iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The House Health Care Bill: Read It

First Posted: 03/24/10 11:58 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:30 PM ET

Pelosi

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) officially unveiled the House health care reform bill that is headed to the House floor. The ceremony, held on the West steps of the Capitol, marks the greatest progress toward the Democratic Party's top domestic priority goal in more than half a century.

The bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act -- H.R. 3962 -- includes a public health insurance option that would be required to negotiate with providers -- the top choice of centrist and conservative Democrats.

Coming in at just under $900 billion over ten years, the plan would cover 36 million uninsured Americans.

House Democrats have posted the bill online. A summary can be read here and the full version is here.

The Congressional Progressive Caucus had pushed hard for a "robust" public option that would have reimbursed providers using Medicare rates. Blue Dog Democrats beat back that effort, costing taxpayers $85 billion over ten years -- money that will go to hospitals, doctors and drug makers, increasing the cost of health care.

The bill also prevents insurers from discriminating against people with preexisting conditions, caps the financial responsibility that insured individuals will face when medical emergencies strike, bans insurers for dropping folks because they get sick, and proposes a host of other insurance industry reforms.

Meanwhile, congressional Republicans are hoping that the historic push will give them an advantage in the 2010 midterm elections. "The lasting image coming out of today's press conference is one of dozens of House Democrats standing proudly behind an incredibly unpopular Nancy Pelosi as she prepares to lead them off a political cliff," said Ken Spain, spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee.

If anything jumps out at you, let me know at ryan@huffingtonpost.com. The SEIU notes that the bill bans the practice of using domestic violence as a pre-existing condidtion.

SEC. 2754. PROHIBITION ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS PRE-EXISTING CONDITION.

A health insurance issuer offering health insurance coverage in the individual market may not, on the basis of domestic violence, impose any preexisting condition exclusion (as defined in section 2701(b)(1)(A)) with respect to such coverage.

UPDATE: In what could be seen as a boost for the bill, the insurance industry says they don't like it. Karen Ignagni, President and CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), put out this statement:

"The promise of health care reform has been that if you like your current coverage, you can keep it. We are concerned that this proposal will break this promise by increasing health care costs for families and employers across the country and significantly disrupting the quality coverage on which millions of Americans rely today.

"The lack of system-wide cost containment is a missed opportunity. Without a greater focus on health care costs, families and employers will not be able to afford coverage and health care costs will rise at a rate much faster than the overall economy is able to sustain.

"We share the concerns that doctors, hospitals, employers, and patients have all raised about the significant disruption a new government-run plan would have on the current health care system. A new government-run plan would bankrupt hospitals, dismantle employer coverage, exacerbate cost-shifting from Medicare and Medicaid, and ultimately increase the federal deficit.

"Estimates show that a government-run plan would cause millions of people to lose their current coverage. Moreover, massive Medicare Advantage cuts would cause millions of seniors to lose their Medicare Advantage coverage altogether, while millions more would face benefit cuts and higher out-of-pocket costs.

"Health plans strongly support comprehensive, bipartisan health care reform and have proposed sweeping insurance market reforms and new consumer protections to ensure that every American has guaranteed access to affordable health care coverage. Experience in the states has shown that insurance market reforms must be paired with an effective personal coverage requirement for these reforms to work. While this legislation recognizes the key linkage of market reforms and a personal coverage requirement, more needs to be done to ensure coverage is affordable and our health care system is sustainable.

"As the process progresses, health plans will continue to work to advance bipartisan legislation this year that will cover all Americans, make coverage more affordable, and improve quality."

Democrats have created a side-by-side comparison of the bill as introduced initially and in its present form.


SBS_FINAL -


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) officially unveiled the House health care reform bill that is headed to the House floor. The ceremony, held on the West steps of the Capitol, marks the greatest progres...
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) officially unveiled the House health care reform bill that is headed to the House floor. The ceremony, held on the West steps of the Capitol, marks the greatest progres...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11,088
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (137 total)
09:32 AM on 03/17/2010
Yes I for one beleive the new health care should be approved. The apposed should look at what our health care cost rose over the past eight yrs of the Bush administration. I look at the money spent by the insurance companys and big business spending a lot of money to fight the change. Why? It is not for the benifit of the middle class which is paying most for the care we are getting.. Clarence
05:11 AM on 03/03/2010
Here is a grand idea: Wanna make costs go down, simply start enforcing payment of medical bills and give welfare to people who actually NEED it, not every john doe that has kids every nine months with jane doe, both of which have been unemployed since 1990. Hospitals raise costs to cover for all the dead beats out there that run to the emergency room for every little sniffle, then never pay the bill. Then we have to pick up the bill for all the people "who can't afford it." A job at the local McDonalds will pay for an insurance policy. We have turned in to such a lazy nation and the lazy people are allowed to continue not working and preying off of others. Start throwing these deatbeats in jail so I can at least feel better about my tax dollars being spent frivolously by the government.
10:23 AM on 01/22/2010
Why is it, that our Congress can not read the Constituion and obey it , just as the oath they took said they would. I for one will not buy the health care option, it is unconstitutional for Congress to write such a bill and they can not force any citizen of this Country to do so.
It is high time that we impeach those who would support such a bill.
We as American Citizens have the right to FREEDOM OF CHOICE.

Also, One of Obamas appointees, made a comment regarding the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, he claimed "The 1st Amendment is HIGHLY OVER RATED". This is the type of people that Obama has in his circle of friends. Those that do not believe in this country or its Constitution
12:25 AM on 01/06/2010
Why must we continue to conform to the illusion spoon fed to us by controlling narcissists? We cling to paper (money) as if it beholds a secret wonder, and all the while all we're doing is perpetuating a system that is fundamentally incapable of sustaining itself. Yes, I too have been fooled by this nonsensical world of capitalism. When will we as a people decide to overthrow this corrupt government? Someone please take the initiative and start a movement of human beings instead of this drone-like monotony...
10:46 PM on 12/24/2009
Perhaps we should simply look into a lower cost health plan that would be significantly less taxes and target the people that truly cannot pay. For example, everybody gets taxes 1-2% ( I can't honestly estimate the numbers) and all of these funds go into a trust. Hospitals treat these patients and then petition the government for a reimbursement of the money. However, the hospital and the government has a pre-negotiated rate to charge for these patients, so that the hospital at least covers costs and the government gets to cover the bills for low income peoples. The hospital does benefit because their costs are being covered, which contributes towards their capital and labor, and they achieve more economies of scale. The hospitals won't abuse this program so much because they don't really make much, but they don't really lose anything either. The government brings in a large amount of money from the taxes, but achieves more results due to the lower rates. Everyone gets taxed a little, but hey, poor people need healthcare too!
10:46 PM on 12/24/2009
I think that all the overweight people, alcoholics, and drug addicts should not get health care! They simply burden our society with their associated health problems that make universal health care not a feasible idea. Now, we may have to all contribute to pay for their "mistakes" and invest in this program that is bound to fail because the government is too big to run something as efficiently as private sectors. Furthermore, we are MANDATED to pay for this program, punishable by fines and prison time if we do not participate. The reason programs work in European countries and Canada is because they don't have a large percent of the population that is obese and in and out of the hospital for a plethora of medical reasons. Why doesn't the government decide to do away with McDonald's and other fast food joints that contribute to our health problems at our expense and their profit. Due to the progression towards a socialist state, it is not out of the question that the government will continue to impose restrictions and needless programs on the entire populace. Recently, there was a rally in Washington D.C. that had millions of people attended (more than any Civil Rights movement) and the entire thing was blatantly ignored by the government and downplayed by media stations to reduce it to something insignificant.
09:48 AM on 12/21/2009
It's impossible to read the whole thing. it's about two or three textbooks big. Our representatives are being paid far to much to have their secretaries read and summarize the whole thing for them. What is so important about them that they have to be iven paid vacations and have three day weeks? They aren't looking at it from a normal persons perspective, they will turn out alright, so it doesn't really matter what effect it'll have on us to them. Maybe if we cut down on their paychecks, just a little, the economy could start to get on it's feet again. We have created a huge biased group of spoiled brats argueing like children over this health bill without fully understanding it or understand us. This has turned into an oligarcy, no matter what we say it won't change their mind, because "they know better". THEY need to get a day job just as much as the 30 million do. It's the blind leading the blind, and eventually we will both fall of the cliff.
03:25 PM on 11/19/2009
Everyone can agree that there has to be a reform of the current system. As history has taught us, anyone with power in mind will tell you the issue is complicated. It really isn't. Reform should only help those who have it and barely afford it, and those who don't have it because they can't afford it. History has also taught us that government owned industries are not prosperous, do not create wealth, and are inefficient. Markets and competition are such devices. If the government is proposing comprehensive reform that involves mandates and controls across the board - you should be scared - very scared.......
05:17 AM on 03/03/2010
Most people that actaully attempt working for a living and keeping a job do not have any problems finding affordable health care. If not, there is always the military where healthcare is free to you. Really, if you cannot afford to take care of yourself, you should be deported with the illegal immigrants and never allowed to return to the united states. Healthcare Reform is not what is needed. The lazy, good for nothing people in this county are what needs to be reformed.
10:40 AM on 11/12/2009
THE GOVERNMENT IS STUPID!

That is MY money coming out of MY paycheck that I work for! Why are they giving it to lazy people?!

We need a better president. We need better representatives. And we need to get rid of government assistance. That means: food stamps, welfare, medicade, and medicare. It's throwing away our money! And they need to stop printing money; isn't that what the federal reserve is supposed to stop?!
10:46 PM on 12/24/2009
If this was facebook, I would LIKE this comment
08:01 PM on 11/10/2009
Read it...and weep.
11:28 AM on 11/10/2009
Does is bother anyone else that illegal immigrants are exempt from the 5 years in jail and/or fine if you do not purchase healthcare? Just a thought.
09:19 PM on 11/30/2009
Your comment is misleading and irrelevant. Illegals are not even included in the plan and are barred from participating, so they cannot be punished for non-participation. As a matter of fact, since they aren't supposed to be here in the first place, they would be guilty of illegally being in the country and for fraud if they tried to participate, they would be subject to penalties like jail, fines, eviction from their home, and/or deportation. Not to mention, an employer who willfully broke the law would also be subject to huge fines. Maybe these fines will help cover your healthcare. Just a thought.
10:16 AM on 01/22/2010
The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

It is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority. The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S.. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care. This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital..
Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution."
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights.

Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas










hat u think is going on.
11:34 AM on 11/08/2009
Well, on the bright side, 221 people just committed political suicide, the 220 who voted and the 1 evil dictator who was voted into office by the people he just screwed! Yes, that's right, millions of you who voted for him WILL lose your jobs, and many more of you will end up in prison when you cant afford the public policy. Oh yeah, did I mention that many of you will die and millions will suffer, which would be OK with me if it were only to happen to obama supporters!! So now it's up to the rest of us to call our senators and voice our opposition to what is the worst bill EVER passed in our country. Funny but sad how the dems who wrote the bill exempted themselves from having to be forced into this...Call Your State Senators....Kill the bill.....Impeach the evil dictator...Fight to take back our FREEDOM.. note to president pelosi, STOP the Madness, Please just go away!!!
09:20 PM on 11/30/2009
yada yada yada....
12:19 AM on 11/08/2009
"Genuine bipartisanship, though, assumes an honest process of give-and-take, and that the quality of the compromise is measured by how well it serves some agreed-upon goal, whether better schools or lower deficits (or health care). This in turn assumes that the majority will be constrained - by an exacting press corps and ultimately an informed electorate - to negotiate in good faith. If these conditions do not hold - if nobody outside Washington is really paying attention to the substance of the bill, if the true costs...are buried in phony accounting and understated by a trillion dollars or so - the majority party can begin every negotiation by asking for 100 percent of what it wants, go on to concede 10 percent, and then accuse any member of the minority party who fails to support this "compromise" of being "obstructionist.""

The Audacity of Hope, page 131.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
06:31 PM on 11/07/2009
Now it's getting good! Page 30:
‘‘(b) INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION.—If the indi-
21 vidual requests such review by an independent, external
22 third-party of a rescission of health insurance coverage,
23 the coverage shall remain in effect until such third party
24 determines that the coverage may be rescinded under the
25 guidance issued by the Secretary under section 2742(f).’’

Burden of proof will be on the insurer to PROVE FRAUD by the customer as the only way to rescind coverage, from the moment a customer is accepted.