More

U.S. Officials: How We Discovered Iran's Secret Nuclear Site

PAMELA HESS   09/28/09 07:07 PM ET   AP

Iran Nuclear

WASHINGTON — U.S. intelligence agencies hit paydirt several years ago when they searched for a hidden Iranian uranium-enrichment site, spotting telltale signs of digging outside the holy city of Qom.

Iran had already owned up to its first uranium enrichment facility near Natanz in 2002 and U.S. intelligence officials figured it was Iran's only attempt to secretly refine fuel for a nuclear reactor, and possibly a nuclear bomb.

Analysts pinpointed the second site several years ago carved into a mountain near Qom, a Shiite holy city and a religious nerve center of the Iranian regime, according to U.S. officials.

There were multiple streams of intelligence that proved fruitful, but one clear sign produced by spy satellites was evidence of digging for underground facilities, said a senior U.S. intelligence official. That official and other administration officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive information.

U.S., British and French intelligence agencies had been sitting on their evolving intelligence for several years, waiting for construction at the site to progress far enough to prove Iran intended to use it for illegal weapons work. In recent months, Obama administration officials said, equipment had been moved into the new site, making the case against Iran clearer.

The underground facility, a cluster of 3,000 connected centrifuges, was within a few months of being completed when Iran made the surprise disclosure of the site on Monday to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the nuclear watchdog.

A senior administration official said Saturday that Tehran made the disclosure because it learned the site had been discovered.

Although there was no confirmation from the U.S. or Iran, images produced both by DigitalGlobe and GeoEye's commercial fleet of satellites show what independent imagery analysts believe to be the site on a military base near Qom.

According to defense consultancy IHS Janes, which analyzed GeoEye's imagery, the images show a well-fortified facility built into a mountain about 20 miles northeast of Qom, with ventilation shafts and a nearby surface-to-air missile site. The image was taken this week.

A separate analysis was done by GlobalSecurity.org of images taken earlier – between 2005 and January 2009 – by DigitalGlobe and also from Google. Those images were taken during an earlier phase of construction and Globalsecurity.org believes there is no underground site.

Instead, GlobalSecurity.org believes that the probable centrifuge facility is simply built into a cut in a mountain. It is constructed of heavily reinforced concrete and is about the size of a football field, large enough to house 3,000 centrifuges.

Iran's Foreign Ministry, however, gave a different location for the site, saying Monday it was near the village of Fordo, which is about 30 miles south of Qom.

The Iranians' disclosure triggered a fast-moving chain of events, leading to a series of secret intelligence briefings about the enrichment site last week by U.S. officials to Russian and Chinese leaders in New York, the IAEA in Vienna and congressional leaders in Washington.

The administration had intended to confront the Iranians about the secret site later this year, but Tehran's sudden disclosure forced their hand. Now the administration hopes to use the new site as leverage to win a commitment from Iran to abandon its nuclear program or face severe new economic sanctions.

Diplomacy and economic pressure are the intended way ahead. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Sunday that a military strike against Iran's nuclear infrastructure would be ineffectual, delaying Iran's program by one to three years at most.

"This is part of a pattern of deception and lies on the part of the Iranians from the very beginning with respect to their nuclear program. So it's no wonder that world leaders think that they have ulterior motives, that they have a plan to go forward with nuclear weapons. Otherwise, why would they do all this in such a deceptive manner?" Gates said Sunday in an interview on ABC's "This Week."

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday that Iran has until Thursday to agree to inspections and voluntarily halt its hidden nuclear program, or the United States and its allies will seek crippling sanctions.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said Sunday that Tehran's intention to produce weapons-grade uranium in the Qom facility has not yet been proven, but the indications are strong.

Clinton spoke on CBS' "Face the Nation." Feinstein appeared on "Fox News Sunday."

U.S. officials said the site was secret and guarded by elite Iranian troops. And there are too few centrifuges to play a meaningful role in Iran's civilian energy program.

However, there are enough centrifuges to refine a small amount of uranium suitable for a warhead, according to U.S. intelligence and administration officials.

President Barack Obama and his senior aides began moving quickly to deal with Iran's disclosure on Tuesday night in New York as they readied for the United Nations General Assembly meeting and sessions with world leaders.

Obama and the U.S. officials debated into the night over what intelligence they could share with the IAEA and other U.S. allies, as well as China and Russia. The two superpowers wield considerable influence over Iran, and their support would be needed to win U.N. Security Council sanctions. China, particularly, supplies Iran with equipment and technology for its oil and gas industry.

Obama personally informed Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Wednesday. Lower-level American and Russian officials discussed the matter throughout the day Thursday. White House officials told their Chinese counterparts on Wednesday.

Also Wednesday, IAEA officials in New York were briefed about the site, followed by a detailed briefing delivered in Vienna on Thursday afternoon.

At the same time, White House officials began briefing House and Senate leaders and key committee members.

The United States, France and United Kingdom went public with their intelligence on the Iranian site on Friday.

Iran maintains the Qom facility is an experimental site for its civilian nuclear program. Iran is bound by an IAEA agreement to disclose new nuclear sites when construction begins. But Iran declared in March 2007 that it rejected that IAEA requirement.

Iran says its new site is meant to produce uranium refined to contain 5 percent of the radioactive isotope U-235, well below the 90 percent needed to fuel a warhead.

The centrifuges at the original Iranian site at Natanz produce about 2 kilograms a day of low-enriched uranium suitable for fueling a civilian nuclear reactor. Iran has accumulated about 1,400 kilograms of low-enriched uranium.

Depending on the design, a warhead needs 12 to 25 kilograms of highly enriched uranium, but U.S. intelligence has reported that Iran has not yet produced any highly enriched uranium.

The U.S. government continues to stand by its judgment from 2007 that Iran could have a nuclear bomb within one to five years.

___

AP White House Correspondent Jennifer Loven contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

International Atomic Energy Agency: http://www.iaea.org/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — U.S. intelligence agencies hit paydirt several years ago when they searched for a hidden Iranian uranium-enrichment site, spotting telltale signs of digging outside the holy city of...
WASHINGTON — U.S. intelligence agencies hit paydirt several years ago when they searched for a hidden Iranian uranium-enrichment site, spotting telltale signs of digging outside the holy city of...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 270
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevecaudill
CLASSIFIED
05:25 AM on 11/18/2009
I don't see a problem here. Iran is only obligated to inform the IAEA of a new nuclear facility at least 6 months before any nuclear material is introduced into the new facility.

Also, centrifuges are used to enrich non-nuclear elements as well as uranium, so the world shouldn't stop turning every time a Muslim country builds a centrifuge...
outnow
Ban the bomb
08:42 AM on 09/30/2009
Iran must report a nuclear facility six months before it becomes operational. It did so. What Iran intends is just a guess at this point. Iran is a distraction from the fact that Ameriicans are dying from hunger and lack of health insurance while Wall Street fats cats cash in on taxpayer money.

The international financial crisis cannot be stopped from the ultimate collapse phase. 53% of young people are unemployed in the US. The unemployment crisis means that out youth are NEVER going to enjoy the same or even close to the standard of living that their parents enjoyed.

The MSM always focuses on some threat that has to be imagined. Would Iran attack the world's greatest military powers without a single newk?
02:20 PM on 09/29/2009
The Headline: Big Lie. U.S. officials DID NOT discover Iranian nuclear site and it WAS NOT SECRET. It was Iran that informed the IAEA of its existence based on the agency's rules.

The facts are available to literate readers to find out and not fall for this propaganda.
10:25 AM on 09/29/2009
Countries who want to stop Iran from developing a nuke:
North America, all countries in Europe.
Australia, majority of countires in Asia including all Arab states (*)
many countries in Africa.

Countries which support Iranian nukes:
(*)Syria.
North Korea.

Who do you stand with?
01:21 PM on 09/29/2009
Countries that claim Israel is the greatest threat to world peace:
Most of the countries in Europe & most of the remaining countries in the world except the US
04:21 PM on 09/29/2009
Bull. Cite your source, failure.
03:01 PM on 09/29/2009
Tribal versus rule of Law????
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
09:41 AM on 09/29/2009
Iran is surrounded by over 24 major U.S. military bases.
U.S. is not surrounded by any Iran military bases.
10:18 AM on 09/29/2009
And let's keep it that way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:36 AM on 09/29/2009
Israel keeps threatening to bomb their so-far entirely legal nuclear facilities. They'd be idiots not to be engaging in a 'pattern of deception'. The only thing Iranian deception proves is that they're not morons.

~~

And it's not like the experience of Iraq doesn't amply demonstrate than no amount of inspection will suffice to prove innocence. All that happened in Iraq is what's already happening in Iran: the continuing failure of inspections to find banned material results in nothing but escallating demands for more, and then still more, inspections. It's a logical impossibility to prove the non-existance of anything, so like Iraq, Iran will never be able to prove the accusations false.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:41 AM on 09/29/2009
here is some satellite imagery of israel's plutonium enrichment facilities...

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Israel/index.html

i think we should impose some "crippling" sanctions against israel for the same reason clinton wants to impose sanctions on iran...
07:46 AM on 09/29/2009
well said vinny . . totally agree with you . . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albert Amato
08:13 AM on 09/29/2009
What twisted world do you live in? Israel will never be the first to use a nuclear device....they are our allies.... Iran has exported terror all over the ME, sworn enemies to US, the Great Satan and sworn to end Israel and threatening other Sunni states.
The whole civilized world wants Iran without Nukes.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
08:19 AM on 09/29/2009
"Israel will never be the first to use a nuclear device..."

Are you sure Israel would never at least threaten to use a nuclear device?

Say, because they've finished pushing the Palestinians into Jordan - and now must look to other nations for lebensraum?
08:29 AM on 09/29/2009
Are you sure Israel will never be the first to use a nuclear device...she has invaded/attacked 6 Arab countries used US provided F-16's, laser bombs & let's not forget phosphorus bombs-illegal devices used against the civilian populations of Lebanon & Palestine. What countires has Iran attacked in the last 100 years.
If threatened Israel has plans to nuke every Arab country & several in Europe as well. Please google Samson Option. As far as being an ally America's 51st state in the Middle East has exhibited a parasitic influence on the host to the tune of $ 100 billion
since 48. She has also exhibited a track record of attacking our naval vessels killing 34 sailors & wounding over 172 with impunity. Please google USS Liberty incident.
The civilized world wants Israel without nukes. Please google Poll Israel greatest threat to world peace.
02:31 AM on 09/29/2009
"U.S. Officials: How We Discovered Iran's Secret Nuclear Site"......The Israelis told us about it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
02:03 AM on 09/29/2009
how did we find it? easy. Someone went back and looked through the papers from the Reagan and Bush 1 terms. They saw we not only sold them the plans and materials to build them, we sent them some experts to help them get a head start on it. We will long be haunted by Iran Contra of Reagans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankinCanada
10:10 AM on 09/29/2009
I believe you but a link to proof would be good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgeP922
01:24 AM on 09/29/2009
Nuclear bombs are a waste of money.

The CIA and other intelligence agencies should promote an international propaganda campaign explaining in hard numbers how much their nations are willing to spend on weapons they simply cannot use.

Juxtapose that to the MASSIVE aresenal big and bad America has, and question the intelligence of any small government has that wants to waste billions on a few weapons.
photo
dukesman2000
We have guided missiles and misguided men
12:32 AM on 09/29/2009
I have seen this movie before. WMD, remember?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Khirad
01:45 AM on 09/29/2009
That Secretary of Defense had a much different tone though. This one said (without mentioning all the 'collateral' and widespread, varied internal political ramifications) that JUST on the practical, tactical side, a strike was ineffectual (and counterproductive, in my view, even assuming they are enriching weapons grade uranium). Yes, I do remember. The media may be playing this up, but the Admin is staying cool on the matter, apart from perfunctory, stale rhetoric towards the IRI. Unless, of course, you believe our troops will be coming home from Afghanistan and Iraq through Iran. We can talk about that - and I'll give you stats, population, strong national identity and topography. Even the mollahs don't think we're that foolish.
12:30 AM on 09/29/2009
This whole issue was cooked up by western governments to cover for the fact that they are powerless in the face of the real problems facing the world. It has one purpose: to distract us from the really scary stuff so we will accept ever growing military expenditure for the benefit of our real masters, global corporations.
The real really scary stuff?
The fact that the G20 (or G any number more or less you care to add) is powerless to fix the financial crisis; we have no real chance of reversing global warming; Americans will soon have the most horrendous healthcare system in the civilized world; 9 years after the invasion of Afghanistan NATO and the Pentagon are planning for the next maybe 9 years with no end in sight; Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and thumbs its nose at any peace efforts; China will call in our markers; I could go on but you can fill in the rest yourself.
02:01 AM on 09/29/2009
I can say that 1) we never paraded ICBMs through the DC mall or major capitals as a huge propaganda vehicle and 2) the only laudable thing I can think Reagan did was work to disarmament.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankinCanada
10:12 AM on 09/29/2009
we paraded them in Japan. That was enough.
12:05 AM on 09/29/2009
"This is part of a pattern of deception and lies on the part of the Iranians from the very beginning with respect to their nuclear program. So it's no wonder that world leaders think that they have ulterior motives, that they have a plan to go forward with nuclear weapons. Otherwise, why would they do all this in such a deceptive manner?" Gates said Sunday in an interview on ABC's "This Week."
In other news or, more correctly, the same news from a different perspective:-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/sep/25/iran-secret-nuclear-plant-inspections
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wernerholm
bio doesnt ever meet guidelines
11:53 PM on 09/28/2009
according to an ad by New England Gas and Electric 1975 we encourage a nuclear Iran
http://www.suburbanempire.com
According to NEG&E the Shah think nuclear is a safe idea, so do the residents of Plymouth, Mass!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoahVail
...a curmudgeon from So. Arizona
12:43 AM on 09/29/2009
Thanks for the refresher.
11:52 PM on 09/28/2009
A better title & question...Israel's covert & illegal nuclear program uncovered. What is the West going to do now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgeP922
01:22 AM on 09/29/2009
Did you just learn of that yesterday?

The world has known it for 30 years.
01:39 AM on 09/29/2009
of course I have known about it for some 25 years...you have missed the point.
07:48 AM on 09/29/2009
ray01 . . the West will keep playing the same old hypocritical games . . . if they were really interested in curbing nuclear weapons . . it would seem as though they would get israel to discloe their nuclear weapons and sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty . . . .
08:32 AM on 09/29/2009
exactly, well said