Czar Blocks Bank Of America Chief's Pay

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Czar Blocks Bank Of America Chief's Pay stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

STEVENSON JACOBS and VINNEE TONG | 10/15/09 11:20 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?

NEW YORK — Capping a year in which he faced shareholder fury, regulatory scrutiny and was stripped of his chairman post, outgoing Bank of America Corp. CEO Ken Lewis will get no salary or bonus for 2009 under an agreement with the government's pay czar.

Kenneth Feinberg, the U.S. Treasury Department's special master for compensation who is scrutinizing pay packages at bailed-out banks, suggested that Lewis should get no pay for the year. Lewis agreed, Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler said Thursday.

In fact, Lewis will pay back about $1 million he has received so far out of a $1.5 million annual salary.

"He will write a check to the company," Stickler said, adding that Lewis agreed to the proposal because he felt it was not in the bank's best interest "to get into a dispute with the paymaster."

The clawback provision doesn't apply to Lewis' previously negotiated retirement package, estimated to be worth tens of millions of dollars.

Wall Street has been eagerly awaiting Feinberg's decisions about pay for 75 of the highest-earning executives at seven firms that got the most taxpayer money. Other companies under Feinberg's scrutiny include American International Group Inc., General Motors, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.

Treasury spokesman Andrew Williams declined to comment on Lewis' compensation, saying only that Feinberg would seek to "strike the right balance" in setting pay for top executives of firms that received significant government help.

Many had expected that Feinberg would seek to curb compensation levels. But now that Feinberg has set a precedent for a clawback in pay, eyes will turn to the fate of other Wall Street CEOs, such as Vikram Pandit, whose Citigroup Inc. also has received $45 billion in bailout aid.

Story continues below
advertisement

"The government is proving they are serious about taking money back for poor performance," said Richard Bove, an analyst with Rochdale Securities, in an interview Thursday evening.

Mark Williams, a finance professor at Boston University and a former Fed examiner, expects that Citigroup and Wells Fargo & Co. executives could also see similar requests from Feinberg.

"It would be inconsistent not to," he said in an interview Thursday.

A Citigroup spokesman declined to comment.

Williams said that as Wall Street earnings improve, there is going to be more pressure on the executives making decisions about how the money will be spent.

"The big discussion is really between those who say we need to focus on retaining talent and attracting top people to help us turn around, and those who think the profits should be used to restore capital that has been eroded through years of excessive risk-taking," he said. "Even whether or not to continue to pay dividends to shareholders will be a question for these banks for some time."

Lewis, 62, hastily announced last month that he will step down as CEO by Dec. 31, ending a tumultuous year in which BofA has faced accusations it misled shareholders about its acquisition of the investment bank Merrill Lynch & Co.

BofA had no successor in place, leading many to think that his quick exit had surprised the board. It has said a replacement would be chosen before Lewis leaves.

The Merrill deal is being investigated by both the Securities and Exchange Commission and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. The AG's office is trying to determine whether BofA misled shareholders about $3.6 billion in bonuses paid to Merrill employees and the investment bank's mortgage lending losses, as well as whether BofA failed to tell shareholders that it considered backing out of the deal before it closed on Jan. 1.

Lewis was first hired as a credit analyst in 1969 at North Carolina National Bank, in Charlotte, N.C. That bank was a predecessor of NationsBank and later Bank of America. He moved through various positions until he was named CEO of Bank of America in April 2001 and also served as chairman until angry shareholders removed him from that post earlier this year.

Bank of America is slated to report its quarterly earnings on Friday before the market opens. Investors will likely be looking at the company's charge-off rate, or the percentage of debt it does not expect to be repaid. Bank of America, like other lenders, has seen more customers stop making their monthly payments as the recession deepens.

Bove said that while the Merrill acquisition was a "brilliant stroke that will benefit the bank," BofA has suffered significant loan losses due to "horrendous underwriting policies." He estimates the bank could post losses on $55 billion worth of bad loans this year.

But he expects Merrill Lynch's operations could contribute $1.6 billion to BofA's third-quarter profit, which could even mean the difference between the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank reporting a profit instead of a loss.

____

Vinnee Tong in San Francisco contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — Capping a year in which he faced shareholder fury, regulatory scrutiny and was stripped of his chairman post, outgoing Bank of America Corp. CEO Ken Lewis will get no salary or bonus for ...
NEW YORK — Capping a year in which he faced shareholder fury, regulatory scrutiny and was stripped of his chairman post, outgoing Bank of America Corp. CEO Ken Lewis will get no salary or bonus for ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
228
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

More work needs to be done to ensure equality in America so we can all life the American dream, instead of wall street

hat tip to: http://tiny.cc/financenews

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 10/17/2009
photo

put up a poster in your neighborhood to show your displeasure with the financial crisis: http://www.scribd.com/doc/21140663/wallst

"wall street is at war with america"
everyone who has seen it loves it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 10/17/2009

I have been trying to call the White house comment line for 3 days & all i get is a busy signal. they need to cap all bonuses from every company that recieved taxpayer bailouts until every penny of the tarp money has been repaid! Banks & AIG etc...are planning on paying out 140 billion in bonuses this year.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 10/16/2009
- RJII I'm a Fan of RJII 77 fans permalink
photo

ditto. afterward, people should take their business elsewhere

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 10/17/2009
photo

I wonder if he will keep his retirement package safe and sound in BofA or will he whisk it away in some off shore account so no tax's will be able to touch it. If the Czar were serious about this the loopholes would be closed by now and off shore accounts for these rich corporate crooks would be illegal. This million is just to appease us, and its going back to the bank which rips off people everyday.
At least put the money into a fund that helps stop foreclosures that is completely independent of the banks.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 10/16/2009

I am confused with the headline. I thought 'czar' was supposed to be a skewed term for these positions. Is this supposed to be ironic and turn the word on its creators?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 10/16/2009
photo

Wait this is a little confusing, Lewis was not there when the mess started had nothing to do with the existing pay or bonuses that were in place. Working for Free, his choice does not have to take the job. But then he is leaving and you expect the next guy to do the same? And when or how does it end? Who would want the job in the first place?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 10/16/2009

Unemployment still out of control and unfortunately we do not have anything that even
resembles a jobs plan from our wonderful leaders. Bailouts, tarp, health plans but no jobs.

hat tip to: http://tiny.cc/financenews

If this is change we can believe in, count me out in 2012

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 10/16/2009
- Chris I'm a Fan of Chris 11 fans permalink

Is the govenrment going to pay back the withholding taxes?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 10/16/2009
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

perhaps he has to claim it back... by tax filing...

do you know of any story that government pays back withholding taxes without tax returns?

we like to hear it...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 10/16/2009
- vlm1948 I'm a Fan of vlm1948 8 fans permalink

I can't believe that anyone would equate these failures with top talent needing to be retained. Only in America.We­lfare for the rich.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 10/16/2009
photo

Making money "the old fashioned way (earning it)" is just so ... clumsy.

/sarcasm

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 10/16/2009
- JohnIII I'm a Fan of JohnIII 8 fans permalink

I'm not sure I understand retaining "talent" argument. I may be over simplifying but how much "talent" does it take to be greedy?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 10/16/2009

NOW ... GO AFTER GOLDMAN

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 10/16/2009
- gespenster I'm a Fan of gespenster 8 fans permalink
photo

So many Czars and proponents of Mao Tse-Tung philosophy (e.g. VJ and Communications Director Anita Dunn's latest Video proclaiming him as her "Go to" philosopher) in this administration - that along with government intrusion and takeover of several industries­...

If I didn't know better... I'd say....NAA­HHH, what are the chances.

(But then again he DID say "CHANGE.."­)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 10/16/2009
- cybexg I'm a Fan of cybexg 27 fans permalink

percent emtpy rhetoric = 100%
percent fact or reason = 0%

Number of sites, references, peer reviewed articles listed, = 0

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 10/16/2009
- rain33 I'm a Fan of rain33 23 fans permalink
photo

wahahahahaha they should have never given them money in the first place. that was the october surprise that bush did before leaving office! thanks alot congress!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 10/16/2009
photo

Logic totaly escapes these people.
These instruments are too complex. = Make them simpler.
We need people who understand them. = Make them soo simple an high schooler could follow them.
Seriously! WTF!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 10/16/2009
- hoopesaz I'm a Fan of hoopesaz 23 fans permalink

People respond to incentives. To tell a CEO (or anyone for that matter), "do you best to save a struggling company, and oh, by the way, pay us $1 million for the opportunity to serve"...s­eriously, seriously bad logic. This is revenge trumping reason.

How many of you, having mad some bad moves at work, would stick around for the rest of the year when told you would not be receiving pay, but would in fact need to pay some money back? That would be none of you if you have even an ounce of honestly left in your body.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 10/16/2009
- Josh Seipp I'm a Fan of Josh Seipp 27 fans permalink
photo

If I had millions of dollars already and loved my job, I darn well would stay.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 10/16/2009
- hoopesaz I'm a Fan of hoopesaz 23 fans permalink

Seriously? You think he LOVES his job? He's doing it so as not to run out on hundreds of thousands of his liberal and conservative employees. Not because he loves a daily beating from people who have 1% of the facts.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 10/16/2009
- kathy001 I'm a Fan of kathy001 78 fans permalink

Yeah, they're doing their best to save those struggling companies, all right. But they're saving the companies by shafting the customers. That's not really a long-term solution for good corporate health.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 10/16/2009
- cybexg I'm a Fan of cybexg 27 fans permalink

I've worked at various levels, including doing business strategy for some of largest corporations in the world.

In my experience, most top level executives do NOT do their job, have survived and prospered through politics, and in no way are able to justify their salaries.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 10/16/2009
- vlm1948 I'm a Fan of vlm1948 8 fans permalink

Totally agree, b**t kissers rise to the top.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 10/16/2009
- gallonjug I'm a Fan of gallonjug 6 fans permalink

Guess you didn't read ths paragraph:

The clawback provision doesn't apply to Lewis' previously negotiated retirement package, estimated to be worth tens of millions of dollars.

Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/czar-blocks-bank-of-ameri_n_323137.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 10/16/2009

If it is an incentive, then we need to ask whether or not it worked. BoA just posted losses of over a billion dollars. I'd have to say that he's done a piss-poor job and doesn't deserve his pay.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 10/16/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect