EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Bernie Kerik Trial: No Talk Of 9/11 Allowed By Ex-Police Commissioner's Defense

JIM FITZGERALD   09/29/09 04:59 PM ET   AP

Kerik

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — The terror attack on the World Trade Center, which made New York City's police commissioner a national figure, cannot be brought up by the defense at his corruption trial, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

"This is not about 9/11," Judge Stephen Robinson said at a pretrial conference. He said the attack was irrelevant to allegations that former Commissioner Bernard Kerik accepted apartment renovations from a construction company in exchange for recommending the company for city contracts.

The government had requested that the defense not be allowed to bring up 9/11, apparently because it would prejudice jurors in Kerik's favor. Kerik received heavy publicity, much of it glowing, for his actions after terrorist-controlled jetliners brought down the trade center on Sept. 11, 2001.

The judge said defense lawyers may mention that Kerik was commissioner in 2001 and that he received much attention, but may not specifically mention the attack.

Robinson also said he would also consider case-by-case whether witnesses can mention 9/11; for example, he said, a witness may want to say that Kerik's performance after the attack was the reason he was considered for head of Homeland Security.

Kerik's trial is scheduled to start next month. He has pleaded not guilty.

Robinson spent much of the hearing criticizing Kerik and his lawyers for an e-mail that he said was submitted to The Washington Times for publication by Anthony Modafferi, an Oakland, N.J., lawyer who is the trustee of Kerik's legal defense fund.

The judge said the article, which was not published, contained some information that was supposed to be under seal and some inaccurate information. He said Modafferi was Kerik's "propagandist and chief fund raiser" and suggested Kerik was feeding him information "for those two purposes."

"You are providing information to what would loosely be called, and charitably, a loose cannon," the judge said.

He warned Kerik he could be jailed for inappropriate behavior and demanded an affidavit spelling out his connection to Modafferi.

Defense lawyer Barry Berke told the judge that Kerik was unaware of the e-mail. He said Kerik had retained Modafferi for legal advice – but not in writing and not for pay. The judge said Modafferi should appear in court if he's part of the defense team.

On the legal defense fund's Internet site, Modafferi writes that Kerik "is the victim of a carefully orchestrated campaign of vilification and harassment by government prosecutors."

The judge told the lawyers that since former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who was Kerik's boss, "may become an issue," he was disclosing that he had been hired by Giuliani as a prosecutor when Giuliani was U.S. attorney in Manhattan.

He also said he had received a solicitation to give money for Kerik's defense, probably because of his Giuliani connection.

"I didn't make any donation," the judge said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — The terror attack on the World Trade Center, which made New York City's police commissioner a national figure, cannot be brought up by the defense at his corruption trial, a...
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — The terror attack on the World Trade Center, which made New York City's police commissioner a national figure, cannot be brought up by the defense at his corruption trial, a...
Filed by David Weiner  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:28 PM on 11/19/2009
As a former criminal justice instructor­, its amazing to me that this guy goes from top cop in New York a very prestigous postiion to defendant. Indeed, it shows that today positions of public trust are increasing­ly fragile with ethics being thrown out at all levels of government­.
blogisti
Approved Knowledge Only
01:17 PM on 09/30/2009
I am certain there must be a law that prohibits reference to 9/11 that in any way diverges from the official story. The reason I believe this is that I have never seen or heard anyone write or speak in the media about any other possibilit­y. This is true in spite of the fact that millions do not believe the 'official' story. Is freedom alive? Do you have the freedom to investigat­e, write or speak any other version of the 9/11 story?
10:25 AM on 09/30/2009
LYING...TH­IEVING...I­NCOMPETENT­.....SC. UM. BAG.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
08:53 PM on 09/29/2009
It's Giuliani who should get banned from mentioning 9/11.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:23 PM on 09/29/2009
You got that right!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolyn LeBeauf
08:25 PM on 09/29/2009
Why is this republican criminal just going to trial? why does it take for ever for the republican­s criminals
to have to pay for their crimes. He and Guilliani should have been in jail. Yes, Guilliani too, for all the criminal things he has done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gem4Obama
In it to win it (for the POTUS)
06:15 PM on 09/29/2009
I believe they don't want the defense to mention 9/11 because as Giuliani's BEST friend, Kerik's defense attorneys would think that using "a noun a verb and 9/11" in every other sentence would be as successful as Giuliani's incessant use of the phrase. Only after then Senator Joe Biden called Giuliani out on it did his popularity slide.