Ahmadinejad: We Will Cooperate With West, But No Retreat "Even An Iota" Over Nuclear Right

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Ahmadinejad: We Will Cooperate With West, But No Retreat "Even An Iota" Over Nuclear Right stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GEORGE JAHN | 10/29/09 11:56 AM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Ahmadinejad

VIENNA, Austria — Iran has given an initial response to a plan that calls for Tehran to ship most of its enriched uranium abroad, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Thursday. An official familiar with Iran's response said Tehran was unwilling to accept the deal, which would delay Tehran's ability to make a nuclear weapon.

The U.S. and allied countries were seeking Iranian agreement to ship out 70 percent of its low-enriched uranium to Russia in one shipment for further enrichment and conversion into fuel for a Tehran research reactor.

Sending that amount in one batch would not leave Tehran with enough material to make weapons-grade uranium should it decide to make a warhead. Experts say Iran would need at least a year to produce enough to make up for the exported material, giving the international community a window in its efforts to persuade the Islamic Republic to freeze its enrichment program.

But a Western diplomat familiar with the Iran offer said Tehran was instead proposing to enrich the material domestically under supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The Tehran research reactor needs fuel enriched to just under 20 percent – far from the 90 percent and above needed to make the fissile core of a nuclear weapon. Iran's stockpile is low-enriched uranium enriched to around 3 percent, suitable only for nuclear fuel.

But the higher the level of enrichment, the easier it is to reach weapons-grade level. Such a proposal outlined by the diplomat is unlikely to be endorsed by the U.S. and its allies, which would see it as bringing Tehran closer to nuclear weapons capacity instead of reducing such a threat.

"They don't want the LEU taken out," said the diplomat, referring to low-enriched uranium. "They want to enrich it there (in Iran) under IAEA supervision."

Iran has signaled in recent days that it was unwilling to give up most of its enriched stockpile in a single shipment and would seek to re-negotiate terms worked out by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei in talks last week with Iran, Russia, France and the U.S. That Iranian stance was reinforced by the language of the IAEA statement.

Story continues below
advertisement

Besides speaking of "an initial response from the Iranian authorities" – suggesting that Iran was looking for further talks – the statement indicated the possible need for further negotiations. It said ElBaradei expressed "hope that agreement can be reached soon" and was consulting with the four nations involved.

The plan would commit Iran to turn over more than 2,600 pounds (1,200 kilograms) of low-enriched uranium – more than the commonly accepted amount of low-enriched uranium needed to produce weapons-grade uranium. The West says Tehran agreed in principle to export that amount in one shipment during Oct. 1 talks in Geneva with the U.S. and five other world powers – something Iranian officials have denied.

In Iran Thursday, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that his country will not give up its nuclear program although the West and Iran are now cooperating on the issue – remarks that signaled a divide between the Islamic Republic and the West on what Iran needed to do to comply with the outlines of the enrichment plan.

Ahmadinejad said the West has moved "from confrontation to interaction" with Iran over its uranium enrichment program, which he called an "inalienable right of the Iranian nation."

"Today we reached a very important point," Ahmadinejad said, speaking at a rally in the northeastern city of Mashhad. "Ground has been paved for nuclear cooperation" and Tehran is ready to now work on nuclear fuel supplies and technical know-how with the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Ahmadinejad added.

But he insisted his government "will not retreat even an iota" over the nation's right to pursue a nuclear program – which the West fears masks nuclear arms ambitions.

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Lee in Washington and Nasser Karimi in Tehran contributed to this report.

VIENNA, Austria — Iran has given an initial response to a plan that calls for Tehran to ship most of its enriched uranium abroad, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Thursday. An officia...
VIENNA, Austria — Iran has given an initial response to a plan that calls for Tehran to ship most of its enriched uranium abroad, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Thursday. An officia...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
54
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

It make zero difference what this dwarf-clown says. He has as much power in Iranian foreign policy as Ronald McDonald.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 11/01/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

You're not entirely a lost cause.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 11/01/2009
- wwoody I'm a Fan of wwoody 17 fans permalink
photo

Iran has every right to their nuclear program.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 AM on 11/01/2009
- WarSkeptic I'm a Fan of WarSkeptic 20 fans permalink
photo

I'd be interested to see how the translator came up with the phrase "Even an Iota"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 11/01/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

;-)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 11/01/2009
- chedet I'm a Fan of chedet 31 fans permalink
photo

Does that mean there cannot be a war? Oh I'm pretty sure the warmongers over here are going to be so upset.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 AM on 10/30/2009
photo

The Fearmonger adult Paperz brigade is equally disheartened.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 11/01/2009
photo

Dr. William Beeman on U.S. – Iranian Relations During the Obama Era
http://kska.org/2009/10/27/awac-presents-dr-william-beeman/

dr. beeman provides a very different perspective on iran than the MSM and previous administration

the audio is worth listening to and will be posted

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 10/29/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Sure, I'll listen to that.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 11/01/2009
- Watain I'm a Fan of Watain 18 fans permalink
photo

Looking at the flow of currencies in the World, Iran would actually be funding a portion of a possible invasion by America or Israel.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 10/29/2009
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 146 fans permalink
photo

Makes me wish the nations - the leaders - of this world would...just...grow...up.

The right - in whose bed I lump all belligerent leaders and politicians, regardless of race, ethnicity, country of origin, professed political philosophy, or religious faith - continue to strike me as walking, talking examples of arrested development.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 10/29/2009
- Cavil I'm a Fan of Cavil 7 fans permalink
photo

stretch your neck our even more you're not looking far enough!
they are grown up; and they like us want spread their particular kind of excrement as we do.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 10/29/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

Please, make sense.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 PM on 11/01/2009
- Cavil I'm a Fan of Cavil 7 fans permalink
photo

stretch your neck our even more you're not looking far enough!
they are grown up; and they like us they want spread their particular kind of excrɜment as we do.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 10/29/2009
- JohnLinus I'm a Fan of JohnLinus 3 fans permalink
photo

Hey, Iran is not gonna attack any country. They know if the do, they will be eliminated in 5 minutes.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 10/29/2009
- JohnnyLee I'm a Fan of JohnnyLee 10 fans permalink

Through their proxy Hezbollah Iran has attacked Israel and Lebanon. They fund and train Hamas who attacks Israel every opportunity they get. Through their proxy the Mahdi Army they've attacked the United States and Sunni Groups inside Iraq. Through their proxy "the Northern Alliance" they've attacked the Taliban.

Iran is active all over the Middle East. If they get a bomb they'll use it to scare the Gulf Arabs into accepting their price structure for oil. The Gulf Arabs will then purchase or build their own bomb. Then we'll have a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 10/29/2009
- JohnLinus I'm a Fan of JohnLinus 3 fans permalink
photo

"Their proxy", sure. The Iran has not attacked the Us. Period.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 10/29/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

I'm usually pointing this out to the other side, but in fairness, both sides must acknowledge the proxy war using militant groups goes both ways.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 11/01/2009
- Nellybelle I'm a Fan of Nellybelle 3 fans permalink

Look at it this way :
The US attacked and occupied two of Irans neighbours , Iraq and Afghanistan.
They threatened to attack Syria ... another nearby country .
The US referred to Iran an part of the "Axis of Evil " .

And you wonder why they might want to defend themselves ??

Much of Iran is a cultured and civilized nation with pro-west leanings, especially the youth .
It would not take much to make them our friend and ally .

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 10/29/2009
- jasjohn128 I'm a Fan of jasjohn128 26 fans permalink
photo

Heartily agree. At the same time, it does no harm (and may have already done much good) to hold that faux government's feet to the fire while THEY answer to their people and try to dig themselves out of the hole they've dug for themselves.

To put recent events in the best possible light, it looks like we're giving them the opportunity to do the right thing and save face while doing it, and they're taking it. But if George W. Bush was still president the insults (and missiles) would be flying by now.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 10/29/2009
- Nellybelle I'm a Fan of Nellybelle 3 fans permalink

It's funny , I have seen Ahmadinejad on TV 2 or 3 times , once at Columbia University and twice on Larry King , and once you got past his ideas about the holocaust it seemed to me that he was genuinely trying to ingratiate himself to the American people , and would have welcomed a constructive dialogue . He's not stupid.

He was treated very rudely by the president of Columbia U. , and by our so-called press ,
who only look for cheap headlines.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 10/29/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

Very interesting.

Ahmedinijad is seeking to reinforce the legitimacy of his regime with foreign policy initiatives. Sort of like all American Presidents, starting with Nixon, would do when they got in trouble domestically.

Since the Supreme Leader declared nuclear weapons UnIslamic, Iran has nothing to lose in the negotiations. If their goal is nuclear energy they are gaining Russian assistance.

But more importantly, this makes Ahmedinijad look better at home. And to some degree, weakens the opposition.

And he needs all the help he can get since he stole the election.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 10/29/2009
- Cavil I'm a Fan of Cavil 7 fans permalink
photo

Politics -- K!LL.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 10/29/2009
- Khirad I'm a Fan of Khirad 304 fans permalink
photo

That was my read too, precisely. And, if we get a comment that Ahmadi doesn't make foreign policy decisions, that is true. But, he postures on them, and does in a sense have limited influence via his cabinet. Nevertheless, the actual policy is not made by him.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 11/01/2009
- Mollabaji I'm a Fan of Mollabaji 17 fans permalink

This is exactly what I have been forecasting and hoping all along that Irans right to nuclear power be recognized, that whatever the issues are to be only resolved through the UN's IAEA, and that Security Council's illegal sanctions be lifted. Now it seems these goals are being achieved only due to the Iranian governement negotiators' intelligent approach and persistence in defending Iran's national rights as a sovereign nation. Let Israel and its agents in U.S. shake in their boots.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 10/29/2009
- CigarGod I'm a Fan of CigarGod 122 fans permalink
photo

Nice post.

I wonder if when the story of Hillary's or Obama's reply is posted...a picture of them raising a clenched fist will be used?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 10/29/2009
- Cavil I'm a Fan of Cavil 7 fans permalink
photo

Clenched fist, Hillary, used -- cigar god what are you getting at?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 10/29/2009
- Cavil I'm a Fan of Cavil 7 fans permalink
photo

Mollabaji

I wonder what decrepit gene pool you come from. Sounds like you graduated from a top-notch Al Qaeda training camp. Regardless of what extremist view you hold dear to your heart, I wonder if that gelatinous blob in your skull can comprehend the idea that ,if Iran produces nuclear weapons this most likely would lead to a nuclear holocaust. Don't get me wrong out of all the nuclear powers in the world Israel is the most dangerous one, as such they should be deregulated and their wepons dismanteled. Iran would trigger a war with Israel that would likely turn worldwide; devastating the whole population of the world. I guess in your ideology, you and your sons if you have any would enjoy double-digit amounts of virgins. Believe what you will, but the rest of us would like to live our-time in this world without psychopaths bombing each other.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 10/29/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

I would think that if Iran were to develop nuclear weapons it would be for defense.

And would prevent war, like it has between India and Pakistan. Full scale war I should say.

The danger, of course would be in the time leading up to the making of the bombs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 10/29/2009
- b1rd67 I'm a Fan of b1rd67 39 fans permalink

So, where did you get your International Security expertise, form watching 24 and reading Tom Clancy novels?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 10/29/2009
- CigarGod I'm a Fan of CigarGod 122 fans permalink
photo

"...if Iran produces nuclear weapons this most likely would lead to a nuclear holocaust."

Quite a provocative statement, but one made without a shred of reasoning...sound or otherwise.

I could speculate that it is based upon your comment about "gene pools" and that you probably think Iran is a civilization of lower life forms....but, I guess I don't have enough information to make such wild and unsubstantiated seculations.

I suppose if you have a crystal ball, then that would be a whole other story.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 10/29/2009
- b1rd67 I'm a Fan of b1rd67 39 fans permalink

"the rest of us would like to live our-time in this world without psychopaths bombing each other."

I bet the civillians in Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan would be inclined to say the same thing with regards to the Predator drones that keep dropping bombs on their homes!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 10/29/2009
- Cavil I'm a Fan of Cavil 7 fans permalink
photo

Guys like you are the reason crazy s0nofb!tches cause bloody wars kill others, even their own kind.

Durango defense from what? the US. you're some kind of patriot. I have been to India and traveled along the India/ Pakistan border on my way to the great Thar desert, met armed forces from both sides found them to have good decorum and steadfast constrain when dealing with foreigners in their land. I agree when you say"The danger, of course would be in the time leading up to the making of the bombs." but will add... and forever thereafter.

b1rd67-
I have traveled extensively and met some of the folks I'm referring in my comments, while gracious to visitors they would support their government willingly or unwillingly to destroy our decadent society,(their views from peasant to educated professional) while this may not qualify as International Security expertise, it is certainly more than an glib HP poster like you has.I wonder were you live, if in the USA you need to check your priorities.

CigarGod-

you question my rational. you say I make "provocative statement, but one made without a shred of reasoning...sound or otherwise."
I don't have a crystal ball, but do have an education strong in psychology which leads me to my inferences. I don't demean or think anyone is inferior we are all the same but I won't allow sentimentality from taking a hard stance against dangerous ideologies nor I will let them take root.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 10/29/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect