More

Obama, McChrystal Meet In Denmark Over Afghan War Strategy

JULIE PACE and LARA JAKES   10/ 3/09 12:45 AM ET   AP

Obama

WASHINGTON — At a pivotal point in the administration's Afghanistan strategy, President Barack Obama and his top Afghan war commander met privately aboard Air Force One Friday for a talk the White House described as productive.

The 25-minute meeting with Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, aboard Air Force One as it waited to carry the president home from Denmark, gave Obama a chance to step outside the circle of advisers he has convened to study the problem of Afghanistan. His war council has been sharing differing opinions on whether the U.S. should send thousands more troops to tamp down the Taliban, or shift to a narrower focus on al-Qaida in neighboring Pakistan.

The Copenhagen meeting was an extension of those war council sessions "as we reassess and re-evaluate moving forward in Afghanistan," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters afterward.

He said Obama and McChrystal "both agree that this is a helpful process." No decisions were made at their meeting, Gibbs said.

Obama was in the Danish capital to pitch Chicago's bid to host the 2016 Olympic games, and McChrystal was summoned there from London, where he gave a speech on Thursday warning that insurgents are gaining strength in Afghanistan and the U.S. needs to increase its efforts there.

Hours after Obama and McChrystal met, the Pentagon said that the general's official request for more troops for the war will not be sent to the White House until next week at the earliest.

At issue is Obama's looming decision to stick with the current mission in Afghanistan – which could require adding as many as 40,000 additional U.S. troops – or scale back the military option and expand operations targeting terrorists in Pakistan.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Friday that McChrystal's troop request is still at the Pentagon and a decision is not imminent. "I don't see anything in the short term. It is exceptionally, closely held," he said.

Without citing numbers publicly, McChrystal has said more troops are needed to "buy time" for the Afghan military and police forces to prepare to take control of the country in 2013.

The meeting was the third conversation between the two since McChrystal disclosed in a television interview that aired Sunday that he had spoken with Obama only once since taking over the U.S. military efforts in Afghanistan. Obama tapped McChrystal in May to replace ousted Gen. David McKiernan.

Obama and McChrystal spoke on Wednesday before Obama convened a meeting later that day of his war council, which McChrystal joined by video conference.

The president had long been expected to approve McChrystal's plan to mount a military push against the Taliban in Afghanistan. But waning public support for the war and concern about his top commanders' call for as many as 40,000 more U.S. troops has exposed emerging fault lines inside the White House.

It's possible that Obama will decide on a hybrid strategy that keeps in place the 68,000 U.S. combat troops who are already in Afghanistan, while adding more military trainers and ramping up strikes on al-Qaida leaders in Pakistan.

Obama is holding two more meetings of his war council next week.

Obama's strategy review was prompted in part by a critical assessment of the war effort that McChrystal sent him last month.

On Wednesday, Obama chaired a meeting of his top military and national security advisers, pressing them for their views on how to proceed. Military commanders support the current strategy of targeting the Taliban, but other key officials divided.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and special Afghan and Pakistan envoy Richard Holbrooke appeared to be leaning toward supporting a troop increase, while White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Gen. James Jones, Obama's national security adviser, appeared to be skeptical of troop increases. Vice President Joe Biden also has been reluctant to support sending more troops, favoring a strategy that directly targets al-Qaida fighters who are believed to be hiding in Pakistan.

The assessment of divisions within Obama's inner circle came from a senior administration official who attended the meeting and spoke on the condition of anonymity, because the discussions were private.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, both support McChrystal's strategy.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — At a pivotal point in the administration's Afghanistan strategy, President Barack Obama and his top Afghan war commander met privately aboard Air Force One Friday for a talk the Whi...
WASHINGTON — At a pivotal point in the administration's Afghanistan strategy, President Barack Obama and his top Afghan war commander met privately aboard Air Force One Friday for a talk the Whi...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:31 PM on 10/04/2009
Are any of you aware of just how much General McChrystal was involved in Pat Tillman cover-up? McChrystal should have been court marshalled.
11:11 PM on 10/03/2009
I can just hear the conversation now. "No we can't, Yes we can, No we can't, Yes we can, No we can't, Yes we can, No we can't, Yes we can."
02:01 PM on 10/03/2009
....LMAO....25MINS.........speed talker they are ! ......wow.... ! : (
01:05 PM on 10/03/2009
I have the utmost respect for our military but i cannot believe that General McChrystal thinks he can publicly try to pressure the President of the United States to make a decision in Afghanistan. This general has danced very close to the edge of acceptable behaviour and I think it is time he did his talking to the chain of command and not reporters.
11:33 AM on 10/03/2009
I wish the Pentagon and those trying to undermine President Obama through leaks would understand that they are all on working for the interests of on country and they are all Team America. As a result they should all be working together on the best plan and not try to undermine each other

It appears from the reports from the Pentagon that they are giving to selective news outlets that some generals have actually bought into the nonsense from the right wing that President Obama is not working for the interests of this country. As a result, one can see where some members of the Pentagon are openly hostile to him and are trying to undercut him and his decision making.

President Obama needs to show up at the Pentagon and straighten some of these people out because the people elected him President and automatically the Commander-in-Chief so he is in charge
02:05 PM on 10/02/2009
Thanks President Obama for trying so hard on behalf of all us who are relying on your judgement and hard work
photo
31Blue
My micro-blog is empty?
01:59 PM on 10/02/2009
Do they have a plan yet or what?
01:45 PM on 10/02/2009
It's hard to get a post through here. Heavy censorship. any suggestion that the answer may lie outside of the tightly held box is immediately deep sixed. Looks like the best and the brightest all over again.
01:35 PM on 10/02/2009
McCrystal was on 60 minutes where he laid out the best strategy for winning in afghanistan i have ever heard.

it gave me hope that we could actually win there for a moment.
but then i remembered who the soldiers are: probably half of them are evangelicals, rednecks, cops, prison guards, etc.... they are people who are not known for their tolerance and deference and ability to empathize with others and treat them with respect, which is what mccrystal's strategy is based on.

he told soldiers not to drive aggressively on the roads there because it makes people mad, well guess what, cops do that here in america and it makes me mad, and here is where they see the population as less of an adversary than most soldiers see afghans.

it's an amazing strategy, but it won't work because soldiers are not humanitarian workers and you'll never be able to get enough of them to act like it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meggie
Your micro-bio did not meet our guidelines.
01:26 PM on 10/02/2009
Hey! Why isn't this the main story?
Where are the tro//ies complaining about this being a wasted trip?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
babybuda
Tolling for the outcast....
01:21 PM on 10/02/2009
Why does the right hate our nation so much ? Seems like the olympics thing was the side show if you ask me our Prez is on the job, not clearing brush .
01:03 PM on 10/02/2009
From the one picture taken on Air Force 1, I saw of McChystral sitting on the couch across from Obama . The body language , although limited, looks like he is politely getting his head handed to him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meggie
Your micro-bio did not meet our guidelines.
01:26 PM on 10/02/2009
I sure hope so. "Leaks" from our generals are bad form.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
12:42 PM on 10/02/2009
To a carpenter with a hammer, everything is a nail... I do not trust military people making policy, and especially don't trust one that leaks stuff ahead of time to further his agenda. It's time to replace McChrystal, period.
01:49 PM on 10/02/2009
Maybe he is having a hard time getting through. It's a problem at this level. Have to be careful what I say tho.
04:29 AM on 10/04/2009
I Dont trust civilians making military policy or meddling in military matters. obama argueing with a general on how to win a war is like a patient argueing with a doctor on how to stop an infection......
photo
Grannysue
Been around for awhile!
12:31 PM on 10/02/2009
OMG our President was in Copenhagen and multi tasked............but but Tan in the Can Man Bohener said he shouldn't be there, but then the Tin Foil Hat clubbers are all use to Bushy boy, he couldn't read My Pet Goat and handle the attack being lodged on our country, so he decided to just stay and read the book!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Coinyer101
King of Doobiestan
12:09 PM on 10/02/2009
The General needs to be retired. Too many Bush administration 'flops' fer that feller. He was the pointman in the Pat Tillman coverup, and in charge of detainees ,who were being tor tured, but, his 'underlings' were the only ones held accountable....,it's horse-hooey!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:53 PM on 10/02/2009
If he was the point man in the Tillman cover up, then I would have to agree with you. That was shameful. But by your logic, all generals should go as they were "under" Bush. Military men don't join up because there is democrat or a republican in the White House. They join to serve their country (and have a steady job and a mediocre retirement I suppose).

There is something that bothers me about Obama not talking with him more directly. Obama has to realize that the information he receives from the SOD is filtered. As bad as this analogy might sound, a good CEO doesn't just talk with his VP of Sales. He calls the guys out in the field to hear exactly what's going on in the trenches. One of the things that made my father a successful CEO and President was he talked with the store managers daily, not all of them of course, but the best ones. That way, he was able to verify what was being told to him in board meetings.

You want to know the truth, you go to the source. Then you can make a reasoned decision.