More

Congress Poised To Penalize Iran If Diplomatic Talks Show Signs Of Faltering

JIM ABRAMS   10/ 3/09 10:21 PM ET   AP

Senate Financial Market

WASHINGTON — Congress is poised to act swiftly on new penalties against Iran if international talks on Tehran's nuclear program show signs of faltering. And this time lawmakers are talking about trying to block gas and refined petroleum exports to Iran, possibly causing serious disruptions in the lives of ordinary Iranians.

"If we want to get their attention, we have to do something real: sanction Iran's gasoline imports," said Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, in a speech on the House floor. "That's where Ahmadinejad is vulnerable," he said, referring to Iran's president.

Sen. Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, is one of several lawmakers working on plans to expand current penalties.

"Congress must equip President (Barack) Obama with a full range of tools to deal with the threats posed by Iran," said Dodd, D-Conn., who said his bill would include extending current restrictions on Iran's financial institutions, imposing new trade bans and exacting penalties for entities exporting certain refined petroleum products to Iran. His committee plans a hearing on the subject Tuesday.

Obama said talks Thursday in Switzerland between Iran and six world powers, where Iran indicated it would open its newly disclosed nuclear plant to U.N. inspectors, were "a constructive beginning." But he said Iran must match its words with actions.

The president said his administration, in conjunction with Congress, is crafting plans that could target Iran's energy, financial and telecommunications sectors. The hope is to gain a united international front that includes China and Russia, countries reluctant in the past to restrict trade with Iran.

Several Democratic leaders, including Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., say Iran should be given a short time to show it is acting in good faith.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said the talks should have the chance to succeed. But, he added, "We don't have to wait, certainly for Russia or China or for anybody else, to take the action we deem to be appropriate."

Hoyer made the comments while speaking to the No. 2 Republican, Virginia Rep. Eric Cantor, on the House floor Thursday.

Cantor prodded Democrats to restrict gas and refined petroleum exports to Iran. He said Republicans did not support the concept of waiting "until there is some collective agreement on the world stage in order for Congress to act."

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, was more direct. "The U.S. must put away the begging bowl, act like a world leader and lead the effort to impose immediate, crippling sanctions on the Iranian regime," she said.

Ros-Lehtinen introduced a bill this year to toughen penalties against people who aid Iran's proliferation efforts. She has an ally in the committee chairman, Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif. He's pushing a bill that would prohibit foreign entities that sell refined petroleum to Iran from doing business in the United States.

While Iran is a major oil producer, it imports gasoline and refined petroleum products. Stopping fuel shipments to Iran could have serious effects on the Iranian people.

Mideast expert Kenneth M. Pollack, director of the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution, said it was questionable whether such penalties would work. There's bound to be ways around them, Iran is quickly expanding its refinery capacity and Tehran could manipulate world opinion by displaying the suffering of common Iranians, Pollack said.

The hardline positions of some in Congress, he added, could prove useful to the White House as it tries to get U.S. allies on board for the administration's more targeted penalties.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — Congress is poised to act swiftly on new penalties against Iran if international talks on Tehran's nuclear program show signs of faltering. And this time lawmakers are talking about...
WASHINGTON — Congress is poised to act swiftly on new penalties against Iran if international talks on Tehran's nuclear program show signs of faltering. And this time lawmakers are talking about...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 111
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Khirad
04:02 AM on 10/04/2009
They should listen to Kenneth Pollack on this. I'm sure someone will make a CIA crack, but on this and other things he tends to know what he is talking about.

I also have a question. Yes, I hear the drums. How are they different than the drums against Iran for 30 years? And, just how much sway do you think neo-cons have in the Obama Admin? And, isn't talking to the IRI a huge departure from said policies?

Or is it all just misdirection? Believe me, I'm wary, but could we tone it down a little or be a little more thoughtful in detail - not amorphous, one-size-fits-all charges against AIPAC (whom I don't underestimate, by the way)? I can, for example see the possibility of elements in the gov't trying to soften public opinion through the media (and give new polling numbers on the US's greatest threat, it's succeeding), but I have not see significant enough signals from the Obama administration to suggest they are hankerin' for war. Furthermore, apart from FOX, this new talk is actually being met with some skepticism on the cable news channels, perhaps all too late learning if but a few half-hearted lessons from the run-up to Iraq.
10:56 PM on 10/03/2009
Why don't you clowns try to fix some of the problems at home first?
02:27 PM on 10/03/2009
Hot potato! Here's that test Joe predicted, Mr. President.
02:22 PM on 10/03/2009
Can you say AIPAC?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:12 PM on 10/03/2009
The neocons are at it again, ratcheting up the rhetoric and the propaganda against Iran in the same way they did with Iraq. There will be no actions the Iranians take or can take that will satisfy the neocon element in the government, always the unnamed sources. It doesn't matter how many documents the Iranians turn over or how many inspections they undergo, the neocons will always say, it's not enough, we can't really trust the Iranians. They will keep up this drumbeat until they get the attacks on Iranian facilities that they have been gunning for ever since they created the mess in Iraq. As Israel's Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said "the international community [should] target Iran as soon as the imminent conflict with Iraq is complete. In an interview with The Times , Mr Sharon insisted that Tehran — one of the “axis of evil” powers identified by President Bush — should be put under pressure “the day after” action against Baghdad ends because of its role as a “centre of world terror”. Times on Line 11-5-2002. Iran is a target and nothing they can do will change the propaganda onslaught.
02:20 PM on 10/03/2009
The only folks here talking about war are the paranoid leftists who cannot seem to wrap their minds around the idea that with the failure of the neocons and with Obama's spectacular success, THAT WE ARE IN A NEW PARADIGM.

The leftist is just as obsolete as the right wing hangers-on-s.

Please lean to the center a little where our fine President and most of America is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:01 PM on 10/03/2009
When people start talking about "new paradigms," I know we've gone down the rabbit hole. Console yourself with the thought that something has changed, but "in July 2003 the US Secretary of State reiterated that there was “very strong intelligence . . . that Saddam Hussein had biological and chemical weapons.” And there were many more unequivocal and detailed statements about the reliability, the certainty, of intelligence, notably from the British prime minister, Tony Blair, and Washington’s Dick Cheney. "At that time those of us who considered these assertions to be nonsense were shocked and chastened. After all, the leaders of the world’s largest military and surveillance machine were declaring that they had “solid intelligence” regarding a terrifying arsenal of evil weaponry that would be used by Iraq’s maniacal leader. All the intelligence gathered by thousands of US spooks and amazingly sophisticated technical devices couldn’t be wrong, could it?" Brian Cloughley, "Iran's Nuclear Program," But of course it was all a lie. The lie is being repeated. You don't have to paranoid to be skeptical, but it sure beats being Ms. Polyanna.
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
03:32 PM on 10/03/2009
NEW PARADIGM = SOS
Stop your adulation and engage your critical thinking skills.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
01:45 PM on 10/03/2009
Where were these Congressman when Bush was taking us to war in Iraqi? Where!!
02:00 PM on 10/03/2009
An even more interesting question is: "Where were all those Americans when Bush was taking us to war in Iraq?

WHERE !!?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:50 PM on 10/03/2009
We were out on the streets protesting - all over the world and all over the country. Where were you, Ms. goody-two-shoes?
01:34 PM on 10/03/2009
Are they done penalizing us?
I sincerely doubt it.

Where's universal health coverage?
Where are the jobs?
01:16 PM on 10/03/2009
that scare um... not!
12:52 PM on 10/03/2009
Here's HOPING that Iran's leader has more sanity than the BIG MOUTHS in WA, for our troops safety and Isreals', waving a big stick over his head, repenting the same threats as Obama from the flapping jaws of the peanut gallory in Washington is hardly comforting to those who could pay with their lives.
01:59 PM on 10/03/2009
1)- The Islamist approach to the P.alestinian crisis is Apocalyptic:
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of a W A R OF DESTINY. The outcome of hundreds of years of w a r will be defined in P.alestinian land" (see Apocalyptic prophecies of the 12'th Imam)

2)- I.ran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: "There is only one solution to the Middle East problem, namely THE ANNIHILATION AND DESTRUCTION OF THE J E W I S H STATE."

3)- I.ran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map." He suggested that the 'word' Israel be removed even as the word USSR was removed from maps; ie: THE STATE CEASES TO EXIST.

4)- December 12, 2008, at an anti-Israeli rally in Tehran, I.ran's President Ahmadinejad said that Israel no longer possesses the essential motive, integrity and philosophy to PROLONG ITS EXISTENCE.

5)- I.ran has denied that the term a.ntisemitic applies to Tehran arguing that a.ntisemitism is solely a European phenomenon.

6)- Ahmadinejad has repeatedly denied the H.olocaust, today and again in June 2009 when President Obama chastised him: Obama told NBC News that Ahmadinejad, who called the H.olocaust a "great deception" should visit the site himself. "I have no patience for people who would deny history."
02:05 PM on 10/03/2009
When are people going to get tired of spreading the LIE about wiping Israel off the map.
02:24 PM on 10/03/2009
Of course, you're fluent in Farsi.
10:01 PM on 10/03/2009
coyote4...
Little girl, your propaganda is not only false, but the Zionist "steer-excrement" is absolutely overwhelming.

It is Zionist lies such as this that will endanger true Jewish in the secular and political Zionist State inside Palestine, and perhaps even around the world... although I hope note.

You have absolutely no idea the dangerous situation this deception will cause as more and more American's realize the nature of Zionism, my prayer is that Americans realize many good and decent Jewish are silenced by a very small minority of Zionist masters.
04:45 PM on 10/04/2009
Prove that it's false.
12:19 PM on 10/03/2009
jabbering about iran takes the pressure off the DC BROTHEL.
02:15 PM on 10/03/2009
BUT, it is the UN "jabbering" and we are but one player.
12:08 PM on 10/03/2009
The US needs to reform it's own foreign policy, before picking on someone else. You know the story: Get the moat out of your own eye, before looking at the speck insomeone else's eye.
http://www.addictedtowar.com, http://www.icahd.org,
02:01 PM on 10/03/2009
This is a UN job, where we are only one participant. Please do try reading an international newspaper at least 3X a week
10:59 PM on 10/03/2009
After the way we stiff armed the UN during the run up to Iraq, I think they are pretty much irrelevant these days.
12:08 PM on 10/03/2009
Here we go again, punishing innocent civilians for the transgressions of their leaders. If they are transgressions. I don't understand why a country isn't permitted to defend itself against hostile neighbors who harbor an arsenal of nuclear weapons, like Israel, or foreign nations abroad who fight aggressive wars, invade and occupy sovereign nations for no reason at all, and who bully, threaten and constantly meddle in the Middle East to secure their supply of oil because they are too lazy and stupid to develop alternative renewable energy.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WorkingClass
01:07 PM on 10/03/2009
HEAR HEAR
02:03 PM on 10/03/2009
Wait!

You spoke exactly the crimes of Iran: "who bully, threaten and constantly meddle in the Middle East"

~
see my six points above your post, then get back to me.
02:21 PM on 10/03/2009
Seems like he/she was referring to America to me. Aggessive wars, illegal occupation, who else could they be referring to?
10:20 PM on 10/03/2009
coyote4...
This sounds like the propaganda put out by Cheney Generals that said they had "Stockpiles of Iran Weapons Found in Iraq as EvidenT Supplies to Iraq Terrorists".

In late year-2008 a (REAL military Expert) looked at the weapons and said '"None Of These Are From Iran".

The Gen's Betrayus and Bergner then stopped lying for Cheney at this point about Iran weapons in Iraq, if liars ever stop lying actually.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mmmk
Obamacrat
12:06 PM on 10/03/2009
let obama do his thing, hi's on the right path . congress , should back off.
02:04 PM on 10/03/2009
Not only that, but that is exactly Obama's job.
12:02 PM on 10/03/2009
Are you people not tired of these dumfcks in gov. Just take a look at these gov offices and you realize its being ran by dumfcks. When are the educated and those with common sense remove these id1ots from the gov along with their stup!d dum.as.s constituents. Geezz..talk about dum.b.!ng down! We have allowed the inept, corrupt and the m0Rons to take over.

Just go to any gov office and it really makes you want to slap, the cr.ap out of these f00ls because they are rude, lazy and ig.n0rant. all by way of our good ol' dumfck Congress and House of Reps. Geezz!!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WorkingClass
12:57 PM on 10/03/2009
Agreed.
02:06 PM on 10/03/2009
.................and here you are displaying your intelligence and rudeness as if you were better than those you criticize!

"stup!d dum.as.s constituent?"
12:01 PM on 10/03/2009
Time to put the begging bowl away? Sounds more like a time to put America's current foreign policy away.