GOP Rushes To Defend Insurance Companies From Dem Attack

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - GOP Rushes To Defend Insurance Companies From Dem Attack stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 09-22-09 08:24 PM   |   Updated: 09-23-09 01:05 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Boehner

UPDATE: Veering right into Glenn Beck territory, House Republicans darkly hinted Wednesday that the White House was behind the nefarious plot to muzzle insurance companies.

House Ways and Means ranking member Dave Camp (R-Mich.), is now demanding to know whether anyone from the White House was involved in the decision to tell companies to stop using taxpayer-subsidized communication to terrify seniors into opposing health reform.

"I have never seen anything like this and I question if politics was the deciding factor," said Camp.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) doesn't think it smells right, either. "[G]angster government is at it again," she wrote in The Hill.

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell took to the Senate floor again Wednesday morning and tried to tie this story into a larger narrative: "Over the past several months we've seen a pattern of intimidation by supporters of the administration's health care proposal, including efforts to demonize serious-minded critics at town hall meetings across the country. Now we're seeing something even worse. The full power of the federal government being brought to bear on businesses by the very people writing the legislation.... Americans are already skeptical about the administration's plan. They should be even more skeptical now."

* * * * * *


Republicans took to the floor of Congress, the Internet and the Wall Street Journal op-ed page Tuesday in a rush to defend a health insurance company that used taxpayer-subsidized communication to terrify seniors with the prospect that health care reform will cut their Medicare benefits.

Republican leaders in both houses of Congress ripped Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) for urging the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to put a stop to the insurers' efforts, decrying what they called a "gag order" and reading the First Amendment on the floor of the Senate.

Baucus, meanwhile, seemed mostly oblivious to the Republican attacks. "I never gag. I believe in the First Amendment," he told HuffPost, but added that he didn't know what the Republicans were referring to. "I have to go back and look to see what it is we did."

Story continues below
advertisement

As chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Baucus spent most of the day marking up a reform bill that so far has no GOP support - although Maine Republican Olympia Snowe has offered some indications of being on board. Snowe has been speaking warmly of the package and most of her reservations seem to be that it isn't generous enough -- objections the Democratic caucus will be happy to overcome. And in Massachusetts, a state senate vote moved Democrats one step closer to regaining 60 seats in the U.S. Senate.

Meanwhile, the GOP rode to the rescue of health insurance companies.

"It is outrageous that the Obama Administration is trying to keep seniors in the dark about the consequences of congressional Democrats' costly government-run health care bills. Would the Administration impose this sort of gag order if seniors were being given information promoting the Obama health care plan? I don't think so," said Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio).

"It looks likes CMS is engaged in government intimidation, pure and simple," said Ways and Means Ranking Member Dave Camp (R-Mich.), who sent off a letter to CMS demanding an explanation.

Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said it shouldn't be seen as coming to the defense of insurance companies. "I don't know that I'm coming to the defense of anything, except the First Amendment. I don't care who they write to," he told HuffPost. "You don't lose your rights because you happen to sell insurance for heaven's sake."

The free-speech argument, however, is complicated by the government-subsidy. Medicare Advantage is a GOP-created program that gives private plans an average of 14 percent more tax dollars than the government pays for coverage of patients under traditional Medicare.

Democratic health-care proposals would cut payments to those plans by about $123 billion over 10 years.

That would cut deeply into insurance company profits.

So, as Huffington Post citizen journalist Dawn Teo reported on Monday, Humana sent mailers to their list of Medicare beneficiaries warning that the Democratic health care reform bill will cut "important benefits and services" and urging them to call Congress to register their concern.

Baucus complained and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) cried foul, protesting that the mailings were misleading and instructing them to stop.

Communication between the private Medicare Advantage providers and beneficiaries is strictly regulated because the private companies are using public dollars.

CMS focused on a mass mailer sent by the insurance giant Humana claiming that the leading health care proposals in Washington would cut billions from Medicare Advantage programs, "as well as spending reductions to original Medicare and Medicaid. While these programs need to be made more efficient, if the proposed funding cut levels become law, millions of seniors and disabled individuals could lose many of the important benefits and services that make Medicare Advantage health plans so valuable."

"I rise to call my colleagues' attention to a truly disturbing development in the health care debate," said Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Humana's home state of Kentucky. "A colleague of ours has called for an investigation into a major health care company because this company informed its customers of its concerns about health care legislation that this colleague of ours introduced. Let me say that again," said McConnell, before saying it all again.

In 2004, Humana's chairman and former CEO David Jones donated a million dollars to the McConnell Center for Political Leadership, a University of Louisville academic center.

The Republican leader made sure to note his connection to Humana on the floor.

"Humana is headquartered in my hometown of Louisville and, yes, I care deeply about its 8,000 employees in Kentucky. But this gag order, Mr. President, this gag order applies to all Medicare Advantage providers. 'Shut up,' the government says. 'Don't communicate with your customers. Be quiet and get in line,'" he said.

He was followed by third-ranking Republican Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who read the First Amendment on the Senate Floor.

Humana was recently featured in a HuffPost story for denying health care due to lack of an enema. In 2005, it settled a racketeering suit for $40 million. It settled a fraud lawsuit in 2000 for $14.5 million. Since 2000, its profits have soared from $90 million to $834 million.

White House Office of Management and Budget chief Peter Orszag explained earlier this year that Medicare Advantage profits would be a prime target of health reform. "Evidence suggests that each dollar provided under Medicare Advantage costs the government a dollar thirty in costs," he said. "I believe in competition. I don't believe in paying a dollar thirty to get a dollar."

While Democratic leaders were ignoring the charges from Republicans, Democratic aides were having a field day, Googling up one sordid Humana clip after another.

Kyl didn't back down, saying that the CMS regulations about communicating with Medicare beneficiaries apply to information about particular health care plans, not health care legislation. "The fact is that these people are exercising their First Amendment right to talk about a piece of legislation that is pending and how, if it were to pass, it might effect people's coverage. If you can't talk about that, you've lost your First Amendment freedom," he said. "I suspect the people that sent this out are going to regret that they did that."

The GOP arguments are likely to fall on deaf ears. Jonathan Blum, director of the Center for Medicare Management said in a statement that CMS is investigating whether Humana inappropriately used the lists of Medicare enrollees for unauthorized purposes.

Blum is a former adviser to Baucus where he worked on Medicare Advantage issues.

"We are concerned that, among other things, the information in the letter is misleading and confusing to beneficiaries, who may believe that it represents official communication about the Medicare Advantage program," said Blum.

Ryan Grim is the author of This Is Your Country On Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America

UPDATE: Veering right into Glenn Beck territory, House Republicans darkly hinted Wednesday that the White House was behind the nefarious plot to muzzle insurance companies. House Ways and Means rank...
UPDATE: Veering right into Glenn Beck territory, House Republicans darkly hinted Wednesday that the White House was behind the nefarious plot to muzzle insurance companies. House Ways and Means rank...
Featured Comments:
photo MarsAmbassador
"Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."
- Macbeth

The Party of No has nothing left up their sleeve but mock outrage. And even that isn't pulled off convincingly. Reading... more >>

 Favorite Reply
Have something to say?

Report Corrections
 
Comments
6272
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (82 pages total)
photo

The headline should have read 'GOP rushes to defend their pay packet'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 10/13/2009

Defending insurance companies!?!? Who loves insurance companies? Oh ya, Republicans, because insurance companies fatten their offshore bank accounts. And let's be honest, the only thing a "good" Republican loves, is money, and the power that it affords. To my mind, that makes these "good christians" pagans...b­ecause they deify money above all else. If they speak of "christian" this and that, they are only buzz words to fleece the rubes among us. They are nihilist money worshipers­...nothing more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 09/28/2009

Since the turn of the century, the rate at which insurance companies charge much more, cover much less, make much more and pay providers much less has been accelerating so fast we have got ourselves into a huge mess. It is amazing how we can allow so few to screw so many. It is mind-blowing that some of our elected officials defend these criminal actions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 09/26/2009
- lihsus I'm a Fan of lihsus 3 fans permalink

Any insurance company sponsored tanning salon perks, here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 09/24/2009
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 145 fans permalink
photo

Republicans are in not a win situation!

Public Option pass,electorate will vote against them(R) for not support it.
Public Option wont pass,electorate will vote against them(R) for voted against it.

Anyways Chess Mate.

HAHAHA!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 09/24/2009
- hrholmes I'm a Fan of hrholmes 93 fans permalink
photo

Hi! I'm from your insurance company and I'm here to help! Here's a tool for you to follow Michelle Bachmanns advice and go slit your wrists. No death panel here. Freedom for jebus!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 09/24/2009
- mamalisa38 I'm a Fan of mamalisa38 56 fans permalink

In 2004, George W. Bush and the Republican's gave $950 million to Iraq for UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 09/24/2009
- myke3000 I'm a Fan of myke3000 13 fans permalink

I wish this was highlighted more in debates and public disclosure!! It is true that the Bush Administration wrote this into the Iraqi Constitution to GUARANTEE the citizens of Iraq Universal Health Care coverage.

Unbelievable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 09/24/2009
- alibeamish I'm a Fan of alibeamish 3 fans permalink

Dems are attacking !! They only want to give these companies a few billions of taxpayer dollars and force us to give 13% of our income to insurance !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 09/24/2009

Ten years from now there may not be any insurance companies, if not, there will be no Republicans and Blue Dog Democrates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 09/23/2009
- qwerty911 I'm a Fan of qwerty911 20 fans permalink
photo

The dems are just as bad in this whole health care fiasco, as the republicans are. Don't let either party fool you. If they truly wanted reform, there are sensible ways to achieve it. The problem is the dems want to do it through big government, and the repubs want to do it sensibly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 09/23/2009
- Buddy McCue I'm a Fan of Buddy McCue 136 fans permalink
photo

Oh, they do, do they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 09/23/2009
photo

Ya had me right up to the "big government" talking point.

The problem is, the dems have done a risk analysis, want a big "kumbahya" moment, and shared responsibility all around.

The problem with the republicans is, if you've got nothing-- you've got nothing to lose. So they are going to drag their feet, stir the beast, and make d@@m sure nothing happens for the next 3 years.

Meanwhile you, I and all these well meaning people get sacrificed on the alter of electability and opinion polls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 09/23/2009
- nicole473 I'm a Fan of nicole473 262 fans permalink
photo

So, qwerty, tell us, how DO the Repubs want to do healthcare. Please be specific.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 09/23/2009
photo

Yes. I have heard so many sensible ideas from the Republicans:

"They're going to kill your grandmothe­r."

"It's going to pay for abortions.­"

"You lie!"

And, of course, "No. No. No. No. No. No, etc."

The Republicans want it to be done with big corporations making obscene amounts of money while literally making choices that kill people. I trust my health much more to the federal government than to someone whose income is directly related to his/her ability to keep me from receiving the health care I need.

You want death panels? Stay with the insurance companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 09/23/2009

I'm afraid that you are badly informed--Why don't you read the bills and the Rep attacks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 09/24/2009
photo

They get their talking points memo each morning they're in session and then one after the other they all repeat them.
No matter what the subject is, if you watch them, that is all you will see. One Repuke after the other spouting the same lies, distortions and fantasies over and over. You will see that pipsqueek FLAKE from AZ so full of glee for every nonsensical "amendment" he brings up, that he can't even read it without giggling.
For the entire election cycle last year, it was, "drill baby drill" "drill here, drill now", they continued that chant even as the oil platforms were being shut down and buttoned up in prep for 2 hurricanes that were entering the Gulf of Mexico.
We got the same with the WARS and with telecom immunity. If the THUGS don't get their way the WORLD WILL END.
Now it's health care and the SKY IS GOING TO FALL if INSURANCE CEOs have to take a cut in profits. But they have no feeling or concern in any way, shape, or form for the 10s of thousands who DIE every YEAR because of no health care or having their policies "rescinded", because they had the GAUL to get sick and MAKE A CLAIM, even those who've paid in $8 to $12 THOUSAND DOLLARS A YEAR FOR 10 OR 15 YEARS WITHOUT A CLAIM.
The THUGS and the "Blue Dog THUGGIES" KNOW which side THEIR bread is buttered on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 09/23/2009
- rrisright I'm a Fan of rrisright 3 fans permalink

well someone is just standing up to the liberal democrat plan of finally getting a one payor system. First you demonize them, even though the vast majority of insurance companies make single digit returns. Obama and his Chicago thugs demonize Wall, St, Car Companies, and now insurance companies. I love my insurance company, I saw a orthopedic specialist in 3 days, I wonder how long i would wiat in a govt plan. Is reform necessary yes, allow interstate competition, tort reform, and start cutting the wast and fraud that Obama's claims is in the medicare budget. Why would you not do that now anyway? Does anyone really believe you can make this plan deficit natural. Whit a 13 trillion Obama deficit not even inclduing tax and trade, a 50 trillion unfunded social security bill commng due, has anyone ever really thought about whats going to happen to this nations monetary system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 09/23/2009
- Josh Seipp I'm a Fan of Josh Seipp 24 fans permalink
photo

You love YOUR plan . But what about everyone that can't afford health insurance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 09/23/2009
- qwerty911 I'm a Fan of qwerty911 20 fans permalink
photo

Here is the thought process of obama and the dungacrat party - They are going to radically change our current health care system, push through a bill without reading the bill entirely, because less then 10% of the population is uninsured??? They are going to force a MAJOR change on the rest of the 90% of the population because 10% is not insured???

That is one extremely radical and socialist idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 09/23/2009
- chazmanr I'm a Fan of chazmanr 16 fans permalink

If Obama and his "Chicago" thugs are demonizing Wall St., why has there been no increase in the enforcement of the few remaining regulations and no new regulations to prevent those greedy thugs from ruining the economy again (perhaps permanently). You are talking out of the wrong orafice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 09/23/2009
photo

Once you put aside your Faux News talking points (and most of us really, really wish you would)- at the end of the day, you are left with one question (ok, maybe more than one):

Why is it good for YOU that these large corporations have no competition? That they are allowed to discriminate, and are therefore perceived as being above the law? Are not subject to the competitive pressures of other US corporations?

How does that serve you, your family, your friends well?

I mean, after all, what kind of capitalist are you???

GASP! How . . . unamerican­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 09/23/2009
- Buddy McCue I'm a Fan of Buddy McCue 136 fans permalink
photo

It makes me wonder why good honest working people stand by thelarge corporations, and imagine that their interests are the same.

What makes people want to support the overdogs instead of the underdogs? Is it just a hierarchical reverence for one's "betters?" Is it just "kiss up / kick down" philosophy that causes this? A fear that if one doesn't stand with the "winners" of society, one will become a loser? Does much of this support come from people like Joe The Plumber, who are sure that they will own whatever business they work for, if they work hard enough?

That each of them will one day be overdogs themselves?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 09/23/2009
- lilma I'm a Fan of lilma 3 fans permalink

One appointment dosen't made great insurance, wait till you get a real illness then brag. Been there, Doing that, and private insurance is nothing to brag about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 09/23/2009

well, sir, i certainly don't think it would help to allow "interstate competition," because individual states are allowed to regulate insurance companies as they see fit - and in some states it is perfectly legal for an insurance company to deny coverage for a woman who was in the past a victim of domestic violence, because it is considered a pre-existing condition. if the borders were opened up, insurance companies would most likely flock to the states with the most lenient regulations, and operate out of those states, because what's bad for consumers is good for profits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 09/27/2009
- balrog221 I'm a Fan of balrog221 23 fans permalink
photo

Insurance companies ....jajaja Here is their business model. Get as much premium as possible and pay out as little as possible in claims. Any insurance financial officer or executive knows this and acts accordingly. As they should The regulators must determine if they are doing so in a manner that is also beneficial to the consumer. Maligning Ins. executives is wrong unless they break the law (misrepresent coverage for example)

Regulating them is 100% neccesary because of the complexity of their products. These entities cannot be held to account by mere market forces.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 09/23/2009
- paulita I'm a Fan of paulita 189 fans permalink
photo

They are having this debate on Cspan 3 currently-- Kyl amendment, and the R side is very disingenuous in their free speech argument. The witness from Medicare has shown that the issue was a breach of contract by Humana who signed an agreement not to speak to the customer direclty about issues affecting benefits without medicares approval. Their mailer from Humana violated this contract. The R side argues "its a 1st amendment issue and you have a right to exercise your first amendment.­"

So therefore, R party, if I sign a contract with the government for military related services and I contract not to give government secrets.. are you then saying its ok if I give government secrets because its my 1s amendment rights? They would never argue such a preposterous position in this case.

It is so see through, then that this is merely an effort to protect big insurers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 09/23/2009
- kjw I'm a Fan of kjw permalink

Read it again txrunner. Humana receives government funds for its participation in Medicare Advantage. The government is saying they can't use the funds they provide to pay for communications.
If you would bother to look deeper, you would realize the communications are strictly in Humana's own self interests and are all based on conjecture. Nothing classier than trying to scare senior citizens with what MIGHT happen!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 09/23/2009
- qwerty911 I'm a Fan of qwerty911 20 fans permalink
photo

How in the heck do you know WHAT funds Humana is using to pay for their communications. Or is it the governments logic (or yours) that if Humana receives ANY funds from the gov that they are then NOT allowed to communicate to the participants?

Sounds kinda silly kwj...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 09/23/2009
- chazmanr I'm a Fan of chazmanr 16 fans permalink

They certainly should not be allowed to lobby the insureds who are provided care through Humana as a result of the government funding. There would be no relationship with these people otherwise. You reap the benefit, you play by the rules you AGREED to.

Where were you people when ant-flag burning amendments were being batted around? Guess the first amendment only applies to speech YOU agree with.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 09/23/2009
- paulita I'm a Fan of paulita 189 fans permalink
photo

There is a current Congressional hearing about the issue which ended about 20 minutes ago, there was testimony as to the fact that Humana was under contract to medicare and they were violating the terms of their contract. Even the Repbulican Senators agreed with that but then tried to say it was a free speech issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 09/23/2009
photo

It's called an annual report. You can pretty much find out this sort of thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 09/23/2009
- LeftRight I'm a Fan of LeftRight 111 fans permalink
photo

Nope, it's that if they are taking ANY government funds then they must be HIGHLY regulated in WHAT communications they present to those who are their customers. You see, this is the LAW!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 09/27/2009
- qwerty911 I'm a Fan of qwerty911 20 fans permalink
photo

Nancy Pelosi recently said “Insurance companies are out there in full force, carpet b0mbing, shock and awe against a public option.” She might have added, “And throwing me a $2,500 a plate fundraiser­.”

Steve Elmendorf, a registered lobbyist for UnitedHealth, is hosting the fundraiser at his palatial home. Odd, isn’t it, that everyday Americans opposed to the health care program are called insurance company lackeys, Nazis, un-American and a**h0les. (Oh, wait. That last one came from the communist who got fired, so it shouldn’t be counted against Nancy).

So let’s make one thing clear: when you have a $2,500 a plate fundraiser thrown for you by the same people that you vilify on a daily basis, you are not an a**h0les.

But you are a F'n hypocrite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 PM on 09/23/2009
photo

No, she's speaker of the House of Reps-- that's politics and she is a succesful pol-- cmon now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 09/23/2009
- chazmanr I'm a Fan of chazmanr 16 fans permalink

No, the rethuglicans have cornered the hypocrisy market (Sanford, Ensign, Palin, Foley, Craig).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 09/23/2009
photo

...DeLay, Gingrich, McCain, Palin, Vitter, McConnell, Kyl, Pawlenty, Bachman, Ross, Camp.... This hypocracy list is endless. All in the name of saving insurance companies from giving up private jets, etc. Best congress our premiums can buy. Can they be trusted to stay bought?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 09/24/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (82 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect