Seinfeld Book Victory: Judge Tosses Out Trademark Suit

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Seinfeld Book Victory: Judge Tosses Out Trademark Suit stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LARRY NEUMEISTER | 09/11/09 06:18 AM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE- In this Oct. 28, 2007 file photo, author Jessica Seinfeld, wife of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, arrives at the Los Angeles premiere of "Bee Movie," in the Westwood section of Los Angeles. On Thursday, Sept. 10, 2009, a New York judge has tossed out a cookbook author's claim that Seinfeld copied her healthy cookbook of recipes for children when she wrote her own "Deceptively Delicious: Simple Secrets to Get Your Kids Eating Good Food." (AP Photo/Chris Weeks, File)

NEW YORK — A federal judge Thursday tossed out a cookbook author's claim that comedian Jerry Seinfeld's wife was a culinary copycat when she came out with her own book explaining how to entice children to eat vegetables.

U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain threw out the lawsuit brought against the Seinfeld couple by Missy Chase Lapine.

The judge rejected Lapine's claims against Jessica Seinfeld, saying that the books, both best sellers, were not similar except for their goal of hiding healthy food inside the favorite meals of children.

She called Lapine's book "a dry, rather text-heavy work" done predominantly in black, gray and shades of brownish-orange. She said Seinfeld's book was "bright and cheerful, full of different colors and various patterns." Consumers who looked at each book were unlikely to be confused, the judge said, tossing out trademark infringement claims.

However, the judge declined to rule on Lapine's claim that Jerry Seinfeld libeled her on David Letterman's show last year when he noted her three names and joked that people with three names – including James Earl Ray and Mark David Chapman – have turned out to be assassins.

She said those claims did not belong in federal court but should instead be filed in state court, where Lapine's lawyer, Howard Miller, said he planned to bring them.

"They are still very much alive," he said of the slander claims, along with claims against News Corp.'s HarperCollins that the publisher misappropriated information from Lapine's book when it rejected her proposal in February and May 2006. Miller said the decision hasn't been made on whether to appeal Swain's rejection of all claims against Jessica Seinfeld.

Lapine's book, titled: "The Sneaky Chef: Simple Strategies for Hiding Healthy Foods in Kids' Favorite Meals," was published in April 2007 by Running Press, an imprint of Perseus Books Group. Seinfeld's cookbook, titled: "Deceptively Delicious: Simple Secrets to Get Your Kids Eating Good Food," was published in October 2007 by Collins, an imprint of HarperCollins.

Orin Snyder, a lawyer for the Seinfelds, called the ruling an "unequivocal victory" against "opportunistic and meritless claims" against Jessica Seinfeld.

"This confirms what we've been saying all along, that this is a trumped up claim," he said.

"Jessica did not copy anything from anyone and created her best-selling cookbook in her own kitchen from her own experiences," he said.

NEW YORK — A federal judge Thursday tossed out a cookbook author's claim that comedian Jerry Seinfeld's wife was a culinary copycat when she came out with her own book explaining how to entice c...
NEW YORK — A federal judge Thursday tossed out a cookbook author's claim that comedian Jerry Seinfeld's wife was a culinary copycat when she came out with her own book explaining how to entice c...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
125
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- vindrag I'm a Fan of vindrag 5 fans permalink

Larry David should have joined the suit. Jerry stole his talent because he sure proved he has none of his own. The Bee movie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 09/12/2009
- Housewife I'm a Fan of Housewife 23 fans permalink

I like David alot, but you are way off base about Seinfeld. He is a comedian in his right and would have been fine without Larry. Larry, on the other hand, was painful to watch as a comedian and would probably be selling insurance without Seinfeld.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 09/12/2009
photo

actually once "Curb Your Enthusiasm" came out it was clear who was the genius behind Sienfeld.
David is brilliant; what has Jerry done since?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 09/12/2009

Some need to start by looking at the filing; it's always good to be armed with information BEFORE you pontificate. Admittedly, some of this is written with a bit too much emotional charge; I would consider changing counsel. However, the facts are the facts...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0107083seinfeld1.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 09/12/2009

thanks for that link, if this is okay, then anything goes..maybe i will put a pretty pink cover on the bible, allude to being the author, and call it the jessicajuliette version..(move over king james)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 09/12/2009
photo

“Countless authors have used the idea of sneaking healthy food into children’s meals, and no one has a monopoly over that idea — the court made that clear,”
“What made Jessica’s book a No. 1 best seller is her innovative and creative expression of that idea.”

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 AM on 09/12/2009
photo

Jessica Seinfeld appeared on Oprah to promote her cookbook and one week later it was a national best-seller.

THAT is what made her book sell as well as it did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 09/12/2009
photo

Certainly her celebrity helped. Without it she wouldn't get the contract.
However, she's a C level celebrity. And without an attractive product, Opra- sales- bump would be negligible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 09/12/2009
- oceanlover I'm a Fan of oceanlover 4 fans permalink

As if... RIP OFF! The courts are right, oh say.... maybe half the time at getting it right. Sell your legal indignation somewhere else. I have an idea... try selling it in Texas let's say where, how many have been exonerated in that past few years for what can only be labeled a galling miscarriage of justice in the past year. So please. Legal crap aside. Let's call a spade a spade when the FACTS clearly point to a rip off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 09/12/2009

I can only hope that the Honorable Laura Taylor Swain had more substantive comments than what was posted in this article. A written work doesn't have to have the same "look" and "feel" as another to be plagiarized. If you combed over both works, you would notice there is high school grade plagiarism at work here. No one is arguing that the puree concept was novel and unique; the issue is that the vernacular, spirit, and recipes were lifted straight from a book published by a reputable chef. This is too coincidental to pass the "it must have been in the ether" argument. They absolutely need to appeal to a higher court. Justice was NOT served, and a no-talent, unethical social climber was let off the hook. Why HarperCollins was not included in the suit? It's so disappointing when embarrassingly wealthy people have to have MORE at the expense of others. Jessica Seinfeld is the epitome of gluttony and opulence; not attractive. Case in point, gifting Oprah 12K in shoes for having her on the show to plug her plagiarized book. Someone could use some instant karma...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 09/11/2009

exaclty-i can take war and peace, add new colors, put my name on it, does that make it my work, of course not..if the content is substantiley the same,or identical..it is not my work..
it that;s the case, i'll get my 5 year old grandson to start coloring and making bright covers and releasing all the classics under his name..maybe i'll start with homer's illiad....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 09/11/2009

typo--should be substantively...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

"maybe i'll start with homer's illiad...."
LOL
Are are entitled to publish Iliad. It is in public domain. And many old English translations re in public domain also. Or you can learn Ancient Greek and translate it yourself.

But do try learning something,. anything, about copyright law before posting nonsense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 09/12/2009
photo

re."If you combed over both works, you would notice there is high school grade plagiarism at work here."
How do YOU know?!
Since YOU haven't "combed" thorough these books. then you have no idea what you're talking about.

Busted!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 09/12/2009
- jennyjen I'm a Fan of jennyjen 9 fans permalink
photo

Lapine failed to prove that Jessica Seinfeld had access to the book. Anyone in publishing can tell you that a book published in October 2007 would have to have been written before the Lapine book's publishing date of April 2007. This would be easily proven by commonly kept business records - phone logs, meeting notes by editors, illustrators, lawyers, etc.

Why do we have to villlify Jessica Seinfeld? Because she is rich?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 AM on 09/12/2009

her husband's wealth, and by extension hers, may have resulted in a less than favorable outcome for Missy Lapine...
i just object to appropriating someone else's work, and putting my name on it...(the judge felt differently)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 09/12/2009
photo

was this whole lawsuit about "nothing?"

is this cookbook about "nothing?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

Not that there's anything wrong with it!!! :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 09/11/2009

Looking at your comments, you seem biased toward the Seinfelds. How about you look at the two texts and then get back to the community on it? You thumb your nose at others who say they have seen the clear similarities, done the homework in comparing, so maybe you could share with the class as to why you think the case doesn't have merit. Or do you have a vested interest?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 09/11/2009
- Charity I'm a Fan of Charity 16 fans permalink
photo

let me get this straight: the judge based her decision on the graphics and illustrations and how the books looked?

wow. that's some research there judge laura swain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

YOu obviously didn't get it straight. You attempting .to judge the merits of the case based on one sentence from the judge quoted in this article. If you really want to find out what happened, why don't you research the legal opinion further, and post it here.Otherwise your opinion isn't worth last years snow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 09/11/2009

When Jessica's "book" came out, it was other people who came forward, not Missy Lapine, noting the striking similarities in the text and specific recipes. How can the judge claim there are not recognizable similarities, when numerous people other than the author, noted the similarities?

Bottom line - Seinfeld is a multimillionaire, with unlimited resources to fight Lapine in court. I certainly wouldn't put it past Jerry to put undue influence on a judge to see the matter in Jerry's favor.

Remember the movie SheDevil with Roseanne Barr? There was a scene where Roseanne's character has a judge removed from her ex-husband's hearing and replaced with someone biased against her ex. If you have clout and connections, anything is possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 09/11/2009
- jcwtts1 I'm a Fan of jcwtts1 147 fans permalink
photo

Crazy unfounded accusations. Give me a break. Your example is a movie. How about the judge was right and they'll try it in state court?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 09/11/2009
- vindrag I'm a Fan of vindrag 5 fans permalink

Mr. and Mrs. No Talent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 09/11/2009
- klbrz I'm a Fan of klbrz 15 fans permalink
photo

Surely they can appeal? It sounds like the author really does have a case against the publisher if they had seen her idea prior to Mrs. S. getting the deal. That is just wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

Appeal a case that wasn't tried?
Now that little Missy will have to pay Seinfeld's court costs, she may have no money left for a ocurt parking to litigate a small claims court. LOL.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 09/11/2009

she may yet have some money as UNITED HEALTH CARE bought thousands and shipped them to policy holders who requested them--part of their Wellness Program...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 09/11/2009
- Changeling I'm a Fan of Changeling 22 fans permalink
photo

"Appeal a case that wasn't tried?"

Umm...yes, dear. She wouldn't be appealing the case. She'd be appealing the judge's dismissal.

A plaintiff is allowed to appeal any adverse decision.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 09/12/2009
- oceanlover I'm a Fan of oceanlover 4 fans permalink

Sick. Sick. Sick. You are indeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 09/12/2009

Apparently the judge is a seinfeld d*ck-s*cker. Limpo!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

When did Jerry start going out with Sandra Bullock? Sorry

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

This is the person who dumped her newlywed husband when Seinfeld winked at her at the gym, so the plagiarism was no surprise. . . but the judge's ruling cloaked in his starstruck biased wording was.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 09/11/2009


ok now my post disappeared...

what jessica s wants, jessica s gets..she was a newly married woman, spotted jerry at gym, and poof, she was the new mrs seinfeld...

if she had such little care for her husband, i doubt she had much for an unknown nutritionist laboring over these recipes...

JESSICA SEINFELD IS REALLY KAISER SOSAY (USUAL SUSPECTS)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

Like your post and the analogy, but. . .

Keyser Soze was a chameleon, and it was a surprise when the "real" person was revealed.

With Mrs. Seinfield, there is no guessing as to what motivates her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 09/11/2009

i just meant the destroy all enemies stance.remeber how the myth was he shot his own family to prove there was nothing he wouldnt do?
sort of like jessica kicking hubby number one to the curb, and destroying his hapiness(however fleeting) to get to jerry....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

Remember this from an earlier HP article titled:

""The Billionaire Thank-You Note: Jessica Seinfeld Gives Oprah 21 Pairs Of Shoes"

"Jessica Seinfeld appeared on Oprah last week to promote her cookbook "Deceptively Delicious" and one week later it is a national best-seller.

With Jessica in the front row, Oprah, walnut-sized diamonds dripping from her ears, told the audience what Jessica had sent to her instead of a note thanking her for last week's appearance. Shoes.

Jessica sent Oprah 21 pairs of shoes. The majority were Christian Louboutin kicks, which retail for $800-$1200 a pair. Just a $16,000-$20,000 thank you, from one multi-millionaire couple to their billionaire friend."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 09/11/2009

aha! the old shoe bribe!!!gets 'em every time....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 09/11/2009
- sweetwhine I'm a Fan of sweetwhine 40 fans permalink
photo

Dixie, I did see that episode. But I think they were Blahnik's. I was embarrassed for Oprah. I mean seriously all those women in the audience salivating over those shoes. Who can afford them? That was one of the few times I thought Oprah was ridiculous. As for Jessica Seinfeld, well that's just how they operate (buy people).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 09/11/2009
- jwdeluca I'm a Fan of jwdeluca 7 fans permalink

Money trumps justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 09/11/2009
- jukesgrrl I'm a Fan of jukesgrrl 72 fans permalink
photo

And integrity remains an unknown word in show business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 09/11/2009
photo

This is not about integrity, this is about intellectual property law and a worthless case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 09/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect