REVEALED: US Almost Nabbed Polanski In Austria

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - REVEALED: US Almost Nabbed Polanski In Austria stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BRADLEY S. KLAPPER | 10/22/09 08:49 AM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Roman Polanski

GENEVA — American prosecutors closely monitored Roman Polanski in Austria and considered seeking his arrest there days before the director's apprehension in Switzerland, documents obtained by The Associated Press show.

Los Angeles officials decided against filing a warrant for Polanski's arrest with the Austrian government after questioning how accommodating it would be to an extradition request. They also were concerned about the limited time available before Polanski left the country, according to e-mails obtained by the AP under U.S. public records request.

The e-mail exchange Sept. 23 came three days before Polanski traveled to Switzerland and was arrested Sept. 26 at Zurich's airport. It sheds new light on how closely U.S. officials were monitoring the 76-year-old director's movements after being tipped off that he was outside France, and why they chose to go after him in Switzerland, where they are now seeking his extradition for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

"I don't have experience with any Austrian extraditions so I don't know how 'friendly' they would be to extradition on such a case," Diana Carbajal, a Los Angeles deputy district attorney, wrote in an e-mail.

She wrote that Polanski had checked out of an Austrian hotel that morning and was "on the move" ahead of his scheduled appearance at the Zurich Film Festival on Sept. 26. With the little time available and questions over extradition, she asked whether it was better to "maintain our position to extradite from Switzerland."

Lael Rubin, another deputy district attorney, answered: "Yes."

Polanski had been in Austria as early as Sept. 16, when he attended the opening night of his cult musical "Dance of the Vampires" in Vienna.

E-mails obtained by the AP show U.S. officials only learned of his upcoming trip to Zurich after the Swiss asked if Washington would be submitting a request for his arrest.

Story continues below
advertisement

Swiss Justice Ministry spokesman Folco Galli said the Americans immediately confirmed they would seek Polanski's arrest. As a result, Switzerland was required by treaty to apprehend Polanski, the director of such film classics as "Rosemary's Baby" and "Chinatown."

It is unclear from the e-mails why Los Angeles officials were concerned about Austrian cooperation on a Polanski extradition request. There was no reference to Polanski's history as a Jewish Holocaust survivor whose mother died in Auschwitz, or the sensitivities about having him pursued in the land of Adolf Hitler's birth.

Austria and the United States have an extradition agreement, and the Vienna prosecutor's spokesman Gerhard Jarosch said wanted individuals have been sent to the U.S.

Jarosch said the U.S. sent no arrest request, and Austrian Justice Ministry spokesman Paul Hefelle said authorities did not detain Polanski while he was in the country because he was not wanted domestically.

Still, U.S. officials expressed stronger confidence in the Swiss justice system.

"Generally, Switzerland does not release fugitives sought for extradition," a Sept. 25 e-mail states.

Later, on Oct. 5, nine days into Polanski's imprisonment, another e-mail states that the Swiss government had assured U.S. officials that Polanski would probably be sent back to Los Angeles to face justice after the U.S. submits its formal extradition request. The U.S. has until Nov. 26 to do so.

"While the Swiss officials cannot speak for the judge, the extradition will likely be ordered based upon the facts submitted in our papers," according to the e-mail, relaying a conversation between Washington and Bern.

Polanski, who won a 2003 directing Oscar in absentia for "The Pianist," was accused of raping the 13-year-old girl after plying her with champagne and a Quaalude pill during a modeling shoot in 1977. He was initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, child molesting and sodomy.

Polanski pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of unlawful sexual intercourse. In exchange, the judge agreed to drop the remaining charges and sentence him to prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation. Polanski was released after 42 days by an evaluator but the judge said he was going to send him back to serve the remainder of the 90 days. Polanski then fled the country on Feb. 1, 1978, the day he was to be sentenced.

A French native who moved to Poland as a child, Polanski has lived in France since fleeing the United States. France does not extradite its citizens.

On Wednesday, Polanski's lawyers split on strategies, with one suggesting for the first time that Polanski might voluntarily return to the U.S. to face justice in California after 31 years as a fugitive.

The new approach emerged after a Swiss court dealt the 76-year-old filmmaker a major setback on Tuesday by rejecting his appeal to be freed from jail because of the high risk he would flee again. Polanski, who has until Oct. 29 to appeal that decision, faces lengthy detention if he is unsuccessful and continues to fight extradition.

"If the proceedings drag on, it's not completely impossible that Roman Polanski might decide to go explain himself in the United States, where there are arguments in his favor," one of his lawyers, Georges Kiejman, told Europe 1 radio.

But another Paris-based lawyer for Polanski said there had been no change in strategy.

"We continue to fight extradition, and for him to be free," Herve Temime told the AP.

___

Associated Press writers Thomas Watkins in Los Angeles and Veronika Oleksyn in Vienna contributed to this report.

GENEVA — American prosecutors closely monitored Roman Polanski in Austria and considered seeking his arrest there days before the director's apprehension in Switzerland, documents obtained by Th...
GENEVA — American prosecutors closely monitored Roman Polanski in Austria and considered seeking his arrest there days before the director's apprehension in Switzerland, documents obtained by Th...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
45
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Ergon I'm a Fan of Ergon 87 fans permalink
photo

He had a chance to appear in an LA court room and explain himself. If he had, he might well have been let off, thanks to the HBO 'documentary' (What's with HBO? They had another apoplogia called 'Capturing the Friedmans')
He didn't show up, and the new LA Attorney issued a new warrant for his arrest in September of this year.
Karma can be such a bitch.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 10/25/2009
- Ventoi I'm a Fan of Ventoi 6 fans permalink
photo

As Charles Manson once said...
you are as free as you make yourself..­.
bars and walls are only a trapping for the body...

which is actually frightenin­g...
when we do not protect ourselves from our spiritual capabiltie­s...

which some of us have developed and do not agree with using...
others have developed and use at will...
others do not even notice until they are given the time and space (four walls)
and need...
or time...

to do so.

It will sometimes be good...
it will often be bad...
it will always be a learning experience­...
here in our world.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 10/23/2009
- Ventoi I'm a Fan of Ventoi 6 fans permalink
photo

We've got to get ourselves back to the garden...

the snakes and apples...
removed...
to find the innocence and nurturing of humans...
women included..­.or in particular­...if we are still allowed to dare to be innocent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 10/23/2009
- Ventoi I'm a Fan of Ventoi 6 fans permalink
photo

Is it really him or the loss of my innocence.­..
I've been missing so much?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 10/23/2009
- Ventoi I'm a Fan of Ventoi 6 fans permalink
photo

In a little foreign town...

Gadafi

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 10/23/2009
- factotem I'm a Fan of factotem 133 fans permalink
photo

Such are our neo-Puritan priorites.
We invoke the entire world's legal system for one r^pe victim, from 40 years ago, but we turn a blind eye to our continued war machinery.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 10/22/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 101 fans permalink
photo

A) try 30 years ago
B) the Swiss picked him up on their own
C) yes, there are a number of injustices in America that should be addressed.­..you'll let me know what you think the LA District Attorney can do about our "war machinery.­"
D) there's nothing puritanical about prosecuting child rapists...­it's common human decency

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 10/22/2009

He was very clever about maneuvering her and rushing her thus being ALONE with her-- altogether very accomplished at that.--mak­es me wonder-- how many females has he done this to???

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 10/22/2009

Laws are the end result of the collective mindset of a society.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 10/22/2009
- zagyzebra I'm a Fan of zagyzebra 2 fans permalink

And for this kind of police and legal work, we taxpayers, sacrifice hard-earned dollars??!!! What is wrong with this twisted country? Is this just a high-profile, justice-be­ing-served case to latch onto? Can't they find one that serves a real purpose, instead of wasting valuable resources on a long forgotten incident bearing absolutely no threat to humanity now?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 10/22/2009

It is obviously not "long forgotten.­" It is obviously in society's interest to pursue criminals. It is obviously our role as a civilized society to let abusers and the children they abuse know that the rap e of children will not be condoned, not matter how famous you are.

Would you apply the same logic to a Na.zi guard tracked down after hiding in Brazil for 40 years?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 10/22/2009

Polanski was not hiding.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 10/22/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 101 fans permalink
photo

The Swiss arrested a fugitive, wanted in the United States. The United States is preparing to receive him.

That's not "twisted." That's "the rule of law."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 10/22/2009
photo

Whats wrong with this twisted country is having people like you that think that the correct functioning of justice is a waste of taxpayer's money.

Perhaps the court can have Polanski pay for this. Afterall, here in France, the condemned can be made to pay a certain sum. I'm not so sure about the States. Perhaps its the same. All in all, your reasoning of wasting tax dollars is lame.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 10/22/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 101 fans permalink
photo

Bravo and fanned.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 10/22/2009
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 57 fans permalink
photo

So, your logic is, if someone succeeds in not being arrested for an X number of years then he/she should go free?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:55 PM on 10/22/2009
- ywcachieve I'm a Fan of ywcachieve 115 fans permalink

Go 'git" him!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 10/22/2009

O, please! Now officials are going to start to "reveal" that they were tirelessly pursuing Polanski for 30 years, almost "nabbing" him here or there, working around the clock on his apprehension. He is not Jason Bourne, you know. The man was living openly in Europe, working, getting an Oscar, buying property. This case is a steaming pile of S**t and it seems to me that LA officials realize it now.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 10/22/2009
- JShankel I'm a Fan of JShankel 101 fans permalink
photo

What difference does it make? We have him now.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 10/22/2009

Who are those "we" you are talking about and how exactly do "you" have him?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 10/22/2009
photo

living openly in Europe? Yes, he lived in France, a country that does not allow extradition of its citizens. Polanski is a citizen of France and Poland.

Case is a steaming pile of s**t and it seems to you that LA officials realize it now?

What is a steaming pile of s**t is the documentary Wanted and Desired.

We now know that the ex-DA that boasted in that documentary that he was advising the judge was
1) not even involved with the POLANSKI case
2) he announced a few weeks ago that he lied about being involved with the case and lied about talking to the judge about the Polanski case

Now perhaps its worth going back to see who is responsible for this steaming pile of s**t of a documentary to see who had the motivation to fabricate that.

Knowing all the record keeping they do in the United States, I doubt that it would have been difficult for the producer of Wanted and Desired to confirm if the ex-DA that they featured in this documentary was truly involved with Polanski case.

So, why did this producer of this documentary not do his/her due diligence to make sure that they interviewed the correct ex-DA?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 10/22/2009

You missed my point.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 10/22/2009

Read the transcript of the grand jury testimony. It speaks volumes.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskia1.html

Also read the transcript of Mr. Polanski's own testimony at his plea hearing.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0928091polanskiplea8.html

This is not about forgiveness or great artists or "flexible justice". If anything it was "flexed" to his advantage, starting with a 90 day "evaluation" as an appropriate consequence for the events described in the transcript.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 10/22/2009
photo

Imagine if he got nabbed in Austria. His supporters would have surely "resurrect " Holocaust all over again, instead of swiss bank accounts.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 10/22/2009
- cdiasmd I'm a Fan of cdiasmd 6 fans permalink
photo

He (RP) skipped out of the last part of the judicial process and as such he is a fugitive from justice and not from his victim. You might be able to walk out of a movie before the end but you can't walk away from the justice process because you don't like the ending. The victim is no longer a component of this saga. She testified and from it he was convicted. But I guess if you have any ties to the Holocaust and commit a crime then flee to Austria because no one will extradite you from the land of Hitler's birth....~­rolls eyes~.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 10/22/2009
- MalloMel I'm a Fan of MalloMel 95 fans permalink
photo

Roman Polanski's victim has forgiven him, and I do too, but nevertheless many of us have to extract that pound of flesh from him. I'm sorry, but I just can't get off on this. The victim now says let him go. I'm good with that.

There are people who will and are screaming about justice, but as we all know, justice is quite flexible. "It all depends on whose ox is being gored."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 10/22/2009

So, run away and later pay your victim a half a million dollars and all is forgiven.

Sorry, I am not good with that. Letting him get away with the crimes of statutory rape and then running away from the law only sends the message that it is ok to do this sort of thing. That is why we do not allow victims to decide sentences.

In fact, the victim is not the only victim here. The man ran away from a lawful conviction, one to which he agreed (all of his claims to the contrary are allegations). That is the business of the state, not the original victim.

This is not even about "justice", but about stating that the law is there for a reason and nobody is above it. Let Polanski go and the only fair thing to do is let all escaped convicts go.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 10/22/2009

Evidently, he never actually made the payment. More testament to character, truth, reliablity.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113456499

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 10/22/2009
- MalloMel I'm a Fan of MalloMel 95 fans permalink
photo

I have to admit that you make it sound good. The guy is already 76 years old. How much flesh do you think that you are going to get out of him?

Like I said, "justice is quite flexible." I really don't care what happens to him. It's just that I can't be on board for this latest hate fest.

You people have beaten the Octomom thing for all it's worth. Now you have moved onto this. You guys move from one thing to another. I watch what you are doing and I find it quite amusing. Forgive me or not, but I just can't follow you people on these quests.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 10/22/2009
photo

Good for you if you're good with that. Well, I'm not and a lot of other people agree that JUSTICE IS FOR ALL.

I don't demand for any specific sentence. He skipped town and the best is that the law is followed. He should have done this.

As I said in my other comments, I don't care if he does 5 days or 5 years. It's just not right for a child rapist to skip town and go to a country with no extradition treaty with the U.S. or go to a country that does not allow the extradition of its citizen.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 10/22/2009

Why was he running from like 48 more days in a psychiatric facility?!?! His actions make no sense unless more victims were going to start popping up. Just serve the rest of your time. Being on the run for 31 years over that?!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 10/22/2009
- JimR I'm a Fan of JimR 38 fans permalink

A lot of abuse victims refuse to press charges against their abusers because they are afraid. But hey, using your logic, if the victim is good with no charge, we should be too, right?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 10/22/2009
photo

"If the victim is good with no charge, we should be too, right??

vraiement n'importe quoi, which means... Really, that is rubbish.

This is not like those old Roman forums where people get to cheer or jeer. Let justice do its work.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 10/22/2009
- SFBunkSurf I'm a Fan of SFBunkSurf 20 fans permalink
photo

Laws go beyond someone's mind set.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 10/22/2009

Laws are the end result of the collective mindset of a society.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 10/22/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect