electricity to charge the batteries and the energy and pollution necessary to manufacture it isn't being taken into account? Shocking.

Gonna have to build some more nuke plants (currently the only technologically viable clean energy source).