Mortgage Loan Modification: More Offers Extended, Fewer Homeowners Accepting -- Are Homeowners Losing Hope?


First Posted: 10- 8-09 08:31 PM   |   Updated: 10- 9-09 06:13 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Mortgages

While the Obama administration and reporters trumpet the fact that the administration is about a month early in reaching its stated goal of modifying half a million troubled mortgages (an accomplishment worth trumpeting), an important aspect is being ignored: last month, less homeowners accepted offers to modify their loans, according to Treasury Department figures released Thursday.

Though the number of offers extended to eligible homeowners continues to rise, the number of offers accepted actually dropped, according to an analysis of Treasury Department data. In August, about 81 percent of homeowners accepted their modification offers; last month, just 54 percent of homeowners did so.

The implications, according to at least one economist, aren't good: homeowners have either lost hope or they're the recipients of terrible advice and just don't trust the Obama administration's $75 billion program.

An administration official confirmed that both are serious challenges.

Since June, when month-specific reports became available, the number of offers extended has increased every month, from 136,560 in June to 186,601 in September. Homeowners were taking advantage of the offers. In June 93,146 homeowners accepted; by August 133,192 homeowners had signed up for the Treasury's plan. But in September, the total dropped to 100,216.

Home Affordable Modification Program
Loan Modification Offers Extended vs Offers Accepted


Source: U.S. Treasury Department

"Servicers are making more offers, but borrowers aren't accepting -- that's a negative sign," says Cristian de Ritis, an economist at Moody's Economy.com. De Ritis speculates that those who declined have "lost hope."

"If they're uncertain about their employment, or feeling insecure about their economic position, they're thinking, 'Do I really want to continue investing in this mortgage?' In order to modify their loan, homeowners need to be certain they can make the payments," he says.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Everyone is focusing on the cumulative numbers, which is what the government is stressing, but it doesn't speak to the deeper problems," De Ritis continued. "If borrowers are losing confidence, that's a problem."

Much has been written about servicers' apparent stubbornness and incompetence when it comes to modifying home mortgages -- not to mention the reportedly frustrating process of going through a modification program -- but homeowners who are declining offers have already gone through the process. As de Ritis notes, they've already been approved. And that's what makes September's low acceptance rate numbers troubling. (more than 72 percent of offers were accepted from June to August)

Officials at the Treasury Department have taken notice. The agency is working with behavioral economists to improve outreach to borrowers, the Huffington Post has learned. Troubled homeowners are waiting too long to respond to the administration's Making Home Affordable Program; Treasury officials are trying to get homeowners to join the program sooner after becoming eligible, rather than waiting until they're on the brink of foreclosure. Behavioral economists study the effects of incentives on decision-making.

Also, on Wednesday officials from Treasury met with marketing representatives from the various mortgage servicers to get them to improve awareness among homeowners. There is concern that some borrowers may not trust the promotional materials arriving in their mailboxes, or the calls they're receiving from servicers encouraging them to take part in the administration-led effort.

One problem lies in the fact that homeowners generally distrust their mortgage servicers, especially since the onset of the housing crisis. But now, borrowers are being asked to trust them. Though it can't be an easy transition, mortgage companies did get borrowers to sign up for these loans; maybe they can also convince homeowners to modify them.

Were you recently offered a home loan modification? The Huffington Post wants to hear from you. Please e-mail me your story at shahien [at] huffingtonpost [dot] com.

Note: This post was updated Friday morning to include the graph seen above, and to reflect the fact that there is some lag time between when a servicer extends an offer and when a borrower's modification plan actually begins. Therefore, monthly ratios aren't as useful. Felix Salmon of Reuters breaks it down.

Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter!

While the Obama administration and reporters trumpet the fact that the administration is about a ...
While the Obama administration and reporters trumpet the fact that the administration is about a ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
34
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

Some shady sounding person from JP Morgan Chase has been calling me saying that I qualify "Obama's refinance plan." Finally, I called him back to ask him to take me off of his list. I have never been late or missed a payment. I was laid off in July and I am still making the mortgage payments. If I do not find a job before I run out of unemployment, I will do my best to hold on to the house. I will not deal with these banks without a stable of lawyers to review and approve the deal. THEY CANNOT BE TRUSTED. If I lose this house, I will never buy another one. I am done.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 AM on 10/21/2009


I have tried from the first day this loan was available to get this loan from IndyMAC/One West.
They have lied numerous times. I read the 17 page loan qualifications the first day it was out, and the I qualified for the loan.
I sent my loan docs through certified mail and they were signed off by IndyMAC., Now they say they never got them. Then, they were shipped to Houston! Then I called back. They don't have a Houston office! Then they moved from Austin to Austin. They said they have no outside phone line and no way to reach loan officers, they said I did not have a Fannie Mae loan, but I checked and I do.
When I first tried to get this loan my mortgage and all my bills were current
. I filed under a hardship clause.
I am a single mother who has made do for 20 years....I have an autistic son who lives with me...but my other son hurt his arm and the surgeons made a mistake and did the wrong surgery and now my son has a crippled arm and a day to day, life or death, blood dyscrasia. He moved in with me from the dorms at UCSD. The medical bills have sunk me, along with IndyMAC/One West.
Now, 10 months after the surgical mistakes, I am on the brink of dominos falling. I would not be in trouble if IndyMAC/OneWest were a lender with integrity.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 10/14/2009
photo

Find out who oversees that bank and file a complaint, I did on Chase.
Chase is overseen by the OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency).

It worked !

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 AM on 10/14/2009
    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 AM on 10/14/2009
photo

call 5 times and ask where to send the docs. If you get the same answer at least 4 times, send via return receipt immediately. Do a new package (complete).
Concurrently contact the FDIC (look at the link in my other post) and ask them how to file a complaint with them on your bank.
The bank has to answer to the FDIC and they will forward that answer to you. Then you can respond and meanwhile you stall the process. But, hurry with all of that. Do it today !
File a law suit on your son's wrongful surgery also.
I know this is a lot to do and digest, but its worth it.
Good luck.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 AM on 10/14/2009
- viper234 I'm a Fan of viper234 25 fans permalink

This program is supposed to help 3 to 4 million homeowners over the next couple of years and everyone thinks getting 500,000 modifications done is laudable? Give me a break. The administration must think the entire country has forgotten that the bulk of the lenders who call themselves "HAMP participants" are the very same economy-killers who got billions in federally funded taxpayer bail-out assistance -- assistance that required no "application and review process," no "terms," plus a 0% interest rate. And now every one wants to give these destroyers of the economy a standing ovation for doing next to nothing to stem the foreclosure crisis in the US? Every day, thousands more homeowners are facing foreclosure adding to that 4 million estimate that came out in August. With real unemployment at 17% and expected to climb through 2010, many more families who've been responsible about paying their bills and their mortgages will be hit with the tragedy of foreclosure. I'll stand with them any day rather than applaud the same big names in finance, the sheltered criminals, that many now seem to want to bow down and worship.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 10/13/2009
photo

I appreciate your comment.
Can you please clarify something for me?

you wrote: According the May 2009 amendment to the Truth and Lending Act, the actual creditor/lender MUST BE IDENTIFIED. A "servicer" and/or "trustee" to MBS trust are NOT defined as a CREDITOR under the TILA. Make sure you know who your creditor is.

Can you please specify , isn't the lender the creditor?
I am just confused because you use lender, creditor, servicer, etc.

For example, if I have a mortgage with WAMU the current servicer, and it states that Loan Link is the "Funding Lender". Does this mean Loan Link is the Creditor?
Please specify for the less educated in that area.

Thanks for your help.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 AM on 10/13/2009

Siebenstein - The TILA amendment states that the creditor must be now be identified. According to TILA, creditor and lender seem to refer to same thing. The definition of creditor in TILA is a) one who regularly extends consumer credit that is subject to a finance charge or is payable by written agreement in more than four installments and b)to whom the obligation is initially payable, either on the face of the note or contract, or by agreement when there is no note or contract. The Fourth Circuit has ruled that both a and b must be met in order to meet the definition of "creditor."

Now, if a mortgage servicer merely services mortgages and they do not regularly extend credit, and their is no assignment of mortgage and mortgage note to them - they cannot be the creditor.

A trustee to a mortgage backed is simply acting in a fiduciary capacity for a trust - and does not extend credit. Further, the trust itself does not extend credit and neither do "investors" in mortgage-backed securities.

Thus, the creditor cannot be the servicer, trustee, trust, or MBS security holders.

Question to ask is who holds your mortgage and mortgage note on their accounting books - most likely they are the creditor.

This is very important - and I would appreciate someone else weighing in.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 10/12/2009

This article is just bad journalism. It implies that homeowners aren't making rational decisions by not accepting the terms offered to them under current mortgage modifications. I think, all things being equal, homeowners are making rational decisions based on the terms offered. For instance, in a lot of areas around the country (including my own - Michigan), property values have plunged so deeply that homes are nowhere near their original purchase price in value. Unfortunately mortgage companies aren't offering anything that forgives enough principal to get the owner's head above water.

Does it really make sense to stretch out the terms of payments for a home that is nowhere near the value of what you owe for it? No. It's best to walk away or short sell it, and that's what rational owners are doing. Walking away or short-selling and moving into a rental home down the street until their credit is good enough to get a mortgage at foreclosure or short sale pricing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 10/11/2009
- Gernuser I'm a Fan of Gernuser 2 fans permalink
photo

Congratulations to to Obama for winning the Nobel Peace Prize

If you like finance & econ news you'll like: http://pie.im/af30

Obama needs to carry out actual heath care & financial reform. Needs to get things done instead of just talking and planning.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 10/10/2009

Obama needs to do actual reform instead of just talk & plan

good articles: http://br.st/tU

~~

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 10/09/2009
- Claireify I'm a Fan of Claireify 16 fans permalink

Come'on, let's admit that Washington is crooked and corrupt. The lobbysists are nothing more than bribe agents, The recipients of campaign money bow to big lobby donors so they can run their "Vote for me" ads.

The Prez can't do very much with his limited powers. The Senate is actually the most powerful of the three branches of our government and obviously, they are dragging their arses. Even to repeal the "Don't ask don't tell" law, Obama needs a majority senate vote.

Research a list of the president's powers. He is really just a figurehead with little or no leverage unless he can go to Senator X, for example, and say, "Remember three years ago when I saved you from drowning? I'm calling in the favor." Or he might have some "dirt" on Senator Y and threaten to reveal it if Sen. Y doesn't come through with a yes vote. But knowing Obama as I think we do, he would never stoop to the latter. The save-your-life approach--I say go for it! Either that, or Americans need to get off their own lazy bums and write their senators to remind them they will not be getting the votes they're counting on for re-election.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 10/13/2009
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 135 fans permalink
photo

"In order to modify their loan, homeowners need to be certain they can make the payments"

Hear that? Listen closely...it is the bells tolling for the death of the 30-year mortgage.

Ahhhh....the rich got richer, though.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 10/09/2009

It is apt that you bring up 30-year mortgage. I believed it was invented during the 30s to help people manage their debt. I don't know if we'll popularize 40-year mortgage this time around, but the UK is giving it a go. We had a property bubble in the 20s, and Florida was at the epicenter. I think before the 20s 25-year mortgage was considered dubious loan arrangement. It is funny to observe that for several generations now, most of us consider 30-year mortgage to be normal.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 10/10/2009
- ldsb I'm a Fan of ldsb 4 fans permalink

Maybe the terms of the modifications offers are lousy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 10/09/2009

You're absolutely correct. The terms are often lousy and after they add the arrears to the loans, the Payments often increase. However, a "modification" has occurred as told by the banks. You see...the banks are laughing their tails off because they pulled another perfect con on the government, their clients and creditors, which has now extended to us, the US taxpayers.

I work with homeowners to try to arm them with information they can use to try to force the banks to really modify their mortgages. The stories as to what happened at the origination by the brokers and lenders, and now the lenders and servicers who are expected to modify the loans are so sad. You would have to ice water running through your veins if they did not bring at least an occassional tear to your eyes.

The author needs to tell the full story as to why people aren't accepting those "modifications" that the Obama Admin believes were offered as help. Otherwise, he is only adding to the problem.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 10/09/2009

The terms are what are currently available.
Even with a poor FICO and no equity and late months, a mod company can get you approx... 4-5% rate and have the late months put on the back end of the mortgage.

You cant get 4-5% with an 800 FICO! especially when you're broke.
That is a real deal. If Fannie or Freddie own the loan you may get 2-3%.

As far as for paying for this service... what do you expect? The loan mod companies will take on the bank for you with RE and legal pros.

You wouldn't go to court without a lawyer?
This is the court of money!
The banks will say they will modify... LOL.
They take about 3/4% off and give you 72 hours to accept.
If you decline you cannot apply for another YEAR.

They hold all the cards and you are in the lobby with your hat in your hand... ALONE, and they tell you to submit your file... and if you screw up one thing you are declined for another year.

I do this for my job and I see it everyday.
You may not WANT to pay for this, but it will work.
You need a Real Estate company with IN HOUSE legal and processing.

The banks work with us on the loans and trash us in the papers, but the 'servicing' agents they referenced in the article... that's us.

write me if you have a question...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 10/10/2009

There are two big problems with loan modifications. 1) servicer terms offered are usually not much better than what the homeowner already has - and is often worse by adding to mortgage principal or extending the life of the mortgage. 2) servicers are often not identifying the current creditor to whom the debt is owed. Any modification in the name of the servicer alone is invalid and may be a source of future problems for homeowner. According the May 2009 amendment to the Truth and Lending Act, the actual creditor/lender MUST BE IDENTIFIED. A "servicer" and/or "trustee" to MBS trust are NOT defined as a CREDITOR under the TILA. Make sure you know who your creditor is.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 AM on 10/09/2009
photo

Watch this and pass it along. It’s depressing and will make you mad but there is hope.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxyRFSYe7ws&feature=PlayList&p=C2C576E10EBF7510

The hope is here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r717Cua6aVw&feature=PlayList&p=C2C576E10EBF7510&index=2

I was in lending and banking for many many years and sold property after it we had foreclosed on it. I know the securitization of these mtg backed securities and the way it was done was in many cases … hinkey.

There is a lot of hope for families in trouble with their lender these days. Pass this along to anyone who you thing may need it. If anyone would like to contact me to learn more they can at billburnsA­Trealtimec­rm.com

I’m not a lawyer so I cannot give legal advice but I can educate them on the issues and give them hope.

The family in Florida who stopped their lender from foreclosing stayed in their home for 2 – 3 years without paying a mtg payment. (Saving for when they may have to move.) The court awarded them “quiet title” because it decided the “lender” would never be able to perfect a foreclosure. They now have what is probably a clear title to their home without encumberances.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 10/09/2009
photo

I appreciate your comment.
Can you please clarify something for me?

you wrote: According the May 2009 amendment to the Truth and Lending Act, the actual creditor/lender MUST BE IDENTIFIED. A "servicer" and/or "trustee" to MBS trust are NOT defined as a CREDITOR under the TILA. Make sure you know who your creditor is.

Can you please specify , isn't the lender the creditor?
I am just confused because you use lender, creditor, servicer, etc.

For example, if I have a mortgage with WAMU the current servicer, and it states that Loan Link is the "Funding Lender". Does this mean Loan Link is the Creditor?
Please specify for the less educated in that area.

Thanks for your help.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 AM on 10/10/2009
- barkingcat I'm a Fan of barkingcat 7 fans permalink
photo

Grammar police: it's not "less homeowners accepted offers," as the HuffPo article states, but "fewer homeowners accepted offers"...

Unless, of course, the article's author means that a smaller fractional portion of each homeowner (say, a torso and two legs?) accepted loan modification offers?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 10/09/2009
- Claireify I'm a Fan of Claireify 16 fans permalink

Yeaaaah, FINALLY someone who gives a damn about grammar. Kudos to Barkingcat! I too m a fellow Grammar Police. I am so tired of grammatical gaffes (such as less vs. fewer) Sadly, most are perpetuated by the media and politicans who don't know the difference between "their" and "there" or "further" from "farther." This is JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL stuff, for Chrissake.

"There's several options..." NO! There ARE several options. "Irregardless, we will win." NO. "Regardless of the circumstances, we will win." All of these egregious errors eventually become accepted usage and represent the dumbing down of America. Maybe we need a grammar Czar in the White House to set some standards. HIGH standards.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 10/13/2009
- tlgeiger62 I'm a Fan of tlgeiger62 56 fans permalink
photo

I have to say, I have worked for a mortgage broker for the last 5 years. To be clear, I'm working about 10 hours a MONTH now for him because he has no business.

What mystifies me is why he has made NO effort whatsoever to put forth information on the programs that are out there to help homeowners. I have mentined it to him but haven't press the issue because I'd like to keep this measly job so I don't have to continue cleaning houses for the rest of my life.

I believe he isn't doing it because there is so much paperwork on top of a an already paper-heavy process that he'd rather not deal with it. I know he puts in many long days now for the couple of files he manages to close each month. But I can't help but wonder if this is the feeling of many brokers out there who just don't want to deal with the process of Loan Modifications.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 AM on 10/09/2009
- blrpalms I'm a Fan of blrpalms 23 fans permalink

I've been trying to obtain a modification thru CitiMortgage since January...­subcreammi­tted 5 packets of over 100 pages each...and it is still ongoing

I've now paid them over $7000 and no modification.

I'm ready to scream

the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing speak to a different person each time

still trying

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 10/08/2009
photo

You must watch these two videos. Now this is not some internet crap. This is what is going on. I was in banking, lending for 20 yrs. Sold bank owned property after our foreclosure department perfected foreclosure. (This was yrs ago when things were way diffferent.) The old rules went out the window years ago and now its the wild west of money making for these lenders, servicers and investors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxyRFSYe7ws&feature=PlayList&p=C2C576E10EBF7510


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r717Cua6aVw&feature=PlayList&p=C2C576E10EBF7510&index=2

(copy and paste if needed)

Fortunately for homeowners there are remedies and amunition to fight for their homes. Modifications are being done that really help - big help. Forensic audits are finding errors in federal truth in lending law or other violations that can help you win. The produce the note tactic is a REAL black letter law tactic that can work effectively if you lender cannot produce your not. If you want to contact me directly to discuss billburnsA­Trealtimec­rm.com I'm not an attorney so I cannot give you legal advice about your situation. However, I can tell you stories and point you to go learn more. billburnsA­Trealtimec­rm.com

"You make a living by what you get. You make a living by what you give." Churchill

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 10/09/2009
- Frogfoot I'm a Fan of Frogfoot 3 fans permalink

More like losing confidence in the govt programs. There is not much reason for hope in those programs, unless you're the mortgage company collecting the fees.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 10/08/2009
- schatsie I'm a Fan of schatsie 71 fans permalink

That is correct, when you look at the FEEs involved and the extensions of the mortgages, it is a fallacy to believe that you will have a job in the next 5 years so you can keep making payments.... If Obama was serious about keeping people in their homes, they would be able to write off 40% of their taxes and healthcare expenses LIKE THE FAT CATS DO...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 10/09/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect