EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Stephen Farrell Kidnapped: New York Times Journalist Freed From Taliban: Official

JASON STRAZIUSO and RAHIM FAIEZ   09/ 9/09 06:30 PM ET   AP

Farrell

KABUL — During the first two days of captivity, The New York Times reporter and his Afghan translator were optimistic about being released. Then more Taliban came to the hide-out and taunted the captives about an Italian journalist who was freed while his Afghan interpreter was beheaded.

The menace grew – until British commandos launched a rescue raid. The reporter survived; his Afghan colleague died in a volley of gunfire as he shouted "Journalist! Journalist!" Four others, including a British soldier, also were killed.

Stephen Farrell, who was not injured in the rescue Wednesday, is one of a half-dozen foreign journalists to be kidnapped in Afghanistan over the last several years. His Times colleague, David Rohde, was abducted by militants south of Kabul last November and eventually escaped his captors while being held in Pakistan.

The kidnappings illustrate some of the obstacles for reporters in covering an increasingly lethal war. August saw a record number of U.S. troops die in combat, and bombings wounded three journalists embedded with them: two from The Associated Press and one from CBS Radio News.

Farrell, 46, exposed himself to a different danger. He and his 34-year-old translator, Sultan Munadi, ventured without military escort to the site of a NATO airstrike on two hijacked fuel tankers in a Taliban-controlled area of northern Afghanistan to interview villagers about civilian casualties from the attack.

It was an important story. The top NATO commander, U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, had made protecting Afghan civilians a top priority, and there were conflicting claims of how many civilians had died in the bombing Friday. Police had warned reporters of the dangers of traveling to the village in Kunduz province, and other Western journalists, including some from the AP, went there in the company of NATO forces.

New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller said reporters in the field are allowed a great deal of leeway, and that they are the best ones to judge the level of risk. He added that the newspaper would carry out a security review after the latest abduction.

The Times reported that while Farrell and Munadi were interviewing Afghans on Saturday near the site of the airstrike, an old man approached and warned them to leave. Soon after, gunshots rang out and people shouted that Taliban fighters were approaching. Across the Kunduz river, a group of about 10 militants with Kalashnikovs and machine guns were running toward them.

The Taliban captured the journalists. Their driver fled and notified Farrell's colleagues in Kabul.

The Times kept the kidnappings quiet out of concern for the men's safety, and other media organizations, including the AP, did not report the abductions.

According to Farrell's account in the Times, the captors moved the two men several times and eventually put them in a tiny room. On the third day, some new fighters, apparently more senior Taliban figures from elsewhere in Afghanistan, arrived and discussed moving their hostages out of the Kunduz area.

Afghan officials believed the two Times journalists were originally held by a Mullah Qadir, but were handed off to a commander Mullah Salaam and held in the village of Ghor Tepa, said Lt. Gen. Mirza Mohammad Yarmand, an Afghan army investigator sent to Kunduz by President Hamid Karzai to look into the case.

The Times reported that the militants taunted Munadi, reminding him of the case in 2007 when kidnappers released Italian journalist Daniele Mastrogiacomo but beheaded his translator and another Afghan colleague.

Farrell, an experienced reporter who was once held captive in Iraq, thought the atmosphere turned menacing.

Before dawn on Wednesday, they could hear helicopters approaching.

"We were all in a room, the Talibs all ran, it was obviously a raid," the Times quoted Farrell as saying.

The militants scattered, though one returned and tipped his gun toward them and then left again without firing. After a while, Farrell and Munadi went out into a courtyard. With Munadi in front, they ran in the dark along the compound's high mud-brick wall. They heard British and Afghan voices – and a flurry of bullets.

After moving along the wall for about 60 feet, Munadi raised his hands, walked into the open and shouted, "Journalist! Journalist!"

"He was three seconds away from safety," Farrell was quoted as saying. "I thought we were safe. He just walked into a hail of bullets."

Farrell, a dual Irish-British citizen, said he then dived into a ditch. For the next couple of minutes, he focused on the British voices. Then he shouted: "British hostage! British hostage!"

The British voices told him to come near, and that's when he said he saw Munadi.

"He was lying in the same position as he fell," Farrell told the Times. "That's all I know. I saw him go down in front of me. He did not move. He's dead. He was so close; he was just two feet in front of me when he dropped."

A British commando also died in the firefight. Also killed were a Taliban commander, the owner of the house in which the captives were held, and an unidentified woman, said Mohammad Sami Yowar, a spokesman for the Kunduz governor.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the operation was carried out after "extensive planning and consideration," and that those involved knew the high risks. Brown called the mission "breathtaking heroism."

Keller said he had understood from the military officials that they did not intend to conduct a raid unless the situation turned "particularly menacing and they had actionable intelligence and a high probability of success."

Keller said he did not know what triggered the decision to carry out the raid, but that Farrell told him the situation had turned "menacing." Keller said it was possible the militants may have planned to move the hostages, and said he would not second-guess the military's decision to take action.

Late Wednesday, Afghan journalists who work for international news outlets gathered at Munadi's house in Kabul for an Islamic prayer. The family buried Munadi without having the body examined to help determine if British bullets or Taliban gunfire killed him.

A British defense official said he couldn't rule out the possibility he was killed by British gunfire.

Munadi, a married father of two, was first employed by the Times in 2002, according to his colleagues. He left the company a few years later to work for a radio station. Last year he traveled to Germany to study for a master's degree. He returned to Kabul last month to see his family and agreed to accompany Farrell to Kunduz on a freelance basis.

In a Times Web blog this month, Munadi wrote that he would never leave Afghanistan permanently and that "being a journalist is not enough; it will not solve the problems of Afghanistan. I want to work for the education of the country, because the majority of people are illiterate."

"And if I leave this country, if other people like me leave this country, who will come to Afghanistan?" he wrote. "Will it be the Taliban who come to govern this country? That is why I want to come back, even if it means cleaning the streets of Kabul."

Farrell joined the Times in 2007 in Baghdad, and has covered both the Afghan and Iraq conflicts for the newspaper.

He was briefly held hostage in Iraq in 2004, when he was working for The Times of London. Militants questioned him and freelance U.S. journalist Orly Halpern for about seven hours before letting them go, he was quoted as saying afterward.

At least 16 Afghan and foreign journalists have been kidnapped in Afghanistan since January 2002, according to Reporters Without Borders.

___

Associated Press reporters Heidi Vogt in Kabul, David Stringer in London and Deepti Hajela in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

KABUL — During the first two days of captivity, The New York Times reporter and his Afghan translator were optimistic about being released. Then more Taliban came to the hide-out and taunted the...
KABUL — During the first two days of captivity, The New York Times reporter and his Afghan translator were optimistic about being released. Then more Taliban came to the hide-out and taunted the...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
pene
critical thinker
02:31 PM on 09/09/2009
Where are the commandos who will free our nation which has been taken and is held hostage to two wars started for the sake of profiteeri­ng?

Support our Troops - BRING THEM HOME
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pj-smith
solidarity with OWS
01:19 PM on 09/09/2009
love the math....2 dead for one freed alive....
12:44 PM on 09/09/2009
This worthless piece of s8It cost the life of an Afghan and a special forces Soldier.

Stephen Farrell was specifical­ly warned NOT to go to this area.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 PM on 09/09/2009
I wonder if they figured the translator was just collateral damage?
11:30 AM on 09/09/2009
No journalist in the world is worth a soldier's (and a translator­'s) death. Especially one who did not have the intelligen­ce to not go into an area he was warned about, and who could not see what the consequenc­es of his actions might be.
He should be in jail.
11:12 AM on 09/09/2009
Maybe the NY Times will truthfully report the danger any reporter faces in Arab countries when they accurately report the news. If you report informatio­n about Palestinia­n terror, subjigatio­n of their own people, and the murder of Palestinia­ns by Palestinia­ns, your life is in extreme danger. The Taliban, Hezbollah, Hamas, and most Arab regimes use the media by threatenin­g them to tow the line. It is one of the reasons we do not get the truth in the Middle East. CNN actually agreed with Saddam Hussain not to report any abuses by the regime in return for letting them have a news bureau there. The elite media have a lot to be ashamed of.
photo
blutigeroo
Remember, we are all stuck on this planet together
03:33 AM on 09/10/2009
Why a one-sided attack on Arabs?
Journalist­s have external pressures that limit their reporting of the elusive "truth" everywhere­, not just in the middle east.
Remember the recent Lockerbie bomber fiasco? The Al-Jazeera bombing fiasco? Israel stopping journalist­s entering Gaza? Torture claims? 9.11 (according so some), Kosovo...
10:26 AM on 09/09/2009
Wow, the Associated Press kept the kidnapping of a journalist quiet but it can't respect a fallen solider and must post photos of his death for the world to see? How many times during this war has the NY Times exposed secret informatio­n that endangered the lives of our troops overseas?

This Times reporter was repeatedly warned not to enter the area. He was kidnapped and allied soldiers died saving him from his own stupidity.

What is worse is how this article tries to blame the rescuing British soldiers for the death of the interprete­r. The soldiers were working to free to the captives. Wouldn't the death be the fault of the reporter who ignored warnings and placed the interprete­r in danger?

I have already mourned for the passing of the once great NY Times. I will not mourn when it finally goes out of business early next year.

God bless the families of the soldiers who passed as well as the family of the translator­.
01:52 PM on 09/09/2009
Very well said. I agree.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
02:45 PM on 09/09/2009
You seem a lot more upset about the Marine's picture being shown than the fact that he got killed.
04:28 PM on 09/09/2009
Fanned.... although I never respond to gringo,,,,­pretty much just skip right over his comments,,­, it's always the same thing..all negative,n­ever a positive. How can a person live like that, always upset.
10:14 AM on 09/09/2009
I am happy to hear the NYT reporter was freed but I am saddened to hear about the interprete­rs death. He and the native reporters are among the few the heroes in all of this.Riski­ng their lives so that we can understand what is happening in a country that is as foreign as can be.

I think this story is also an indication that what we call the Taliban are different from the criminals in al Qaida. In this war (I hope) prisoners are taken.
10:28 AM on 09/09/2009
The reporter didn't just risk his life. By ignoring warnings and entering an area filled with Taliban, he needlessly risked his life, the interprete­r's life, and the lives of the soldiers who rescued him. These brave soldiers did not have to die.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 PM on 09/09/2009
I like your comment just as much each time I read it. As a spy, this reporter is lucky to be alive. The official policy in regard to reporters and other civilians who enter a war zone under their own steam is that no effort will be made to retrieve them, no matter what.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:10 PM on 09/09/2009
Sorry about the wording of my other response. I meant that the official policy _should be_ that no effort is made to retrieve these people.
10:28 AM on 09/09/2009
The reporter didn't just risk his life. By ignoring warnings and entering an area filled with Taliban, he needlessly risked his life, the interprete­r's life, and the lives of the soldiers who rescued him. These brave soldiers did not have to d!e.
09:54 AM on 09/09/2009
But a what expense?
photo
JakeMontero
Independent thinking
09:42 AM on 09/09/2009
how is this good news when two more people di.ed from Obama's war?
10:17 AM on 09/09/2009
Nice republican talking point.

Just how was this war that Bush started and then screwed up suddenly becomes President Obama's.

Certainly it is his to fix the criminal misconduct of the previous Administra­tion.

But calling it "Obama's War" in hopes that he will fail and Republican­s can achieve a temporary partisan political advantage is really . . . how you say?

Despicable­.
11:14 AM on 09/09/2009
It is not a Republican talking point---it is a far left talking point used to try to get Obama to surrender and retreat from Afghanista­n. The Republican­s support our continued efforts in Afghanista­n because they remember 9/11 and do not want it to happen again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
repugnicansfearme
Here endeth the lesson.
09:42 AM on 09/09/2009
Gee, I smell a book, and a movie, and multiple appearance­s by the reporter. Too bad the interprete­r, making $30 a day, was killed trying to protect the reporter. Too bad about the soldier killed. Too bad he had to be there WHEN HE WAS WARNED OF THE DANGER. I hope the reporter realizes what his actions have caused.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:57 AM on 09/09/2009
There is no "story" that's worth this kind of risk, and as it turns out rescuing this dude caused the death of two more people. Can't we just call it an illegal war and get the hell out of there?
10:19 AM on 09/09/2009
Illegal war?

In what sense? As I recall the Afghanista­n war had the backing of the UN.

Which makes it legal.

You are confusing it with the Iraqi War.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:05 PM on 09/09/2009
Sorry. Obviously I meant "immoral." Blame the editors.
11:16 AM on 09/09/2009
Since when is this war "illegal?" You sound worse than the Palestinia­ns "the ILLEGAL wall" "the ILLEGAL occupation­" etc.

We did not start this war and if we do not finish it we will be fighting it all over again. I think your screen name says it beautifull­y.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:06 PM on 09/09/2009
Thanks for the compliment on my screen name. Each of us is 65% water.
08:29 AM on 09/09/2009
for our arm_ies occu_pying foreign countries, vvhite vvestern Iife is precious. mus_lim Iife is vvorthless­.
08:37 AM on 09/09/2009
Tell that to Daniel Pearls wife. Not sure what he did to the peace loving people who chopped off his head. Maybe he misspelled Taliban.
photo
JakeMontero
Independent thinking
09:43 AM on 09/09/2009
nonsense. stop posting drun.k
08:29 AM on 09/09/2009
I find it amazing that a newspaper surpresses the news (though I read rumblings of this kidnapping over the weekend) when it's one of its own. Tell me the TImes would have kept quiet for other people. Answer: it wouldn't. It would have said it had the obligation­, and the right, to publish news.

I'm glad the reporter is safe and sad that others died. And the Times is proving itself increasing­ly irrelevant­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eileenflemingWAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
08:59 AM on 09/09/2009
"The Times kept the kidnapping­s quiet...an­d other media outlets, including The Associated Press, did not report the abductions following a request from the Times."

In 2006 and many times since, I contacted the New York Times with a request to PLEASE cover Mordechai Vanunu's historic FREEDOM of SPEECH Trial in Israel which began January 2006: the same day Hamas was democratic­ally elected.

The TIMES; and ALL the other corporate media outlets-in­cluding Amy Goodman whose 2004 interview with Vanunu was major testimony against him- to PLEASE follow this incredible story in the "only Middle East democracy" but none of them even bothered to respond to me.

"US Media is under Israeli occupation too."-Mord­echai Vanunu

Eileen Fleming, Author, Founder of WeAreWideA­wake.org
Producer "30 Minutes with Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu"
08:28 AM on 09/09/2009
for our armies occupying foreign countries, vvhite western life is precious. muslim life is vvorthless­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
badger2196
Above the radar
11:56 AM on 09/09/2009
We heard you the first time