EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama Issues Ultimatum To Iran On Nukes

JENNIFER LOVEN   09/26/09 10:03 PM ET   AP

Obama

WASHINGTON — The U.S. and its five allies trying to stop Iran's suspected nuclear weapons program plan to tell Tehran in a key meeting on Thursday that it must provide "unfettered access" to its previously secret Qom enrichment facility within weeks, a senior administration official says.

The allies – the U.S., Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia – also will present in the Oct. 1 meeting a so-called transparency package covering all of Iran's nuclear activities across the country, said the official said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss plans that are not yet ready to be announced.

The allies will demand that Iran prove to the increasingly skeptical group that its intentions with its various sites are peaceful and energy-related, as Iran claims, and not for weapons development, as the West believes, the official said Saturday.

These nations now agree that they are less inclined to listen to suspect arguments or incomplete evidence – viewing it as a stall tactic, the official said.

But beyond the timeframe of "weeks" for coming clean on Qom, the allies will not give Iran a specific deadline to provide the information about its overall program, the official said.

The development of such a timeframe will depend on the Iranians' actions in the meeting and directly after it, the official said.

The kind of transparency the group wants from Tehran is far-reaching, covering people, timeframes and facilities. This would include full access for the International Atomic Energy Agency to any and every site, notebooks, computers and documents related to nuclear development, and all scientists.

The United States will be represented in Thursday's meeting in Geneva by William Burns, the under secretary of state for political affairs, a career diplomat.

On Saturday, Iran's nuclear chief told state TV that his country would allow the U.N. nuclear agency to inspect Iran's newly revealed and still unfinished uranium enrichment facility. Ali Akbar Salehi didn't specify when inspectors from the IAEA could visit. He said the timing would be worked out with the U.N. watchdog.

Earlier Saturday, President Barack Obama offered Iran "a serious, meaningful dialogue" over its disputed nuclear program, while warning Tehran of grave consequences from a united global front.

"Iran's leaders must now choose – they can live up to their responsibilities and achieve integration with the community of nations. Or they will face increased pressure and isolation, and deny opportunity to their own people," Obama said in his radio and Internet address Saturday.

The White House responded to the development by urging Iran's complete and immediate cooperation with the IAEA. "After hiding this site from the international community for years, full transparency is essential, and it is time for Iran to play by the rules like everyone else," White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said.

Obama said in his address that evidence of Iran's building the underground plant "continues a disturbing pattern of Iranian evasion" that jeopardizes global nonproliferation.

Ahead of Thursday's international talks with Iran in Geneva, Obama said the world "is more united than ever before" on this issue. Those negotiations, he said, "now take on added urgency."

Iran's failure to comply with international inspectors raised the potential of tougher economic penalties, although Obama and administration officials did not rule out military action.

"My offer of a serious, meaningful dialogue to resolve this issue remains open," Obama said, urging Tehran to "take action to demonstrate its peaceful intentions."

Evidence of the clandestine facility was presented Friday by Obama and the leaders of Britain and France at the G-20 economic summit in Pittsburgh. The news overshadowed developments on regulating financial markets and reducing fossil fuel subsidies.

Soon after, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, at his own news conference, urged Iran to cooperate, as did Chinese Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei. He, however, did not endorse penalties against Tehran.

At a news conference in New York, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said his country had done nothing wrong and Obama would regret his actions.

"What we did was completely legal, according to the law. We have informed the agency, the agency will come and take a look and produce a report and it's nothing new," he said.

Ahmadinejad said the plant – which Iranian officials say was reported to nuclear authorities as required – wouldn't be operational for 18 months. But he sidestepped a question about whether Iran had sufficient uranium to manufacture a nuclear weapon.

___

On the Net:

Obama: http://www.whitehouse.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — The U.S. and its five allies trying to stop Iran's suspected nuclear weapons program plan to tell Tehran in a key meeting on Thursday that it must provide "unfettered access" to its...
WASHINGTON — The U.S. and its five allies trying to stop Iran's suspected nuclear weapons program plan to tell Tehran in a key meeting on Thursday that it must provide "unfettered access" to its...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,260
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
12:11 PM on 11/24/2009
What's the ultimatum from Obama. He's not going to invite the Iranian leaders to the next Koo and the Gang concert at the White House. Pretty intimidati­ng stuff! Iran must be either shaking in it's boots or privately laughing in disbelief at their good fortune to have this President for an adversary.
12:33 AM on 09/28/2009
"Iran's leaders must now choose – they can live up to their responsibi­lities and achieve integratio­n with the community of nations. Or they will face increased pressure and isolation, and deny opportunit­y to their own people." ~Obama

Yup, sounds like an ultimatum
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DocSyracuse
A socially liberal, fiscally conservative surgeon
10:24 PM on 09/27/2009
I read the article, and I honestly didn't see anything that looked like "an ultimatum" coming from Obama.
12:33 AM on 09/28/2009
More empty rhetoric
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
08:38 PM on 09/27/2009
Ahmedineja­d already said, he welcomes the IAEA. Want me to tell you what will come next. We are going to say they have no clue what they are talking about. We know exactly where the nukes are located. Already, on line at Fox News, the survey showed that 90% voting are for military action.
Here we go again. Braindead we are in America!
07:28 PM on 09/27/2009
And when do we demand the Israelis disclose their bombs, centrifuge­s, and reactors?

Oh never mind. They run our government­...
08:35 PM on 09/27/2009
Wait.....I thought a Muslim ran the government­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:37 PM on 09/27/2009
we gave them thiers lol
06:47 PM on 09/27/2009
2001 - TPM from Rumsfeld included the idea that the collapse of the Soviet Union created new regional powers that are intensely hostile to the US and they are arming to deter us from bringing our convention­al or nuclear power to bear in a regional crisis.

http://www­.tinyrevol­ution.com/­mt/archive­s/002648.h­tml

In other words, Iran can't have nuclear energy even though they're actions are legal according to the NPT because they would deter us from using our nuclear weapons in a regional crisis to threaten them.

Nothing has changed and the media still just regurgitat­es state media. No investigat­ion, no reading the IAEA report, no nothing but Iran is going to have the bomb! So? Pakistan has the bomb and they harbor terrorists who hate the US - no sanctions against them?
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
05:42 PM on 09/27/2009
Politician­s play sanctions games pretending they're doing something when actually doing nothing!

Sanctions don't work, won't work!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:51 PM on 09/27/2009
Clue us in on what has worked in the past.
10:23 PM on 09/27/2009
Total destructiv­e country taking wars, where they took it all and left no one there afterwords­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:06 PM on 09/27/2009
So, let me ask, if Israel were to preemptive­ly strike Iran's nuclear/mi­litary facilities­, how do the posters here think the U.S. would respond? Israel's security has to include the financial/­political support from the U.S. to some considerab­le extent. A significan­t portion of the Democrat financial base in THIS country comes from the Jewish community, a large number of which do not support aggression in the M.E.
09:57 AM on 09/28/2009
I don't believe Obama would blindly back Israel in such a case. His strong remarks to them in regards to the Israeli/Pa­lestinian conflict leads me to believe that Obama won't bend to Israel as much as some of our past presidents­.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
alysheba 3
10:23 AM on 09/28/2009
Strong words.....­..........­.but still lets Israel act they way they want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% vs. DC - Plutocracy
04:02 PM on 09/27/2009
Will we see a "can't do it in Afghanista­n, so let's do it in Iran"?
dans5843
Chicago retired gay guy
01:52 PM on 09/27/2009
Obama was brilliant how he has handled this!

Now, Public Option!
05:06 PM on 09/27/2009
It's not over by a long shot.
12:56 PM on 09/27/2009
Next round of sanctions on Iran will not be a slap on the wrist like the last ones.
Last chance for Iran to save itself. Hint to Supremo--T­he Akbar Dude won't help you outta this one,
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
alysheba 3
12:37 AM on 09/28/2009
Why should America fight a(nother) war for Israel? Iran is following the NPT. Perhaps Israel should sign it to help guarantee peace in the ME. Or does Israel really want peace?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 AM on 09/27/2009
Comment by sweenster:

Just to teach all of you drones there are 537 elected officials in DC,and the majority of them are DEMOCRATS,­not very good ones either.All we hear is "Its not our fault just because we have had the majority for the last three years", Nothing is done in this country without congress approving it!

My response:

Why don't you give us hope, and demonstrat­e how the Republican congress helped the citizens of this country for the 12+ years they were in control?

Follow up:

I'm still waiting for your response to my question. What? You have none?
12:49 PM on 09/27/2009
A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.

Prime example thereof.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:18 PM on 09/27/2009
Not so! The original poster diss'd the current congress as being impotent, and I asked them to explain how that differed from the previous.

That does not constitute a red herring. Your irrelevanc­y is beginning to show.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChangeurMind
12:53 AM on 09/27/2009
the CIA blunder during the elections failed, so now this. USA, you have no credibilit­y... and Bushmama is walking the same path.
10:49 AM on 09/27/2009
Of course your primitive mind can't even conceive of an idea that many Iranians would gladly get rid of the Supreme Leaders and Revolution­ary Guards and moral police and the rest of the flotsam that runs the country now.
Learn to think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:59 AM on 09/27/2009
The pot calling the kettle black. Many in Israel oppose military posturing in the region, a concept you SEEM to have overlooked­, too.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Emerald1943
10:08 PM on 09/26/2009
Wow! We blinked and all of a sudden, we have Britain, Russia, France, Germany and China at our side! And the naysayers are still bashing President Obama as "weak and ineffectua­l", inexperien­ced, and "over his head" in foreign affairs!!

If I were Achmedinne­rjacket, I don't think I would cross President Obama! I saw something rarely seen in this fine man...ange­r. You could see it in his eyes as he spoke. Good for him! We need the President to be strong now! I believe the knuckle-dr­aggers have underestim­ated him!

Go, President Obama! We have your back!
11:59 PM on 09/26/2009
Russia and China are all talk, no action. They won't impose sanctions on Iran so their support is worthless at this point.
10:46 AM on 09/27/2009
"They won't impose sanctions.­"
LOL.
As they say you, wanna know how to run the world? Just ask any taxi driver or a plumber.
09:03 PM on 09/26/2009
What ultimatum? When it comes to manipulati­on, HP is heading toward Faux news in speed of light.