iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lawmakers Skip Thursday Hearings To Raise Funds

First Posted: 11/10/09 05:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:00 PM ET

Mark Schauer

Now that Congress is back in session, its members are busy with two jobs: Making laws and raising campaign funds. Good government groups insist the two tasks are incompatible. On Thursday, that proved to be the case for several legislators.

The nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation obtained invitations to fundraisers that day in honor of 22 lawmakers. Some of these events were taking place at the same time as honorees' scheduled committee hearings in Congress. Huffington Post interns visited some of these fundraisers to inquire about the scheduling conflict.

(There's nothing particularly unusual about these little parties but our mission is to cover mundane lobbying in real time.)

As Rep. Mark Schauer (D-Mich.), a member of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, was leaving a fundraiser at a Capitol Hill townhouse, he said that earlier he'd made an appearance at a hearing on hazardous materials (which was ongoing).

The price of admission to the fundraiser, which was hosted by lobbyist Tim Rupli, ranged from $500 to $5,000. Among the guests were a lobbyist from the Machinist & Aerospace Workers Union and another from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

HuffPost interns Julian Hattem and Elyse Siegel asked Schauer which guests attended the fundraiser to give him money. Schauer said it was "people for labor, the environment." He added, "Even though health care is the big story, there are still lots of other issues."

Meanwhile, at the hearing, Lon D. Santis of the Institute of Makers of Explosives testified about transporting hazardous materials: "Although the IME is taking steps to add measures in its standards to address the major causes of roll‐overs, it does not believe that [multipurpose bulk trucks] are any more prone to roll‐over than other bulk material transport vehicles."

Also at Schauer's fundraiser: "Special Guest" Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.), who was missing out on a Judiciary Committee hearing on "Competition and Commerce in Digital Books".

"I couldn't attend. I had... a lot of other meetings going on," said Wasserman-Schultz, who'd appeared on MSNBC at 11. She added that she was not the honoree, just a special guest. "I'm with the Democratic leadership, and he's a freshman congressman, so I'm trying to help him out."

In a subsequent phone interview, Wasserman-Schultz spokesman Jonathan Beeton told the Huffington Post that his boss had already reviewed the prepared witness testimony.

"It's not uncommon for multiple hearings and multiple subcommittee hearings to be going on at one time," he added.

At the nearby Capitol Hill Club, the Huffington Post visited a fundraiser for Rep. Robert Latta (R-Ohio), who, like Schauer, sits on the transportation committee.

The host -- perhaps mistakenly -- led Huffington Post interns George Sweeney and Jenna Staul directly to the table where Latta was seated. Asked about his guests, Latta said it was "folks in the district we have contacts with." They weren't able to ask Latta about the transportation committee hearing.

Sweeney and Staul also spotted Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele but they felt compelled to leave due to the less-than-hospitable vibe coming from the lunch table.

Reporting contributed by Julian Hattem, Elyse Siegel, Jenna Staul, and George Sweeney


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Now that Congress is back in session, its members are busy with two jobs: Making laws and raising campaign funds. Good government groups insist the two tasks are incompatible. On Thursday, that proved...
Now that Congress is back in session, its members are busy with two jobs: Making laws and raising campaign funds. Good government groups insist the two tasks are incompatible. On Thursday, that proved...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:32 PM on 09/17/2009
Mark Schauer could care less about his constituents. He will do whatever Nancy tells him to do. He is a pure politician that needs to serve only one term. I think everyone mentioned in this article needs to be voted out. Good article, keep it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prettyinpink
Liberalism-Ideas so good-they're MANDATORY
05:43 PM on 09/24/2009
seconded.
photo
Blufftonian
Beware low-level staffers
03:56 PM on 09/11/2009
Not Charlie Rangel. He was spending the day consulting with his income tax advisors at ACORN.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yliza
Living Life during Interesting Times
02:17 PM on 09/11/2009
This is yet another reason why we need campaign finance reform. It would free up our elected representatives to actually do their jobs.
01:25 PM on 09/11/2009
CLEAN ELECTIONS!
08:09 AM on 09/11/2009
It is interesting that Michael J. Fox only popped into my thoughts this morning.

Where has he been with his stem cell platform during all of the law making and health reform.



I am against stem cell research. Next thing you know they will be robbing Peter to help Paul stand.
11:47 AM on 09/11/2009
Not the sharpest knife in the drawer are you?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tyler-Durden
leading a revolution of one
12:38 PM on 09/11/2009
nice avatar. it shows your best side.
photo
Osusuki
All your base are belong to us...
03:47 AM on 09/11/2009
If we could ever get real campaign finance reform instead of that McCain-Feingold bag of horse apples, we wouldn't have this problem. Of course, that's a little hard while the progressives are already fighting a two front war against the bankers and the health insurance companies.
12:37 AM on 09/11/2009
Good job, interns. And a great idea for an assignment. Perhaps if there were more of an outside presence at these soirees, our representatives would do more representing while official business is being conducted. Recommend that this be an ongoing feature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
10:55 PM on 09/10/2009
All they care about is getting re-election rather than legislation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
08:28 PM on 09/10/2009
A good reason to legislate that fund raising events can only occur during certain weeks out of the year. Or kick anyone out who misses a certain number of hearings. Or limit ALL fundraising to the Web.
10:48 PM on 09/10/2009
How about suggesting that they can only fund raise within their home states? That way their constituents can more readily see who are buying them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
ErnestineBass
No longer a cog in The Machine.
12:46 PM on 09/11/2009
Now THERE'S an idea!

Trouble is we don't have the kind of money they're looking for.
photo
Moshe
Shalom to all
07:42 PM on 09/10/2009
Our lawmakers priorities should be pretty clear by now: Money first, and then money second, and finally, money.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Savage
I am Eclectablog
07:41 PM on 09/10/2009
Say what you will, Mark Schauer is a solid, progressive Democrat who beat out an odious far-right Baptist minister. Perhaps if we changed the terms of Congressman they wouldn't have to begin fundraising the day they get elected so that they can turn around and run 2 years later.

I've got Mark Schauer's back. He's one of the Good Guys and is not selling his soul for a buck as this article seems to suggest. Our district (MI-07) is well-represented by him and it's a far cry from the man who held this post a year ago, Tim Walberg.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicole473
Because Republicans are a threat to this democracy
08:27 PM on 09/10/2009
You\re right about the fund-raising.
09:05 PM on 09/10/2009
I'm with you Chris. Mark Schauer is a good man. He is intelligent, inquisitive and unlike most politicians, does not have an out-of-control ego. Schauer is exactly the kind of person we need in congress!
07:41 PM on 09/10/2009
SCOTUS is about to put an end to this. When they vote 5-4 to allow corporate sponsorship, there will be no need for politicians to hold fund raisers.

Obama promised change, and he meant it!!!
07:52 PM on 09/10/2009
I still think we should at least wear the decals of their sponsers,like NASCAR, so we at least know who they're driving for.
photo
Realitylost
Take your ball and go home, whiners.
08:31 PM on 09/10/2009
And just like Nascar we could watch them go in boring circle after boring circle, and every once in a while a crash.
11:58 PM on 09/10/2009
You forget that Bush stacked the deck with Republican judges, after firing those that wouldn't support his agenda. This took its toll on the make up of our judicial system then, and now.
07:15 PM on 09/10/2009
This has always bothered me, no matter their political persuasion. Likely there are many days they could take off when whatever committees they're on may not be meeting, or only their experts are meeting -- unlike the rest of the employed folks in this country. But when their committees are in session and they leave to attend a fundraiser or a profile-raiser, they should be docked a day's pay just like those of us who pay their way would be. They get plenty of sick days and plenty of vacation days. They're supposed to be doing a job for us, for the US!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Danyelle79
07:04 PM on 09/10/2009
Congress/ Funraiser. Not law makers
06:54 PM on 09/10/2009
I have a bill proposal for the house and the senate

Term Limits for one and..

All elected representatives should be docked on a per diem basis every time they go out on the campaign trail and cut out half days for fundraising and any event not used for creating/working on legislation or voting. It also should apply to taking more than 2 weeks of vacation. Anything after 2 weeks needs to be unpaid. This should apply from the President on down.

How many average American workers get more than 30 paid days off? How many of you get to take off numerous half or full days with pay to play golf, or go to lunches or go off on someone's yacht? How many of you get to take off work with pay for about the total of 1 year, in order to find another job?

How do we get this into the house or the senate? Then show the American people that our elected officials don't care that we pay them even when they are not working for us, because we all know it will be shot down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
12:09 AM on 09/11/2009
Term limits skew right.
12:11 AM on 09/11/2009
Term limits? No thanks. We've got them in California and it makes for amateur hour in the legislature...with party apparatchiks, lobbyist, and staffers running the show.

Dare say most Reps would much rather be in the office or on the floor than shilling for the cash they need to perpetually run for their seat...and time away from the House or Senate isn't time off...I'll fault politicians for a lot of things, but sloth isn't one of them...

How 'bout strict public financing? Won't happen with this Supreme Court, but if you want a crusade...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tyler-Durden
leading a revolution of one
12:46 PM on 09/11/2009
CALI govt isn't a circus because of term limits, pal. but strict public financing is the way to go.