Stevens Retirement Would Signal Shift In Court Politics

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Stevens Retirement Would Signal Shift In Court Politics stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09- 3-09 09:37 AM   |   Updated: 09- 3-09 09:45 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Stevens

True/Slant:

In the legal gossip world, (hell, even in the real world), a lot is currently being made of the fact that Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has only hired one law clerk so far this term. In SCOTUS speak, this kind of dalliance in hiring help is often interpreted as an indication of probable retirement. Not that this was unexpected -- Stevens is 89 years old, which makes him the second oldest justice in history.

A friend reminds me that for a long time, there was a tradition that, when possible, a Supreme Court Justice would retire when the current President was of the same party as the President who nominated you. That was the case even when your judicial philosophy might have "drifted" from where it once was.

Read the whole story: True/Slant

In the legal gossip world, (hell, even in the real world), a lot is currently being made of the fact that Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has only hired one law clerk so far this term. In SCOT...
In the legal gossip world, (hell, even in the real world), a lot is currently being made of the fact that Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has only hired one law clerk so far this term. In SCOT...
Filed by Rachel Weiner  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
22
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

If Stevens is going to retire, he might as well do it now while we have a democrat in office. We cannot afford to have another right wing nut in the court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 09/04/2009
- neocon666 I'm a Fan of neocon666 72 fans permalink

This is the SCOTUS replacement the republicans are really afraid of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 09/04/2009
- DeaconJoey I'm a Fan of DeaconJoey 12 fans permalink
photo

Obama. Nominate an extremely liberal Asian American, or a somewhat left-moderate gay White American.

That would probably cause a few strokes and heart attacks among those on the Right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 09/04/2009
photo

At this point, I'm expecting someone like W. Scott Simpson.

http://www.americablog.com/2009/06/mormon-bush-holdover-filed-anti-gay.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 09/07/2009
- HLL I'm a Fan of HLL 76 fans permalink

Thank you, Justice Stevens, for your excellent service to this country.

I hope President Obama will place two more female Supremes on that male-dominated court: May one be an extremely Liberal African-American woman and the other a moderately Liberal Asian American woman - then America will be represented more evenly!!!!!! Hmmmmmmm, that would make 4 women on the court with Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor. Oh yeah!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 09/04/2009
- noaxe397 I'm a Fan of noaxe397 130 fans permalink

I only hope my mind is as sharp as Justice Stevens's when I'm 89 years old. I know being a SCOTUS is probably not physically demanding, but you do have to get up in the morning and go to work, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 09/04/2009
- Okieborn I'm a Fan of Okieborn 69 fans permalink

Great News !!
Maybe we as Americans and 2nd class citizens, will finally get some representation !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 09/04/2009

I hope he waits until we have a liberal President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 09/04/2009
photo

When Stevens goes, the lid will be closed on the gay rights struggle as it relates to the judiciary and the 14th Amendment will reek of formaldehyde.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 09/03/2009
- S1m0n I'm a Fan of S1m0n 100 fans permalink
photo

It's true that Sandra Day O'Connor retired under a Republican president, but she *did* hold out until after he was reelected to a second term, despite the fact that her husband had been in very poor health for some time. She announced her retirement in July 2005, and because of the delay with Roberts' appointment, didn't actually leave the court until January of the following year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 09/03/2009

Am I the only one who thinks that the headline didn't really represent what the story was about at all?

Interesting article...­misleading headline.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 09/03/2009
- mamapower I'm a Fan of mamapower 71 fans permalink
photo

honey, you ain't alone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 AM on 09/04/2009
- mdemploi I'm a Fan of mdemploi 5 fans permalink

Reader's comment: 'dalliance' is a poor choice of words.
Nothing amorous or casual or frivolous about the possible retirement of an AJSCOTUS.
The decision to hire one clerk rather than four is never made lightly or without deliberation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 09/03/2009
photo

It's going to be another 20-50 years at this rate until we see a real liberal or progressive SCOTUS. The political climate is just too grounded like tree roots in our archaic Judeo-christian foundations to actually consider someone who knows how to look forward at how much farther we have to go as a society, rather than continue to look back and be proud of how far we've supposedly come

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 09/03/2009
- Anym I'm a Fan of Anym 22 fans permalink
photo

We need our own liberal Scalia.

and obama keeps appointing center right judges.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 09/03/2009
- jingles32 I'm a Fan of jingles32 123 fans permalink
photo

"Keeps appointing?" Just how many has he appointed then? Did I miss something? And I would hardly describe Sotomayor as right of anything (a good thing).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 09/03/2009
- Rand I'm a Fan of Rand 57 fans permalink

She IS somewhat to the right of Souter based on her decisions

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 09/03/2009
- Anym I'm a Fan of Anym 22 fans permalink
photo

The s was a mistake but she is conservative(pro) in her rulings dealing with industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 09/03/2009

Keeps? He's only nominated the one.

But I do agree. We need a good, solid bleeding heart liberal progressive judge who isn't afraid to be branded as such; is, in fact, proud of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 09/03/2009
- Okieborn I'm a Fan of Okieborn 69 fans permalink

President Obama seems to have a definate plan, and it seems to be to fill the court with conservatives !!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 09/03/2009

in the begining , when it was written, (justices serve for life, )
people then just did not live as along as they do today.

Much has changed since the law was written

Many rules and laws have been revised to reflect this fact.

This one law is long past due for revision.

One GOOD reason more liberals are needed ..... the court needs balance

anyone object to this logic?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 09/03/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect