The Rise Of Fed-Up Judges

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - The Rise Of Fed-Up Judges stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09- 4-09 05:22 PM   |   Updated: 09-21-09 12:15 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Gavel

Several reports over the last few days have featured judges who have gotten fed up with the shoddy paperwork turned in by banks that are trying to take back properties from hard-luck homeowners. The judges are fighting back.

In Brooklyn, Judge Arthur Schack is making a name for himself battling bankers who haven't done due diligence in their foreclosure paperwork. The New York Times reported that he's tossed out 46 of 102 foreclosure filings that have crossed his desk in the last two years.

"I'm a little guy in Brooklyn who doesn't belong to their country clubs, what can I tell you?" Schack said. "I won't accept their comedy of errors."

In Florida, a judge annoyed that bank lawyers had been skipping hearings reportedly told Deutsche Bank National Trust attorney Farzad Milani "that he would not do his work while [Milani] sits in his office in Fort Lauderdale smoking his Cohiba cigars and drinking his lattes," according to the Daytona Beach News-Journal. The judge, John Doyle, ultimately removed himself from the case over complaints about his comments.

And in Phoenix, Ariz., the New York Times reports that Judge Randolph Haines of the United States Bankruptcy Court allowed a homeowner to summon a senior Wells Fargo executive to cross-examine him about missing paperwork in her application for a loan modification.

"The kind of story I hear from this debtor is one that I and other bankruptcy judges around the country are hearing over and over and over again," Haines told the Times, referring to a woman who'd failed to get Wells Fargo to deal with her application,

"Bankruptcy judges are more frequently expressing this frustration about lack of responsible record keeping by the financial services industry," said Robert Lawless, a law professor at the University of Illinois, in an interview with the Huffington Post.

Lawless blogged about a case in Ohio and pointed to another in Pennsylvania in which judges smacked banks' lawyers for inadequate paperwork.

In the Ohio case, Countrywide Home Loans (now part of Bank of America) was sanctioned by Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum, who pointed out that "the problems created by the mortgage servicing industry have been pervasive in many of the cases on this Court's docket."

But how much is this really happening?

HuffPost readers: Know about a fed-up judge? Please tell us about it. Email arthur@huffingtonpost.com.

Julian Hattem contributed to this report.

Several reports over the last few days have featured judges who have gotten fed up with the shoddy paperwork turned in by banks that are trying to take back properties from hard-luck homeowners. The j...
Several reports over the last few days have featured judges who have gotten fed up with the shoddy paperwork turned in by banks that are trying to take back properties from hard-luck homeowners. The j...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1164
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)

Its about time there is some equality if the courts for people. Check out this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CZwXwXcUaA ). There is no acountability to force these financial insitutions to not just be ethical, but do things LEGALLY! They think they are all above the law and hope people will just step aside while they step over them. I refuse to give up easily, which is merely a thorn in the side. I couldn't figure why they would bother with a small little home worth $200K or less, heck they will lose money if they rack up enough legal bills, but then you find out that they don't just take your home and sell it and pocket that cash, but they also turn in an insurance claim and get the full payout from a policy on the loan they took out hoping you would default. If they force you to default- the house and an insurance payout for them! Finally there are some judges stepping up for the people. The law is for the people to live by, apparently not the bankers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 10/02/2009

Obama isn't doing enough with regards to executive pay and bank & wallstreet regulation

good articles: http://www.iamned.com ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 09/08/2009
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 278 fans permalink
photo

In some states you do not even need to be a lawyer or know the law to be a judge !!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 AM on 09/07/2009
- jayes I'm a Fan of jayes 3 fans permalink
photo

class conscious judges? i guess if anyone, they would be capable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 09/06/2009
photo

Do you know why this is news?
Because it is the exception rather than the rule.
Most judges spend most of their time defending the big corporations without question.
This is one of very few exceptions.

I once had a friend who worked for a company whose owners sold out for multi-millions. He then saw on TV news how another owner who sold out gave nice bonuses to his employees. He wondered why his company didn't do that. I told him that the reason it was on the news was that it rarely ever happened...what your company did happens all the time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 09/06/2009
photo

I want to live in a country where PEOPLE own their houses, not the banks. This being an emotional issues, it's really hard for me to humanize The Banks in any degree. At no stage do they operate with our interests in mind.

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
- Thomas Jefferson

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 09/06/2009

thx for posting my favorite quote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 09/07/2009
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 278 fans permalink
photo

Many judges don't even read the paper work they depend on clerks to check the paper work. Few of the clerks are even trained well enough to see the Fraud in the loans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 09/06/2009
- dillydawg I'm a Fan of dillydawg 58 fans permalink
photo

Absolute true comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 09/07/2009

Maybe the bank's lawyers are having the same problem the government did with "cash for clunkers"! Too much paperwork and not enough help....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 09/06/2009
photo

wtf?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 09/06/2009
- mikebarden I'm a Fan of mikebarden 11 fans permalink
photo

OK now, which way is the wind blowin'?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 09/06/2009
- mazzetta I'm a Fan of mazzetta 9 fans permalink
photo

bank's lawyers needing help for paperworks?
they're supposed to be paid exactly in order to comply with, isn't it?

it sounds odd, you cannot compare a litigation in court with appliances for "cash for clunkers", different sports, different leagues...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 AM on 09/07/2009
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 60 fans permalink
photo

Judges tend to be sleasy lawyers on steriods.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 AM on 09/06/2009
photo

2x wtf?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 09/06/2009
- Bethab I'm a Fan of Bethab 8 fans permalink

Can someone explain what is the result when this happens? Does the person then own the home free and clear?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 09/05/2009

No. They just get to live in it, free of charge, until the banks manage to figure out who actually holds the mortgage and find the papers.

If the banks can't find the mortgage papers at *all*, for instance if they were never properly recorded in the county courthouse, then yes, the person owns the home free and clear

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 09/06/2009
- petef59 I'm a Fan of petef59 20 fans permalink

Sounds like government employees (according to THE major talking point coming from private business the last 30 years).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 09/06/2009
- BLBass I'm a Fan of BLBass 32 fans permalink

I'm curious why this is only just starting to happen. No judge, even one who is a member of the right clubs, should be willing to accept incomplete filings in foreclosure cases -- or any case. I honestly think that doing so is an impeachable offense on the judge's part, if not criminally corrupt. The fact is that this behavior has been extremely common in foreclosure cases for years if not decades, and I hope some good-government watchdog out there is digging up records that will point to the biggest offenders and the judges who bought their crap time and again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 09/05/2009
- pfrogger I'm a Fan of pfrogger 61 fans permalink

no offense, but where have you been living?
obviously not in the US.
this is SOP. and they have been doing it for decades. and now they're going to stop?
sorry that's not realistic.
watchdogs? seriously? you must be Fing kidding? you mean like the SEC and Federal authorities that allowed Madoff, Stanford, and slew of other ponzi/scam schemes happen?
the SEC is a joke. any good investor knows that. if they don't, they ARE NOT GOOD INVESTORS! federal watchdogs are a joke. most of the SEC guys go and work for these big companies afterwards or even before. the ratings agencies get paid by the same people they rate.
I'm sorry you didn't know, but you need to get your head out of your derriere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 09/05/2009

If the homeowner can find a good mortgage lawyer who will work for cheap, then the judges *have* to do their job. But most people being foreclosed on can't. :-(

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 09/06/2009

To think of all those foreclosures that could of had incorrect paperwork is mind boggling. Each one that did equals a possible claim against the property's title down the road, in the sense that the foreclosure might have been illegal in the first place. A sheriff's deed would be meaningless in cases like that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 09/05/2009
- BarryS I'm a Fan of BarryS 26 fans permalink
photo

1. explain in court that Judge will hold the bank in contempt of court, no not the clerk sent by the bank, the president of the bank, and all members of the board of directors. One month in prison per PAGE missing. One extra year if no pages of a certified mailing are produced.

2. require bank to produce ALL documents sent to them. If any are not delivered to the court, court rules that the mortgage is invalid, and ower gets the house free and clear.

3. failure to show, to produce documents,

4. Then, one million dollar a day fine for failure to comply WHILE keeping all bank officials are in prison.

This is just like contempt at a grand jury hearing. It is amazing how often the "paper" get lost over and over again.

Then hand another copy to them in courst and require their attorneys to be liable if the documents are lost again. same penalties: all partners of law firm in contempt until document produced. 1 million a day fines. I bet another page will never be "lost" ever again.

Judges bend over backwards to these crooks knowing full well that they are being lied to and played. It is time for action.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 09/05/2009
- CRUMBOWSKI I'm a Fan of CRUMBOWSKI 21 fans permalink

YES! Bravisimo!..

How can we implement your ideas? In cal we have the 'Intiative Process" but the Banking Inustry would just do their OWN bill...OR.­.."Adverti­se" the whole issue out of context...a "F.E.A.R." Campaign....

Perhaps one other method to send a Message to Banks..JUST AWARD THE PROPERTY TO..THE INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN..! Or...REDUC­E...Perman­ently..the Interest Rate...If banks stood to LOSE the Property..OR MONEY..if they played 'Corporate Hostility Toward The Little Guy Because We are Big And You Are Small And We Normally Get Away With It.."...

Anyway...I agree...there needs to be PUNITIVE RESULTS beyond mere chastising..for this kind of Corporate UTTER Lack of REGARD for the RIGHTS of the Citizenry..MONEY is ALL they understand­...hell..t­hey didn't even say..'Thank You'..for the Bail-Out..how did THAT go unnoticed?..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 09/05/2009
- DeSwiss I'm a Fan of DeSwiss 28 fans permalink
photo

None of this will stop until they start sending some "suits" to the slammer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 09/05/2009

Oh, would this be akin to people doing their jobs and blowing the whistle in the face of greed and wanton self-interest? It's about damn time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 09/05/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect