Breaking News:
CNBC: GM'S DEAL TO SELL SAAB IS OFF
Get Breaking News by Email

Unemployment Rate Rises To 9.8 Percent; U.S. Economy Shed 263,000 Jobs In September

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Unemployment Rate Rises To 9.8 Percent; U.S. Economy Shed 263,000 Jobs In September stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS
What's Your Reaction?

WASHINGTON — Job hunters will face long odds well into next year. As the unemployment rate inches closer to 10 percent, most businesses are nowhere close to hiring again.

Uncertain about prospects for recovery – the economy's and their own – employers cut 263,000 jobs in September, the government said Friday. Unemployment crept up to 9.8 percent.

As the economy slowly turns around, sales are slowly growing and many companies are starting to make money again. But they're doing it by cutting costs, squeezing more work out of fewer employees and relying on part-timers and cheap overseas labor.

Until companies are confident the recovery is here to stay, they will probably keep laying off workers. The economy lost 62,000 more jobs in September than in August, and the unemployment rate notched up from 9.7 percent to a new 26-year high.

Most economists say the recession is probably over. But the recovery isn't robust enough to embolden businesses to hire again.

"Fear is a large factor for many companies," said Michael Williams, dean of the graduate school of business at Touro College in New York. "What happens after the government's stimuli end? Does the recovery morph into something durable, or is there an abyss on the other side?"

President Barack Obama called the jobless figures a sobering reminder that progress to reverse the recession will come in fits and starts.

Employers are expected to continue cutting payrolls for six to nine more months. Economists think the jobless rate will go as high as 10.5 percent around the middle of next year before declining gradually.

Story continues below
advertisement

It could take three or four more years for unemployment to fall to normal levels. The worst recession since the Great Depression has already claimed 7.2 million jobs, and analysts figure 750,000 more jobs could disappear over the next six months.

The drumbeat of job losses is creating fear that Americans won't start spending again and the recovery may fizzle. Some worry the economy might succumb to a "double dip" recession – meaning it would stop growing and start shrinking again.

"This recovery looks like roadkill," said Christopher Rupkey, economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. "The heavy layoffs have stopped, but there are simply no new jobs available, and the harder the jobs are to get, the harder and longer this road to recovery is going to be."

After the recession of 1981 and 1982, the economy added 1.2 million jobs in the first six months of recovery. By contrast, after the 2001 recession, the economy lost 1.1 million jobs before unemployment peaked two years later. It was dubbed a jobless recovery.

Economic historian John Steel Gordon says this could be a jobless recovery, too, with businesses wringing more work out of the employees they still have and relying on part-time and overseas help.

"It's actually worse now," he said. "Companies aren't going to hire until it becomes obvious we're back in a lasting growth cycle."

Until then, economists think, the few industries creating jobs will probably include health care, education, legal services, data processing and transportation. And early next year, the federal government will be hiring for the 2010 census.

In the last economic recovery, the financial industry drove job growth, but that probably won't happen this time. Job growth should also be slow in construction, manufacturing and retail.

All told, 15.1 million Americans are out of work – twice as many as at the start of the recession. Counting laid-off workers who have settled for part-time work or just given up, the unemployment rate is 17 percent, the highest on record since 1994.

People are also staying out of work longer. The number of people jobless for six months or longer jumped to a record 5.4 million. That's more than one-third of the unemployed, a record.

A key Obama adviser noted that while the job losses in September were the most since July, layoffs are way down from a recession high of 741,000 in January.

"We still think the overall trend is moving in the right direction," said Christina Romer, chair of the President's Council of Economic Advisers. "We're going from much larger job losses earlier this year. We want them to moderate more."

Alan Krueger, chief economist at the Treasury Department, would not rule out seeking another a second economic stimulus package – a decision he said could be made later. Republicans say the first package, $787 billion worth, isn't helping stanch job losses.

"Wasteful government spending is not the solution to what ails this economy," said Indiana Rep. Mike Pence, chairman of the House Republican caucus.

A House bill to add 13 weeks of unemployment benefits for people in states where the jobless rate is 8.5 percent of higher has stalled in the Senate. Hundreds of thousands of people already have exhausted their benefits or are about to.

The September unemployment rate would have been higher – perhaps over 10 percent – if not for the exodus of 571,000 people from the work force, economists said. Many of them were so frustrated over a lack of work that they simply abandoned the search.

Older workers who are laid off are also dropping out and filing for Social Security benefits at a faster-than-expected pace, the government says. Applications for retirement benefits are 23 percent higher than last year. Disability claims are up about 20 percent.

Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist at the Economic Outlook Group, says he's optimistic the recovery won't fizzle. But he says it will "jagged and uneven," with more pain ahead for jobseekers.

____

AP Economics Writer Martin Crutsinger and Associated Press Writer Mark S. Smith contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Job hunters will face long odds well into next year. As the unemployment rate inches closer to 10 percent, most businesses are nowhere close to hiring again. Uncertain about prospe...
WASHINGTON — Job hunters will face long odds well into next year. As the unemployment rate inches closer to 10 percent, most businesses are nowhere close to hiring again. Uncertain about prospe...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1431
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (23 pages total)
- catbite I'm a Fan of catbite 5 fans permalink

Dont, just don't, publish stories about companies with jobs who are unable to find candidates. What a huge risk it would be for someone to pack up and move to a far away state. At least if they remain where they are, friends, community and family will be there to help. You move away, the job stinks and what would you do then?

And, have you read the qualifications these employers ask for? 6 computer languages, 15 years experience in exactly that same job description, lean, green belt, black belt, six sigma, all the general buzz words. What ever happened to aptitude? And all the advice from job coaches and outplacement about what color to wear, what to say, how to sit, on and on. Geez, am I auditioning for Broadway or interviewing for a job? I am waiting to see the ad for the blue eyes, blond hair, athletic-build marketing wiz..These HR divisions let their best people go and what is left are a bunch of people scrambling to run a hiring department and they are searching for perfection. Get real!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 10/04/2009
- 1will I'm a Fan of 1will 33 fans permalink

Wasn't the Stimulus Bill supposed to keep unemployment at 8% or less?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 10/04/2009

Thank you; Glenda, for your astute contribution.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 10/04/2009
- Gernuser I'm a Fan of Gernuser 2 fans permalink
photo

To make matters far worse, consider what the US government has actually done to fix the underlying problems? Nothing

good articles; http://iamned.blogspot.com

The government has put the same punch bowl out that got us into the mess in the first place. More debt and consumption and don't worry about paying it back. (Berbnanke= Greenspan II)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 10/04/2009

www.shadowstats.com

real unemployment is 21 percent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 10/04/2009
photo

Most of the stimulus is not set to go out until next year. Only 125 billion has gone out. It has helped. The 8,000 dollar tax rebate tot hose buying homes for the first time has moved billions of bad assets off the banks records. States lioke Pawlenty's Minnesota were able to balance their budets with stimulus money. Badly needed road projects are being completed all over this country.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 10/03/2009

I am sorry, but monetary policy under this administration should be listed as "Economics for Dummies"!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 10/04/2009
photo

Severe cuts in government spendiong now would only create more unemployment.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 10/03/2009
- Watain I'm a Fan of Watain 16 fans permalink
photo

Impossible! Ob is the president. It must be GOP propaganda.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 AM on 10/03/2009
photo

Agreed.
Fanned

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 10/03/2009
- BocaMom I'm a Fan of BocaMom 16 fans permalink

I wish the President and the Congress could focus on the Economy! As President Clinton reminded us,
it's the economy stupid! Not the Olympics in Chicago! Not having beer parties at the White House!
Not passing Health Reform until we can pay for a Public Plan that includes Universal Health Care!
We need America working again. And not seeing more and more of our friends and neighbors out of jobs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 10/03/2009
photo

This all goes back to Ronald Reagan and his pal Milton Friedman. We did not learn from de-regulating the Savings & Loans.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

Well ... .... Yes, Exactly.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 10/03/2009
photo

Unemployment hit 10.4 % in 1983. ROnald Reagan had been in charge for almost three years. Yet, the right is screaming "failure" because Obama has not fixed it in nine months. When 2012 come3s around, the economy is growing and creating jobs, the Republican Party is going to lose in a McGovernesque landslide. All of their predictions of doom and gloom will be shown for what they were.

Today, not only did they cheer the loss of the Olympics, they cheered the unemployment rate increasing. These people are REPUBLICAN'S first, and American's last.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 10/02/2009
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 137 fans permalink
photo

Better not to look beyond 2010 and throwing Republicans out then. Wars are won one battle at a time.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 10/02/2009
- Brute I'm a Fan of Brute 46 fans permalink

If you think the unemployment lines are long, wait till you see Comrade Obama's heathcare lines.....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

You do know that calling a president "Comrade" is not very original? Your boys called Clinton "Comrade Clinton." What did people like you do before you had Rush, Sean, and Glenn, to think for you?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 10/02/2009
- Humanistic I'm a Fan of Humanistic 19 fans permalink
photo

What a weak argument. The lines at the ERs already are long, but the hospital charges are many times higher than they would be in a properly administered system. Those costs are passed along to taxpayers, and to the insured so they result in ever increasing premiums. Is that what you want to perpetuate?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

You mean they will be as long as the lines in the other countries with nationalized health care?

Which is to say, not at all?

Unlike the 3 months I have to wait now?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

After graduating from Villanova and still unemployed , I don't know whats left to do..I even heard the price of b-o-o-t-y is extremely LOW ..What else could I do ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

So now that the rich have all the money, when will trickle down happen?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 10/02/2009
- wewin I'm a Fan of wewin 3 fans permalink

Well half their wealth evaporated when they dropped the last straw on our backs. But the good news is they are back to their manipulative ways and half that half has come back. I hear when the other half comes back they may be ready for a little trickle our way.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 10/02/2009
- wewin I'm a Fan of wewin 3 fans permalink

Your a saint!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

Well, I had hoped to live a while longer....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 10/02/2009
- txrunner I'm a Fan of txrunner 5 fans permalink

2008 was a record year for my small business - and I'm holding even in 2009.

That being said - I've downsized my workforce since the beginning of 2008 and recently relocated my business to a smaller location.

I'm still able to maintain current sales and client service - but I'm just not planning growth for 5 years. Since I don't plan on growing my business - I don't need the growth tool, PEOPLE.

By eliminating the opportunity for my employees, I'm actually going to put more to the bottom line. And this economy and this administration, THAT'S SMART BUSINESS

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 10/02/2009
- Humanistic I'm a Fan of Humanistic 19 fans permalink
photo

Thanks for all the encouragement. You've got yours, and you're SO proud of it. But don't forget: "Pride goeth before a fall."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 10/02/2009
- abbyrose86 I'm a Fan of abbyrose86 221 fans permalink
photo

co-sign.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 10/03/2009

Don't forget to transfer all of your investments into the overseas market. Under this adminstration, thats the only way to go!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 AM on 10/04/2009
photo

All Drooling Rightwingers LOVED Reagan ... ah ... Reagan was THE BEST PRESIDENT and had the BEST economic policy ... according to the Droolers...

Reagan took office 1/1981 Unemployment was 7.5%

8 months later August 13, 1981 - Reagan CUT taxes for the top 1% as a result unemployment immediately SPIKED ... SKYROCKETED

How long did it take Reagan to reduce the unemployment rate to below 8%?
1/1981 - unemployment rate 7.5% .... Reagan sworn in.
1/1981 - 7.4%
3/1981 - 7.4%
4/1981 - 7.2%
5/1981 - 7.5%
6/1981 - 7.5%
7/1981 - 7.2%
8/1981 - 7.4% * Reagan CUTS taxes for top 1%
9/1981 - 7.6%
10/1981 - 7.9%
11/1981 - 8.3%
12/1981 - 8.5%

1/1982 - 8.6%
2/1982 - 8.9%
3/1982 - 9.0%
4/1982 - 9.3%
5/1982 - 9.4%
6/1982 - 9.6%
7/1982 - 9.8%
8/1982 - 9.8%
9/1982 - 10.1%
10/1982 - 10.4%
11/1982 - 10.8%
12/1982 - 10.8%

1/1983 - 10.4%
2/1983 - 10.4%
3/1983 - 10.3%
4/1983 - 10.3%
5/1983 - 10.1%
6/1983 - 10.1%
7/1983 - 9.4%
6/1983 - 9.5%
7/1983 - 9.4%
8/1983 - 9.5%
9/1983 - 9.2%
10/1983 - 8.8%
11/1983 - 8.5%
12/1983 - 8.3%

1/1984 - 8.0%
2/1984 - 7.8%

It took Reagan 28 MONTHS to get the unemployment rate back down below 8%

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

* the first 8 months of Reagan's term unemployment averaged 7.4%

* 8 months AFTER Reagan took office Reagan CUT taxes for the top 1%

* 2 months AFTER Reagan CUT taxes - Reagan CREATED the conditions for unemployment rate to CLIMB and AND CLIMB and CLIMB.

* 23 months AFTER Reagan was sworn in unemployment hit the RECORD HIGH of 10.8%.

* Reagan INCREASED taxes 11 TIMES to bring down the HIGH unemployment rate HIS tax CUTS created.

* 28 MONTHS AFTER Reagan CUT taxes ... Reagan FINALLY was able to bring DOWN the unemployment rate to BELOW 8%.

* Reagan left office with a $3 TRILLION dollar debt ....which ... In today's dollars that is $6.25 TRILLION.

The Droolers did NOT have any problems with the FACT that Reagan's tax cuts CREATED HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT ....

The Droolers did NOT have any problems giving Reagan 2 YEARS & 4MONTHS to reduce the unemployment ... and they CONTINUE to say - Reagan was the smartest economic President we ever had.

REAGAN PROVED tax cuts for the top 1% does NOT work .... "W" tax cuts for the top 1% should expire in 2010.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 10/02/2009
photo

GOPer comment:

So, what's wrong with that?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 10/02/2009
- jeff90125 I'm a Fan of jeff90125 25 fans permalink
photo

You need to read this.

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

It is pure speculation on your part to say that he increased taxes to bring down unemployment. The only way a tax increase would help unemployment would be because if taxes are high enough, you will need two jobs to put food on the table.

The fact is that Reagan knew a tax increase would be a bad thing. He had to do it. He made sure word did not get out that the tax rates were increasing. If people knew it, they wouldn't spend as much money. No spending = no growth.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 10/03/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (23 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect