More

Norman Borlaug Dead

MATT CURRY and BETSY BLANEY   09/13/09 05:09 PM ET   AP

Norman Borlaug Dead

DALLAS — Scientist and Nobel Peace Prize winner Norman Borlaug rose from his childhood on an Iowa farm to develop a type of wheat that helped feed the world, fostering a movement that is credited with saving up to 1 billion people from starvation.

Borlaug, 95, died Saturday from complications of cancer at his Dallas home, said Kathleen Phillips, a spokesman for Texas A&M University where Borlaug was a distinguished professor.

"Norman E. Borlaug saved more lives than any man in human history," said Josette Sheeran, executive director of the U.N. World Food Program. "His heart was as big as his brilliant mind, but it was his passion and compassion that moved the world."

He was known as the father of the "green revolution," which transformed agriculture through high-yield crop varieties and other innovations, helping to more than double world food production between 1960 and 1990. Many experts credit the green revolution with averting global famine during the second half of the 20th century and saving perhaps 1 billion lives.

"He has probably done more and is known by fewer people than anybody that has done that much," said Dr. Ed Runge, retired head of Texas A&M University's Department of Soil and Crop Sciences and a close friend who persuaded Borlaug teach at the school. "He made the world a better place – a much better place."

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack called Borlaug "simply one of the world's best. A determined, dedicated, but humble man who believed we had the collective duty and knowledge to eradicate hunger worldwide."

Borlaug began the work that led to his Nobel in Mexico at the end of World War II. There he developed disease-resistant varieties of wheat that produced much more grain than traditional strains.

He and others later took those varieties and similarly improved strains of rice and corn to Asia, the Middle East, South America and Africa. In Pakistan and India, two of the nations that benefited most from the new crop varieties, grain yields more than quadrupled.

His successes in the 1960s came just as experts warned that mass starvation was inevitable as the world's population boomed.

"More than any other single person of his age, he has helped to provide bread for a hungry world," Nobel Peace Prize committee chairman Aase Lionaes said in presenting the award to Borlaug in 1970. "We have made this choice in the hope that providing bread will also give the world peace."

But Borlaug and the Green Revolution were also criticized in later decades for promoting practices that used fertilizer and pesticides, and focusing on a few high-yield crops that benefited large landowners.

Borlaug often said wheat was only a vehicle for his real interest, which was to improve people's lives.

"We must recognize the fact that adequate food is only the first requisite for life," he said in his Nobel acceptance speech. "For a decent and humane life we must also provide an opportunity for good education, remunerative employment, comfortable housing, good clothing and effective and compassionate medical care."

Borlaug also pressed governments for farmer-friendly economic policies and improved infrastructure to make markets accessible. A 2006 book about Borlaug is titled "The Man Who Fed the World."

Norman Ernest Borlaug was born March 25, 1914, on a farm near Cresco, Iowa, and educated through the eighth grade in a one-room schoolhouse.

He left home during the Great Depression to study forestry at the University of Minnesota. While there he earned himself a place in the university's wrestling hall of fame and met his future wife, whom he married in 1937. Margaret Borlaug died in 2007 at the age of 95.

After a brief stint with the U.S. Forest Service, Norman Borlaug returned to the University of Minnesota for a doctoral degree in plant pathology. He then worked as a microbiologist for DuPont, but soon left for a job with the Rockefeller Foundation. Between 1944 and 1960, Borlaug dedicated himself to increasing Mexico's wheat production.

In 1963, Borlaug was named head of the newly formed International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center in Mexico, where he trained thousands of young scientists.

Borlaug retired as head of the center in 1979 and turned to university teaching, first at Cornell University and then at Texas A&M, which presented him with an honorary doctorate in December 2007.

He remained active well into his 90s, campaigning for the use of biotechnology to fight hunger. He also helped found and served as president of the Sasakawa Africa Foundation, an organization funded by Japanese billionaire Ryoichi Sasakawa to introduce the green revolution to sub-Saharan Africa.

In 1986, Borlaug established the Des Moines, Iowa-based World Food Prize, a $250,000 award given each year to a person whose work improves the world's food supply.

He received the Congressional Gold Medal, the highest civilian honor given by Congress, in 2007.

He is survived by daughter Jeanie Borlaug Laube and her husband Rex; son William Gibson Borlaug and his wife Barbie; five grandchildren and six great-grandchildren.

___

Blaney reported from Lubbock, Texas.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

DALLAS — Scientist and Nobel Peace Prize winner Norman Borlaug rose from his childhood on an Iowa farm to develop a type of wheat that helped feed the world, fostering a movement that is credite...
DALLAS — Scientist and Nobel Peace Prize winner Norman Borlaug rose from his childhood on an Iowa farm to develop a type of wheat that helped feed the world, fostering a movement that is credite...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 571
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
10:29 PM on 09/17/2009
I am greatly disappointed with what i am reading. His work is pro humanity as well as pro environment. it seems those who criticize his approach to farming seem to care just about "their environment" , which doesn't take account to millions and millions of people who wouldn't have FOOD .

rest in peace
Norman Borlaug
pharmmajor
proud Libertarian.
05:49 PM on 09/17/2009
To all you know-nothings taking the time to bash Borlaug's legacy, I ask you: what are you doing to help people in need?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 PM on 09/16/2009
He is the father of global poverty and inequality. The father of unsafe food. The father of corporate distribution of wealth AND food. The father of stronger pesticides. The father of obesity. The father of mono-agriculture.

He is no hero.
pharmmajor
proud Libertarian.
05:44 PM on 09/17/2009
You are an absolute ret@rd.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:48 PM on 09/16/2009
Genetically Modified foods. Gee. Thanks.
03:53 PM on 10/27/2009
You prefer starvation? Unless you're figuring out a way to achieve the same success in feeding the world, you need to shut your mouth.
07:22 PM on 09/16/2009
In 1974, after four years of study, the UN Research Institute for Social Development confirmed that fact that while Borlaug's 1st Green Revolution increased production, it failed to distribute food fairly. People remained hungry amid plentiful food supplies.

World leaders considering a 2nd Green Revolution can avoid a repetition. Last year, the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) issued its final report. Initiated by the World Bank and the FAO, after six years 400 experts chosen through a multi-stakeholder process concluded: "Business as usual is no longer an option." 

They point out the need to strengthen the agroecological sciences, redirect AKST to address persistent socioeconomic and gender inequities, and fully develop the use of existing AKST (formal, traditional and community-based). While acknowledging that some challenges my be resolved by applying emerging AKST, it encourages nations to refocus existing AKST on small-scale agricultural systems to create opportunities for poor farmers. The authors take export-oriented agriculture to task for failing to improve soils, sequester carbon, improve water supplies, create desirable farm livelihoods, reduce poverty and hunger, or improve the vitality and resilience of farming communities. 

Unlike the 1st Green Revolution, the authors of the IAASTD squarely address the challenges facing nations that aim to sustainably increase food production, while improving the livelihoods of the rural poor. 

A useful guide is finally at hand.
04:04 PM on 09/14/2009
In all honesty, many of the comments being made on this thread are horribly disappointing.

The claim that Borlaug contributed to overpopulation is ignorant. The total growth of world food production is faster than the total world population growth for the first time in history because of the green revolution. Borlaug spent his life seeking better ways to feed the world and succeeded beyond anyone's wildest imagination. India feeds itself, no longer entirely dependent on grain imports, because of Norman Borlaug. Ditto Pakistan.

The claim that Borlaug 'polluted a billion waterways' is also ignorant. The single most important breakthrough that Borlaug made was his 'dwarfing' process, which allowed more wheat or rice to be grown in a field the same size. This works to /reduce/ the total land use needed to support agriculture. This was a huge environmentalist breakthrough.

Environmentalists attacking Borlaug's work are like creationists attacking Darwin's work, substituting their religion for scientific reality.

If one man can ever be said to have saved the world, it was Norman Borlaug.
05:08 PM on 09/14/2009
Dwarf wheat is actually shorter wheat stalks that are less like to "lodge" Lodging of wheat is when rains are heavy or wind pushes it over when it is ripe. Dwarf varieties are less effected by lodging. More of the crop is harvested.

Borlaug was strong in helping areas rapidly modernize farming practices. It isn't just about the seed, but it is about timing and tillage practices also. America is very modern in soil, topsoil, water and subsoil moisture conservation. The "green" movement thinks this is something newly discovered. Urban dwellers have extensivly redefined some of the words that formerly were land management, soil conservation and stewardship.
04:36 AM on 09/15/2009
"Dwarf wheat is actually shorter wheat stalks that are less like to "lodge" Lodging of wheat is when rains are heavy or wind pushes it over when it is ripe. Dwarf varieties are less effected by lodging. More of the crop is harvested."

Yes. The lodging process frequently caused farmers in countries with less advanced agricultural nations (such as India, at the time) to underplant a field so that they could more effectively glean the grain lost to lodging. This meant that they were expending too much labor for too little return, and not able to make the most efficient use of the land available. Dwarf wheat strains allowed farmers to more fully plant a field with less risk of lodging and less gleaning necessary.

Even in fully modernized nations, dwarf strains produce larger harvests because of the lower risk of lodging, as you say. In less modernized nations, they also allowed farmers to plant more of the available farmland.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:20 AM on 09/14/2009
That his accomplishments saved a billion lives is questionable, a difficult thing to quantify, and highly anthropocentric.

How many non-human organisms have been destroyed to facilitate the constant demand for monoculture wheat farming that is needed to feed the billions of parasitic humans currently scratching and nibbling at the earth's surface?
03:55 PM on 10/27/2009
You volunteering to reduce humanity's foot print? Go for it I say.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:01 AM on 10/31/2009
I have been.
07:41 AM on 09/14/2009
The term green revolution is a misnomer. He didnt save a billion lives, he polluted a million waterways. Die in PEACE
10:18 PM on 09/14/2009
His intention was to save people from starvation and prevent massive deforestation. His work did save people from starvation and prevent deforestation. What corporations did with his good intentions is deplorable. My cousin Mike Natvig farms the Norman Borlaug farm to this day utilizing the traditional crop rotation method of farming. All of my Great Aunts and Uncles lived till their 90's and I believe this was because they farmed and ate organic all their lives. No fertilizer, hybrid seed, or pesticides. Mike Natvig to this day says, "You have to look back on what the impacts are and monitor your actions." Norman Borlaug never gave up searching for the balance. That's more than I can say for most humans. He did have a fundamental understanding of the basic principles of agriculture. That was how he was raised and how subsequent generations have continued to farm to this day.
yappnmutt
humping legs for liberty
05:12 AM on 09/14/2009
the law of unintended consequences suggests his work may have hastened the end of the world because he enabled humans to overpopulate the world putting too much pressure on the environment.

forgive him. he knows not what he does. may he enjoy his next life.
07:25 AM on 09/14/2009
My goodness, what a lack of empathy! Many people who were fed because of Borlaug's incredible work would have died a slow and horrible death from starvation. Please try to envision that...a slow and horrible death...your own... or your children... or your entire family.This is not some abstract problem written on a blackboard, but real human beings with feelings, just like you and me. No one asks to be born, or chooses where they are born, but you should thank your lucky stars for the opportunities which you were born into. Because others were born in a famine area, are they less human than you?
We can probably figure out a way to save the environment, and your fellow man, that doesn't include starvation and death.
I am VERY grateful for his work. The results that Mr. Borlaug found in his lifetime actually saved millions of lives. We should honor his memory with the deep respect he deserved.
07:43 AM on 09/14/2009
Using your logic, Idi Amin Dada and Pol Pot were better people than Norman Borlaug.
None of Dada's or Pot's actions brought about increased used of Earth's resources. In fact,
increased poverty along with decreased population (by whatever means) brings about decreased co2 production that is all that matters to you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adeyemo Sodipo
We all belong to the human race!!!
02:06 AM on 09/14/2009
Thank you and Rest In Peace. Thank God for you.
01:24 AM on 09/14/2009
Did he save a billion lives or kill a billion or more? And would someone else have done it anyway if he hadn't done it? Is this man, or people like him, a villain or a hero?

Think about it, people. Maybe, just maybe, the rapid expansion in the number of people on the planet, doubling in the 30 years since 1980 from 3.5 billion to 7 billion now would not have happened or would not have happened as easily had there been no food available. And what are we going to do now that we have 7 billion people, and maybe another doubling in another 30 years, while we also face climate changes that are going to affect the agricultural systems world-wide? The so-called "green" revolution of using massive amounts of artificial fertilizers and massive mechanized farms has virtually killed our topsoil.
01:21 AM on 09/14/2009
During the Great Leap Forward (1959-61) Mao Zedong claimed to have developed a planting technique that would greatly increase crop production of wheat. It was, of course, all a fantasy. But -- as is common in totalitarian countries -- no one around him was brave enough to disagree with him. So Mao ordained that every commune in China use his technique. Again, no one on the communes were willing to go against him so they all reported greater harvests than actually occurred. So Mao ordered the farms to send, say, 50% of their output to the central government thinking that that would leave 50% for the farmers when in actuality the 50% was 100% of the output.

Long story short: 30-80 million Chinese peasants starved as a result...and the grain elevators were full to overflowing.

See Jasper Becker's book "Hungry Ghosts" for documentation of this greatest mass murder in human history.

Isn't Communism wonderful?
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
12:58 AM on 09/14/2009
Didn't the Green Revolution start creating massive debt?
12:50 AM on 09/14/2009
With all due respect, I say this man has at least equally killed a billion more. The green revolution kicked the can of the obvious egalitarian ecovillage solution down the road to yet be even now more difficult to implement. The designs of cities and communication centers need to be self sustaining. Everyone should know how to grow food. See http://www.powerofcommunity.org/cm/index.php to see how another country, abruptly taken off the hydrocarbon economy Borlaug's model Green Revolution requires. Our economic structure need not dictate the growing of food, the growing of food need dictate the structure of the economy via natural law.
Blessings to his family and this man's soul.

See http://thefutureoffood.com/
10:48 PM on 09/15/2009
why on earth is that people think that protesting and showing a big mouth actually changes anything? What really changes things is hard work. "This man", as you say, worked the best he could; are you unhappy? Become yourself a scientist and DO SOMETHING.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dukedraven
12:45 AM on 09/14/2009
If you can eat wheat, corn, rice, soy, etc., with no consequences to your body, Cbani, all the power to ya. If not, watch this and weep:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94d-KVorSHM