Bernie Kerik Trial: No Talk Of 9/11 Allowed By Ex-Police Commissioner's Defense

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bernie Kerik Trial: No Talk Of 9/11 Allowed By Ex-Police Commissioner's Defense stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JIM FITZGERALD | 09/29/09 03:59 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — The terror attack on the World Trade Center, which made New York City's police commissioner a national figure, cannot be brought up by the defense at his corruption trial, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

"This is not about 9/11," Judge Stephen Robinson said at a pretrial conference. He said the attack was irrelevant to allegations that former Commissioner Bernard Kerik accepted apartment renovations from a construction company in exchange for recommending the company for city contracts.

The government had requested that the defense not be allowed to bring up 9/11, apparently because it would prejudice jurors in Kerik's favor. Kerik received heavy publicity, much of it glowing, for his actions after terrorist-controlled jetliners brought down the trade center on Sept. 11, 2001.

The judge said defense lawyers may mention that Kerik was commissioner in 2001 and that he received much attention, but may not specifically mention the attack.

Robinson also said he would also consider case-by-case whether witnesses can mention 9/11; for example, he said, a witness may want to say that Kerik's performance after the attack was the reason he was considered for head of Homeland Security.

Kerik's trial is scheduled to start next month. He has pleaded not guilty.

Robinson spent much of the hearing criticizing Kerik and his lawyers for an e-mail that he said was submitted to The Washington Times for publication by Anthony Modafferi, an Oakland, N.J., lawyer who is the trustee of Kerik's legal defense fund.

The judge said the article, which was not published, contained some information that was supposed to be under seal and some inaccurate information. He said Modafferi was Kerik's "propagandist and chief fund raiser" and suggested Kerik was feeding him information "for those two purposes."

Story continues below
advertisement

"You are providing information to what would loosely be called, and charitably, a loose cannon," the judge said.

He warned Kerik he could be jailed for inappropriate behavior and demanded an affidavit spelling out his connection to Modafferi.

Defense lawyer Barry Berke told the judge that Kerik was unaware of the e-mail. He said Kerik had retained Modafferi for legal advice – but not in writing and not for pay. The judge said Modafferi should appear in court if he's part of the defense team.

On the legal defense fund's Internet site, Modafferi writes that Kerik "is the victim of a carefully orchestrated campaign of vilification and harassment by government prosecutors."

The judge told the lawyers that since former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who was Kerik's boss, "may become an issue," he was disclosing that he had been hired by Giuliani as a prosecutor when Giuliani was U.S. attorney in Manhattan.

He also said he had received a solicitation to give money for Kerik's defense, probably because of his Giuliani connection.

"I didn't make any donation," the judge said.

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — The terror attack on the World Trade Center, which made New York City's police commissioner a national figure, cannot be brought up by the defense at his corruption trial, a...
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — The terror attack on the World Trade Center, which made New York City's police commissioner a national figure, cannot be brought up by the defense at his corruption trial, a...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

As a former criminal justice instructor, its amazing to me that this guy goes from top cop in New York a very prestigous postiion to defendant. Indeed, it shows that today positions of public trust are increasingly fragile with ethics being thrown out at all levels of government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 11/19/2009
- blogisti I'm a Fan of blogisti 18 fans permalink

I am certain there must be a law that prohibits reference to 9/11 that in any way diverges from the official story. The reason I believe this is that I have never seen or heard anyone write or speak in the media about any other possibility. This is true in spite of the fact that millions do not believe the 'official' story. Is freedom alive? Do you have the freedom to investigate, write or speak any other version of the 9/11 story?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 09/30/2009

LYING...THIEVING...INCOMPETENT.....SC. UM. BAG.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 09/30/2009
- LMPE I'm a Fan of LMPE 72 fans permalink

It's Giuliani who should get banned from mentioning 9/11.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 09/29/2009
- bzb I'm a Fan of bzb 272 fans permalink
photo

You got that right!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 PM on 09/29/2009

Why is this republican criminal just going to trial? why does it take for ever for the republicans criminals
to have to pay for their crimes. He and Guilliani should have been in jail. Yes, Guilliani too, for all the criminal things he has done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 09/29/2009
- Gem4Obama I'm a Fan of Gem4Obama 2 fans permalink
photo

I believe they don't want the defense to mention 9/11 because as Giuliani's BEST friend, Kerik's defense attorneys would think that using "a noun a verb and 9/11" in every other sentence would be as successful as Giuliani's incessant use of the phrase. Only after then Senator Joe Biden called Giuliani out on it did his popularity slide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 09/29/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect