Pakistan: WFP Compound Attacked By Suicide Bomber In Disguise, 5 Killed

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Pakistan: WFP Compound Attacked By Suicide Bomber In Disguise, 5 Killed stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHRIS BRUMMITT | 10/ 5/09 04:58 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Pakistan

ISLAMABAD — A suicide bomber who killed five staffers at the U.N. food agency's headquarters in Pakistan on Monday was dressed as a security officer and allowed to enter the heavily guarded building after he asked to use the bathroom.

The United Nations announced it was temporarily closing all its offices in Pakistan after the noontime bombing, which blew out windows and left victims lying in pools of blood in the lobby of the three-story World Food Program compound.

"This is a heinous crime committed against those who have been working tirelessly to assist the poor and vulnerable on the front lines of hunger and other human suffering in Pakistan," U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in Geneva.

Despite the office closures, the U.N. said its Pakistani partner organizations would continue distributing food, medicine and other humanitarian assistance. The world body said it would reassess the situation over the next several days.

Pakistani authorities launched an investigation into the major security lapse, saying they would question guards who failed to stop the bomber from carrying out the first suicide attack in Islamabad in four months.

The attack came a day after the new Pakistani Taliban leader met reporters close to the Afghan border, vowing more attacks in response to U.S. missile strikes on militant targets in Pakistan. Ending speculation he had been killed, Hakimullah Mehsud denied government claims the militants were in disarray and said his fighters would repel any army offensive on their stronghold in South Waziristan.

Authorities blamed Islamic militants for Monday's bombing but did not single out the Taliban.

It was unclear whether militants targeted the World Food Program because of its work in Pakistan or were simply looking to kill foreigners or those working with them. The dead were four Pakistanis and an Iraqi.

Story continues below
advertisement

Extremists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq seeking to attack high-profile Western targets have shown no hesitation in striking foreign humanitarian agencies, including the United Nations, regardless of the work they are doing in relieving the suffering in the countries. A blast in June on a luxury hotel housing many foreign aid workers in the northwestern city of Peshawar killed two U.N. staffers and wounded others.

Sometimes the very nature of their work invites attack. In Monday's bombing, insurgents may have believed that by feeding refugees from the fighting in the Swat valley, the World Food Program is propping up a Pakistani government they view as a U.S. puppet or somehow supporting the army offensive there.

The U.N. and various humanitarian agencies, including those funded by the U.S. government, have been expanding in Pakistan over the last year to help support its elected government.

The United Nations considers itself a major target in Pakistan. Many of its offices are surrounded by 12-foot-high blast walls. Its staff members are driven in bulletproof cars and not allowed to bring their families with them on assignment in the country.

The World Food Program compound, which employs more than 70 people, is surrounded by square metal cages filled with sand and small stones used to protect against blasts and projectiles.

"This was one of the best-protected U.N. centers in all of Pakistan," U.N. spokeswoman Michele Montas told reporters at the world body's headquarters in New York. "We were really quite heavily guarded at least at that compound. How that person got in – that is still being investigated, and we're trying to find out from surveillance cameras."

Asked whether security had been bolstered following last month's attack that killed 12 African U.N. peacekeepers in a U.N.-authorized mission in Somalia, Montas replied: "Not that I know of."

Taliban and allied militants have carried out scores of suicide attacks in Pakistan over the last 2 1/2 years. Under U.S. pressure, Pakistani security forces have recently had some success combatting the extremists. Hakimullah's predecessor, Baitullah Mehsud, was killed in a U.S. drone strike in August.

Monday's bombing was one of at least four major strikes in the past three weeks that would appear to show Pakistani militants are regrouping and have retained the capacity to carry out attacks. It took place in a well guarded, upscale residential area close to where President Asif Ali Zardari has a home.

Hassan Abbas, a former official in the Bhutto and Musharraf governments, said the attack is significant because it shows militants can still breach high security zones. "Probably, terrorists were able to penetrate the local security infrastructure," Abbas said.

Police official Bin Yamin said the bomber detonated his explosives in the lobby. Typically, visitors to U.N. buildings in Islamabad are screened and patted down for weapons and explosives in secure chambers some distance from the entrance to the building. It was unclear whether the attacker went through that process.

Security camera footage broadcast on local TV shows the bomber walking through a door into what appears to be the main building carrying a 2-foot-long cylindrical object – possibly a detonator – in one hand. Seconds later, a bright flash fills the screen.

"There was a huge bang, and something hit me. I fell on the floor bleeding," said Adam Motiwala, an information officer who was hospitalized with wounds to his head, leg and ribs.

Medical officials at two hospitals said five staff members were killed, including two Pakistani women, two Pakistani men and an Iraqi. Several others were wounded, two of them critically, the WFP said in a statement.

Interior Minister Rehman Malik said the attacker was wearing the uniform of the paramilitary police unit guarding the outer perimeter of compound. He said the bomber, who was in his 20s, asked if he could go inside the building to use the bathroom. He was carrying around 8 kilograms (18 pounds) of explosives.

"We are investigating those security officials who were present and on the duty and who allowed him inside," he said.

Malik said the bombing proved the militants were growing desperate in response to recent government offensives against the groups.

"These terrorists," he said, "they are injured snakes."

Polls show the Pakistani public has been losing patience with the militants this year – a point emphasized in a speech Monday by Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi at Rice University's Baker Institute in Houston.

"Today when people see that there are innocent people dying, when they see all the major urban centers of Pakistan being hit, when they see that the economy of Pakistan has suffered and job creation and investment have been compromised because of these extremists, I think the public opinion has changed," Qureshi said.

___

Associated Press writers Ishtiaq Mahsud in Sararogha and Edith M. Lederer and John Heilprin at the United Nations contributed to this report.

ISLAMABAD — A suicide bomber who killed five staffers at the U.N. food agency's headquarters in Pakistan on Monday was dressed as a security officer and allowed to enter the heavily guarded buil...
ISLAMABAD — A suicide bomber who killed five staffers at the U.N. food agency's headquarters in Pakistan on Monday was dressed as a security officer and allowed to enter the heavily guarded buil...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
49
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- SolarArray I'm a Fan of SolarArray 12 fans permalink
photo

Crazy stupid people on this blue marble we call Earth.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 AM on 10/06/2009
- Watain I'm a Fan of Watain 13 fans permalink
photo

Ob is going to fix it with another visit on the Late Night Show.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 10/05/2009
- KIVPossum I'm a Fan of KIVPossum 43 fans permalink
photo

Nah, he's going to have a banner made and declare Mission Accomplished.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 AM on 10/06/2009
- inorbit I'm a Fan of inorbit 23 fans permalink
photo

I'm sure this act will make the perpetrators very unpopular in Pakistan.

Can you go any lower?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 10/05/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 260 fans permalink
photo

It all depends where you are in Pakistan, but even in FATA, there's been growing disfavor displayed among sectors of the population. Many aren't too keen on the Pakistani military, either. The people get stuck in the crossfire.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 10/05/2009
- mommadona I'm a Fan of mommadona 160 fans permalink
photo

Excuse me....

Can we just state the obvious?

Pakistan is a failed state with loose nukes and a military embedded with theocratic end-timers?

Gotta start from SOME benchmark.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 10/05/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 133 fans permalink

That is not obvious because it is false.

A good place to start would be with an understanding of Pakistan.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 10/05/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 260 fans permalink
photo

You might appreciate this,

Armageddon at the Top of the World: *Not*!
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090803/cole

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 10/05/2009

Actually American and Israel intelligence is involve in it. I say, PK face all problem due to USA proxy war.

People of PK sacrifice their life for America, But the word don't about it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 10/06/2009

The terrorists got the publicity they wanted.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 10/05/2009
- outnow I'm a Fan of outnow 173 fans permalink

The weirdness of blowing up aid workers from the UN defies logic. Ayn Rand would argue that each person acts in his own self-interest. This proves that they don't.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 10/05/2009
- cowtippor I'm a Fan of cowtippor 19 fans permalink

doesn't defy logic.

You have the Taliban who's trying to win the favor of the people it wishes to control.

They can't do that as long as refugees are being cared for and fed by the UN.

So how do you counter this? Terror. You blow them up, thereby accomplishing a few things:

1) Showing that refugees aren't safe around western organizations
2) Scaring away aid agencies, thereby creating further hardship

now the Taliban can come in, give them a few loaves of bread, and claim to be their saviors.

Their religion or ideologies aren't what make them evil. Their willingness to maim, extort, and kill in order to hold power is what makes them evil.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 10/05/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 108 fans permalink

Right on! Fanned.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 10/05/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 133 fans permalink

You have that right.

Religion is not the problem. Its the use of religion for control.

My understanding of Islam is that as long as you fulfill your obligations to God no man cna call you unislamic.

What the Taliban and bin Ladin preach is the opposite of what is intended.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 10/05/2009
photo

Very well put.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 10/05/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 260 fans permalink
photo

Well yes, ideology in itself is not an act. And you just presented, sort of in a forensic psychologist type of way how they view this as rational. But it still isn't. The people, at least in Punjab and Sindh and even in places like Quetta ( http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/national/hazaras-protest-target-killings-509 ), are hardly won over by this violent behavior from any of these groups and are on to their game. Plus, this group has also attacked Pakistani government convoys and installations (though they would contend that they are illegitimate Western pawns, I suppose, to extend your point). Still, I do get your point, and it does have merit.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 10/05/2009
- JerryLevy I'm a Fan of JerryLevy 53 fans permalink
photo

This is true. Exactly like Hezbollah and Hamas. Most terrorist groups act very similarly and they have total disregard for human life.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 10/05/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 108 fans permalink

Who gives a tinker's d*mn what Ayn Rand thinks?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 10/05/2009
- outnow I'm a Fan of outnow 173 fans permalink

Just a little tongue in cheek. The current edition of Newsweek (October 5th) has a good Taliban interview that explains what exactly what they think. I might surprise you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 10/05/2009

no one with an education

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 10/05/2009
- HeimeBach I'm a Fan of HeimeBach 9 fans permalink

Truer words wre never spoken then when Rush said that Democrats cannot be trusted with the security of the United States.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 10/05/2009
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 59 fans permalink
photo

You say that after Bush/Cheney let 911 happen. After being warned.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 10/05/2009
- HeimeBach I'm a Fan of HeimeBach 9 fans permalink

I hope you didn't hurt anything on that stretch...The worst you can say about republicans is that maybe they weren't as vigilant as they should have been. But weak national security and appeasement of our advesaries is a matter of policy for the democrats.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 10/05/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 133 fans permalink

How can you criticize Bush/Cheney?

After all the memo did not say: "Bin Ladin intends to attack within USA on Sept11, 2001 using airplanes to crash into buildings in New York City and Washington DC."

How could anyone possibly imagine what they might do?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 10/05/2009
- ILB I'm a Fan of ILB permalink

Well, if Rush said it, it must be true. Good grief.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 10/05/2009
- HeimeBach I'm a Fan of HeimeBach 9 fans permalink

Because Rush said it doesn't mean that it's not true.
Obama criticized Bush/Republicans for not focusing on Afghanistan and based his entire national security policy on finishing the job there. Now the left of his party wants out and he's capitulating?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 10/05/2009
- cowtippor I'm a Fan of cowtippor 19 fans permalink

World War 2:
Franklin D Roosevelt (Democrat)
Harry Truman (Democrat)

Korean War:
Harry Truman (Democrat)
Dwight Eisehower (Republican)

Vietnam War:
Dwight Eisenhower (Republican)
John Kennedy (Democrat, succeeded by Lyndon Johnson)
Richard Nixon (Republican, succeeded by Gerald Ford)

Iran Contra:
Ronald Reagan (Republican)

Cold War:
Harry Truman (Democrat)
Dwight Eisenhower (Republican)
John Kennedy (Democrat)
Lyndon Johnson (Democrat)
Richard Nixon (Republican)
Gerald Ford (Republican)
Jimmy Carter (Democrat)
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
George W Bush (Republican)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 10/05/2009
- cowtippor I'm a Fan of cowtippor 19 fans permalink

o yes, and in case anyone wants to argue that Democrats can't bring out the big guns during a war, Harry Truman (a democrat) is the only head of state in the history of the modern world to have ever nuked another country - twice.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 10/05/2009
- blutigeroo I'm a Fan of blutigeroo 27 fans permalink
photo

How about blaming the American people for alllowing (in the past and present and probably in the future too) their leaders to do as they like. In other parts of the world when the leader does something that the people do not like and the people are sick of it, the leaders' experience "people power" at its best. (e.g. Musharraf)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 AM on 10/06/2009
- EmmaJ76 I'm a Fan of EmmaJ76 43 fans permalink
photo

Yes lets not forget that it is Bush that failed to protect the US on 9/11, and Bush that started illegal wars in the area that distabalized the region.

But as long as we can have a pop at PBO, silly little facts shouldn't get in the way.

This is all because of GWB's mess. Your analogy also forgets that history tells a different story about how well the Dems have done to protect the US.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 10/05/2009
- cowtippor I'm a Fan of cowtippor 19 fans permalink

to say this is all one person or another's fault is to ignore history.

let's pick WW1 to start with.

WW1

WW2 - caused putting all blame on germany and levying crippling financial punishments, leading to the naz1party coming to power

Cold War - Power struggle between American and Soviet ideologies, encompasses the following wars:
Korean War
Vietnam War

Things the US did to fight the USSR during the cold war comes back to bite the US:
Saddam Hussein was put into power by the US to fight
Iran Contra
Bin Laden was trained by US to fight USSR

this just keeps going on and on.... if not one war, it's another

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 10/05/2009
- royevatom I'm a Fan of royevatom 10 fans permalink

I don't think the Security of the US is in the hands of the Democrats, that would be the Military and the Intelligence Agencies, Federal, State, City, and County Police as well as other organizations charged with the duty to protect our nation.
So your statement taken from Rush must mean that the Democrats can't be trusted to run a war. That doe's not make sense as the military are the ones pulling the strings in Iraq and Afghanistan. Think for yourself. The bombing in Islamabad has nothing to do with the Democratic Party.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 10/05/2009
- cowtippor I'm a Fan of cowtippor 19 fans permalink

everything bad = democrat's fault

if they blame enough stuff on the democrats, eventually they most surely will be right

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 10/05/2009
- Horst I'm a Fan of Horst 23 fans permalink

These Islamists are the worst...it makes no sense to kill people who are trying to feed the poor. Lowest of the low.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 10/05/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 260 fans permalink
photo

Way to go, TTP, in your campaign to turn every last Pakistani outside your limited Pathan base against you. I only hope that any renewed vigorous response to this doesn't create more IDP's.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 10/05/2009
- Morganster I'm a Fan of Morganster 18 fans permalink
photo

This is not in the least surprising.

The Department of Safety and Security at the UN is one of the most dysfunctional arms of the organization. Under their purview, catastrophic loss of life of UN personnel is not uncommon: just two of a myriad of examples: In 2003, the bombing of the UN office in Iraq = 22 casualties, in 2007, the bombing of the UN office in Algiers = 17 casualties.

By the UN's own admission, all of these deaths occurred due to the abject failure of their Department of Safety and Security to implement the most basic security precautions and measures.

One only need to Google the report from the investigative panel engendered by the Secretary General "Towards a Culture of Security and Accountability" led by former Ambassador Brahimi. It is a damning indictment of the gross negligence and incompetency of the UN's internal security.

The worst part is that the executive staff responsible continue in their jobs at the UN without a care in the world.

Beware if you take a UN job overseas, you are on your own.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 10/05/2009
photo

Regarding the suicide bomber and those who prepared and supported him: I wonder who they thought they would impress or win over by killing innocent people who, in their profession, were only thinking of others and caring for them with the greatest of empathy. I ask you, what kind of hearts are won over by this kind of murder?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 10/05/2009
- BradSmith I'm a Fan of BradSmith 165 fans permalink
photo

Not a good think that's for sure. However, you could ask the same questions to Obama.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 10/05/2009
- royevatom I'm a Fan of royevatom 10 fans permalink

Wanna clarify that post Brad ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 10/05/2009
- GZLives I'm a Fan of GZLives 41 fans permalink

Religious fanatics see those Muslims that were killed as martyrs,
and any non Muslims killed as deserving it.

And the overall act as fulfillment of their religious obligation.
From these sorts of people this horror is cause for celebration

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 10/05/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect