Court Says Employer Must Pay For 340-Pound Employee's Weight-Loss Surgery

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Court Says Employer Must Pay For 340-Pound Employee's Weight-Loss Surgery stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHARLES WILSON | 09/10/09 02:46 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Weight Loss

INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana court has ruled that a pizza shop must pay for a 340-pound employee's weight-loss surgery to ensure the success of another operation for a back injury he suffered at work – raising concern among businesses bracing for more such claims.

The Indiana Court of Appeals decision, coupled with a recent Oregon court ruling, could make employers think twice before hiring workers with health conditions that might cost their companies thousands of dollars at a shot down the road.

"This kind of situation will happen again ... and employers are undoubtedly worried about that," said Lewis Maltby, president of the National Workrights Institute in Princeton, N.J., an offshoot of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Boston's The Gourmet Pizza must pay for lap-band surgery for Adam Childers, a cook at the store in Schererville, under last month's Indiana ruling that upheld a 4-3 decision by the state's workers' compensation board.

Childers, who was then 25, weighed 340 pounds in March 2007 when he was accidentally struck in the back by a freezer door. Doctors said he needed surgery to ease his severe pain, but that the operation would do him no good unless he first had surgery to reduce his weight, which rose to 380 pounds after the accident.

His employers agreed to pay for the back surgery, but argued they were not obligated to pay for a weight-loss operation that could cost $20,000 to $25,000, because Childers already was obese before he was hurt.

The board and the court, however, said the surgery – and disability payments while Childers was unable to work – were covered because his weight and the accident had combined to create a single injury. They said Boston's didn't present any evidence that his weight had been a medical problem before the accident.

Boston's attorney, Kevin Kearney of South Bend, said the company has asked the court to hear the case again. He declined to comment further. The Dallas-based company, which has more than 50 franchise stores in 25 states, also declined to comment Wednesday. A message seeking comment also was left with the restaurant in Schererville.

Story continues below

"There's actually a string of cases across the country that have reached similar conclusions," said Childers' attorney, Rick Gikas of Merrillville. He cited cases in Ohio, California, Oregon, Florida and South Dakota, including some dating back to 1983.

The most recent was in Oregon, where the state's Supreme Court ruled Aug. 27 that the state workers' compensation insurance must pay for gastric bypass surgery to ensure that a man's knee replacement surgery was effective.

But some believe the Indiana case – which experts said reflects general rules of workers' compensation law – could have a chilling effect on business.

"The case in Indiana kind of draws a line in the sand," said Tom Lynch, CEO of Lynch, Ryan & Associates Inc., a Wellesley, Mass.-based consulting firm that helps businesses manage workers compensation.

What's different, he said, is that it was based not just on state law but on principles used in several states.

"I think employers are going to be really upset about this," said Maltby, whose group generally advocates for workers.

Part of the reaction stems from people's attitude to obesity, he said. "Because we all think it's his own fault for being so fat, and it's such an expensive procedure, a lot of people would say it isn't fair to the employer."

Gikas said Childers has lost some weight on his own during his two years off. Court records said he had also tried to quit smoking. He's still awaiting the surgery.

Lynch said the ruling could make employers wary of hiring people who are overweight or have other conditions that might expose them to workplace injury. He noted that employers in all 50 states must take workers "as they are" when they hire them.

"Legally, you cannot refuse to hire this 350-pound person because they're 350 pounds. That's illegal. But you might find some other reason not to hire them," he said.

Both Lynch and Maltby said the issue won't go away soon, in part because one-third of American adults are considered obese, with a body mass index of 30 or more. The index is based on height and weight. Last year, at least 220,000 obesity surgeries were done in the United States, says the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

And Lynch said the ruling could have repercussions beyond obesity and weight-loss surgery.

"Who among us does not have some kind of situation that either now or in the future ... could contribute to an injury?" he said. "This could be a big deal."

INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana court has ruled that a pizza shop must pay for a 340-pound employee's weight-loss surgery to ensure the success of another operation for a back injury he suffered at wo...
INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana court has ruled that a pizza shop must pay for a 340-pound employee's weight-loss surgery to ensure the success of another operation for a back injury he suffered at wo...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
590
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)

...Everyday it's the same old rethreads. NO change form Washington.

good articles: http://www.iamned.com ......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 09/13/2009
photo

Facts: Many are obese. Many have been obese from the dawn of time. Many will be obese when time reaches its dusks. Obesity, then, is an immutable fact of life. Live with it! The same way buildings/work environments are designed/constructed/operated in a manner that make them friendly to the physically-challenged, so, too, must they be for the obese. God bless America!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 09/12/2009
photo

Obesity has existes since the dawn of time? What anthropology book are you pulling that out of?
Fact: America is the heaviest country in the world. Fact: America's obesity is a result of convenience food and lack of education in regards to personal health.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 09/12/2009
- CydMiller I'm a Fan of CydMiller 15 fans permalink

Obesity has not existed since the dawn of time. Did you get that from the same book (I use the term lightly) that states 'Man and Dinosaurs walked the earth together'. People had to physically work hard for their food (hunt, prepare) for centuries. We have allowed an unregulated, greedy corporate system take over that uses layers of salt, fat, sugar, and chemicals and offers these concoctions cheaply on every street corner. These concoctions trigger the brain to eat even when its not hungry and contain chemicals that are detrimental to our health. They are cheaper to buy vs whole foods and can be picked up at a drive-thru vs having to be prepared.

God Bless Corporate America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 09/13/2009

Maybe if he wasn't 340 pounds the door might have missed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 AM on 09/12/2009
photo

Maybe not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 09/12/2009

I know lots of people who are overweight and can work circles around smaller people. They are dedicated to their jobs and they are valued by their employers. The sad thing here, this is going to cause business owners to create higher standards for employment. They could introduce some type of physical fitness exam, fitness test, which an obese individual may not be able to pass. What happens then, legalized discrimination, is it going to happen, bet it already has.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 09/11/2009

I have black friends, they sure can dance. I also have several gay friends, they are good to have around when rearranging furniture. I sure hope employers don’t start testing for homosexuality---you know “higher standards”. I’d hate for anyone to discriminate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 09/11/2009

I think there SHOULD be physical fitness tests for physically demanding jobs..... so that things like this can be avoided. And no, obese people do not run circles around healthy people.... or perhaps they do it for about 4 minutes, and then burn out like a fast car.

If an obese person cannot perform a job because it has physical requirements, that person does not deserve the job.

How rational would it be to hire a physically unfit person to perform a job that he or she can't do?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 09/12/2009
- fem56 I'm a Fan of fem56 15 fans permalink

I know a number of obese people, as opposed to just overweight who are perfectly healthy, who are great, productive people but there is no doubt the weight takes a huge toll especially on them. It causes, I believe, are genetics, family culture-big cause, emotional and spiritual. Due to their genetics and upbringing I don't imagine they will ever be anywhere close to normal weight but they could be much healthier. No doubt the truly obese person is often a big expense to the health care system just as a heavy smoker might be but how do you legislate this without discriminating against them. It isn't fair to these small businesses either. I think we ought to tax all junk foods and fast foods unless proven to be healthy like Pollo Loco, , stop subsidizing corn, subsidize fresh fruits and vegetables, require gym classes through twelve grade-no make gym required through out life. Every working person must participate in a gym class or power walk one hour a day. Through high school-fine-but maybe not to practical beyond that but I bet the employees would be happier and more productive-when they had time to work at least.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 09/11/2009

I believe a country that spends more on the profits of healthcare-providing corporations than it does on physician services needs to rethink healthcare public policy. And I think that a company which spends more to litigate the need for a procedure than that procedure costs is in the litigation business, not the healthcare business. And I think that an employer who offers health insurance as an employment incentive but doesn’t deliver it should be held criminally responsible for fraud. And I think that people who moralize this issue with puritan views of sin need to be excluded from the public policy debate

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 09/11/2009
- StJames I'm a Fan of StJames 115 fans permalink
photo

Oops, and does anyone here think we don't need real healthcare reform? Personal responsibility is all well and good but this is a young man who was no doubt overfed from the day mama brought him home from the hospital. Then he proabably went through a school system that has sharply curtailed physical education. And his over-indulgent and probably equally overweight parents bought him a nintendo system and a computer so he could happily vegetate infront of a brightly colored screen. His employers have been paying premiums to an insurance company to cover these types of situations. The insurance company is no doubt looking to get out of their contract...Oh well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

How many thousands upon thousands of advertisements do you think he was exposed to between the ages of 1 and 12 for fast food, junk food, sugar-bomb cereals, candy, cookies, pie, doughnuts, brownies, cake, chips, SODA, etc. etc. etc. etc.?

How many of these ads came with clowns, dancing dolls, bright colors, happy-happy smiling animals, magical creatures, laughing and dancing children more cute than any 1,000 normal children and the CONSTANT message that eating and drinking their products will make you happy, energetic, popular and fun, fun, FUN?!?

We let the food industry brainwash ourselves and our children - then we wonder why there's an epidemic of obesity and metabolic disorders in this country.

Hello?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

Fanned!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 09/12/2009
photo

Here are some ideas for employers who are worried about this case:

Include gym membership as one of your benefits. Let people work a flexible schedule when possible to facilitate use of the gym (e.g. a two-hour break at mid-day to exercise and have a light lunch.)

Make sure that your insurance plans cover both mental healthcare for eating disorders and state-of-the-art obesity treatment including gastric surgery for the morbidly obese.

Don't allow consumption of foods or liquids other than clean water while working (require employees to go outside to get something to eat or drink during their breaks or else bring their own food from home to eat only while in a break room, away from the work area.)

Get rid of the endlessly-flowing, stress-elevating, sleep-sapping coffee-pots and their accompanying fake creamers, massive boxes of sugar-packets, envelopes of hot "cider" or hot "chocolate".

No candy dishes, no doughnuts, no ordering cookie baskets for meetings, no vending machines selling soda or candy, zero tolerance for potluck Fridays, birthday cake, anniversary cake, baby shower cake, wedding shower cake, Valentine's Day candy, Easter candy, Thanksgiving pies, Christmas candy, post-Vacation chocolate-covered nuts and all the other excuses people come up with to fill American workplaces with sugar, fat, salt, sugar and more sugar.

If you want healthier workers, create a health-supporting workplace. Put your action where your words are and watch your employee's health improve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 09/11/2009
- fem56 I'm a Fan of fem56 15 fans permalink

I find water boring but make home brewed ice tea. That works too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 09/11/2009
- StPeteDave I'm a Fan of StPeteDave 5 fans permalink

A pizza shop that offers benefits is an anomaly. You sure woudln't find any here that do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 09/13/2009

I notice that several people posting here jump to the conclusion that universal healthcare like Canada or England would be the answer to this situation.

What about personal responsibility? The truth is that this man weighs 350 pounds because he took in more calories than his body could use. The choice of what and how much food to eat was his.

As for the workplace injury, as a 356 Lb. Man myself I can assure that the extent of his injuries were exasperated by the mans weight. The back, legs, and joints are already stressed by the excess weight. Additionally, the attempt to "catch yourself" when you fall can lead to further injuries for a heavy person; because the force generated by the extra mass not only makes for more striking force and makes it harder to stop the fall. With my own personal experiences I’d say that a portion of the man’s injuries were due to being overweight which made the injuries worse. Additionally, at this weight balance and agility are greatly diminished which leads to accidents.

Apply personal accountability and the man becomes partially responsible for the accident via diminished balance and agility. The Man is responsibile for a percentage of his injuries because being overweight added to their seriousness. The effects of his weight on the success of the recovery are his responsibility alone.

Some, myself included, are addicted to eating. Any addicted person in recovery will say… “You are responsible for You.”

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 09/11/2009

This isn’t about personal accountability, it’s about paying for healthcare services. This man’s employer convinced him to come to work, in part, for that peace of mind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 09/11/2009

Future signs in restaurant windows, "Help Wanted. Tub o' Lards Need Not Apply"

This type of ruling creates a whole new set of problems for small business owners. Why take on a liability as large as this? Next they will have to pay for any fat employees gym memberships to say they tried to reduce the liabilty.

On the positive side, this would be a great business opportunity for entrepreneurs. Create a company that tests new hires in a boot camp type of scenario for a day. Of course the new hires have to pay for the camp, eliminates those that woudn't be able to make it without discriminating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

Think of it this way, if a pregnant employee had been hit on the job, and she went into premature labor, and her baby had to spend some time in the neonatal intensive care unit, would her employer's insurance be on-the-hook for her complications and the baby's complications?

Of course.

Sure, her pregnancy wasn't her employer's "fault" (one hopes), but as soon as she was hit on the job, a spiral of consequences came out of that hit that changed her normal (until that moment) pregnancy into a nightmare. Her pregnancy wasn't the problem, the hit was the problem.

In this case, a strong young man with a weight problem might have been looking at twenty or thirty years before his weight became a serious medical problem. Then BAM he gets hit on the job and all of a sudden he needs back surgery which will only work if he's less heavy.

The obesity -- like the pregnancy in my example -- wasn't an acute problem until the on-the-job injury.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 09/11/2009

As a heavy person I can assure that the man's condition was acute before the accident. The condition is called morbid obesity… Google it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

What was his age at the time of the accident? How tall is he? How muscular?

You don't have all the facts you need to leap to that conclusion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 09/11/2009
- kathy001 I'm a Fan of kathy001 84 fans permalink

The way the article lays it out, it does make sense. But I still think it's wrong to force the employer to pay for surgery for a condition that could have - and should have - been dealt with by the employee long before the accident happened. The way I see it, the employee is guilty of negligence in his own health care.

I also think people with severe weight issues are going to suffer for this decision through job discrimination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 09/11/2009

I think you guys are looking at this too myopically. Given that the medical opinion was that the back surgery could not be done on its own, the court had two options to choose from, either the employer pays nothing or the employer pays for both surgeries. Of the two evils, charging the employer with an extra twenty thousand dollar bill doesn't seem as bad as allowing a person to live with a lifetime of pain because of a workplace injury. The former option is a quantitative difference in the amount they are responsible, while the latter is a qualitatively different ruling. We may not like the idea of an employer having to foot an extra bill for something that is within the employee's control, but I can see why the court chose the former option. It was the lesser of two evils.

To me, this speaks more to the need for health care reform more than anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 09/11/2009

As ridiculous as the Mcdonald's coffee spill case !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 09/11/2009
- The Meek I'm a Fan of The Meek 11 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 09/11/2009

Wasn't ridiculous look up the facts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 09/11/2009

I wonder how it was decided that surgery was the only (or preferred) method of dealing with the obesity issue?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

Because 95% of obese people who lose weight via diet and exercise regain all the weight lost (or more) within two years. Study after study after study confirms this.

People who have the weight-loss surgery keep off 60% to 75% of their excess weight after two years.

Diet and exercise -- despite the common misconceptions and prejudices -- do not work for 95% of the obese people who work so hard to follow them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 09/11/2009

Obviously, they gain the weight back by not, you know, dieting and exercising. If you run and loose weight then stop running guess what? I

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 09/11/2009

Where do you get 95% anyhow?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 09/11/2009
- HomerJFong I'm a Fan of HomerJFong 2 fans permalink
photo

Wondered that for a moment myself, but I'd imagine that it was a combination of the time factor and the fact that his back pain would most likely keep him from doing any meaningful exercise (he gained 40 lbs after the accident)...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

I bet those pizza shop owners wish the US had a public health system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 09/11/2009
- Godweiser I'm a Fan of Godweiser 255 fans permalink
photo

I say it's time to take the profiteering middle-man out of healthcare; they're leeching off every other industry and government (who has to pay the bills when someone's coverage is dropped and they go bankrupt) and passing all their costs down on the rest of us.

Much as Republicans like to go, "hoo dangy, that there is socialism" I have to admit, right now, the way capitalism is going (off a cliff) I think the country could do with a little socialism as a balancing act.

Yes, let all the conservatives spit out their tobaccky wads and start raging at me for saying it outright.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 09/11/2009
- Samcat604 I'm a Fan of Samcat604 19 fans permalink

The reason why socialism is bad any almost every context is because it will never result in people being better off than if the free market is allowed to operate.

Concepts like organized chaos (people naturally tend toward order given no restraints) and creative destruction (allowing old ideas to die) is what moves people forward and advances the human condition.

The left is not capable of understand that order and 'the right thing' will happen when the free market is allowed to function properly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 09/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect