More

Where The Wild Things Are Wins Box Office

DAVID GERMAIN   10/18/09 09:36 PM ET   AP

Where The Wild Things Are

LOS ANGELES — "Where the Wild Things Are" proved a bigger hit with adult audiences than family crowds as the adaptation of Maurice Sendak's beloved children's book debuted at No. 1 with $32.5 million.

Moviegoers 18 and older accounted for 43 percent of the audience, while parents with children made up 27 percent, according to distributor Warner Bros.

Overture Films earned the No. 2 spot with Jamie Foxx and Gerard Butler's vengeance thriller "Law Abiding Citizen," which debuted with $21.3 million.

Expanding into wider release, Paramount's low-budget horror sensation "Paranormal Activity" moved up to No. 3 with $20.2 million.

Shot for a reported $15,000, "Paranormal Activity" outdid the premiere of Sony's fright flick "The Stepfather," which cost $19 million and played in nearly four times as many theaters but managed just a No. 5 opening with $12.3 million.

The results for "Where the Wild Things Are" matched the intent of director Spike Jonze, who viewed his take as a story about a child, but not necessarily a children's movie.

During production, Jonze had clashed with Warner Bros., which had wanted a more kid-friendly film. The studio gave Jonze more time and money to finish the film and ultimately backed his vision with a huge marketing campaign for "Wild Things."

"I think all sides reached a very happy compromise, and certainly Spike delivered a movie that was so true to the book, yet it generated the emotion that we felt strongly about to bring in our family audience, as well," said Dan Fellman, head of distribution for Warner.

Jonze's adaptation features newcomer Max Records as Sendak's misbehaving young protagonist, a boy who journeys to a make-believe island of monsters torn between hugging him and eating him. The live-action and voice cast includes Catherine Keener, James Gandolfini and Forest Whitaker.

A cheap acquisition at the Slamdance Film Festival, "Paranormal Activity" came out of nowhere, riding online fan buzz to a domestic total of $33.7 million so far. The movie expanded to 760 theaters, up 600 from the previous weekend, and has plenty of room to grow.

Paramount plans to expand the movie to between 1,800 and 2,000 theaters next weekend, then widen its release even farther for Halloween. It will go head-to-head with an established horror franchise as Lionsgate opens "Saw VI" on Friday.

Shot in a raw documentary style, "Paranormal Activity" is a twist on the haunted house story as a couple tries to capture on camera the strange phenomena and apparitions afflicting them.

"Paranormal Activity" might have a shot to duplicate the success of "The Blair Witch Project," a 1999 Sundance Film Festival discovery that rode Internet buzz to a $140 million domestic total.

"When you have a movie playing this well and it has such a broad appeal, it certainly tells you that is a possible outcome," said Rob Moore, vice chairman of Paramount. "I certainly couldn't predict it yet, but nothing with this movie has been predictable so far."

Hollywood had its strongest weekend yet this fall, with overall business at $141 million, up 41 percent from the same weekend last year.

"All the top five movies all did really well. It's kind of exciting to see the box-office get reignited and to see consumers excited about what's available," said Kyle Davies, head of distribution for Overture.

Fans had a good range of choices among horror tales, action, family fare and romantic comedy, including the previous weekend's No. 1 movie, Universal's "Couples Retreat," which slipped to fourth-place with $17.9 million. "Couples Retreat" raised its 10-day total to $63.3 million.

"This is why the fall is such a great time to be not only a studio executive, but a moviegoer. It's really an eclectic mix out there. You don't get this in summer," said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Hollywood.com. Final figures will be released Monday.

1. "Where the Wild Things Are," $32.5 million.

2. "Law Abiding Citizen," $21.3 million.

3. "Paranormal Activity," $20.2 million.

4. "Couples Retreat," $17.9 million.

5. "The Stepfather," $12.3 million.

6. "Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs," $8.1 million.

7. "Zombieland," $7.8 million.

8. "Toy Story" and "Toy Story 2" in 3-D, $3 million.

9. "Surrogates," $1.92 million.

10. "The Invention of Lying," $1.9 million.

___

On the Net:

http://www.hollywood.com/boxoffice

___

Universal Pictures and Focus Features are owned by NBC Universal, a unit of General Electric Co.; Sony Pictures, Sony Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Classics are units of Sony Corp.; Paramount and Paramount Vantage are divisions of Viacom Inc.; Disney's parent is The Walt Disney Co.; Miramax is a division of The Walt Disney Co.; 20th Century Fox, Fox Searchlight Pictures and Fox Atomic are owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros. and New Line are units of Time Warner Inc.; MGM is owned by a consortium of Providence Equity Partners, Texas Pacific Group, Sony Corp., Comcast Corp., DLJ Merchant Banking Partners and Quadrangle Group; Lionsgate is owned by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.; IFC Films is owned by Rainbow Media Holdings, a subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corp.; Rogue Pictures is owned by Relativity Media LLC; Overture Films is a subsidiary of Liberty Media Corp.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

LOS ANGELES — "Where the Wild Things Are" proved a bigger hit with adult audiences than family crowds as the adaptation of Maurice Sendak's beloved children's book debuted at No. 1 with $32.5 mi...
LOS ANGELES — "Where the Wild Things Are" proved a bigger hit with adult audiences than family crowds as the adaptation of Maurice Sendak's beloved children's book debuted at No. 1 with $32.5 mi...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:41 PM on 10/19/2009
The movie was a rorschach test. Everyone who told me it was about the pain of divorce was dealing with the pain of divorce. Someone told me it was dark and lonely, and then she asked why I don't walk down her part of the hallway anymore (note to self....make a wine date). I always thought the book was about setting limits with those whose love controls and consumes you, in favor of a the pure love a good mother gives, including forgiveness. (Note to therapist...book me ASAP). In the opening scenes, a hipster who was frustrated with the sounds the children were making (at the weekend matinee, mind you) yelled, "Shut up the kids." I had to tell my son there were monsters on screen, but a mean guy over there, so stay away. At the end, my son asked (in a whisper) why the mommy was crying. I told him she loves him so much she is just happy he is back, even though he was naughty. He looked up at me and said, "I'll never go away from you, Mom." I'd repeat that experience every day, if I could.
FYI, my older son came home and said, "I didn't really get it. I just like the book better." That is a great lesson for a child to learn, as well.
05:28 PM on 10/19/2009
Where the Wild Things Are was very much worth going to see.
02:51 PM on 10/19/2009
I was amazed at how such a short children's book could turn into a full length motion picture. I just recently read the book for the first time after the movie came out and loved it. I was a slightly surprised by how dark and sad it was but still thought it was beautifully made. Since I hadn't read the book as a child, I got interested in the movie after I read it's reviews on http://www.moviereviewintelligence.com/index.aspx?BID=27&RID=645&CID=0. I couldn't agree more with the critics.
12:14 AM on 10/19/2009
I want to see where the wild things are!!

paranormal activity looks like it would bore me to tears...sorry
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
11:41 PM on 10/18/2009
If this a secret contest to ssee how short a book you can make a feature film out of? Which book had fewer pages, Cat in the Hat or Polar Express.?
11:22 AM on 10/19/2009
Yes, but both of those movies were garbage, whereas Where The Wild Things Are is an amazing work of art.
10:19 PM on 10/18/2009
my three year old daughter loved this movie. i was actually a little surprised. though she loves the book, she's really into the whole "princess" schtick right now. it was really refreshing to see something made for families that didn't have all that candy coating.
photo
brooklyncitizen
Quaerite primum regnum dei
08:45 PM on 10/18/2009
Are producers and writers just plain out of ideas?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jessicadevyn
Do you like Huey Lewis and the News?
08:24 PM on 10/18/2009
I loved the book when I was about 5 but I don't know how I would feel having it as a movie. Does every book need to be made into a movie? Kids need to use their imaginations and learn how to read, two things that movies don't support.
09:06 PM on 10/18/2009
Nonsense.
02:13 AM on 10/19/2009
"Kids need to use their imaginations and learn how to read, two things that movies don't support."

My husband grew up watching movies, like Star Wars, ET, and the Muppet Movie. He was a very creative kid and spent hours writing and making his own little home movies. He went on to do it for a living, and his ability to read and be imaginative was not sacrificed because of his love for film, it was enhanced.

Where the Wild Things are looks great, and it was made with the author's involvement and his blessing.
08:45 PM on 10/19/2009
We came home and my children asked to read the book again. In 24 hours, we've read it 4 times. It had been on the shelf for a year. I think 2 forms of media can compliment one another.
06:10 PM on 10/18/2009
another clinton documentary???

get over it gore!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ericmiami
Liberal with a CCW
05:48 PM on 10/18/2009
My money is part of that opening and I regret I didn't give it to some panhandler who needed a jug of wine. This movie had no redeeming qualities. The popcorn was ok, though.
07:06 AM on 10/19/2009
Wow. It's funny how a work of art can be so beautiful that it moves some people to tears, while others can see "no redeeming qualities".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ericmiami
Liberal with a CCW
07:46 AM on 10/19/2009
It's the Sarah Palin of movies, jerkzilla.
05:29 PM on 10/18/2009
This film made me laugh and cry. You're certainly never too old (or certainly, too young) to be reminded how important empathy is. Kids under 6 may be a bit scared, but the violence in this movie is pretty mild compared to what they're watching on TV. The creatures are so lifelike it's hard to believe their faces are CGI. I'm in total awe of this movie.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Niasia
Tryin to make it in the Nation's Capital
05:24 PM on 10/18/2009
I loved the film but then I am 29 without children.... I really enjoyed it.
03:27 PM on 10/18/2009
and why do we pay some people $20 million a movie?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RachelMc
04:09 PM on 10/18/2009
not each i hope.
05:05 AM on 10/19/2009
Well, because we are willing to pay at least $10.00 a ticket to see a film in the theater and a ridiculous amount of money at the concession stands. Until we stop going to first run theaters paying such high prices, the film industry will continue to expect to receive outrageous salaries for it's stars and production personnel. Simple as that.
02:40 PM on 10/18/2009
Once of the first books I purchased was a copy of Where the Wild Things Are through the Scholastic Book Club at my elementary school. I totally fell in love with that book and had a copy for years until it was lost in a move. I was a little worried about Spike Jonze's interpretation, but I have to see the move really captures the look and essence of the book remarkably well. Even better, I was able to share the movie with my nieces and nephew who also thought it was great.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TimLB
03:30 PM on 10/18/2009
The film was a terrific experience. Highly recommended. Captures the adventure of youth beautifully. And a tremendous performance from 'Max'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RachelMc
04:09 PM on 10/18/2009
oooh yay i was hoping for a positive review from some1
01:30 PM on 10/18/2009
"Where's Michael Moore's much-heralded feat of brilliance? Nowhere in sight, thankfully."

you do know that it's been out almost a month right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
"We don't believe you!" Alright, alright.
08:11 PM on 10/18/2009
Are you talking to anyone specifically?