iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Hate Crimes Bill Approved By Congress, Extends Protection To Gays

JIM ABRAMS   10/22/09 07:00 PM ET   AP

Gay Rights

WASHINGTON — Physical attacks on people based on their sexual orientation will join the list of federal hate crimes in a major expansion of the civil rights-era law Congress approved Thursday and sent to President Barack Obama.

A priority of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., that had been on the congressional agenda for a decade, the measure expands current law to include crimes based on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. The measure is named for Matthew Shepard, the gay Wyoming college student murdered 11 years ago.

To assure its passage after years of frustrated efforts, Democratic supporters attached the measure to a must-pass $680 billion defense policy bill the Senate approved 68-29. The House passed the defense bill earlier this month.

Many Republicans, normally staunch supporters of defense bills, voted against the bill because of the hate crimes provision. All the no votes were Republicans except for Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., who supported the hate crimes provision but opposes what he says is the open-ended military commitment in Afghanistan.

"The inclusion of the controversial language of the hate crimes legislation, which is unrelated to our national defense, is deeply troubling," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.

Hate crimes law enacted after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1968 centered on crimes based on race, color, religion or national origin.

The expansion has long been sought by civil rights and gay rights groups. Conservatives have opposed it, arguing that it creates a special class of victims. They also have been concerned that it could silence clergymen or others opposed to homosexuality on religious or philosophical grounds.

Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay rights group, hailed the bill as "our nation's first major piece of civil rights legislation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Too many in our community have been devastated by hate violence."

Some 45 states have hate crimes statutes, and the bill would not change current practices where hate crimes are generally investigated and prosecuted by state and local officials.

But it does broaden the narrow range of actions – such as attending school or voting – that can trigger federal involvement and allows the federal government to step in if the Justice Department certifies that a state is unwilling or unable to follow through on an alleged hate crime.

The measure also provides federal grants to help state and local governments prosecute hate crimes and funds programs to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles.

"As we learned in the civil rights era, sometimes communities need assistance and resources from the federal government when they have to confront the most emotional and dangerous kinds of crimes," said Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo.

The bill also creates a federal crime to penalize attacks against U.S. service members on account of their service.

Attorney General Eric Holder said nearly 80,000 hate crime incidents have been reported to the FBI since he first testified before Congress in support of a hate crimes bill 11 years ago. "It has been one of my highest personal priorities to ensure that this legislation finally becomes law," he said.

The FBI says more than half of reported hate crimes are motivated by racial bias. Next most frequent are crimes based on religious bias, at around 18 percent, and sexual orientation, at 16 percent.

At the urging of Republicans the bill was changed to strengthen free speech protections to assure that a religious leader or any other person cannot be prosecuted on the basis of his or her speech, beliefs or association.

"Nothing in this legislation diminishes an American's freedom of religion, freedom of speech or press or the freedom to assemble," said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. "Let me be clear. The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act targets acts, not speech."

That didn't convince Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., who said the bill was a "dangerous step" toward thought crimes. He asked whether the bill would "serve as a warning to people not to speak out too loudly about their religious views."

Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, said the measure was "part of a radical social agenda that could ultimately silence Christians and use the force of government to marginalize anyone whose faith is at odds with homosexuality."

___

The defense bill is H.R. 2647.

On the Net:

Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — Physical attacks on people based on their sexual orientation will join the list of federal hate crimes in a major expansion of the civil rights-era law Congress approved Thursday an...
WASHINGTON — Physical attacks on people based on their sexual orientation will join the list of federal hate crimes in a major expansion of the civil rights-era law Congress approved Thursday an...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,478
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
07:07 PM on 10/24/2009
Thanks to Judy Shepard and the Black Congressional Caucus and the (James) Byrd Family for their efforts on our behalf. I remember hearing the news on the radio about what happened to Matthew and how sick I felt to my stomach. Even Matthew's funeral was marred by hate. I admire Judy Shepard for turning her grief into positive action. What a great lady!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Freedom
Post-Modern Adventurer
10:27 PM on 10/23/2009
"Conservatives have opposed it, arguing that it creates a special class of victims."

I'd argue that religious leaders singling out homosexuals as sinful, while like-minded politicians demonize them in speeches, is what creates a special class of victims. The law merely adds that class to the list of other classes of people that have to be protected from conservatives. Oops, I meant klansmen. Same difference.

If conservatives don't like it, maybe they should have spent the last decade addressing the homophobia implicit in their anti-gay agenda.

"They also have been concerned that it could silence clergymen or others opposed to homosexuality on religious or philosophical grounds."

An entirely facetious argument, since these laws have nothing to do with hate speech -- if they did, they would have already been used to silence Christian Identity groups who preach overt racism. Of course they haven't been used for that because the law doesn't affect speech.

What I find most hilarious about this argument is that conservatives are essentially admitting that those same " clergymen or others opposed to homosexuality on religious or philosophical grounds" are practicing hate speech. Logically, the only way this legislation could threaten those clergymen is if they were engaged in hate crimes, so by worrying that clergymen will be affected, they admit they know their priests preach hatred.

But good luck finding a conservative who will admit that.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
klandish
03:09 AM on 10/24/2009
They don't "hate" us... they are just concerned for our "souls". Oh, and they would like to eradicate us if we don't find the passage to heaven via their conformist sexual behavior. Is that too much to ask?
07:32 PM on 10/23/2009
I am having a hard time understanding how opening up in the military about being gay will help anybody. Gays will be basically wearing a sign saying open season..... and those who are against it will act out stupidly... is this just for attention like evreything else has been or what????
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
klandish
03:29 AM on 10/24/2009
If someone or many needlessly persecutes another fellow soldier for a perceived, imaginary or actual difference there will be policies followed to ensure the persecuted is protected from the offender(s). But by being an "invisible illegal victim" there are no safe guards, thus making the actual perpetrator's actions perfectly acceptable. When hard and fast rules are put into place to protect all fellow soldiers from harassment the victimization will cease immediately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rmath
05:24 PM on 10/23/2009
DeMint doesn't need to worry about "thought crimes". You can't get in trouble for what you're not doing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:18 PM on 10/23/2009
"Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, said the measure was "part of a radical social agenda that could ultimately silence Christians and use the force of government to marginalize anyone whose faith is at odds with homosexuality."

That's just hyperbole ... although I kinda wish he were right.
I'm not saying anyone SHOULD be silenced ... but I can dream ... can't I?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
01:34 PM on 10/29/2009
Anybody whose "faith is at odds with homosexuality" does not have a "faith." He has a complex and needs therapy.
04:05 PM on 10/23/2009
It's about time this law was passed. I find it shameful that in America there is still hatred, bigotry and homophobia. Too have a situation that makes such a law needed is, in my view, shameful and criminal! Why should one person hate another just because he or she is not of the same faith, from a different country, has black skin, or their sexual orientation is not like theirs????? It makes no sense too me!! God made all kinds of people! Those people are not right or wrong they are God's creation and no religion or political party has the right to hate them!!
02:34 PM on 10/23/2009
cluess you're so sensitive about your hom o pho bia. There's nothing to be afraid of. I'll see you on the other gay thread! toodaloo!

Very pleased at the progression of this bill.
02:44 PM on 10/23/2009
Have fun "milking your joke" -- or whatever you're calling it these days.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
aftershock
02:45 PM on 10/23/2009
I'd imagine you call it "hide and seek"...
02:56 PM on 10/23/2009
A bill with no reasonable objection takes 12 years to pass through the legislature and Julia is "pleased at the progression"? I'm not sure what to make of the rest of her comments here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joel Redman
Proud liberal
03:44 PM on 10/23/2009
Unfortunately the there have been a number on unreasonable objections over the years. Let's hear it for the party of NO!
02:22 PM on 10/23/2009
"Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, said the measure was "part of a radical social agenda that could ultimately silence Christians and use the force of government to marginalize anyone whose faith is at odds with homosexuality."

Could this quote be any more disgusting? I see a lot of posters commenting that the Right doesnt want their ability to speak hate hindered, but this guy is basically advocating violence against gays by Christians whose beliefs dont jive with homosexuality. Its called a Hate Crime. Does he think the hate crime is just yelling at someone? No, a hate crime involved some intimidation and/or a physical attack. How can he think this is an ok comment to make? I am not naive, but I just dont get it. It saddens me.
04:09 PM on 10/23/2009
Perkins an his ilk think that they are the only ones that are right ABOUT ANYTHING!! When in actuality they are wrong on just about EVERYTHING!!!
photo
bluefire66
You're Terrible Muriel!
01:47 PM on 10/23/2009
One can also say:
Straight people are weird. It's like they aren't even Americans. I guess we need them to pick our crops and slaughter our cattle. And I've heard that they are pretty good yard work and cleaning the house. I suppose I wouldn't want my kid working in fast food restaurants, so it's good to have straights there. And the gstraight junkie who lives under the bus shelter recycles all of the bottles and cans in the neighborhood. I guess we do need these weirdo straights . As long as they learn to speak English and pass a citizenship test, I see no problem letting them stay in this country.
12:23 PM on 10/23/2009
"My comment has to do with my hatred of gays." CluelessJD

Is there any question why there needs to be an inclusion within a hate crime bill for sexual orientation?
For protection from people who think (and sometimes act out) just like Clueless.
12:47 PM on 10/23/2009
Have you read the bill?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
aftershock
12:49 PM on 10/23/2009
Have you?
12:57 PM on 10/23/2009
Sounds to me that you are afraid of the bill as if it will prevent you from voicing your hatred towards the Gay community. Well until you can post something stating very specifically where the bill words a restriction of speech, it's best that you just refrain from unsubstantiated conclusions.

But who knows, maybe your main objective to the bill relates more to your actions than to your concerns with limitation of free speech. And if you intend to act on your hate, then this bill was created maily for people like yourself, valifying Bedfordny's argument.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dots
The shadow of God is beauty.
12:23 PM on 10/23/2009
NOW we can repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell.
12:47 PM on 10/23/2009
Don't ask don't tell is a good policy.
12:51 PM on 10/23/2009
Maybe for f arting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paulied
12:13 PM on 10/23/2009
For all of you who do not understand hate crimes, let me try to explain. Just as the 9/11 attacks victimized ALL of America, not just the 2,000 actually killed, so do hate crimes have more victims than the actual target. By their very nature, hate crimes are designed to terrorize an entire community into silence and submission. They try to tell people to learn their place, whether that place be on the back of the bus or in the closet.
12:01 PM on 10/23/2009
Cons:

This bill does NOT take away YOUR right to hate. Okay? So just chill. It's nothing to fear.

BUT PLEASE KEEP THAT HAT E TO YOURSELVES.
12:14 PM on 10/23/2009
Given the alarming incidence of domestic violence among gay couples compared to heterosexual couples, I think we need legislation that requires sentence enhancement in cases of gay domestic violence. Wouldn't you agree?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paulied
12:15 PM on 10/23/2009
Where do you get your information, you unspeakable d0ucheb@g?
12:19 PM on 10/23/2009
I think that you should keep not only your h 8 to yourself, but also your stupidity.

Many here will agree.
photo
paisleyface
if we're not gonna have sex, get off my back
12:21 PM on 10/23/2009
Exactly. They are still free to obsess about gay people, free to spend their hard earned dollars on anti-marriage efforts at the expense of schoolbooks, health care, etc. Nobody is stopping anyone from hating anyone. But if someone were to hurt someone or incite others to hurt someone because they're gay or handicapped or belong to any one of a number of miroties, the consequences will now be certain, not ignored as happens across the country.
01:17 PM on 10/23/2009
45 states already had hate crimes laws that included glbt as a protected class -- meaning the law swept in 5 more states -- but your point is....
12:01 PM on 10/23/2009
Just read the comments and you'll see why people hate gays. It has less to do with how they are raised or what they believe and more to do with the fact that gays are really, really annoying.
12:02 PM on 10/23/2009
CLUELESS for a reason.
12:11 PM on 10/23/2009
I can see our cool black Hawaiian President say, you know what? They're just too damn annoying. No bones. VETO!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
aftershock
12:05 PM on 10/23/2009
Bigotry won't get you anywhere here.
12:15 PM on 10/23/2009
There's not a quality at all that will get you anywhere here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthrofreak
11:49 AM on 10/23/2009
Justice comes one step at a time.