Rep. Visclosky Under Fire For Close Ties To Lobbying Firm

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Rep. Visclosky Under Fire For Close Ties To Lobbying Firm stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Jenna Staul
First Posted: 10-26-09 09:49 AM   |   Updated: 10-26-09 05:30 PM

What's Your Reaction?

The Washington Post examines the overnight success story of tech firm NanoSonix -- an upstart Illinois-based company that has seemingly benefited from its close ties to Rep. Peter Visclosky, a Democrat from Indiana.

Now investigators are focusing in on possible links between Visclosky's earmarks and his staff's campaign fundraising efforts.

Visclosky, who sits on the House Appropriations Committee's defense subcommittee, backed a $2.4 million earmark for NanoSonix to develop a brand of night vision goggles shortly after the three-employee firm hired a Washington lobbyist and filed its incorporated papers, according to the Post.

"I understand how this can look from the outside," NanoSonix chief executive Sean Murdock said. "My belief was we had to pursue government funding if this technology was going to see the light of day."

The congressman signed off on at least $44 million in earmarks in 2008 and 2009 for 15 tech firms hired by the K&L Gates firm, the same lobbyists representing NanoSonix.

From the Post:

A Post review shows that K&L Gates clients winning Visclosky's support, along with their lobbyists and investors, donated almost $200,000 to Visclosky and an additional $130,000 to the House Democratic campaign committee since 2005. The donations often came in clusters, around the time Visclosky's committee was crafting its annual earmarks ...

The New York Times reported earlier this year that federal law enforcements officials who raided PMA Group's offices were examining the firm's relationship with Visclosky.

Prosecutors ordered the raid based on suspicions that the firm illegally funneled out money to circumvent campaign finance laws. Visclosky was reportedly one of the lawmakers closest with PMA before it folded, and he relied heavily on the firm for campaign fundraising and earmarked millions each year to its clients.

Report Corrections
 
Comments
29
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- strangelet I'm a Fan of strangelet 24 fans permalink

I agree that the headlines ought to be standardized, e.g., "Rep. Visclosky (D-IN),,,,".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 10/27/2009
- jfh I'm a Fan of jfh 8 fans permalink

I prefer the Fox Noise approach to headlines, it should be ...

Rep. Visclosky (R-IN),,,,".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 10/27/2009
- Billar I'm a Fan of Billar 6 fans permalink
photo

Shame, Shame on you Peter.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 10/26/2009
- windup I'm a Fan of windup 21 fans permalink

Fund elections publicly and get rid of the bribes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 10/26/2009

Yes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 AM on 10/27/2009
photo

Lobbying, i.e., institutionalized bribery, is a cancer on the body politics.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 10/26/2009
photo

Which has spread and metastasized wreaking havoc upon the citizenry.

We can no longer tolerate any of this - even if it is "legal." "Corporate personhood" be damned!
We have to expose these whoring "representatives" in office, and then see to it that they are promptly relieved of their position.
Zero tolerance on the part of the people will have at least some impact.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 10/26/2009

This is directed to the MODERATOR of HP. Try getting your information correct and thorough before you post a story. Because I am 100% positive the first time I read this story on Rep. Peter Visclosky(D-IN) it did not mention his party affiliation. Also why did you change it to what you did? Rep. Peter Visclosky, a Democrat from Indiana instead of Rep. Peter Visclosky(D-IN). Please respond, thank you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 10/26/2009

decaf

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 10/26/2009
- dems08 I'm a Fan of dems08 179 fans permalink
photo

hp didn't have to post this article at all

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 AM on 10/27/2009
photo

The corruption must stop.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 10/26/2009
photo

OK, as much as I love HuffPost and I'm a staunch Democrat, I still find it rather annoying that when they report on a republican't, they cite their political affiliation; but as often as not, if not more often than not, when they report on a Democrat, they neglect to mention their political affiliation. Come on guys!!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 10/26/2009

his party affiliation is mentioned in the first paragraph

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 10/26/2009

You are correct, thanks. I could of sworn it dd not say when I first read it. My mistake.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 10/26/2009
photo

I double-checked before I posted, so perhaps it was added (or I could have missed it... twice). Plus, they don't put it in the headline like they do for the repubs either.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 10/26/2009

Now why is the fact Rep. Peter Visclosky is a democrat not mention here?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 10/26/2009

did you read the f'n story?..it­'s in the first damn paragraph.­..my goodness

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 10/26/2009

It wasn't there in the first damn paragraph when I first read it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 10/26/2009
- Cogs I'm a Fan of Cogs 26 fans permalink

Show up at Peter Visclosky's office without a check in hand and I wonder if he'd give you the time of day.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 10/26/2009
- zendem1 I'm a Fan of zendem1 108 fans permalink

Nope. There's a charge for that.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 10/26/2009
- aonemandog I'm a Fan of aonemandog 13 fans permalink

To me, this all boils down to the relationship between a prostitue and their "Johns" The prostitute gets arrrested and the "Johns" usually are not targeted. If it is illegal to take a bribe isn't it illegal to offer one? Why isn't law enforcement going after the individual lobbyists as well as the politicians?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 10/26/2009
- Ron44 I'm a Fan of Ron44 17 fans permalink

He is owned and paid off by the Lobbying Firm!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 10/26/2009

Rangel and characters like these clearly show how trustworthy the Democratic party politicians are. We know that we cannot trust the Republicans as their vote supporting rape was demonstrated when they opposed Al Franken's legislation. Not a peep from the HF readers except one comment so far. Amazing! Guys, if we want to be against corruption, we have to be like Caesar's wife - above reproach. We have to out ALL corrupt politicians irrespective of what group they belong to.

Can we create a deck of cards like the one that was created for the Saddam team? We need to have the photograph, name and short bio of all these folks hosted on a webpage linked her. But, we may need many decks of cards as we will definitely have more than one deck of corrupt politicians.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 10/26/2009
photo

I think all politicians should have to show an icon of their various supporters, proportional to their total donations, with a people icon for donations from the people... it would be interesting to see who the reps really represent.­.. maybe if they can't be show on the commercials they could be included in the cards...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 10/26/2009

Lobbying is bribery, not free speech.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 10/26/2009

totaly agree

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 10/26/2009
- zendem1 I'm a Fan of zendem1 108 fans permalink

Have to agree with you there.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 10/26/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn