Stephen Farrell Kidnapped: New York Times Journalist Freed From Taliban: Official

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Stephen Farrell Kidnapped: New York Times Journalist Freed From Taliban: Official stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JASON STRAZIUSO and RAHIM FAIEZ | 09/ 9/09 05:30 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Farrell

KABUL — During the first two days of captivity, The New York Times reporter and his Afghan translator were optimistic about being released. Then more Taliban came to the hide-out and taunted the captives about an Italian journalist who was freed while his Afghan interpreter was beheaded.

The menace grew – until British commandos launched a rescue raid. The reporter survived; his Afghan colleague died in a volley of gunfire as he shouted "Journalist! Journalist!" Four others, including a British soldier, also were killed.

Stephen Farrell, who was not injured in the rescue Wednesday, is one of a half-dozen foreign journalists to be kidnapped in Afghanistan over the last several years. His Times colleague, David Rohde, was abducted by militants south of Kabul last November and eventually escaped his captors while being held in Pakistan.

The kidnappings illustrate some of the obstacles for reporters in covering an increasingly lethal war. August saw a record number of U.S. troops die in combat, and bombings wounded three journalists embedded with them: two from The Associated Press and one from CBS Radio News.

Farrell, 46, exposed himself to a different danger. He and his 34-year-old translator, Sultan Munadi, ventured without military escort to the site of a NATO airstrike on two hijacked fuel tankers in a Taliban-controlled area of northern Afghanistan to interview villagers about civilian casualties from the attack.

It was an important story. The top NATO commander, U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, had made protecting Afghan civilians a top priority, and there were conflicting claims of how many civilians had died in the bombing Friday. Police had warned reporters of the dangers of traveling to the village in Kunduz province, and other Western journalists, including some from the AP, went there in the company of NATO forces.

New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller said reporters in the field are allowed a great deal of leeway, and that they are the best ones to judge the level of risk. He added that the newspaper would carry out a security review after the latest abduction.

The Times reported that while Farrell and Munadi were interviewing Afghans on Saturday near the site of the airstrike, an old man approached and warned them to leave. Soon after, gunshots rang out and people shouted that Taliban fighters were approaching. Across the Kunduz river, a group of about 10 militants with Kalashnikovs and machine guns were running toward them.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Taliban captured the journalists. Their driver fled and notified Farrell's colleagues in Kabul.

The Times kept the kidnappings quiet out of concern for the men's safety, and other media organizations, including the AP, did not report the abductions.

According to Farrell's account in the Times, the captors moved the two men several times and eventually put them in a tiny room. On the third day, some new fighters, apparently more senior Taliban figures from elsewhere in Afghanistan, arrived and discussed moving their hostages out of the Kunduz area.

Afghan officials believed the two Times journalists were originally held by a Mullah Qadir, but were handed off to a commander Mullah Salaam and held in the village of Ghor Tepa, said Lt. Gen. Mirza Mohammad Yarmand, an Afghan army investigator sent to Kunduz by President Hamid Karzai to look into the case.

The Times reported that the militants taunted Munadi, reminding him of the case in 2007 when kidnappers released Italian journalist Daniele Mastrogiacomo but beheaded his translator and another Afghan colleague.

Farrell, an experienced reporter who was once held captive in Iraq, thought the atmosphere turned menacing.

Before dawn on Wednesday, they could hear helicopters approaching.

"We were all in a room, the Talibs all ran, it was obviously a raid," the Times quoted Farrell as saying.

The militants scattered, though one returned and tipped his gun toward them and then left again without firing. After a while, Farrell and Munadi went out into a courtyard. With Munadi in front, they ran in the dark along the compound's high mud-brick wall. They heard British and Afghan voices – and a flurry of bullets.

After moving along the wall for about 60 feet, Munadi raised his hands, walked into the open and shouted, "Journalist! Journalist!"

"He was three seconds away from safety," Farrell was quoted as saying. "I thought we were safe. He just walked into a hail of bullets."

Farrell, a dual Irish-British citizen, said he then dived into a ditch. For the next couple of minutes, he focused on the British voices. Then he shouted: "British hostage! British hostage!"

The British voices told him to come near, and that's when he said he saw Munadi.

"He was lying in the same position as he fell," Farrell told the Times. "That's all I know. I saw him go down in front of me. He did not move. He's dead. He was so close; he was just two feet in front of me when he dropped."

A British commando also died in the firefight. Also killed were a Taliban commander, the owner of the house in which the captives were held, and an unidentified woman, said Mohammad Sami Yowar, a spokesman for the Kunduz governor.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the operation was carried out after "extensive planning and consideration," and that those involved knew the high risks. Brown called the mission "breathtaking heroism."

Keller said he had understood from the military officials that they did not intend to conduct a raid unless the situation turned "particularly menacing and they had actionable intelligence and a high probability of success."

Keller said he did not know what triggered the decision to carry out the raid, but that Farrell told him the situation had turned "menacing." Keller said it was possible the militants may have planned to move the hostages, and said he would not second-guess the military's decision to take action.

Late Wednesday, Afghan journalists who work for international news outlets gathered at Munadi's house in Kabul for an Islamic prayer. The family buried Munadi without having the body examined to help determine if British bullets or Taliban gunfire killed him.

A British defense official said he couldn't rule out the possibility he was killed by British gunfire.

Munadi, a married father of two, was first employed by the Times in 2002, according to his colleagues. He left the company a few years later to work for a radio station. Last year he traveled to Germany to study for a master's degree. He returned to Kabul last month to see his family and agreed to accompany Farrell to Kunduz on a freelance basis.

In a Times Web blog this month, Munadi wrote that he would never leave Afghanistan permanently and that "being a journalist is not enough; it will not solve the problems of Afghanistan. I want to work for the education of the country, because the majority of people are illiterate."

"And if I leave this country, if other people like me leave this country, who will come to Afghanistan?" he wrote. "Will it be the Taliban who come to govern this country? That is why I want to come back, even if it means cleaning the streets of Kabul."

Farrell joined the Times in 2007 in Baghdad, and has covered both the Afghan and Iraq conflicts for the newspaper.

He was briefly held hostage in Iraq in 2004, when he was working for The Times of London. Militants questioned him and freelance U.S. journalist Orly Halpern for about seven hours before letting them go, he was quoted as saying afterward.

At least 16 Afghan and foreign journalists have been kidnapped in Afghanistan since January 2002, according to Reporters Without Borders.

___

Associated Press reporters Heidi Vogt in Kabul, David Stringer in London and Deepti Hajela in New York contributed to this report.

KABUL — During the first two days of captivity, The New York Times reporter and his Afghan translator were optimistic about being released. Then more Taliban came to the hide-out and taunted the...
KABUL — During the first two days of captivity, The New York Times reporter and his Afghan translator were optimistic about being released. Then more Taliban came to the hide-out and taunted the...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
73
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- pene I'm a Fan of pene 20 fans permalink
photo

Where are the commandos who will free our nation which has been taken and is held hostage to two wars started for the sake of profiteering?

Support our Troops - BRING THEM HOME

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 09/09/2009
- pj-smith I'm a Fan of pj-smith 19 fans permalink
photo

love the math....2 dead for one freed alive....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 09/09/2009
- itsamessi I'm a Fan of itsamessi 3 fans permalink
photo

This worthless piece of s8It cost the life of an Afghan and a special forces Soldier.

Stephen Farrell was specifically warned NOT to go to this area.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 09/09/2009
- 4evryoung I'm a Fan of 4evryoung 6 fans permalink

I wonder if they figured the translator was just collateral damage?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 09/09/2009

No journalist in the world is worth a soldier's (and a translator's) death. Especially one who did not have the intelligence to not go into an area he was warned about, and who could not see what the consequences of his actions might be.
He should be in jail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 09/09/2009
- JerryLevy I'm a Fan of JerryLevy 54 fans permalink
photo

Maybe the NY Times will truthfully report the danger any reporter faces in Arab countries when they accurately report the news. If you report information about Palestinian terror, subjigation of their own people, and the murder of Palestinians by Palestinians, your life is in extreme danger. The Taliban, Hezbollah, Hamas, and most Arab regimes use the media by threatening them to tow the line. It is one of the reasons we do not get the truth in the Middle East. CNN actually agreed with Saddam Hussain not to report any abuses by the regime in return for letting them have a news bureau there. The elite media have a lot to be ashamed of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 09/09/2009
- blutigeroo I'm a Fan of blutigeroo 28 fans permalink
photo

Why a one-sided attack on Arabs?
Journalists have external pressures that limit their reporting of the elusive "truth" everywhere, not just in the middle east.
Remember the recent Lockerbie bomber fiasco? The Al-Jazeera bombing fiasco? Israel stopping journalists entering Gaza? Torture claims? 9.11 (according so some), Kosovo...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 AM on 09/10/2009
- GringoLingo I'm a Fan of GringoLingo 191 fans permalink
photo

Wow, the Associated Press kept the kidnapping of a journalist quiet but it can't respect a fallen solider and must post photos of his death for the world to see? How many times during this war has the NY Times exposed secret information that endangered the lives of our troops overseas?

This Times reporter was repeatedly warned not to enter the area. He was kidnapped and allied soldiers died saving him from his own stupidity.

What is worse is how this article tries to blame the rescuing British soldiers for the death of the interpreter. The soldiers were working to free to the captives. Wouldn't the death be the fault of the reporter who ignored warnings and placed the interpreter in danger?

I have already mourned for the passing of the once great NY Times. I will not mourn when it finally goes out of business early next year.

God bless the families of the soldiers who passed as well as the family of the translator.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 AM on 09/09/2009
- bigsioux I'm a Fan of bigsioux 35 fans permalink

Very well said. I agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 09/09/2009
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 386 fans permalink
photo

You seem a lot more upset about the Marine's picture being shown than the fact that he got killed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 09/09/2009
- Hopeington I'm a Fan of Hopeington 81 fans permalink
photo

Fanned.... although I never respond to gringo,,,,pretty much just skip right over his comments,,, it's always the same thing..all negative,never a positive. How can a person live like that, always upset.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 09/09/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 136 fans permalink

I am happy to hear the NYT reporter was freed but I am saddened to hear about the interpreters death. He and the native reporters are among the few the heroes in all of this.Risking their lives so that we can understand what is happening in a country that is as foreign as can be.

I think this story is also an indication that what we call the Taliban are different from the criminals in al Qaida. In this war (I hope) prisoners are taken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 AM on 09/09/2009
- GringoLingo I'm a Fan of GringoLingo 191 fans permalink
photo

The reporter didn't just risk his life. By ignoring warnings and entering an area filled with Taliban, he needlessly risked his life, the interpreter's life, and the lives of the soldiers who rescued him. These brave soldiers did not have to die.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 09/09/2009
photo

I like your comment just as much each time I read it. As a spy, this reporter is lucky to be alive. The official policy in regard to reporters and other civilians who enter a war zone under their own steam is that no effort will be made to retrieve them, no matter what.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 09/09/2009
photo

Sorry about the wording of my other response. I meant that the official policy _should be_ that no effort is made to retrieve these people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 09/09/2009
- GringoLingo I'm a Fan of GringoLingo 191 fans permalink
photo

The reporter didn't just risk his life. By ignoring warnings and entering an area filled with Taliban, he needlessly risked his life, the interpreter's life, and the lives of the soldiers who rescued him. These brave soldiers did not have to d!e.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 09/09/2009
- GringoLingo I'm a Fan of GringoLingo 191 fans permalink
photo

If the reporter had not ignored warnings and entered a Taliban occupied area, none of this would have happened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 09/09/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 136 fans permalink

So you would prefer that no reporters are on the scene. And that we only get the "official" version of this, and any other story.

Or the Taliban version.

Which do you prefer?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 09/09/2009

I hope you are saddened by the death of one of the rescuing British service members, too. THEY were supposed to be there, rescuing the journalist who should not have been.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 09/09/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 136 fans permalink

And where should the reporter be?

Back at headquarters watching the Daily Follies?

Me, I respect people who put themselves in harms way in order that we can see/hear what is happening in the field.

In case you didn't catch what is happening here, the Taliban is trying to make propaganda hay out of the bombing of that tanker truck.

I appreciate a first hand report from someone other than the military or the Taliban.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 09/09/2009

What about THE SOLDIER who died? Not saddened by his death?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 09/09/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 136 fans permalink

Of course I am.

But my point was about the reporters and particularly the interpreters.

Saddened by the Afghani deaths as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 09/09/2009
- yankees I'm a Fan of yankees 18 fans permalink

But a what expense?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 09/09/2009
photo

how is this good news when two more people di.ed from Obama's war?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 09/09/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 136 fans permalink

Nice republican talking point.

Just how was this war that Bush started and then screwed up suddenly becomes President Obama's.

Certainly it is his to fix the criminal misconduct of the previous Administration.

But calling it "Obama's War" in hopes that he will fail and Republicans can achieve a temporary partisan political advantage is really . . . how you say?

Despicable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 09/09/2009
- JerryLevy I'm a Fan of JerryLevy 54 fans permalink
photo

It is not a Republican talking point---it is a far left talking point used to try to get Obama to surrender and retreat from Afghanistan. The Republicans support our continued efforts in Afghanistan because they remember 9/11 and do not want it to happen again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 09/09/2009

Gee, I smell a book, and a movie, and multiple appearances by the reporter. Too bad the interpreter, making $30 a day, was killed trying to protect the reporter. Too bad about the soldier killed. Too bad he had to be there WHEN HE WAS WARNED OF THE DANGER. I hope the reporter realizes what his actions have caused.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 09/09/2009
photo

There is no "story" that's worth this kind of risk, and as it turns out rescuing this dude caused the death of two more people. Can't we just call it an illegal war and get the hell out of there?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 09/09/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 136 fans permalink

Illegal war?

In what sense? As I recall the Afghanistan war had the backing of the UN.

Which makes it legal.

You are confusing it with the Iraqi War.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 09/09/2009
photo

Sorry. Obviously I meant "immoral." Blame the editors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 09/09/2009
- JerryLevy I'm a Fan of JerryLevy 54 fans permalink
photo

Since when is this war "illegal?" You sound worse than the Palestinians "the ILLEGAL wall" "the ILLEGAL occupation" etc.

We did not start this war and if we do not finish it we will be fighting it all over again. I think your screen name says it beautifully.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 09/09/2009
photo

Thanks for the compliment on my screen name. Each of us is 65% water.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 09/09/2009
- newyorkid I'm a Fan of newyorkid 40 fans permalink
photo

for our arm_ies occu_pying foreign countries, vvhite vvestern Iife is precious. mus_lim Iife is vvorthless.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 09/09/2009
- trebor0927 I'm a Fan of trebor0927 13 fans permalink

Tell that to Daniel Pearls wife. Not sure what he did to the peace loving people who chopped off his head. Maybe he misspelled Taliban.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 09/09/2009
photo

nonsense. stop posting drun.k

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 09/09/2009

Tell that to the family of the British soldier who died trying to rescue your Muslim friend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 09/09/2009
- JerryLevy I'm a Fan of JerryLevy 54 fans permalink
photo

Tell that to the white western brave soldiers who saved thousands of Muslim lives in Yugoslavia that were threatened with extinction from Molosovitch or tell that to the brave white western soldiers that rescued Kuwait from Iraq. Ms. Newyorkid, you have a skewed world seen through racist eyes. And by the way, what is with the __ __ __ in your postings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 09/09/2009

I find it amazing that a newspaper surpresses the news (though I read rumblings of this kidnapping over the weekend) when it's one of its own. Tell me the TImes would have kept quiet for other people. Answer: it wouldn't. It would have said it had the obligation, and the right, to publish news.

I'm glad the reporter is safe and sad that others died. And the Times is proving itself increasingly irrelevant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 09/09/2009
photo

"The Times kept the kidnappings quiet...and other media outlets, including The Associated Press, did not report the abductions following a request from the Times."

In 2006 and many times since, I contacted the New York Times with a request to PLEASE cover Mordechai Vanunu's historic FREEDOM of SPEECH Trial in Israel which began January 2006: the same day Hamas was democratically elected.

The TIMES; and ALL the other corporate media outlets-including Amy Goodman whose 2004 interview with Vanunu was major testimony against him- to PLEASE follow this incredible story in the "only Middle East democracy" but none of them even bothered to respond to me.

"US Media is under Israeli occupation too."-Mordechai Vanunu

Eileen Fleming, Author, Founder of WeAreWideAwake.org
Producer "30 Minutes with Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 09/09/2009
- newyorkid I'm a Fan of newyorkid 40 fans permalink
photo

for our armies occupying foreign countries, vvhite western life is precious. muslim life is vvorthless.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 AM on 09/09/2009

We heard you the first time

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 09/09/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn