iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

One Company Responsible For Nearly Half Of All Permanent Mortgage Modifications

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:20 PM ET

Mortgage

Nearly half of the permanent home loan modifications under the government's plan to help troubled borrowers come from a single company that handles less than three percent of the eligible mortgages.

Ocwen Financial declared Monday that it was responsible for 45 percent of the 1,711 modifications that have become permanent after a three-month trial period under the Obama administration's $75 billion foreclosure prevention plan.

The rest of the mortgage servicers enrolled in the government's Making Home Affordable program -- including multi-billion dollar bailout recipients Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup -- converted just 948 trial modifications into permanent ones.

More than 72 percent of Ocwen's 1,058 borrowers who went through the trial process received a permanent reduction in monthly mortgage payments, the company says. The average for all servicers stood at a paltry 1.26 percent, according to a recent Congressional watchdog's report. Ocwen noticed its high conversion rate after being contacted by the Huffington Post.

For a company that has been dogged by allegations of improper conduct towards borrowers, the news is one of the few bright spots to emerge from an otherwise dreary report by the Congressional Oversight Panel (COP), the Elizabeth Warren-led body created last year to watch over the bailout.

"The crisis has made them look good," says Alan White, a law professor at Valparaiso University who has written extensively on mortgages and foreclosures. "[Ocwen] seems to have gotten ahead of the curve."

Meanwhile, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo declined to reveal the number of trial home loan modifications under the government's program that have become permanent; Bank of America didn't respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

White suggests that the banks are reluctant to reveal the data because the number is embarrassingly low. He adds that the Treasury Department "should start firing the under-performing servicers and bidding their work out to the successful companies."

Based on company-provided figures, Ocwen appears to fall into that select group. Thus far, most of its temporary modifications are becoming permanent. And the rate at which its modified loans redefault after six months -- 24 percent -- is nearly half the rate of the entire industry, according to a report released by federal regulators last month.

But COP cautions that the permanent figures are "very preliminary." A spokeswoman for Treasury, Meg Reilly, says the sample size is not large enough to draw conclusions regarding conversion rates, since more than 95 percent of trial modifications have yet to reach the deadline for converting to final modifications, she adds.

Here's why: Permanent modifications under Obama's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) first go through a three-month trial period. Since the COP and Ocwen figures are as of Sept. 1, that means that those permanent modifications entered the trial phase back in April and May. As of the end of May, 50,130 borrowers were in trial plans (there are now 500,000). The low number of permanent modifications is partly due to the fact that "the initial volume of HAMP trial modifications was quite low," the COP noted in its report.

Even at this preliminary stage, the low number of permanent modifications is still shockingly low. Warren's panel said it is "concerned about the low rate of conversion from trial to permanent modifications." Unless the rate increases "substantially... HAMP will come nowhere close to keeping up with foreclosures."

The panel's report discusses possible reasons behind the low conversion rate, including data reporting issues and the failure of borrowers to comply with the program, like making timely payments. One issue stands out: "the difficulties servicers have in assembling completed documentation on modifications commenced on a 'verbal' or 'no-doc' basis."

As the report points out, Treasury permits servicers to rely on a borrower's stated income in order to get them into a trial program. Full documentation is required for a permanent adjustment, but for those first three months a borrower doesn't need to prove income or debt levels, an ominous parallel to the lack of vetting applied to many mortgage borrowers during the housing boom.

Ocwen is different, says Paul Koches, general counsel and an executive vice president at the firm. The Florida-based mortgage servicer requires all documentation to be in place before putting a borrower in a trial modification, Koches says. It also requires the first month's payment (rather than setting up the plan, and then collecting modified payments for the next three months).

"We trust but verify. We don't do trial modifications until we're locked and loaded," Koches says.

The documentation requirement helps explain the firm's high conversion rate. Koches adds that it also is one of the main reasons behind their borrowers' comparatively low redefault rate. Having the paperwork in place before the trial plan starts also helps account for why so few of the firm's loans have been accepted into the trial program.

The firm views the Obama plan as a way to make money: Ocwen says modifications under the government's plan will generate more revenue for the firm than non-government-backed modifications, according to its latest quarterly filing with federal regulators. Servicers get a bonus when a borrower's trial plan becomes permanent, then additional bonuses during the next few years if the borrower stays in the program. And as more trial modifications become permanent in the next few months, Ocwen expects even higher revenues.

Since government-backed modifications are part of the Obama administration's $75 billion foreclosure prevention plan, Ocwen could get as much as $656 million from taxpayers for its modification efforts.

White of Valparaiso University adds that the firm, in contrast with its bigger competitors, may have already had the internal systems in place to turn temporary modifications into permanent ones. Ocwen specializes in subprime mortgages -- about 85 percent of the 300,000 loans it services are subprime -- which traditionally have higher delinquency and foreclosure rates. Because of that, the firm may have had experience in modifying loans, thus it was better prepared when the housing bubble burst.

Big banks like Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, though, aren't used to modifying loans, White says, so now they're struggling to keep up. However, he adds, the housing bubble burst two years ago; the banks should have been at least partly ready for the onslaught of delinquent mortgages and loan modification requests.

White also brings up an interesting statistic. He looks at the 1,711 permanent modifications as mortgage loans that entered the trial phase by the end of May. At that point, there were 50,130 trial modifications. So according to White, a little more than three percent of trial modifications became permanent.

(Treasury and COP note that many of those temporary modifications may be in process of getting paperwork submitted in order for them to achieve permanent status. Treasury granted a two-month extension -- on top of the three-month trial -- for borrowers and servicers to get their documentation ready.)

Taking out Ocwen's numbers, the rest of the servicers in Obama's plan were responsible for just 948 permanent adjustments out of 49,072 trial modifications, or a temporary-to-permanent conversion rate of less than two percent.

Elizabeth Warren's panel said that permanent modifications that do not redefault will be key to preventing foreclosures -- HAMP's only goal. To make the point, the panel's report noted that in August there were more trial modifications than completed foreclosure sales.

"While this is cause for some measured optimism," the panel cautioned, "unless August trial modifications convert to permanent modifications at a rate of 80 percent, a far cry from current conversion rates, permanent modifications will not keep pace with completed foreclosure sales."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Nearly half of the permanent home loan modifications under the government's plan to help troubled borrowers come from a single company that handles less than three percent of the eligible mortgages. ...
Nearly half of the permanent home loan modifications under the government's plan to help troubled borrowers come from a single company that handles less than three percent of the eligible mortgages. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 139
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
07:36 PM on 01/13/2010
I find it ironic that Warren's panel is overseeing a process that results in homeowners paying a substantially higher percentage of their income on housing than she suggests in her own book.
10:49 PM on 10/20/2009
Hah Tompoe - yes it is tokenism.

Zombeck wrote a rebuttal:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-zombeck/ocwen-bank-fun-with-numbe_b_327298.html
02:10 PM on 10/18/2009
These numbers give new meaning to the term, tokenism. Utterly disgusting.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
01:04 PM on 10/16/2009
One day America woke up and realized that Business had overthrown their government and that democracy had been replaced by corporatism...

Makes a good first line for an unfortunately fictional novel, doesn't it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:28 PM on 10/15/2009
I guess me and five rescued dogs are next. I've was laid-off for almost a year and the only job I could find pays 36% of what I made, $1600/mo. with a $1100/mo. mortgage payment. The value of the house has dropped just below what I owe. Savings, assets of value, all gone.

Regardless of what happens, I refuse to abandon the dogs. We might end under a bridge or a tipi in the middle of nowhere, but we'll be together.

This not the hope and change I was dreaming of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eaglett1111
03:08 PM on 10/15/2009
It's absolutely ridiculous to say that trial mods don't require homeowners to verify income. I have been working with Chase - if you can call it that - for nine months and they have at least 5 copies of every paystub I have this year, my last two years taxes, a 4506T that allows them to find out if the IRS thinks I'm cheating on my taxes, my income and expense sheets, my homowners insurance, property insurance, a statement saying I have no HOmeowners insurance association dues, hardship statements - you name it. 9 months. No trial mod yet. I am finally in default so maybe now I'll get their attention. I am trying everything I can. I cannot tell you the number of times my paperwork have been lost, or new people I've talked with. It's homegrown terrorism if you ask me.
02:10 PM on 10/15/2009
hat tip to; http://bit.ly/1NkbAn
02:10 PM on 10/15/2009
Everyday the middle class get g0uged through stealth inflation

banks keep reporting blowout earnings while everyone muddles along
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Aim high, allow for the wind, land on target.
02:08 PM on 10/15/2009
Incorrect Buzz Word's we fell for/
To big to fail.
Enough blame to go around.
No buyer for lehman Bros.
we dont know the value of the toxic assets.
Don't ask don't tell what we do with 750 billion.
People did not read the contract.
Ajustable rate ballon comes due if market changes without notice.
No documentation loan.
No job prequalificaation.
Fanny and Freddymac rules were 28% of income was the cut off for the Mortgage payment.
Mortgage insurance, what was that.
It seems to me a Plane hitting the World Trade Center is equevilent to Letting lehman Brothers go down The consequences were the same . A World Financial meltdown or a World terror castraphtropyy.One being symbolic to stop a General Election and the other to justify and finance a unjust war .
The financial wizards premeditated the raid on the tax peyers dollars .
To big to fail was a buzz word. Heads must roll It's clear to me this was a premeditated strike to transfer wealth and create 400 billionaires. Bush played us we lost everything . They just stopped making so much.
01:42 PM on 10/15/2009
I doubt that Ocwen really did all the things right... too many people in their service... it's so surprising!

Regards,
tony
http://www.foreclosurelistings.com/
12:57 PM on 10/15/2009
Thomas Jefferson once said:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private BANKS to control the issue of currency, the BANKS and CORPORATIONS that will grow around them will deprive the people of their property until their CHILDREN wake up HOMELESS on the continent that their fathers Conquered"

Here we are.
REVOLUTION. Revolt or expect more.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
02:01 PM on 10/15/2009
Where do I sign up?
12:44 PM on 10/15/2009
Sad to see so many people in over their heads. Banks should lower interest rates to 0% to 1% when possible. If the people can't afford that they are out of luck.
pissedmichael
The name was an accident, please excuse
11:30 AM on 10/15/2009
Are we really that surprised? An industry that has managed to come up with increasingly creative ways to separate us commoners from our money for thousands of years--suddenly finds that it is rocket science to give some back? Please.
10:42 AM on 10/15/2009
Economy is suffering big time. Ignore the cheerleaders.

good articles; http://bit.ly/1NkbAn

A person making 60,000 pays 20,000 of it in various taxes. A person making a million or more has a tax rate of 30% compared to 90% decades ago.
09:22 AM on 10/15/2009
If it's Ocwen doing half the mortgage modifications I would watch out because Ocwen is the worst something is fishy.
09:47 AM on 10/15/2009
The "worst" doesn't even begin to describe it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-zombeck/deck-stacked-against-home_b_321232.html