Pakistan Takes Taliban Chief's Hometown Of Kotkai

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Pakistan Takes Taliban Chief's Hometown Of Kotkai stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ASIF SHAHZAD and ASHRAF KHAN | 10/24/09 01:05 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Pakistan
Pakistani people who fled fighting between security forces and militants in Pakistani tribal area of Waziristan, wait for food relief in the suburb of Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan on Saturday, Oct. 24, 2009.

ISLAMABAD — Pakistani soldiers captured the hometown of the country's Taliban chief Saturday, a strategic and symbolic initial prize as the army pushes deeper into a militant stronghold along the Afghan border. An army spokesman said the Taliban were in disarray, with many deserting the ranks.

The 8-day-old air and ground offensive in the South Waziristan tribal region is a key test of nuclear-armed Pakistan's campaign against Islamist militancy. It has already spurred a civilian exodus and deadly retaliatory attacks.

Washington has encouraged the operation in the northwest because many militants there are believed to shelter al-Qaida leaders and are also suspected to be involved in attacks on Western troops in Afghanistan. The U.S. military has also kept up its own missile strikes in the lawless tribal belt, including a suspected one that killed 22 Saturday.

The battle for Kotkai town was symbolically key because it is the hometown of Pakistani Taliban chief Hakimullah Mehsud and one of his top deputies, Qari Hussain. It also lies along the way to the major militant base of Sararogha, making it a strategically helpful catch.

The fight was intense, taking several days and involving aerial bombardment, officials said.

The majority of homes in the town were converted into "strong bunkers" and it also was home to a training camp for suicide bombers, army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas told reporters. Troops had begun ridding it of land mines and roadside bombs.

"Thank God, this is the army's very big success," Abbas said. "The good news is that (communications) intercepts show that there are differences forging among the Taliban ranks. Their aides are deserting them."

Abbas said some of the fleeing Taliban have shaved their beards and cut their hair to try to blend in with the civilian population. Taliban spokesmen could not immediately be reached for comment.

Story continues below
advertisement

Three soldiers and 21 militants died in the most recent fighting in the region, the army said. Because it has blocked access to South Waziristan, independently verifying the data is all but impossible.

The government has forged ahead in South Waziristan despite a wave of violence that has put the nation on edge. Some 200 people have been killed in a variety of militant attacks across the country this month.

The U.N. says some 155,000 civilians have fled the region. In Dera Ismail Khan, a gritty town near South Waziristan where many of those fleeing have congregated, the refugees reacted to the news of Kotkai's capture with suspicion.

"They are making tall claims of conquering Waziristan in a few weeks, but we think this is not doable even in five to six years," said Azam Khan Mehsud, who hails from the Makeen area.

Others noted that Pakistan had failed at least three times before to wrest the region from the Taliban and said they feared the damage the army might cause.

"Years ago, the army suddenly started an operation and we all had to leave our area in the clothes we were wearing," said Abdul Samad Khan, 65, a farmer from the Spinkai Raghzai area. "When we returned to our area all our homes were either bombed, bulldozed or torched. Our animals were missing. Now imagine, if they come with more might, what they will do with our area."

The army has deployed some 30,000 troops to South Waziristan to take on some 12,000 Taliban militants, including up to 1,500 foreign fighters, among them Uzbeks and Arabs.

The U.S. has launched scores of missile strikes at militant targets in Pakistan's tribal belt over the past year, killing several top insurgents including former Pakistani Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud.

The latest strike hit Chuhatra village in the tribal region of Bajur on Saturday, local government official Mohammad Jamil said.

The target appeared to be Faqir Mohammad, a prominent Taliban leader, but he is believed to have escaped the hide-out by minutes, Jamil said. Most of the 22 killed were Afghan nationals, he said.

Pakistan formally protests the missile strikes, saying they violate its sovereignty and raise sympathy for the Taliban, while the U.S. rarely discusses the attacks. However, analysts believe the two sides have a secret deal allowing the strikes.

The U.S. has shown no sign of easing the drone-fired attacks even as Pakistan is waging its own fight in the tribal areas. Asked if the missile attacks are a distraction or help, the army spokesman said Pakistan would prefer to go it alone.

"We do not want any assistance or interference from outside," Abbas said.

He added that a mysterious explosion Wednesday in North Waziristan – initially described by intelligence officials as a suspected U.S. missile attack – had turned out to be a blast caused when explosives being loaded onto a vehicle accidentally detonated.

Also Saturday, a military helicopter crashed in the Bajur tribal region, killing three officials, the army said, adding that the crash was an accident, not caused by any militant attacks.

___

Associated Press writers Habib Khan in Khar, Riaz Khan in Peshawar, Zarar Khan in Dera Ismail Khan, and Hussain Afzal in Parachinar contributed to this report.

ISLAMABAD — Pakistani soldiers captured the hometown of the country's Taliban chief Saturday, a strategic and symbolic initial prize as the army pushes deeper into a militant stronghold along th...
ISLAMABAD — Pakistani soldiers captured the hometown of the country's Taliban chief Saturday, a strategic and symbolic initial prize as the army pushes deeper into a militant stronghold along th...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
29
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Guys you'll need to get real about this don't get into your US media drivel and comment based on that.Look who's waging war against whom and who seems more powerful in selecting targets and bombing them ?? uh ?? Its the Taliban. They seem like a more organised force than then pakistani military.J­ust seeing a few pictures of smoke over hills doesn't mean that they are fighting the taliban and damn by god you guys just buy this stuff and some of your mobs keep sayin "go mlitary crush them" or " Pakistan is finally gaining an upper hand on the taliban" now if this is not drivel then what is ? Can't you see how many of yr troops are killed on daily basis ? Can't you see synchronised attacks on military and political outposts ? compared to smoke rising from the hills ? my opinion and advise (mine only) ....either get out NOW or send in extra troops to cover for the existing ones but just waiting to see what happens and then act will only bring back bodybags.I­f anyone differs let me know.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 AM on 10/28/2009
photo

Islam is in its origins an Arab religion. Everyone not an Arab who is a Muslim is a convert. Islam is not simply a matter of conscience or private belief. It makes imperial demands. A convert's worldview alters. His holy places are in Arab lands; his sacred language is Arabic. His idea of history alters. He rejects his own; he becomes, whether he likes it or not, a part of the Arab story. The convert has to turn away from everything that is his. The disturbance for societies is immense, and even after a thousand years can remain unresolved; the turning away has to be done again and again. People develop fantasies about who and what they are; and in the Islam of the converted countries there is an element of neurosis and nihilism. These countries can be easily set on the boil."

Sir V.S Naipaul, Nobel Prize winner

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 AM on 10/26/2009
- Rapier I'm a Fan of Rapier 10 fans permalink

It may be symbolic but hardly strategic in a guerrilla war. The fighters have simply moved away until the army leaves. The same difficulty we face in Afghanistan. It is going to be hard to keep the army supplied in winter.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 10/25/2009
- AHR I'm a Fan of AHR permalink

Taliban's Pakistan
As the state machinery took its time before launching the operation in Waziristan, the Taliban outflanked it by launching an offensive of their own, bringing the war to the heartland of the country.

The brazen attack on GHQ, which was quickly followed by three synchronised raids on security establishments in Lahore, is a change in the tactics of the Taliban. After taking on GHQ, the proverbial nerve centre, they have shown a change in the tactics of terror: the militants’ attacks have now metamorphosed into a full-blown urban war.Until recently they would attack military convoys with improvised devices or their frenzied cadres would blow themselves up near a target or in a crowd. Now they have descended from the hills of Waziristan (as the common understanding goes) to extend the theatre of war. It will divide the focus of the armed forces and put many people’s lives at risk.

http://ahraza.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/taliban-ka-pakistan/

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 10/25/2009
- duxguts I'm a Fan of duxguts 24 fans permalink
photo

All the ISI chickens are coming home to roost. Funny thing is that we funded the ISI and still are.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 10/25/2009
- Horst I'm a Fan of Horst 24 fans permalink

I thought his home town was Newark

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 10/25/2009
- jws2346 I'm a Fan of jws2346 36 fans permalink

Oh noes, do you have any ideer how hard it is to get a change of address with the Postal Service? Seriously though, I've never been anywhere in the Middle East, let alone Pakistan, but a thread I was reading by someone that has said something about the Pakistan troops being sympathetic to the Taliban and sometimes even card carrying members?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 10/25/2009
- pterack5 I'm a Fan of pterack5 7 fans permalink

support our troops by sending in more. . .wee. . .its job's for the unwashed in our great society. . .and free health care. . .

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 10/25/2009
- Gasparilla I'm a Fan of Gasparilla 30 fans permalink

That's why our being in Afghanistan is counterproductive. Countries like Pakistan need to figure out for themselves that their best interests are not served by allowing radical fanatics on their territory or as neighbors.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 10/25/2009
- RJII I'm a Fan of RJII 77 fans permalink
photo

amen. help from the sidelines, no more bankrupting occupations.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 10/25/2009
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 149 fans permalink

Pakistan must defeat the Taliban or they will descend to Shariah law and a country with no rights for women. Their nascent democracy will be a thing of the past. Well, the U.S. will never let the Taliban get close to victory because who could sleep with a nuclear armed Taliban!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 10/25/2009
- ImissBush I'm a Fan of ImissBush 35 fans permalink
photo

not very christian of them

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 10/25/2009
photo

Very good work by all involved to retake a stronghold. As the article mentions, this is largely symbolic but is only a battle in a larger war. President Obama has all the information he needs to decide on General McCrystal's troop request. Where he is making this difficult, is he is mixing it with his domestic political agenda and issues over preserving the contentness of his anti-war base. First, it's clear to many he is withholding decision because he's not sure where healthcare reform is going and does not want to dissatisfy his supporters on two counts--he'd rather solve one so he can see how to handle the other. Second, for his own personal gain and image, how could he decide to "escalate" a war by sending more troops BEFORE he receives in Nobel Peace Prize in November.

Mr. President: It is time for you step up support our troops. For each day you delay comes a day they are undersupported. You must stop stalling. Man up now, show some backbone, make the tough call and don't wait. To continue inaction demoralizes our troops and makes our country appear weaker through your indecision. The time is now for you to be the commander-in-chief and not a political candidate. If you are not in this to our troops and coalition a chance to achieve your objectives in Afghanistan, then pull them out and assume the consequences weak leadership will be responsble for.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 10/25/2009
- RJII I'm a Fan of RJII 77 fans permalink
photo

your magic 8ball is working in over drive. your points one and two are pure conjecture-- point three is the kind thinking that recently led us into f00lish unnecessary wars..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 10/25/2009

OMG, OMG, OMG!!11!!!!!1!

BRING BACK THE DRAFT! FREEZE ALL NON-DEFENSE SPENDING AND SEND IT ALL TO OUR SOLDIERS IN AFGHANISTAN.

GOTTA SUPPORT THOSE TROOPS!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!11!!!!1!
[IF YOU DON'T AGREE YOU'RE AN ANTI-AMERICAN COMMIE!!!]

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 10/25/2009
photo

My best wishes to the people of pakistan, expending all their blood and treasure in a civil war for all of us while armchair generals criticise.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 10/25/2009
photo

Armchair Generals? Their blood and treasure.
Catch a little realism here. Paskistan has nuclear weapons and this is largely about stabilizing the region, which includes defeating Taliban and Al Qaida, but becomes even higher stakes given the tensions between Paskistan and Nuclear India...ad­d to all...musl­m countries that have a dubious past in supporting terrorists. For the USA to attribute this as "good luck guys, we're hoping you do good" is the most dangerous COA to take...for the USA, and for the world.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 10/25/2009
- sysmgr1345 I'm a Fan of sysmgr1345 15 fans permalink
photo

We all know the Taliban just buried their weopons, put on burqas, and walked out of town with everyone else. The people that were interviewed for this article are probably Taliban.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 10/25/2009

everyone needs to stand up and fight the Talibans oppression! including Pakistan!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 AM on 10/25/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect