Obama To Address Human Rights Campaign Saturday

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama To Address Human Rights Campaign Saturday stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PHILIP ELLIOTT | 10/ 5/09 01:57 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to address the nation's largest gay rights group this weekend in an effort to mollify an uneasy Democratic constituency frustrated with the White House's slow pace.

Obama plans to address Saturday's Human Rights Campaign fundraising dinner gala, the organization and the White House announced Monday afternoon.

"It is fitting that (Obama) will speak to our community on the night that we pay tribute to his friend and mentor Sen. Edward Kennedy, who knew that as president, Barack Obama would take on the unfinished business of this nation – equal rights" for the gay community and for "every person who believes in liberty and justice for all," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.

The dinner falls on the eve of the National Equality March, expected to draw thousands of gay and lesbian activists to the National Mall. Many have been critical of Obama's slow pace on redeeming campaign promises to end a ban on gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military and pushing tough nondiscrimination policies.

"Eleven months after his election, he has failed to deliver on any of his commitments to gay Americans, but even worse has been his refusal to engage around these issues," said Richard Socarides, who advised President Bill Clinton's administration on gay and lesbian policy.

"What he needs to do now is engage and deliver," said Socarides. "Spend some of his political capital on ending the gay military ban, a hugely symbolic issue. And with no intellectually sound arguments left against it, come out squarely for gay marriage equality."

Obama wasn't likely to go that far, though, despite a rocky relationship with gay grass roots activists. He has taken a slow and incremental approach to the politically charged issues. He has expanded some federal benefits to same-sex partners, but not health benefits or pension guarantees. He has allowed State Department employees to include their same-sex partners in certain embassy programs already available to opposite-sex spouses.

But that remains far short of his campaign rhetoric.

"At its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans," Obama said a 2007 statement on gay issues. "It's about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect."

Since then, he publicly has committed himself to repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that allows gays and lesbians to serve in the military as long as they don't disclose their sexual orientation or act on it. On Jan. 9, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs answered "yes" when asked whether the administration would end a policy that has seen the dismissal of more than 12,000 troops after their sexual orientation was revealed.

But as president, Obama hasn't taken any concrete steps urging Congress to rescind the Clinton-era policy that some former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have acknowledged is flawed.

Yet the office of the current chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, signed off on a journal article that called for lifting the ban, arguing that the military is forcing thousands of military members to live dishonest lives.

Obama also pledged during the campaign to work for repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, which limits how state, local and federal bodies can recognize partnerships and determine benefits. But lawyers in his administration defended the law in a court brief. White House aides said they were only doing their jobs to back a law that was already on the books.

Even before Obama took office, he disappointed gay and lesbian activists who objected to the invitation to evangelist Rev. Rick Warren's participation in the inauguration despite Warren's support for repealing gay marriage in California.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to address the nation's largest gay rights group this weekend in an effort to mollify an uneasy Democratic constituency frustrated with the White House'...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama plans to address the nation's largest gay rights group this weekend in an effort to mollify an uneasy Democratic constituency frustrated with the White House'...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
160
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

“Senator Clinton, will you go on the record saying that civil unions are not equal to marriage?” asked a reporter.

“No,” replied the Democratic presidential candidate.

http://www.gaypeopleschronicle.com/stories08/february/0229081.htm

President Obama said he supports the right to marry "unequivocally" as a candidate in 1996. He has never explained why gay Americans suddenly became less than equal.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 10/07/2009

Let me explain. Outside of San Francisco, gay marriage is a political loser. Obama was not elected mayor of San Francisco. He was elected President of the United States. He has a responsibility to govern. Governing the federal government and its relationship to all people present on the land of the United States is a very big responsibility. It's pretty much 200 million times bigger than the Castro.

If he prioritizes gay marriage, he'll see his party lose power and he will not achieve anything he hopes to get done.

If he prioritizes gays in the military during a time of war, he will see his party lose power and he will not achieve anything he hopes to get done.

I think you can rest assured that he won't support deterioration of gay rights.

And what is it that you want from him? From what I can tell from the gay themed blogs today, you mostly want symbolism. I for one resent that you are going to insist on your symbolic victories to the detriment of the rest of us who are looking for change from the international and economic disaster left by the Bush administration.

There is no gay emergency right now. There are other emergencies.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 AM on 10/10/2009
- daltexman I'm a Fan of daltexman 8 fans permalink

Obama is no friend to the LGBT community, regardless of what the Obamapologists will have you believe. The HRC fall into this category; several in the community fall into this category. What we as a community need to do is stop financing Obama, the DNC, and any candidate who is not a real "fierce advocate". Enough of these FAINOs (Fierce Advocates In Name Only). Get rid of DOMA and DADT -- no more excuses, no more strategies that make this happens 100 years from now. What do we want? Justice! When do we want it? Now!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 10/07/2009
- LynnW49 I'm a Fan of LynnW49 24 fans permalink
photo

Ditto that.

This time, I hope that the HRC does not suck up, and does not settle for the rehash of old promises that Obama (whom I supported in '08) dished up at the Stonewall anniversary reception at the White House. Gay leaders should have boycotted that event entirely. Their excuse for going was to give voice to justice, but they just laughed at the lame jokes and applauded the empty rhetoric that we have heard before. Just yesterday I threw away the HRC bumper stickers I got when I mistakenly contributed to that weak organization months ago.

I won't make the same mistakes again, and agree that the course of action you suggest is the only way to really give voice. If we did that, the President and Congresspeople would really pay attention and DO something..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 10/07/2009
- happycozy I'm a Fan of happycozy 6 fans permalink
photo

Uh--hello! The HRC is the group that's been advising Obama. HRC, and even Barney Frank, want to pass ENDA before addressing DADT and DOMA. So as well as blaming Obama, you need to blame some in the LGBT community for selling you out on gay rights..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 AM on 10/08/2009
- LynnW49 I'm a Fan of LynnW49 24 fans permalink
photo

Thanks for the Sullivan link. That does say it all.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 10/07/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Oh yeah. Obama also does not think that torturing prisoners is a crime.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 10/06/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Obama supports Bush's wars, is against gay rights, favors the Communist Chinese government over the Dalai Lama, etc. Obama could care less about human rights.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 10/06/2009

I hope all of those that are angry (like I am) are coming to the march on Sunday. I'm tired of sitting around and complaining. I'm ready to get out there and actually fight for it.

Do you think MLK jr. sat around and complain? what about Gandhi? No, they went out a marched, got arrested, and Gandhi starved himself in protest. What have we done? Marched a couple times and sent money to organizations.

I"m fairly sure that neither MLK jr. and Gandhi made a profit while doing what they did.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 10/06/2009
- Anym I'm a Fan of Anym 25 fans permalink
photo

HRC as a gay man makes me sick.

IT's just a group of wealthy homosexuals who want to hang with the people in power.

It's not actually trying to change the laws, that discriminate against them.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 10/06/2009
photo

Here here!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 10/06/2009

fanned

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 10/06/2009
photo

I agree 100%
Obama is the first politian I ever contributed too and I have given to the HRC for many years.
I wish I could get a 100% refund, all that money wasted. I am tired off the HRC kissing Obama's a**. They definately do not need my hard earned money any more.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 10/07/2009

enough blah blah blah, Obama. Do something.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 10/06/2009
- sws3030 I'm a Fan of sws3030 3 fans permalink

Remember Rick Warren? Remember Donnie McClurkin?

This president lied for votes. He is anti-gay which he has demonstrated by his invitations and associations. He can talk all he wants to on Saturday...come Sunday morning he will be back to his old associations and his bigoted beliefs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 10/06/2009
photo

Where do I even begin.

The HRC speaks only for the HRC, not for the majority of gay Americans. Their "spokesman" says Obama's speaking "to our community" - but his "inclusive" vocabulary is pretty hollow. Few people believe that snow job.

I wish the gay political mainstream was as driven to engage gay issues we can manage "at home" as they are in using their leverage to pressure the president to take abstract "action". As usual, there is no discussion of self-determination, because the gay political mainstream is stuck in a "what have you done for me lately" mentality.

My question to the HRC is: "what symbolic acts have you demanded from others that make no difference in OUR lives (real inclusiveness there) ??"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 10/06/2009
- ADC14 I'm a Fan of ADC14 4 fans permalink

More useless prattle from the President. Little by little, he's destroying his base. He will be a one term president and deservedly so.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 10/06/2009
- sws3030 I'm a Fan of sws3030 3 fans permalink

Hopefully, the dems will toss him aside during the 2012 convention and run a candidate who understands what civil rights and honesty really are.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 10/06/2009
- cminca I'm a Fan of cminca 13 fans permalink

I'm loving Grayson in Florida.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 10/06/2009
photo

Sadly, I don't see that happening unless Republicans put someone really good up (i.e., someone really competitive).

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 10/06/2009
photo

Gay Democrats got what they wanted. A raw pounding from Obama. Tomorrow is the sweettalk "no honey i won't do it again" before pounding them again.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 AM on 10/06/2009
- Montgriz I'm a Fan of Montgriz 36 fans permalink

Obama talks and everyone marvels and walks away feeling great...then he does nothing....well, in 2010, we will do nothing....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 AM on 10/06/2009

I am as impatient as the next Obama supporter to see him "make" his promises real. And I do believe he intends to get rid of DADT. The thing is he wants what he changes to last. Presidential signing orders can be reversed by the next administration with the a simple signature (you saw him sign away a lot of Bushsh@t in the first month of his administration). But it is harder than hell to change a law passed by Congress. Pres. Obama is preparing the ground so that Congress WILL pass a repeal law that will endure future administrations.

In other words, it is strategy aimed at produce lasting change. If it works (and I think it will,) he will use similar strategy to make other changes, including to DoMA..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 AM on 10/06/2009

That should be "executive orders" , not "signing orders" - duh

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 AM on 10/06/2009
- sws3030 I'm a Fan of sws3030 3 fans permalink

Please, lets be honest. Its a strategy designed to help him with the christian right during the next election.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 10/06/2009
- cminca I'm a Fan of cminca 13 fans permalink

Then why hasn't he been vocal about supporting Rep Murphy? He got the Lily Leadbetter act out of committee and signed in two days--but no movement on hate crime legislation.

He spent 18 hours on a plane in order to support the Chicago olympic bid, yet he has (seemingly) spent less time on campaign promises to the LGBTQ community. He's had plenty of time to support Congressional movement on these issues, yet he hasn't.

What should be the lesson learned?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 10/06/2009
photo

I might believe that if Obama were visibly trying to get such laws passed instead of punting issues or being silent. It's not so much that he hasn't passed anything but that he doesn't appear to even be *trying*. Doing nothing is *not* a plan for lasting change. Even health care is not an excuse; he could, at least, lay out a tentative road map for his plans.

An executive order has a visible effect, would raise the profile of the issue, and probably make it easier for Congress to repeal DADT since they'd be able to point and say "look: everything's fine". If DADT still hasn't been repealed by the time the next administration comes in and that president rescinds the executive order, that would raise the profile of the issue even more.

On Obama ended Bush's legacy, I haven't seen a lot of that. For example, I recall him "closing" Guantanamo Bay yet there's now talk that it may stay open beyond the deadline.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 10/06/2009
- LynnW49 I'm a Fan of LynnW49 24 fans permalink
photo

didn't see your comment until i posted mine. i agree wholeheartedly.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 10/08/2009
- LynnW49 I'm a Fan of LynnW49 24 fans permalink
photo

An executive order is perceived by some as letting Congress off the hook. I disagree. Obama could have signed an executive order to stop the bleeding, and then browbeat Congress and gathered public support. He has been willing to take his views on race to the public forum (the Philly speech after the Rev Wright flap), as well as his views on abortion (recall the Notre Dame speech, delivered in a Catholic institution no less). He has, thankfully, taken his health reform show on the road, and even if his position on health reform is murky and weak, he is out there talking about it. He has done nothing to deliver such teachable moments, or to garner public support for civil rights for all Americans, including gay ones. No doubt that the man is cagey, but his tactics and strategies for everything BUT gay rights are apparent.

In any case, an executive order might be temporary, but it would have given us 7 years (at least) of justice (at last) while Congress got off its butt. Obama's failure to sign such an order speaks less about strategy than it does about his discomfort with taking a vigorous public stand on gay rights.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 10/08/2009
- bascombe I'm a Fan of bascombe 33 fans permalink
photo

sure! tell them to "Remain hopeful".

Dems will be hoping I contribute to their campaigns.

And just like me they will be hoping in vain.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 10/06/2009
- LynnW49 I'm a Fan of LynnW49 24 fans permalink
photo

Exactly right. A pro-health reform candidate for the House here in Montana is making personal phone calls, and when we spoke, I said, I like what you have to offer, but will do nothing for your campaign until I hear publicly what you plan to do to restore the 14th Amendment for all Americans. And then I outlined what it would take (repeal DOMA, end DADT, etc) to bring justice for gay Americans. I think I got his attention, although it will be interesting to see what he will say or do in a state like Montana. There IS support here, but there is also opposition.

Anyway, my money will go out of state to support candidates with a proven record on gay rights. And not one dime or one ounce of effort for anyone else. As for the President himself: Obama could help create a spectacular economic recovery, help to deliver a public option for health insurance, smack down Wall Street, and turn water into wine, and he will not get my vote again unless he starts doing something real for gay rights. And even then, I might withhold my support because of all of the agony he has caused gay families while dilly dallying and courting Rick Warren and his ilk.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 10/08/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect