iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Joint Session Of Congress Address On Health Care Planned

CHARLES BABINGTON   09/ 3/09 12:45 AM ET   AP

Barack Obama

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will deliver a major prime-time health care address to Congress next week, opening an urgent autumn push to gain control of the debate that has been slipping from his grasp under withering Republican-led attacks.

Scheduling of the speech next Wednesday night, just a day after lawmakers return from their August recess, underscores the determination of the White House to confront critics of Obama's overhaul proposals and to buck up supporters who have been thrown on the defensive. Allies have been urging the president to be more specific about his plans and to take a greater role in the debate, and aides have signaled he will do that in the address to a joint session of Congress in the House chamber.

The speech's timing also suggests that top Democrats have all but given up hope for a bipartisan breakthrough by Senate Finance Committee negotiators. The White House had given those six lawmakers until Sept. 15 to draft a plan, but next week's speech comes well ahead of that deadline.

It follows an August recess in which critics of Obama's health proposals dominated many public forums. Approval ratings for Obama, and for his health care proposals, dropped during the month.

White House senior adviser David Axelrod told reporters Wednesday, "We believe this is the best way to kick off the final discussions, the final debate, and bring this thing to a close in a way that is meaningful."

Listeners to Obama's speech will have "a clear sense of what he proposes and what health care reform is not," Axelrod said. He declined to offer details of what the president might discuss.

Axelrod said earlier that all the key ideas for revising health care are "on the table," suggesting that Obama will not offer major new proposals.

But he may talk more specifically about his top priorities, and perhaps add details to pending plans, to save a high-profile initiative whose defeat would deliver a huge blow to his young presidency.

Many advocates of sweeping health care changes – which would include health coverage for virtually every American, greater competition among insurers and incentives to increase the quality of care instead of the number of medical procedures performed – welcomed the president's more direct role. Obama and congressional Democrats clearly lost momentum during the August recess, they say, and the president's high profile and still-considerable personal popularity are needed to change the dynamic.

"He's got to get into the nitty-gritty and embrace very concrete proposals," said Ralph Neas, head of the National Coalition on Health Care.

Richard Kirsch, national campaign manager for the liberal advocacy group Health Care for America Now, said, "It's really clear they understand they have to provide more presidential leadership, more presidential direction."

Kirsch said Obama doesn't have to provide legislative language, but he must detail "the contours of the reform he needs."

It's far from clear that Obama's speech will satisfy grumbling liberals. For instance, he consistently has refused to insist on a government-run program to compete with private health insurers, a top goal of liberals, even though he says he prefers such an option.

Axelrod called the public option important, but stopped short of saying it was essential to a final bill.

Several lawmakers say Obama must convincingly show that he can reduce the cost of pending health care plans. Nonpartisan budget officials have said Obama's proposals could increase the federal deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade.

Neas said billions of dollars can be saved by changing health payment practices to discourage unnecessary procedures. He also said insurance and pharmaceutical companies should be required to offer more savings to the nation's health care system because they will benefit from millions of new customers if greater coverage of Americans is mandated.

Such demands could be awkward for Obama. He has praised those industries for the cost reductions – worth tens of billions of dollars over the next decade – they already have pledged to make.

Before Obama's speech to Congress was announced, the Republicans' top negotiator on health care indicated Wednesday that bipartisan talks would continue despite White House suggestions that he and another GOP bargainer have not acted in good faith.

Jill Kozeny, a spokeswoman for Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, said the accusations were unjustified. She said Grassley and the five other Senate Finance Committee members – half Republicans, half Democrats – will hold their scheduled conference call Friday to try again to reach common ground on a health care bill that could win broad support in the full Senate.

Axelrod on Tuesday suggested that Grassley and Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., have not acted in good faith because they sharply criticized Democratic plans during the August recess.

Kozeny said Wednesday: "Attacks by political operatives in the White House undermine bipartisan efforts and drive senators away from the table."

Enzi spokeswoman Elly Pickett said of her boss: "Repeating that you don't agree with plans put together solely by one side doesn't mean you aren't willing to work together on a different plan. He is."

Axelrod had kind words for the third GOP Senate negotiator, Olympia Snowe of Maine. Many lawmakers see her as the likeliest possible Republican senator to support a major health care package if a true bipartisan accord can't be reached.

Obama "has a high regard for her," Axelrod said. "She's made a good faith effort to try and find common ground."

In one measure of the intense opposition Obama and his allies faced this summer, opponents of the Democratic effort outspent supporters on television commercials in August for the first time this year, according to a firm that monitors political advertising.

Foes of the Democratic drive spent $12.1 million last month, compared with $9.1 million for backers of the effort, according to Evan Tracey, president of the Campaign Media Analysis Group in Arlington, Va. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and several conservative groups were the biggest advertisers against the health care overhaul, while the drug industry, labor and AARP spent the most on the effort's behalf.

Republicans and groups opposed to Democratic health care proposals have vowed to keep up the fight. A few hours before the president's speech on Wednesday, activists will present lawmakers with stacks of petitions opposing "government-run health care." The event is sponsored by the conservative National Center for Policy Analysis and Salem Radio Network

___

Associated Press writers Alan Fram and Ben Feller in Washington, Mike Glover in Iowa, and Mead Gruver in Wyoming contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will deliver a major prime-time health care address to Congress next week, opening an urgent autumn push to gain control of the debate that has been slipping ...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will deliver a major prime-time health care address to Congress next week, opening an urgent autumn push to gain control of the debate that has been slipping ...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,734
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (35 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPQR1775
10:19 AM on 09/03/2009
I am an officer in the US Army and I have healthcare, paid for my the US Public, since the GOP approve the "TRICARE" formatt, healthcare for the military tank! The GOP all have their hands and stock option in the healthcare market, its a nasty game they have been running, CAPITALISM is a farce, it stinks and it sole intent is to keep Americans in a constant state if indentured slavery. The GOP and the Blue Dogs dems are all bought and paid for by the cabal of industrialist organizations. I lived in Europe and the europeans are so waay advance that we are and freerer, I lived in Asia and they are by far the greatest technologically advance race on the planet. Africa is about to awake and when it does all the American greed of corporations will be pushed out like Zimbabewee, for as in South America, everyone is realizing that capitalist white Americans don't care about people only money. The EU will become the world corrency by 2011, the US under President O will become a more honest, moral base on humanity guiding principles and not by "religious edics", America is on the path to enlightenment. The GOP and Cheney will go the way of the Dinasoars, the "GODS" are about tired as are we mortals of the GOP and their evil ways. Healthcare reform will pass before September 30, "BE THE CHANGE!"
11:07 AM on 09/03/2009
Thank you for explaining to Joemartini1296. We would have a majority if so many Senators weren't bought by the private health care industry. If we can't get public health care in whatever form than this is indeed a banana republic owned and operated by private health care. americans can then go down (liberally) in history and the world's most stupid rubes, ever.
10:03 AM on 09/03/2009
just what he needs... to be on TV again, discussing health care bills that haven't made it out of committee, haven't been marked up and aren't final. providing more generic rhetoric that will further confuse people, as well as congress.

yeah, that's what he needs, more TV time.

mr. president, you have an overwhelming majority in both the house and the senate. how's about you stay off TV for a week and actually take leadership on this reform?

good grief.
09:39 AM on 09/03/2009
Mr. President, you need to hammer home one thing to the PUBLIC.

The Republicans are working for the PUBLIC, and they are protecting the PUBLIC from their PUBLIC option. That's right, little pilgrims, the Republicans do not want the PUBLIC to have the right to make a PUBLIC decision as to health care. Apparently, the Republicans regard the PUBLIC as not intelligent enough to make a PUBLIC decision as to whether they should buy health care from insurance companies or buy it from a government run plan. But, if the PUBLIC is not to be allowed this privilege, just who will make the decision for the PUBLIC? Of course, the Republicans want all of the PUBLIC'S decisions made by the various INSURANCE COMPANIES who donate millions of dollars into the reelection coffers of the Republicans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:24 AM on 09/03/2009
Since you seem to be so enthralled with the word PUBLIC you should know PUBLIC is a code word for
Government (Socialized) Medicine. If you like FEMA then think about "FEMA" Health care.

All we need to do is make repairs to what we have.
Expand, even though it's broke, the Medicaid Health program for those who cannot afford Health Insurance.
Create a high risk pool, just like that is done with car insurance, and help provide Insurance coverage for those with pre-existing conditions.
Allow the purchase of personal insurance across state lines. There are other tweaks that can also be made.
We should do this first.
photo
Totto
"Not 'Noise' One Round: *Music*
03:16 PM on 09/03/2009
Under Clinton, FEMA worked beautifully. Under Bush, who hated government and wanted to give his pals billions of taxpayer money, FEMA worked not at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Monrocsol
Bible is a fairy tale book
07:55 AM on 09/03/2009
Yet again, we elected the wrong person to run our country. Obama is inexperienced. Bush could not speak, this one can, but cannot lead.

Maybe if we drink a little more Kool-Aid...
04:01 AM on 09/03/2009
Hopefully, the President will do what is right for the country and not what he perceives his image to be in terms of bi-partisanship. We can't know what it is to be the President. There are issues he deals with, complicated by his historic election and all that reverberates from that. But, if the American Public could just get his attention for a moment, beyond the unbelievably hateful GOP few, or the absolute insane militia types in this country who have used the Health Care Reform debate as a forum to express their racism and ignorance and paranoia, fueled by the unethical Republican Party. Isn't it so very sad, that this madness has it's source in greed, the money in the pockets of politicians. Beyond shameful. The President has inadvertenly looked weak, as of late. It is so puzzling because he is probably just smarter than the rest, assessing the situation. But, he needs to help the millions without insurance with a public option. He must be strong and stand up to the corporations, as he promised. Then, just move on.
03:17 AM on 09/03/2009
Obama please keep in mind during that there is a noticable ignorant public here in the midwest. Along w/ the details of your proposals please confront the rhetoric.
We are being put in compromising positions when it comes to health care. One example is "Socialized Medicine" as thought we are letting our country go to the dogs. This is not true in fact Medicare is more of a government run program then the current proposals. Why not just tell the it like it is.

Wendell Potter, former head of corporate communications for Cigna noted, “Over the years I helped craft this messaging and deliver it," ( http://www.prwatch.org/node/8422 ). He has had a change because it was wrong to scare the public about reform especially after witnessing the long lines of uninsured patients in Tennessee being treated publicly in stalls used for livestock.
The insurance industry can no longer be removed from the consequences of their actions sustaining stock, & denying procedures.

In fact our country is in bad shape because of the inequality of health coverage. The fact that most people worked hard while playing by the rules only to loose everything due to medical care is something this country should not allow.
We cannot afford to let health care continue as it has. Health care premiums will double w/in a decade. We need a robust public option for health reform in order to compete with for-profit insurers and keep them honest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickmcdougal
03:14 AM on 09/03/2009
It is scary when the things you found comfort in are gone
But My Nation Does not live in the fear propagated by the past
My Nation is born again
My Nation is beautiful
My Nation is created through the minds of Babes
My Nation Is Free and always Changing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgECKj9LSH4
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickmcdougal
03:16 AM on 09/03/2009
My Name Is Joseph Patrick MacDonald
I am a United States Citizen
I demand that my Government protect me from enemies foreign and domestic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickmcdougal
03:10 AM on 09/03/2009
Oh Danny Boy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickmcdougal
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickmcdougal
03:08 AM on 09/03/2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N202Kk1ifhI
we will only be judged for the moments we could of done something and we remained silent
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickmcdougal
03:06 AM on 09/03/2009
I want to hear from all those that claim HealthCare reform is Naziish,
I am a Chzech Bohemian American my grandfather was a Navy Veteran of World War II and a carpenter to Billy Durant/ So the door is truly open now come on in
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickmcdougal
03:03 AM on 09/03/2009
Hmmmm\
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohyQblkQ8fc
12:58 AM on 09/03/2009
Since republican supported anti-health care reformists are going to present stacks of anti-reform petitions just before Obama's speech, why don't supporters in turn gather pro-reform petitions and present them back to back with the republican ones. I'm sure they will outnumber the obstructionists.
12:53 AM on 09/03/2009
We’re told, framing the argument means winning the argument. No one's better at it than David Brooks, who, in his recent column, characterized the public reaction to President Obama as follows: “…if the president is proposing it, it must involve big spending, big government and a fundamental departure from the traditional American approach.” And “If Obama agrees to use reconciliation, he will permanently affix himself to the liberal wing of his party and permanently alienate independents.”

Let’s look in Brooks’ frame? The rough numbers: 25% Conservatives, 35% Liberal, 40% ‘Independents’. Brooks says to President Obama: 'Give up your 35% and battle the Repubs over the 40%.' Obama gets 20% (half the ‘independents’) and the Repubs get 20% (the other half) plus their Conservative base, 25%. Final tally: Obama 20, Repubs 45.

Judging from the White House ‘leaks’, Obama and team are jumping right in Brooks' frame, taking the sucker punch – and, I predict - going down in flames. Brooks has framed the game, and he wins!

What remains of the Obama presidency will be slowly eroded away, as we hear about bonuses to financial companies (approved by Obama’s White House Czar), doubling down on the pointless and wasteful war in Afghanistan (Obama’s ‘new strategy to win in Afghanistan’), and continued dithering on the real economy, with workers continuing to lose their jobs and not finding new ones, under-employment, diminished work hours, declining incomes, loss of homes, lose of health insurance, etc.
12:26 AM on 09/03/2009
i thought "the one" had the press conference a few weeks ago to clarify this whole thing. a mulligan here?
12:41 AM on 09/03/2009
What are you talking about? Obama has not adressed a joint sesion of congress on this issue ever.. Oh yea I guess you dont know the difference between a town hall and a JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS...WTF