A keystone of Obama's Wall Street reform agenda is getting support from the unlikeliest of corners. Alan Greenspan, an acolyte of Ayn Rand and extreme free-marketeer, is backing one of the most far-reaching elements of the financial overhaul: the Consumer Financial Protection Agency.
Greenspan told the Washington Post that pushing for the CFPA was "probably the right decision." Given the former Fed chairman's penchant for obliquity, the straight-forward endorsement takes on greater weight.
Wall Street and community bankers argue that the proposed agency will restrict financial innovation and otherwise inhibit economic growth. Those are the types of arguments that Greenspan was prone to make during his tenure as chairman, but the financial crisis has persuaded Greenspan that the "intellectual edifice" buttressing radical free-market ideology has, in his words, "collapsed."
Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.), the lead backer of the CFPA in the House Financial Services Committee, recalled the Greenspan opposed consumer protections while he was chairman. "It's a dramatic turnaround from his public position and even more so, apparently, from what he was privately pushing within the deliberations at the Fed," he told HuffPost.
Greenspan has acknowledged that the collapse has led to a crisis of faith. "I made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations, specifically banks and others, were such as that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms," Greenspan said at a House hearing last October under questioning from Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.).
"In other words," said Waxman, moving in for the kill, "you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working."
"Absolutely, precisely," said Greenspan. "You know, that's precisely the reason I was shocked, because I have been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well."
It's one thing to reject a failed ideology, but another altogether to embrace the kind of regulation represented by the CFPA. "He has already said that he erred in assuming that the market would take care of things--the Ayn Rand point of view--but this seems to go farther than he's gone before in calling for a new agency to protect consumers from financial products," said Miller.
Greenspan told the Post that the Fed has enough responsibilities to manage and that consumer protection would be too much. Miller noted that Greenspan's position is "diametrically opposite of what leadership at the Fed are saying now."
Top Fed officials are pushing to make consumer protection a core Fed responsibility. But Democrats passed a law in 1994 requiring the Fed to adopt rules protecting financial consumers. When the GOP took over Congress in 1995, the Fed decided not to act. It didn't write the rules until Democrats retook Congress in 2007 and began work on a new set of laws. "The damage was already done," noted Miller.
The CFPA would gauge the safety of financial products and be given broad powers to require understandable explanations of the terms of financial instruments and otherwise restrict behavior that now goes on unmolested. It was first proposed by Harvard Prof. Elizabeth Warren, the head of the congressional panel overseeing the financial bailout. It is fiercely opposed by the banking lobby.
Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) earlier postponed a vote on the agency until after the August recess. The banking lobby's stiff resistance made it difficult for the chairman to be sure he had enough votes to pass it.
The vote is now expected in October.
Last week, Frank issued a memo to committee members outlining proposed changes to the original package, which had been blasted by the Chamber of Commerce for over-reaching and going so far as to regulate butchers who give meat on credit.
The original bill would have required financial institutions to offer standard, "plain vanilla" financial products meeting certain basic guidelines for transparency and safety. That requirement has been dropped, according to the memo, which was obtained by HuffPost.
Some consumer advocates expressed alarm at the proposed changes, but others following it closely say that the changes are largely technical and that the real fight is yet to come.
To: Democratic Members, Committee on Financial Services
From: Barney Frank, Chairman
Subject: Discussion Draft of Consumer Financial Protection Agency Bill
Date: September 22, 2009
I will soon be releasing an initial revised discussion draft of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) bill, intended to be responsive to the primary concerns Members have expressed to date. I invite all Members to contact me about any concerns regarding the execution of these changes or other concerns with the CFPA provisions. Any Members who would like to sponsor any of the changes identified below should contact me or Jim Segel on my staff.
The discussion draft will make several key changes to the Obama Administration's draft legislation to make clear that CFPA will not disrupt merchants, retailers and other nonfinancial businesses or subject banks and other depository institutions to needless additional regulatory burdens and costs. At the same time, CFPA will have a mandate to set strong rules that all financial institutions--both banks and nonbanks--will have to follow when providing financial products and services to consumers to create a level playing field and remove the current competitive disadvantage that adversely impacts traditional banks and thrifts.
We will make the following key changes:
Nonfinancial Businesses Exempt. Merchants, retailers and other nonfinancial businesses will be excluded from the regulation and oversight of CFPA. That means that merchants and retailers can continue to give their customers tabs and layaway plans without becoming subject to a new layer of regulation. Also, doctors and other businesses that bill their customers after a service is provided, including telephone, cable, and internet providers, will be excluded.
Credit and other financial activities of nonfinancial business will continue to be subject to the Truth in Lending Act and other consumer statutes as they are today.
The Federal Trade Commission will continue its longstanding role of providing oversight for these activities.
Other Exemptions. In addition to providing clear exclusions for securities, commodities, investment and general insurance products (other than financial planners), the following other businesses will not be subject to CFPA regulation for acting in their traditional capacities:
Accountants and other businesses that perform tax preparation services,
Real estate brokers and agents;
Telecom, cable and other communications providers;
Consumer reporting agencies;
Providers of IRAs, 401(k) plans, 529 plans and pension plans; and
Service providers that provide strictly ministerial and support services to financial institutions.
No "Plain Vanilla" Requirement. Financial institutions will not be required to offer plain vanilla products and services and CFPA will not have authority to approve or change business plans.
No "Reasonableness" Standard. CFPA will not be able to mandate "reasonableness" standards that would place financial institutions in the untenable position of having to assess whether consumers comprehend the products and services they are being offered. Instead, CFPA will be mandated to improve the current disclosure regime with an emphasis on clarity, simplicity, conciseness, and reduction of regulatory burden.
Simultaneous and Coordinated Exams. Depository institutions will have simultaneous federal safety and soundness and consumer compliance examinations (unless they request exams at different times). Whatever they choose, the banking agencies and CFPA will have to coordinate and consult one another on the timing, scope and results of exams to ensure a minimum regulatory burden.
Dispute Mechanism. Depository institutions that receive contradictory or conflicting supervisory determinations or directives from CFPA and their prudential supervisors will be able to appeal the decisions to a disinterested governing panel and receive a quick and definitive answer.
Registration and Supervision of Nonbanks.
o All nonbank financial institutions that provide consumer financial products and services will be required to register with CFPA; and
o Nonbanks will be subject to a level of supervision and scrutiny that is no less burdensome or comprehensive than that governing traditional banks and thrifts and that will fully reflect the risks posed by these previously unregulated entities.
- Assessments on Nonbanks. Nonbanks will be subject to assessments and the legislation will make explicit that neither small nor large banks will pay for the examination and supervision of nonbanks.
- Federal Reserve Payments. To ensure adequate funding of CFPA without placing additional burden on financial institutions, the Federal Reserve will fund CFPA at a level that reflects amounts the banking agencies currently pay for consumer compliance.
- Agency Structure. CFPA will be run by a single Director, who will be advised by a Consumer Financial Protection Oversight Board, which is made up of the Federal banking agencies, NCUA, FTC and HUD and the Chairman of the State Liaison Committee of the FFIEC. In addition, CFPA will have an Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity to ensure that the agency has adequate resources to address fair lending and civil rights laws under its jurisdiction. We also will clarify that financial literacy will be an important part of the new agency's mission.
How will Donald Trump’s first 100 days impact YOU? Subscribe, choose the community that you most identify with or want to learn more about and we’ll send you the news that matters most once a week throughout Trump’s first 100 days in office. Learn more