Military Reverses Ban On Afghanistan Soldier Death Photos

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Military Reverses Ban On Afghanistan Soldier Death Photos stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID BAUDER | 10/16/09 05:56 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Afghanistan Soldier

NEW YORK — Military leaders in Afghanistan have backed off an attempt to ban news organizations embedded with the Army from photographing or videotaping images of U.S. personnel killed in the war.

But there was still confusion Friday about what photographers will be allowed to capture on the battlefield. The ban put in place by regional commanders at the Bagram Air Field was partly in reaction to a controversy over distribution last month of a photo by The Associated Press showing a U.S. Marine mortally wounded in a grenade attack.

The AP distributed the picture to its members despite pleas by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and against the wishes of the Marine's family in Maine.

Shortly afterward, the Afghanistan regional command changed the rules that reporters and photographers are required to sign before being embedded with a unit. The amended rules stated: "Media will not be allowed to photograph or record video of U.S. personnel killed in action."

The AP photo was one factor in the change, said Maj. Virginia McCabe, a Bagram-based spokeswoman for Regional Command East.

"It's a unique situation when a reporter embeds," she said. "They are given unfettered access to our soldiers. And in doing so, they are going to see things they would not normally see."

News organizations say they try to be respectful in such coverage. But there's a long history of photography that gives citizens the sense of what wartime is really all about, said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

"I'm really concerned about the government deciding what's newsworthy, instead of a news organization deciding what's newsworthy," she said.

Story continues below
advertisement

Maya Alleruzzo, an AP photographer recently assigned to Afghanistan after working in Iraq, found she was prohibited from shooting pictures of damaged vehicles, wounded soldiers without their permission and soldiers who were killed in action.

"I felt like I was welcome to cover everything else but the war," she said.

After news organizations protested the amended rule, the Pentagon suggested a rewrite. The new rule released Thursday would allow photography of casualties but said participating news organizations could not use material where there is a recognizable face or other identifiable feature. Journalists could not write about or photograph wounded troops unless those service members give prior permission.

Prior to the AP's controversial photo in September, news organizations had much more leeway to publish photos of the dead as soon as the next of kin had been notified – even though much less of this material has been shown during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars than in past conflicts.

The Pentagon intervened to tell the field commanders that the complete ban on images was too restrictive, but stopped short of ordering a rewrite. Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the second version still does not give news organizations enough freedom. "Only about half my concerns were resolved," he said.

Whitman said he had asked for a second revision, but none came by the close of business Friday in Afghanistan. Another Pentagon spokesman, Dave Lapan, said field commanders were still reviewing it.

"Any time that you're talking about casualties, the reporting of casualties and imagery of casualties, it's an emotional issue," Whitman said. The Defense Department is chiefly concerned that its rules of embeds preserve operational security and the military's system for giving relatives notice of casualties, he said.

John Daniszewski, AP senior managing editor, said he's still waiting for the outcome of the Pentagon's review.

"We are seeking the freedom to cover the war in Afghanistan and the armed forces so as to provide as much information as possible to the hundreds of millions of people who have a keen interest in developments in the conflict," Daniszewski said.

Dusan Vranic, chief photographer for the AP in Iraq until this month, said restrictions for embeds have gradually grown tighter. The rule that photographers needed permission from soldiers or kin for photos of the wounded basically made it "mission impossible," he said.

A rule that forbid embeds from giving "information on effectiveness of enemy techniques" was also widely used to cleanse images coming from the war, he said.

"If they feel like it, all images you will end up having at the end of the day will be `soldier gives candy,'" Vranic said.

___

AP National Security Writer Anne Gearan and AP Writer Robert H. Reid in Afghanistan contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — Military leaders in Afghanistan have backed off an attempt to ban news organizations embedded with the Army from photographing or videotaping images of U.S. personnel killed in the wa...
NEW YORK — Military leaders in Afghanistan have backed off an attempt to ban news organizations embedded with the Army from photographing or videotaping images of U.S. personnel killed in the wa...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
187
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
photo

Back in 2001, after 9/11, I was working on the archaeology survey of West Point Academy, on parts that had to be cleaned up due to damages to large trees by Hurricane Floyd. I had previously worked on the archaeology of the EPA National Priority site across the river in Cold Spring, NY in the 1990s, where the West Point Foundry was located, and cannon founding, proofing and test firing went on at the west side of the river. Anthrax I recall had appeared in the mails, later to have been found to be from the US Army, and a jetliner crashed into Queens, NY bound for the Dominican Republic, killing all on-board. Security at the Point was more thorough than usual and entrances blocked by large vehicles. Listening to the TV in the small motel the crew stayed in nearby, after work in the former Raritan River flooded Bridgewater, NJ and some testing at a Picatinney Arsenal former rocket assembly facility, I was interested in the report that we were going into Afghanistan, according to Japanese news reporting, to clean-up the airfields that the Russians had left behind, in what my Dad called "Russia's Vietnam". Well eight years later I've yet to see a report on airfields other than that the largest one in Asia is being built there according to DW-TV. Some policy huh? Airfields.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 10/19/2009
- solarian I'm a Fan of solarian 15 fans permalink

my favorite quote the people who started the war will pay with their money and lifes

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 10/19/2009
- solarian I'm a Fan of solarian 15 fans permalink

they don't want you to see what happens when you go to war I would like to see the generals ,pentigon all be on the point but they are safe and sent someone else to die so they can die first

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 AM on 10/19/2009

As someone who hasn't heard from his friends since high school graduation, I worry about the ones that went into the military. I know that many of the military families around here want their privacy, and don't want the press exploiting their dead kids for a story- at least, that's how the families feel. After the loss of their boy or girl, I can see why they would be touche about that sort of thing.

This is a good compromise, because it satisfies the needs of the family while giving the American public the dose of reality it so sorely needs when it comes to war. We almost never see the bodies. We see numbers, and the occaisional homage to the local war hero that died in combat, but that isn't enough.

If only this had come so many years earlier...­imagine how different these wars would be now.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 10/18/2009
- foxisms I'm a Fan of foxisms 105 fans permalink
photo

The duplicity is enough to make one stagger.
It appears perfectly acceptable to send young people to die in a foreign occupation but we're just a little too sensitive for pictures that show what actually happens when we send young people to die in a foreign occupation.
A little sensitivity 8 years ago, and Afghanistan and Iraq would still be "fly overs" for people wanting to get someplace important or tourist worthy.
It's all about cause, effect...c­ause, effect.
You think the Afghanis and the Iraqis have been living a Kodak experience for the last eight years?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 10/18/2009
- foxisms I'm a Fan of foxisms 105 fans permalink
photo

I see the difference now.
It's perfectly acceptable to send our people to die in a foreign occupation but we're just a little too sensitive for pictures that show what actually happens when we send our people to die in a foreign occupation.
A little sensitivity 8 years ago, and we wouldn't even be in Afghanistan or Iraq today and there would be none of the pictures that no one wants to see. Cause, effect. Cause, effect.
You think the Afghanis and the Iraqis are having a Kodak moment to cherish?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 10/18/2009
- foxisms I'm a Fan of foxisms 105 fans permalink
photo

Bot lag. Sorry, a slight variation of this will probably post again.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 10/18/2009
- vinny I'm a Fan of vinny 83 fans permalink
photo

This no doubt resulted from the PBS Frontline documentary showing a soldier get killed and what a clusterF strategy it is to have our kids walking through the bush trying cull out the Taliban.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 10/18/2009
- berrycooda I'm a Fan of berrycooda 24 fans permalink

Showing a badly wounded or dying military person is no different than
taking pictures of a terrible auto or other accident.

The pictures are not shown to protect families.
Many of the times it is for the photog's portfolio of pics and eventually get shown.

There are plenty of pictures in battle zones to show how dastardly the war is without showing any person in agony or torn apart by bombs.
Turn it around and think how you would feel if it were your loved one.
Many of the comments are probably from people who never had anyone in the military during war or in any type of fatal accident.
Why do you think there are closed caskets at funerals..­...
Most people don't need visuals to know that war is hell. Especially if they have empathy for any military person having to be so far from their families and enduring what we hear on news programs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 10/17/2009

We have an all-volunteer military that the American people have forgotten about. I am one of those volunteers, and have been for more than 25 years. I work for the American public, and believe with my whole heart that my employers should have to see the dead and dying young Americans they send into elective war (Iraq) and tragically mis-managed to the point of being un-winnable war (Afghanistan). Photos of our war dead are unfortunately the only way that my employers may someday say "enough" and end this neverending tragedy

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 10/18/2009
- nexxtep54 I'm a Fan of nexxtep54 44 fans permalink

While I agree with your sentiment, it wasn't the American public, or any other public that started this war. It was the last republican administration, and they lied to the American public and the UN to push their agenda. Not only should these photo's be shown, but pics of dead civilians ass well. We don't see much of that. . . just a trailer line in any given article about any given operation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 10/18/2009

Amen. Show 'em the photos. Better yet, bring back the draft -- then the silent majority will have some skin in the game. -- U.S.N., Retired

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 10/18/2009
- foxisms I'm a Fan of foxisms 105 fans permalink
photo

To be honest, I would hope I might have talked some sense into one of my "loved ones" and talked him/her out of participating in either of these occupations we're involved in. Especially in view of the fact that after all these years, still, no one has any idea what the real mission is in either conflict.
I'm going to let the gov't farm my kids for that? I don't think so.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 10/18/2009
- Ifticar2 I'm a Fan of Ifticar2 24 fans permalink
photo

The only propose of the public display of such photos and video is to punish the parents and loved ones of the soldier. The liberal media wants to weaken the military by getting parents and loved ones to stand in the way of their offspring's military careers.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 10/17/2009
- weatherwaxx I'm a Fan of weatherwaxx 259 fans permalink

95% of the "liberal media" is owned by the same 6 corporations that own the GOP. The "liberal media" is a Rovian myth.

Go look up the history of wartime journalism. Some of the most powerful images of war show the COST of war.

Americans don't need to be spoon-fed pablum. War IS ugly. If America is to be a free country, we need to know REALITY.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 10/18/2009
- nexxtep54 I'm a Fan of nexxtep54 44 fans permalink

Ifticar2, By your reasoning all military cemetery's should be closed and Memorial day be canceled lest parents and loved ones of the fallen be punished by the reminded of their loss. If you lose a loved one to battle, you know they didn't pass quietly in their sleep.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 10/18/2009
- mykebee I'm a Fan of mykebee 8 fans permalink

Ifticar2..­.can you see this? It's the one lap to go sign.

Are you really this ignorant? As a society (and mothers and fathers) we have, and DEMAND the right to see how, when and why our sons and daughters died. Preventing the viewing tof he caskets that return from abroad as a result of our governments decisions only strengthens the ability of government to have more return home that way.

Suppression of the vision of truth is a lie. If our government suppresses our ability to view our sons and daughters returning home in caskets they are lying to us and manipulating our feelings and perceptions.

Any government that operates on the basis of manipulating my perception is not a Government of the People, nor a Democracy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 10/18/2009
photo

Isn't YOUR KIND always crying about freedom of speech? The First Amendment covers free speech and the freedom of the press. YOUR KIND sees no problem in saying whatever traitorous slogan they want but somehow showing the real costs of war should be censored. You can't have it both ways in a free society.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 10/18/2009
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 74 fans permalink

Hey ! It's war ! Get over yourselves, military, and stop trying to control reporters.

It's going to be bl oody. It's war. Lift the fog.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 PM on 10/17/2009
- cplKlyde I'm a Fan of cplKlyde 14 fans permalink

Bring the troops home and it wont be an issue

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 10/17/2009
- steeev3 I'm a Fan of steeev3 25 fans permalink
photo

Ahh.. that's better. We got a little to close to reality than some folks can handle. Great work WH, we can finally get back to that other planet where everything is puppies and muffins!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 10/17/2009

There is no reason for us to be in Afghanistan now and there never has been. The only reason we ARE there is to make money for the terror/industrial complex.

We have been duped.

Al Qaeda is a joke. They don't need Afghanistan to do their dirty little tricks.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 10/17/2009
- Fred Hood I'm a Fan of Fred Hood 131 fans permalink
photo

These "military leaders" know if people see the death involved in war they will be less likely to want to fund this waste.... Which is against their wishes and objectives they are "military leaders" no war no glory for them....

END THE WAR NOW TODAY.....­..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 10/17/2009
- redhead61 I'm a Fan of redhead61 67 fans permalink
photo

I agree. This has been done before and they tried to curtail photos to prevent citizens from knowing the truth about the war causalities. Out of sight, out of mind is what the Pentagon wants.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 10/17/2009

The powers that be have a vested interest in not allowing images of the reality of war to be shown to the American public...i­t was the iconic photographs of the Vietnam war that we all remember that added fuel to the fire of the war protests that finally ended the that war...wher­e are the equivalent photos of the two wars our government now wages? Without photographers being allowed to show us these wars the American public is allowed to live in blissful ignorance of what our government does in our name. It's time to let the reporters report.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 10/17/2009
- UncleHomer I'm a Fan of UncleHomer 10 fans permalink

That's why Ronald Reagan changed the free press coverage of war that had been used since the Revolutionary War. They learned their lesson during the Vietnam war. If people REALLY know what's happening they might not support it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 10/17/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect