Ashley Olsen, Isaac Mizrahi, Robin Givhan Discuss The Future of Women's Fashion

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Ashley Olsen, Isaac Mizrahi, Robin Givhan Discuss The Future of Women's Fashion stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Hilary Moss
First Posted: 10-22-09 07:35 AM   |   Updated: 10-22-09 11:51 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Fash

Why do people love to hate fashion? There was a lot of finger pointing in an attempt to answer the age-old question at the 92nd Street Y on Wednesday night. At "The Future of Women's Fashion" discussion moderated by Glamour magazine Editor-in-chief Cindi Leive, Washington Post fashion editor Robin Givhan and designers Isaac Mizrahi and Ashley Olsen tossed around a couple of ideas, including one sports analogy.

"In the U.S. you don't think of fashion in the same category as other forms of visual arts...you don't put it in the same category as painting or sculpture," Givhan explained. "People condescend to fashion because it's a women's industry. No one would ever say that spending thousands of dollars for football season tickets is a waste of time and shallow and ridiculous, but a woman willing to spend $25,000 or $5,000 on a dress is somehow just being pretty."

Her comments were met with a round of applause worthy of a game-winning touchdown and elated gasps from Mizrahi. The assorted audience of high-heeled twentysomethings, aging New York ladies who've seen it all, and even a handful of curious men, were treated to the group's insights on an industry that is arguably out of -- or totally under -- control. The two designers naturally thought things were going sartorially swimmingly.

"I think it's never been a better time for people, for designers and for people buying clothes," Mizrahi said. "Perhaps it's not a good time for greedy people who want to make tons of money...and I think it's great because for years designers and merchants and customer were saying, 'What is this? It's getting out of hand.' And what we're going through now is a real necessity to get us to [an industry] that will actually function."

2009-10-22-92YFutureofFashion4.jpg
Joyce Culver for the 92nd Street Y

Olsen concurred, noting, "There's so much opportunity out there for people my age."

But Givhan, speaking from a shopper's perspective estimated that on a scale of one to ten, the current state of fashion is a three or a four.

"For a long time the fashion industry was kind of just coasting on trendy handbags and trendy shoes. I think this time is really forcing people to rework the whole structure of the fashion industry and a huge part of that is teaching customers what's really valuable," she said.

Story continues below
advertisement

And who better to impart such style lessons than America's own First Lady Michelle Obama? Although Givhan argues against an overarching 'Michelle Obama Effect,' ("No one raced out and bought $2,000 Jason Wu dresses"), she thinks the FLOTUS has set a great example for women over the age of 30:

"She's shown you can incorporate fashion into your life in a way that really works and doesn't make you look silly and that doesn't necessarily negate your IQ." Givhan also mentioned Obama's hand in shifting the female professional uniform from boxy suits to tasteful dresses.

"She's an actual woman. She isn't a tiny size. She isn't a huge size. She's a real size," Mizrahi added.

2009-10-22-92YFutureofFashion14.jpg
Joyce Culver for the 92nd Street Y

However, in the wake of industry blows such as the Ralph Lauren model retouching controversy, is fashion truly ready to embrace a "real-sized" woman? And is that what customers expect to see?

"What has struck me is that for all of the complaining and the blogging about how thin models are no one is not buying clothes from designers who use thin models," Givhan said. "The only thing that has stopped them from buying is the economy, not because they were reacting to the images they were seeing."

Mizrahi agreed: "Fashion advertising is hateful, yet they wouldn't do it if it didn't work."

Givhan did extend a compliment to the fashion magazine business, which she views as trying to help customers find ways to indulge during the recession and celebrating style.

So then what, exactly, is the future of fashion?

"It's going to be more democratic," Givhan said.

"It's going to be less obvious and less visual. More about fetishes. More fetishistic!" Mizrahi exclaimed.

Olsen responded with perhaps the most promising words.

"It's going to be more exciting. And more fun."

Read more about the panel HERE.


Who Is The Ultimate Game Changer In Style? VOTE NOW!

And follow HuffPost Style on Twitter and become a fan of HuffPost Style on Facebookwhile you're at it.

Why do people love to hate fashion? There was a lot of finger pointing in an attempt to answer the age-old question at the 92nd Street Y on Wednesday night. At "The Future of Women's Fashion" discussi...
Why do people love to hate fashion? There was a lot of finger pointing in an attempt to answer the age-old question at the 92nd Street Y on Wednesday night. At "The Future of Women's Fashion" discussi...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Cecelia . I'm a Fan of Cecelia . 2 fans permalink
photo

srsly. a target designer and Michelle from full house.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 10/22/2009

'Can't say I see the value in having an Olsen twin on the panel.

Why didn't they call one of the winners of Project Runway, or several--not all of them have been under 30. And thank god, I might add....opportunity isn't just for teens, 20somethings, or people who acted on lame sitcoms as a child.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 10/22/2009
- lee4713 I'm a Fan of lee4713 3 fans permalink

I've never understood why the Olsen twins are seen as fashion tastemakers and trendsetters. Most of the time they look like unmade beds with unwashed faces (do they ever remove their eye makeup, or just keep slapping it on?).

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 10/22/2009
- ChaiKat I'm a Fan of ChaiKat 7 fans permalink
photo

"No one would ever say that spending thousands of dollars for football season tickets is a waste of time and shallow and ridiculous, but a woman willing to spend $25,000 or $5,000 on a dress is somehow just being pretty."

I beg to differ with Ms. Givhan, but I find spending that kind of money for either ridiculous.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 10/22/2009

hear, hear!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 10/22/2009
photo

I absolutely agree. And if women want designer label fashion, consignment stores are the way to go. I think it makes sense in this economy. $5,000 on a dress? Sheesh!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 10/22/2009
- mairs I'm a Fan of mairs 205 fans permalink
photo

Ashley is commenting on fashion as an outside observer I take it?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 10/22/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect