NHL Stays Put But Canadian Hockey Migrates South

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - NHL Stays Put But Canadian Hockey Migrates South stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 10- 8-09 04:47 PM   |   Updated: 10- 8-09 05:58 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Senators Rangers Hockey

By Sandro Contenta

TORONTO, Canada -- When acclaimed novelist Mordecai Richler was alive, he could often be found in the middle of the afternoon sipping a glass of Macallan's single malt whisky -- his favorite -- in a basement pub in downtown Montreal called Woody's.

Richler, who died in 2001, oozed Montreal. The poor Jewish neighborhood around St. Urban Street, where he grew up, inspired his writing. And the city's storied hockey team -- the Canadiens -- fueled his passion.

He was also an acerbic commentator of Quebec politics, the bogeyman of those who wanted to make the province an independent country, which resulted in my interviewing him several times throughout the 1990s. But never did he sound more willing to talk than when I asked for his views on hockey.

He was already at the bar, scotch in hand, when I walked into Woody's for our 3 p.m. rendezvous. It was the spring of 1993 and the Toronto Maple Leafs were in the last game of a semi-final series against the Los Angeles Kings. A Leafs victory would result in a Stanley Cup final against their legendary rivals the Montreal Canadiens. The last time that happened was 1967.

The thought of a match-up last seen when the National Hockey League was made up of its original six teams had the normally grumpy Richler almost chatty. He was no fan of the Leafs, but he wanted them to cream Los Angeles, one of the teams that began a league expansion into southern U.S. cities where he felt the game wasn't appreciated.

Indeed, the Florida Panthers and the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim were poised to enter the league the following season, and the thought had Richler rolling his eyes.

Story continues below

"The Mighty Ducks," he growled. "What kind of a name is that for a hockey team?"

I can only imagine what Richler would have said about the saga of the Phoenix Coyotes.

An Arizona judge last week rejected the $242.5 million-bid by BlackBerry billionaire Jim Balsillie to buy the bankrupt Coyotes. Canadian hockey fans received the decision with disgust.

Balsillie, a Canadian, wanted to move the team to Hamilton, a hockey mad city in southern Ontario, whose fans now have to travel 65 traffic-choked kilometers (40 miles) to Toronto to catch an NHL game. NHL commissioner Gary Bettman fought him every step of the way, and won. The Coyotes are staying in the desert -- at least for now -- where even dirt cheap tickets can't fill the arena.

The court ruling validates the right of the NHL and its franchise owners to decide who owns its hockey teams and where they play their home games. Some of the resistance was personal: Bettman and the owners have made clear they don't want to let Balsillie, who has tried three times to buy a hockey team, into their elite club. He rubs them the wrong way. The Toronto Maple Leafs also believe they have a veto against any new team moving into their territory, which as far as they're concerned, includes Hamilton.

The veto claim might someday be challenged in an anti-trust lawsuit. For Leafs fans -- in their fourth decade of suffering with a mediocre team while its owners pocket huge profits -- that day can't come soon enough. Competition might finally force the Leafs to invest in quality players and lower ticket prices.

More problematic for the NHL in the short term is the growing sense in Canada of a league snubbing a hockey-crazed country that produces most of its players. Only six of the league's 30 teams have Canada as a home. Yet it's the sixth time the league has blocked U.S.-based teams from moving north of the border. The NHL has never stopped a Canadian team from heading south, including the Winnipeg Jets, which became the now bankrupt Coyotes.

Damien Cox, the hard-hitting hockey columnist for the Toronto Star, calls it the Anywhere But Canada rule.

Balsillie had made patriotism a key part of his bid to buy the Coyotes.

"From the beginning, my attempt to relocate the Coyotes to Hamilton has been about Canadian hockey fans and Canadian hockey," he said, after the court ruled against him. "All I wanted was a fair chance to bring a seventh NHL team to Canada, to serve the best unserved hockey fans in the world."

Instead, the NHL is determined to press ahead with bringing hockey to America's Sunbelt, despite the precarious state of several teams already there, including those in Florida. It's about money, of course, the big network contracts and sponsorship deals potentially available in the U.S.

And so the talk is of a future team in Las Vegas. I can almost hear Mordecai Richler growling in his grave: "And what are they going to call them, the Showgirls?"

Read more from GlobalPost.com.


Get HuffPost World On Facebook and Twitter!

By Sandro Contenta TORONTO, Canada -- When acclaimed novelist Mordecai Richler was alive, he could often be found in the middle of the afternoon sipping a glass of Macallan's single malt whisky -- ...
By Sandro Contenta TORONTO, Canada -- When acclaimed novelist Mordecai Richler was alive, he could often be found in the middle of the afternoon sipping a glass of Macallan's single malt whisky -- ...
Filed by Adam Taylor  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
33
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

No Canadian I know likes Gary Bettman. He is an i di ot. The problem is relatively simple to solve. Ignore Bettman and cut out the teams that are continually losing money and either reduce the size of the league or find new money making locales. No more phuquing Coyotes, Canes or Predators! Perhaps it's time for a European Conference. There are pro leagues over there that pay well.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 11/16/2009
photo

The NHL made a major mistakeback in the 90's with expansion. Most of the "southern teams" aren't making money and suffer low attendance. The hockey your seeing today is not the way the game was in the day of Gretzky and Lemuiex. The other problem with expansion was the dilution of a thin talent pool. What really started it was the owners of the old MN North Stars selling it and getting the San Jose Sharks. These guys couldnt sell hockey in an american hockey hot bed like MN, and they gave them another in San Jose? And of course the greedy owners were more than eager to get their hands on the franchise fee each new team had to pay. I ll be honest, the NHL lost me around the time the NJ Devils started with that god awful trap, and nothing they've done since has changed my mind. We ll ok that and Ed Snyder bringing Sara Palin to a Flyers game

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 10/10/2009
photo

I don't know how many additional markets in Canada that could support a team. Winnipeg already tried and failed. That town is a dump, an absolutely lawless dump. Go there in winter, you'll know why the NHL doesn't want anything to do with them. Quebec City is too small a market to support a team again. That really only leaves Hamilton. And there is no doubt in my mind they could support a team. Problem is, they'd be poaching fans from the Maple Laffs, the Sabres and the Red Wings and I don't think the Board of Governors would approve a move there. That leaves moves in the States. I think Portland and Kansas could and would support teams and I think that you need to get rid of any two of Nashville, Atlanta, Phoenix and the Panthers. Contract two teams and put their players in a waiver draft and then move whatever two teams you don't outright get rid of. The Islanders are most likely going to move if Wang doesn't get his new arena complex, either. They're screwing him around on that BIG time, not giving him a yes or a no, just leaving him hanging in limbo. He's only going to put up with that for so long.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 10/09/2009
photo

Some possible NHL expansion teams
Tijuana Coyotes.
Baghdad Dervishes
Havana Revolutionaries.
Riyadh Camels.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 10/09/2009
- dtrobert I'm a Fan of dtrobert 8 fans permalink

Richler oozed Montreal? He oozed racism, you mean.... There was nothing he hated more than the fact that he had to share his beloved city with all those French people... who make up 80% of the population.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 10/09/2009
- wizegeye I'm a Fan of wizegeye 36 fans permalink
photo

Teams have left the US for Canada, although not many. A couple of decades ago, the Flames moved from Atlanta to Calgary, where they continue to play today. The pushback from the NHL regarding the relocation of the Phoenix Coyotes to Hamilton is directly related to the finanical survival of other current NHL franchises. In addition to Toronto, Detroit has many fans in western Ontario. A team in Hamilton would affect the fan base and TV revenue for both the Maple Leafs and the Red Wings. This situation played out when the NFL Clevelend Browns wanted to move the franchise to Baltimore. The Washington Redskins were given concessions since the move would affect their revenue. Another example is when the MLB Montreal Expos moved to DC. The Baltimore Orioles were against the move and required financial concessions to agree to it. Unfortunately, hockey doesn't have the money that the NFL and MLB have, so when one of its strongest (financially) franchises (Detroit) speaks, the NHL listens.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 10/09/2009
photo

"Teams have left the US for Canada, although not many."
EH?
Fact 33% of Canadian teams left Canada ( 3 out of 9).
This is A LOT!
Not to mention most of the talent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 10/09/2009
- wizegeye I'm a Fan of wizegeye 36 fans permalink
photo

I didn't say anything about how many teams left Canada, so I wasn't disagreeing with the author. I was only pointing out that occasionally, it does happen the other way. There also have been US teams from the north that have moved south (e.g., Hartford to Carolina). The problem is that the revenue an owner can earn from a US city is often times more than the revenue generated in a Canadien city. My point was that the moves aren't meant to slight Canada, which definitely has some of the most rabid hockey fans in the world, but are based on economics.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 10/09/2009
- expatwing I'm a Fan of expatwing 6 fans permalink

I'm pretty sure Bettman isn't worrying about taking fans away from the Red Wings - he hates us!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 10/10/2009
- Nominy I'm a Fan of Nominy 5 fans permalink

Canada should start its own Major League and tell the NHL to piss off

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 AM on 10/09/2009
- wizegeye I'm a Fan of wizegeye 36 fans permalink
photo

The players would still come to the NHL. The Canadien teams cannot produce the revenue to support the current salaries of most NHL players. The decision-making regarding the location of NHL teams is an economic one, not a slight against Canada.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 10/09/2009
- S1m0n I'm a Fan of S1m0n 103 fans permalink
photo

We did. It's the NHL. They took our cup, too. It was donated in 1892 by Lord Stanley, the then Governor General of Canada, to be awarded annually to Canada's top amateur hockey club, and to be called the Dominion Hockey Challenge Cup*.

*Canada then being officially "the Dominion of Canada". Dominion was an impressive-sounding but vague title taken from the book of Genesis, where God awards Adam 'dominion' over the animals.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 10/09/2009
photo

Not a big hockey fan, but I never understood the idea of putting teams where the only ice comes out of the refrigerator or the chest at the convenience store. The people down there couldn't care less about the sport. Florida? Phoenix? Dallas? You're kidding me, right?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 10/09/2009
- wizegeye I'm a Fan of wizegeye 36 fans permalink
photo

There are a lot of snowbirds and northern transplants in cities like Phoenix, Dallas, Tampa and Miami. The vast majority of the fans who attend the games in these cities are originally from northeast and midwest cities.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 10/09/2009
photo

Sure, but they don't seem to take any love of the game with them, or being snowbirds, they never liked the game in the first place.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 10/09/2009
- hilaritee I'm a Fan of hilaritee 8 fans permalink

the GTA (greater toronto area) has grown exponentially in the last 20 years, so much so that the idea that a team in Hamilton would hurt revenue for the leafs is absurd. the corporations who seemingly own 75% of all leafs tickets, will continue to pay for those season tickets no matter what. the hamilton team could have satisfied the average joe fans who can never score leafs tickets. the buffalo sabres organization, which is much farther than hamilton from toronto, benefit regularly from the sale of tickets to frustrated canadian fans who do not have any hope of acquiring leafs tickets. the nhl shoudl be ashamed for its lack of appreciation for the dedicated hockey fans of canada. that is not to say that hockey isnt appreciated in the us in many places, buffalo included. the sabres are revered in buffalo and look at washington, those caps fans are hockey crazy. anti- trust might be the only way to go...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 10/09/2009
- ljkcan I'm a Fan of ljkcan 29 fans permalink

118 miles Hamilton to Toronto. 113 miles Hamilton to Buffalo. I have lived in Toronto for over 28 years and yet have not gone to a game since I moved from Montreal. Once a habs fan always a habs fan.

I think between the salaries and the strikes which of course raise the ticket prices how many can afford season tickets anymore?. Yet it is the one thing most Canadians love unless you like curling. It also has the two things that make any ice game good. Ice and beer

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 10/09/2009
- S1m0n I'm a Fan of S1m0n 103 fans permalink
photo

The existance of a local veto right was strongly denied by the league in discovery for this suit. If it exists after all, not only does the league have anti-trust trouble, they will also be guilty of perjury. Balsillie would be able to sue for all the profit he would have made in Hamilton if the league hadn't perjured itself, and the present owner would be able to sue the league for the 100 million or so difference between Balsillie's offer and the league's counter offer to buy the team at for a substantially lower price.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 10/09/2009
- Squeezer55 I'm a Fan of Squeezer55 9 fans permalink
photo

I think Saskatchewan deserves a team. In the early 80's, Bill Hunter tried to bring the then financially precarious St. Louis Blues to Saskatoon . Even tough they showed over 15,000 preseason tickets sold, the NHL turned down the move. It's a shame because the football Saskatchewan Roughriders will get fans and buses from Prince Alberta north (6 hours away) and Lloydminister west ( 6 hours away). They sell more fan / team products than the entire league combined.
The NHL under Bettman would rather put a team in a place like ....Hannibal, Missouri or Crawdad, Louisiana, than in Canada. Commissioner Gary Bettman is the King of A-holes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 AM on 10/09/2009
- expatwing I'm a Fan of expatwing 6 fans permalink

faved! Bettman sucks!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 10/10/2009
- up420oz I'm a Fan of up420oz 28 fans permalink
photo

bettman, hope you get anual cancer, as that what you have been to us!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 10/11/2009
- OneTop I'm a Fan of OneTop 95 fans permalink
photo

The NHL isn't interested in the Canadian market. There is nothing to be argued about that point.

Without question a team in Hamilton or K/W would be a sold out mega success. In a league that has had a lot of questionable / insolvent owners it defies logic that they would exclude a guy like Balsillie.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 10/08/2009
- Destin I'm a Fan of Destin 55 fans permalink
photo

I'm still mad about my Atlanta Flames. Just when they get good and star players and everything going their way, nearly getting to the Cup in their last year in Atlanta, only to be sold by the owners and team moved to Calgary where the Calgary Flames proceeded to dominate hockey and the Cup for a few years. Oh what could have been.

I don't have the Canadians over that. I hate the American businessmen over that. GRRRR. How often do we have to see this process repeat? Look at the joke of the Florida Marlins in 1997. I'm sure Mr. Baseball Commissioner still has the receipt for that World Series, seeing as how it was bought outright.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 10/08/2009
- OneTop I'm a Fan of OneTop 95 fans permalink
photo

I agree with you whole heartily.

The same thing happened when Quebec city was moved to Colorado

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 10/08/2009
- 11907281 I'm a Fan of 11907281 15 fans permalink
photo

The difference being they won the cup their fist year in Colorado, I felt for the people of QC.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 10/09/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 325 fans permalink
photo

Winnipeg is a city of 700,000. Why is the NHL so opposed to a franchise there, I don't get it.
I can understand some of the concerns with Hamilton because it's only 45 miles from Toronto, but they at one time had five franchises (New Jersey, the Islanders, the Rangers, the Whalers and the Bruins) within about 200 miles of each other, so that explanation doesn't completely hold water with me, either.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 10/08/2009

If the NHL thought they could put a team in Hamilton without inviting a massive legal battle with the Leafs, they'd do it in a heartbeat. They admitted the team would be worth a hell of a lot more in Hamilton than it is in Phoenix; there is no question it would be financially successful. Apart from the Leafs' threat (and maybe the Sabres') there is no sound business reason to not pursue that.

I don't know why the NHL doesn't make the case that a Leafs' veto -- which the League claims the team does not have -- really is a violation of anti-trust laws. The Leafs' legal threat would evaporate, and the NHL could get the money-hemorrhaging Coyotes out of the desert and into a market where they would actually sell tickets.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 10/08/2009
photo

Maybe NHL can make a rule. No snow in the winter-- no hockey.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 10/08/2009
- PepeLepew I'm a Fan of PepeLepew 325 fans permalink
photo

It doesn't snow a lot in Vancouver!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 10/08/2009
- alysheba 3 I'm a Fan of alysheba 3 50 fans permalink

That's okay, we can get rid of the Canucks. (I grew up and again live in BC, and grew up with 4 Canuck fans in the house. Me I like the Habs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 10/08/2009
photo

Yes, true. But least it snows in Whistler. Close enough.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 10/09/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect