Pamela Anderson Enlists Little Girl To Carry Train Of Revealing Dress (PHOTOS)

Would you allow your young daughter to carry the train of Pamela Anderson's barely-there dress? Sharon Gault, Pam's makeup artist, did Sunday night at the 6th Annual Hollywood Style Awards Sunday night.

Here are some pics of Little Adelaide and Pam kicking off LA Fashion Week with photographer David LaChapelle.

PHOTOS:

• • • •

Get HuffPost Entertainment On Facebook and Twitter!

Comments

[fartuleques]

remember when she was hot? http://www.actressscene.com/2008/12/pamela-anderson-in-raw-justice.html

[Deadra Martin]

hot mess! train wreck.

[KataVideo]

'Can't decide if the poor kid's in danger of catching a social disease or getting a contact high.
And picture 4 could not be any creepier.

[wagadog]

Perhaps she should have enlisted a competent dressmaker first?

[marcain]

It must bother her she doesn't get the press she once did. Even in her prime I wasn't attracted to her even though she was attractive in that porny way. An average looking latina is better looking to me.

[Aitch5]

well you rock then dude!!!

[olddognewtrick]

Aye Carumba! What a big caboose!

[kissmygrits]

Gross.

[audadvnc]

Yeah, Pam's been through the mill multiple times, but is still incredibly sexy! Go Pam!

[bynddrvn5]

"Hey, my mommy said I could play with a life sized plastic Barbie doll, and this is what I got?"

[rbryanh]

They should swap outfits. The little girl could have fun being randomly swathed in pink satin bedding, and seeing less of Anderson's butchered meat would make nice change.

It's always nice, though, to see children behaving with taste and dignity despite the pathetic antics of their doomed elders.

[ywcachieve]

The child does not look happy about it, at all.

[Piratefish]

Pam Anderson is not hot at all.

[StarDagger]

It is really cute, and the little girl will grow up and know how to dress sexily (if she is lucky enough to have a playboy playmates body, hehe)

[Patricia Harbeck]

That "little girl" is not horrified, and her mother is a very, very sweet and loving person, whom I've known for twenty years or more and all of you guys and your "comments" are what's horrifying. Adelaide is far from abused, and most of you all have never worked a day in the "industry" so you know zippo about what you are "talking" about, and publicly bashing a "little girl" is childish and abusive itself and putting it in print no less, is classless.­..........­......Ther­e are allot worse things a child could be doing on a Sunday night than holding a "train" for a dress worn by Ms. Anderson. Probably none of you know what it's like, but when flashbulbs are going off, and paparazzi are screaming "Pamela, Pamela" so they can get the "money shot" can make anybody look stunned...­......"the girl" is not treated poorly I can assure you. In fact, in her short life, she's traveled, met with, been to, some of the most amazing and beautiful places, y'all will never go!!! So, blast on losers!!!

[marred]

Aw poor baby :) Geezus you fashion drama queens can get upset easily can't you? Don't worry I'm sure there's a horribly dressed, insincere, superficial shoulder you can go cry on :)

[GroundZeroHuman]

Patricia: "In fact, in her short life, she's traveled, met with, been to, some of the most amazing and beautiful places, y'all will never go!!! So, blast on losers"!!!

Wow Patricia, that's why we log on and read the Huffington Post, to be able to see places us ordinary folk will never get to see, you are so right. Free speech seems limited here, I think we all should just go somewhere else. We are all "losers", not worthy of Patricia Harbeck. I was going to agree with the poster who said that the little girl was nicely behaved, and she looks beautiful in her dress, I dare say she quite outshines Ms. Anderson. Anyway, this "loser" is g-o-n-e to share this with many, many of my ordinary, everyday friends. Ciao*~

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/12/pamela-anderson-enlists-l_n_317499.html

[Patricia Harbeck]

wow, groundzerohuman about sums it up, and hiding behind a fake name also equivocally ballsy of yourself, at least I can put my NAME behind it........­.....speak­ing of sincere, you wouldn't know sincere if it slapped you in the face......­......leav­e the human part off and just call yourself like you see it, ground zero.........some people just can't STAND the success of other's who put themselves out on a ledge a bit, sometimes it works, other times it doesn't, but you're probably too shy or would have such stagefright i mean you can't even put your real name behind your comments......how funny is that? ......i'd like to see you walk a red carpet in any dress without looking shellshocked, nor would you have the guts to subject yourself to other's critiques, especially coming from nitwits that which whom know nothing about the subject of what they are ranting...­......what a dork. the "little girl" is 10, not 2, is at work WITH her mum instead of with a babysitter, in the middle of the afternoon, probably two or three o'clock, oh wow, how abusive that is.......pluheeeez

[Feanor]

Spot on. there's nothing at all wrong with this. Although I don't care for the dress.

[sunnybunny]

I'm with you. I love to see Pam getting into fashion. She was pregnant at the same time as me and I can remember looking at the photos of her to try to figure out what to wear and still look like a cool rock chick not a frumpy sunday school teacher while prego (loved the look with the spandex and the big cut up motley crue shirts - worked great for me too).But I'm really kind of disappointed in the clothes she's coming out with lately.Come on Pam. Get some cooler clothes to model. As for the kid, kids seem to love that sort of thing especially girls, why so uptight?

[oceanofconsciousness]

What, she can't carry her own diaper?

[mbroo]

That's exaclty what it looks like a large pink diaper.